Front. Public Health Frontiers in Public Health Front. Public Health 2296-2565 Frontiers Media S.A. 10.3389/fpubh.2025.1539180 Public Health Original Research Risk of mental health conditions in bereavement: a population-based analysis of lung cancer spouses Tay Djin L. 1 * Dubose Kline 2 3 Chipman Jonathan 2 3 Ellington Lee 1 Alnajar Malek 1 Iacob Eli 1 Stephens Caroline 1 Ornstein Katherine A. 3 1College of Nursing, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, United States 2Department of Population Health Sciences, School of Medicine, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, United States 3School of Nursing, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, United States

Edited by: Toni P. Miles, Rosalynn Carter Institute for Caregivers, United States

Reviewed by: Vahid Rashedi, University of Social Welfare and Rehabilitation Sciences, Iran

Molnar Rebeca Isabela, Emergency County Hospital Targu Mures, Romania

Don Lollar, Oregon Health and Science University, United States

*Correspondence: Djin L. Tay, djin.tay@nurs.utah.edu
12 05 2025 2025 13 1539180 03 12 2024 14 04 2025 Copyright © 2025 Tay, Dubose, Chipman, Ellington, Alnajar, Iacob, Stephens and Ornstein. 2025 Tay, Dubose, Chipman, Ellington, Alnajar, Iacob, Stephens and Ornstein

This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

Background

Caregiving to lung cancer patients is distressing, isolating, and associated with a high burden of anxiety and depression. However, few population-based studies in the U.S. have examined the risk of mental health conditions (MHCs) among spouses of lung cancer patients after the death of their partner. Guided by Anderson’s Behavioral Health Utilization model, we examined the role of sex, pre-bereavement MHC, and decedents’ healthcare utilization on the risk of having a diagnosed MHC after the death of a lung cancer patient.

Methods

This retrospective cohort study linked state-wide health facility records of 1,224 dyads—deceased lung cancer patients and their bereaved spouses (824 female, 400 male)—in Utah between 2013 and 2021. Bereavement-related mood/stress-related conditions were identified for spouses using diagnostic codes (starting from day 1 following the patients’ deaths). The Kaplan–Meier curves and Cox proportional hazard models were used to estimate the risk for a composite outcome of MHC/death and the risk of MHC, after adjusting for censorship due to death and controlling for covariates.

Results

The majority of spouses were aged 65+ (female: 67%; male: 33%), white/non-Hispanic (female: 89%; male: 90%), and urban-dwelling (female: 69%; male: 71%). Spouses experienced 374 events (MHCs/death) across the follow-up period. Adjusting for census-tract level income, cancer stage, insurance, censoring due to death, and the interaction between sex and MHC, spouses with preexisting MHCs had 4.09 times higher risk of developing MHCs during bereavement (95% CI: 2.70, 6.19) compared to spouses without pre-existing MHCs. Spouses of decedents with some college education (aHR: 0.68, 95% CI = 0.48–0.97) and longer survival (aHR: 0.85, 95% CI = 0.74–0.99) had a lower risk of MHCs compared to those of decedents with high school education and shorter survival.

Discussion

This population-based study supports evidence for multi-level risk factors associated with having MHC after the death of a spouse with lung cancer. Findings suggest the need for targeted bereavement support for subgroups of spouses at greater risk of MHCs.

bereavement neoplasms caregiver stress mental health epidemiologic studies section-at-acceptance Public Mental Health

香京julia种子在线播放

    1. <form id=HxFbUHhlv><nobr id=HxFbUHhlv></nobr></form>
      <address id=HxFbUHhlv><nobr id=HxFbUHhlv><nobr id=HxFbUHhlv></nobr></nobr></address>

      Introduction

      Cancer caregivers, particularly those supporting patients at the end of life, are a vulnerable population with increased mental health risks (1, 2). Research shows that partners of cancer patients experience anxiety and depression at levels higher than the general population and comparable to those of the cancer patients themselves (3–5). In addition to poorer self-reported mental health, cancer caregivers experience greater psychiatric morbidity before and after bereavement. Population-level studies from other countries have established that spouses of cancer patients have a 30% higher risk than spouses of non-cancer patients of developing new-onset substance abuse, depression, or stress-related conditions within the year following a cancer diagnosis. A 29% increased risk of these mental health diagnoses in bereavement persists, even after adjusting for confounders and other pre-existing mental health diagnoses (6). Similarly, in the United States (US), analyses of commercial insurance claims data found that, compared to non-cancer caregiver controls, almost 2 in 10 (19.6%) cancer caregivers had new mental health diagnoses in the year after losing their partner (7).

      Lung cancer is characterized by a high rate of recurrence, low survival (8), and distressing symptoms that contribute to poor quality of life for patients and family caregivers (9–11). The intense symptom management and stigma associated with lung cancer may be particularly isolating for spouse caregivers (11, 12). Lung cancer patients have a higher prevalence of anti-cancer treatment utilization at the end of life (13), which has been associated with poorer mental health among cancer caregivers (14, 15). Analyses of cancer caregivers covered under the same health insurance policy found that caregivers of lung cancer patients were more likely to be diagnosed with a new mental health disorder following the patient’s diagnosis compared to caregivers of non-lung cancer patients (18.9% vs. 10%) (7).

      During cancer caregiving, wives have been observed to report poorer mental health than husbands (16). However, studies report mixed findings by gender in bereavement. While the loss of a spouse is among the most distressing life events across genders, husbands experience greater overall physical health impacts compared with wives after losing their spouse (17–19). Yet, with regard to mental health, the findings are less clear. While wives have been reported to experience a prolonged trajectory of distressing symptoms compared with husbands in population studies in Denmark (20), the opposite finding has been observed in a Korean cohort (21). Additionally, symptoms may also differ by gender and time. In the acute bereavement phase, husbands exhibit greater initial shock, while wives exhibit greater long-term psychological resilience around the 1-year mark (22). However, these mixed findings regarding gender could be due to the greater participation of female individuals in caregiving research, as well as the influence of social norms that facilitate female caregivers’ expression of distress and mental health care (23), highlighting the need to examine gender effects in bereavement using population-based approaches.

      While the majority of population-based studies on bereavement have been conducted outside of the US (6, 24), findings from these studies may be less generalizable to the US healthcare system. Examining the risk factors associated with MHCs among lung cancer spouses, a population vulnerable to the mental health impact of caregiving is needed to provide scientific evidence for targeted bereavement interventions in this population. Given these gender-based differences in bereavement mental health, we sought to focus on the relationship between gender and mood- and stress-related mental health diagnoses after the loss of a partner to cancer. Guided by Anderson’s Behavioral Health Model (25), we tested the hypothesis that predisposing characteristics (female sex) and need characteristics (spouses’ pre-existing mental health conditions and decedents’ healthcare utilization) would be associated with the risk of bereavement MHCs (Figure 1).

      Adapted Anderson Behavioral Health Model for spouses’ bereavement mental health utilization.

      Methods

      This secondary analysis used data from bereaved spouses and partners of decedents diagnosed with lung cancer between 2013 and 2018 in Utah identified with the Immunotherapy, Palliative, End of Life Treatment Utilization, and Spousal Outcomes (ImmPETUS) cohort (23). ImmPETUS was developed to facilitate the study of changes in cancer patients’ end-of-life and primary caregiver health utilization during a period of rapid adoption of immunotherapies in advanced cancers. The ImmPETUS cohort is a linked dataset comprising demographic, clinical, end-of-life, and spousal caregiver data that combine several key population datasets in Utah: the Utah Population Database’s (UPDB) statewide health facility data from the Utah Department of Health, the Utah All-Payer Claims Database (APCD), and the Utah Cancer Registry (UCR).

      Data sources UPDB

      The UPDB is a statewide database that enables the linkage of health and family records from statewide health registries, sociodemographic data, vital records, and genealogical data for all Utah residents at the individual level. The UPDB health facility data are complete as they contain all inpatient, ambulatory surgery, and emergency department administrative data for every encounter in the state, regardless of insurance coverage, including encounters among the uninsured population. However, the UPDB’s health facility data does not capture administrative data from care settings outside of inpatient, ambulatory surgery, and emergency department settings, such as physician visits.

      APCD

      The Utah APCD contains all administrative data, including pharmacy records for the insured population, Medicaid, and commercial Medicare Supplemental and Advantage plans for older adults aged 65 years and above. The APCD does not collect data from non-commercial Medicare plans, health plans covering fewer than 2,500 individuals (26), the Veterans Health Administration or TRICARE system (serving active service members and veterans), Indian Health Services (tribal and urban Indian health programs), and individuals who self-pay are underrepresented (27). As such, the data collected by the APCD represent approximately 60%–70% of Utah’s non-Medicare population (28).

      UCR

      The UCR collects, stores, and manages cancer surveillance data in Utah for the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) program of the National Cancer Institute. The UCR captures data on cancer staging, diagnosis, and sociodemographic data current at the time of the index cancer diagnosis. According to the SEER program, cancer data from the UCR are complete and valid (29).

      To maximize coverage of the population and data completeness, we linked the UPDB health facility, Utah APCD, and UCR data for the sample. Eligible cancer patients (1) had a record in the UCR; (2) had a diagnosis of lung or bronchus cancer between 2013 and 2018; and (3) were at least 18 years of age or older at the time of cancer diagnosis. Spouses and partners aged 18 and above were identified with UPDB’s family groups, which are derived using a combination of marital records and children’s birth records. Cancer patients with a non-natural cause of death (e.g., an accident) were excluded.

      Measures

      The variables were selected a priori and informed by Anderson’s Behavioral Health Utilization Model (25). We examined the associations between predisposing (spouses’ sex, age, ethnicity, and socioeconomic characteristics), enabling (rurality and insurance type), and need characteristics (spouses’ pre-existing MHCs, decedents’ stage at cancer diagnosis, survival, and cancer decedents’ healthcare utilization) and the outcome of MHCs.

      MHCs

      The outcome of interest was a documented diagnosis of mood- or stress-related disorder documented in administrative data any day after day 1 of the death of the partner. Anxiety, depression, and stress-related disorders were identified with International Classification of Disease (ICD) 9 and 10 codes identified by other large, published studies using administrative records that were developed by or verified with physician input (6, 30) (codes are listed in Supplementary Table 1).

      Predisposing characteristics

      Our primary independent variable was binary sex derived from birth records. We also adjusted the models for age (years), spouses’ ethnicity (non-Hispanic White, Hispanic, and non-Hispanic other ethnicity), census-tract level median annual income quartiles ($16,900–$46,604; $46,605–$60,057, $64,058–$74,624, $74,625–$193,958) obtained from the UPDB’s American Community Survey data, and the maximum education level of decedent as recorded on death certificates (less than high school, high school graduate, some college, college graduate, and postgraduate).

      Enabling characteristics

      Rurality was based on the Utah Department of Health definitions of Urban (counties with a population of 100 persons or more per square mile), Rural (7–99 persons per square mile), and Frontier (<7 persons per square mile) (25). Decedents’ primary insurance type (Medicaid, Medicare, Private, and Other) was also assessed.

      Need characteristics

      We assessed spouses’ pre-existing MHCs and decedents’ stage at cancer diagnosis (localized, regional, and distant) and survival (time from diagnosis to death, in years). Inpatient and emergency department visits after cancer patients’ diagnosis were included as a covariate to assess healthcare utilization.

      Analyses

      Descriptive statistics were calculated for the sample, and standardized mean differences were used to compare effect sizes between male and female individuals in the sample. The Kaplan–Meier curves and survival analyses assessing the composite outcome of death and MHCs were conducted, followed by cause-specific analyses, accounting for censoring at death. To avoid overfitting, we included spouses’ sex, age, and history of MHCs, and patients’ cancer stage, survival, education, census-tract level income quartile, inpatient stays, and emergency department visits in the models. To account for the higher use of mental healthcare among female individuals, in general, we included the interaction of sex with mental health condition in the models. After applying the inclusion and exclusion criteria, missing data for each variable were assessed. The proportion of missing information for all variables did not exceed 8%. We assumed missing data to be missing at random and used multiple imputation models to address the missing data (31). After identifying variables with missing data, we used the Hmisc and rms packages in R to impute the data using the AREG method to impute the data and aggregate the information across 23 iterations of the imputed data (32–34). All analyses were conducted in R with significance at a p-value of <0.05.

      Results Characteristics of the sample

      A total of N = 1,224 spouse-patient dyads (female spouses n = 824; male spouses n = 400) were identified after excluding lung cancer patients without spousal links (n = 31,379) and patients who were living (n = 14,824; n = 3; Figure 2). Female spouses had a median age of 68 years (interquartile range (IQR) = 61–76), and male spouses had a median age of 70 years (IQR = 64–77; Table 1). The majority of spouses were non-Hispanic White (female n = 723, 89%; male n = 354, 90%) and lived in urban areas (female 566, n = 69%, male = 285, 71%). Almost one in five female and male spouses lived in census tracts with the lowest quartile of annual household income. Greater proportions of male spouses had lost a partner with less than a high school education (19% vs. 17%) and a high school education (37% vs. 33%), while greater proportions of female spouses lost a partner with a post-college education (9.5% vs. 5.5%).

      Cohort selection.

      Differences in characteristics between male and female spouses (N = 1,224).

      Spouse sex
      Group Characteristic Female Male SMD2 95% CI2,3
      n = 8241 n = 4001
      Spouse Age at Diagnosis (Median, IQR; years) 68 (61, 76) 70 (64, 77) −0.16 −0.28, −0.04
      Ethnicity4,5 0.04 −0.08, 0.16
      Non-Hispanic White 723 (89%) 354 (90%)
      Hispanic 59 (7.3%) 25 (6.3%)
      Non-Hispanic Other 31 (3.8%) 15 (3.8%)
      Spouse’s pre-existing mood disorder 54 (6.6%) 21 (5.3%) 0.06 −0.06, 0.17
      Patient Rurality4 0.06 −0.06, 0.18
      Urban 566 (69%) 285 (71%)
      Rural 207 (25%) 95 (24%)
      Frontier 50 (6.1%) 20 (5.0%)
      Education4,6 0.17 0.05, 0.29
      Less than high school 136 (17%) 75 (19%)
      High School Graduate 274 (33%) 146 (37%)
      Some College 248 (30%) 114 (29%)
      College Graduate 84 (10%) 41 (10%)
      Postgraduate 78 (9.5%) 22 (5.5%)
      Census-tract level median income (Dollars) 0.09 −0.03, 0.21
      16,900–46,604 154 (19%) 82 (21%)
      46,605–60,057 270 (33%) 115 (29%)
      64,058–74,624 231 (28%) 115 (29%)
      74,625–193,958 169 (21%) 88 (22%)
      Stage4,7 0.22 0.10, 0.34
      Distant 532 (67%) 286 (73%)
      Localized 136 (17%) 38 (9.7%)
      Regional 128 (16%) 66 (17%)
      Insurance type4 0.11 −0.01, 0.23
      Medicaid 25 (3.1%) 16 (4.1%)
      Medicare 580 (73%) 268 (68%)
      Other 13 (1.6%) 8 (2.0%)
      Private 179 (22%) 103 (26%)
      Inpatient visits post-diagnosis4 3.0 (1.0, 6.0) 3.0 (1.0, 6.0) 0.05 −0.08, 0.17
      Emergency room visits4 1.0 (0.0, 3.8) 2.0 (0.0, 4.5) −0.08 −0.20, 0.04

      1Median (IQR); n (%). 2SMD, standardized mean difference; bolded values are significant. A difference of 0.2 indicates a small, 0.5 a medium, and 0.8 a large effect size (34). 3CI, confidence interval. 4Indicates unknown/missing data, numbers suppressed due to small cell sizes to protect confidentiality. 5Due to small cell sizes, ethnicity was combined into three categories. Non-Hispanic and Others included individuals classified as American Indian/Alaska Native, Asian, Black or African American, Native Hawaiian or Pacific Islander, or Multiple Ethnicities and Non-Hispanic. 6Decedents’ lifetime maximum level of education was assessed using death certificate data. 7Reflects the stage of cancer diagnosis as indicated in Utah Cancer Registry records.

      Pre-existing MHCs prior to decedents’ deaths were observed in 6.6% of female (n = 64) and 5.3% (n = 21) of male spouses, respectively. A greater proportion of cancers diagnosed at distant stages was observed for deceased partners of both female and male spouses (67% and 73%, respectively), and the majority of decedents were insured through Medicare (partners of female spouses n = 580, 73%; partners of male spouses n = 268, 68%). Deceased partners of female and male partners had a median of 3 inpatient visits and 1–2 emergency department visits after their cancer diagnosis, with a majority of decedents dying at home (62%–64%). Female spouses were significantly younger (standardized mean difference, SMD = −0.16, 95% CI = −0.28–0.04), differed in deceased partners’ maximum education level (SMD = 0.17, 95% CI = 0.05–0.29), and cancer stages (SMD = 0.22, 95% CI = 0.10–0.34), which supported the fact that these differences were not large in magnitude.

      Events (composite outcome of MHCs and death)

      To account for the possibility of death as a competing event to MHCs, i.e., spouses may die prior to presenting to a health facility where MHCs would be documented, we developed a composite outcome of MHC and deaths. A total of 374 events contributed by N = 1,224 spouses were documented across the study period. Figure 3 features the Kaplan–Meier curves by sex that describe the estimated overall probability of mood disorder or composite outcome (mood disorder or death) over time (years). The curves suggest that female spouses had a greater probability of mood disorder (Figure 3A), male spouses had a greater probability of death (Figure 3B), and that male and female spouses had a similar probability of any event (mood disorder + death; Figure 3C).

      Kaplan–Meier curves for overall probabilities of MHC, death, and MHC + death. (A) Probability of MHC by bereaved spouses’ sex. (B) Probability of death by bereaved spouses’ sex. (C) Probability of MHC + death by bereaved spouses’ sex.

      Cox proportional hazards models

      Separate Cox proportional hazards models evaluated differences in time to the composite outcome and mood disorder accounting for censorship due to death (cause-specific model). After adjusting for the interaction between sex and MHCs, neither model showed a difference in the risk of MHCs in bereavement based on sex or decedents’ healthcare utilization.

      Model for the composite outcome

      After adjusting for covariates, the risk of MHC/death was increased for each 10-year interval for surviving spouses. Specifically, at a given point in time, a 10-year increase in spouses’ age at diagnosis was associated with a hazard ratio of 1.37 (95% CI: 1.19, 1.55). Having a diagnosed MHC prior to the cancer decedents’ death was associated with a three times higher risk (aHR: 3.16, 95% CI: 2.21, 4.53) of MHC/death. Compared with decedents whose maximum lifetime education was at the high school level, spouses of decedents with some college-level education (aHR: 0.69, 95% CI = 0.52–0.90) and who were college graduates (aHR: 0.64, 95% CI = 0.41–0.99) had a lower risk of MHCs in bereavement (Table 2).

      Adjusted Cox proportional hazards for the composite outcome (time to MHC or death).

      Variables aHR1,2 S.E. Lower 0.95 Upper 0.95
      Male sex (spouse) 0.96 0.11 0.76 1.20
      Spousal age at patients’ diagnosis, per 10-year difference 1.36 0.07 1.19 1.55
      Spouse’s pre-existing MHC 3.16 0.18 2.21 4.53
      Time from Diagnosis to Death 0.95 0.05 0.85 1.05
      Decedents’ maximum education, ref. High school graduate
      College Graduate 0.64 0.23 0.41 0.99
      Less than high school 1.09 0.14 0.83 1.43
      Postgraduate 0.81 0.23 0.52 1.27
      Some College 0.69 0.14 0.52 0.90
      Decedents’ inpatient visits after cancer diagnosis 0.99 0.02 0.96 1.02
      Decedents’ emergency department visits after cancer diagnosis 1.01 0.01 0.98 1.03

      1Models have been adjusted for decedents’ census-tract level income, cancer stage at diagnosis, maximum lifetime education, insurance, and the interaction of sex*MHC (all not significant). 2Bolded coefficients indicate statistical significance.

      Cause-specific model

      In the cause-specific analysis, spouses’ age was no longer a significant predictor of the risk of an outcome; however, the decedents’ length of survival was associated with spouses’ risk of MHCs. An additional year of survival was associated with a 15% decrease in the risk of spouses experiencing an MHC in bereavement. As in the previous analysis, having a previously diagnosed MHC was associated with a significantly adjusted hazard ratio of 4.09 (95% CI: 2.70, 6.19). Spouses of decedents with some college-level education had a lower risk of bereavement MHCs (aHR: 0.68, 95% CI = 0.48–0.97) compared with decedents with a high school-level education, after accounting for censorship due to death (Table 3).

      Adjusted Cox proportional hazards for the cause-specific model (time to MHC adjusted for censorship due to death).

      Variables aHR1,2 S.E. Lower 0.95 Upper 0.95
      Male sex (spouse) 0.75 0.15 0.56 1.02
      Spousal age at patients’ diagnosis, per 10-year difference 0.94 0.08 0.80 1.10
      Spouse’s pre-existing MHC 4.09 0.21 2.70 6.19
      Time from Diagnosis to Death 0.85 0.07 0.74 0.99
      Decedents’ maximum education, High school graduate
      College Graduate 0.76 0.26 0.46 1.27
      Less than high school 1.18 0.18 0.83 1.67
      Postgraduate 0.88 0.28 0.51 1.50
      Some College 0.68 0.18 0.48 0.97
      Decedents’ inpatient visits after cancer diagnosis 1.00 0.02 0.97 1.04
      Decedents’ emergency department visits after cancer diagnosis 1.01 0.017 0.98 1.05

      1Models have been adjusted for decedents’ census-tract level income, cancer stage diagnosis, insurance, and the interaction of sex*MHC (all not significant). 2Bolded coefficients indicate statistical significance.

      Discussion

      Examining the impact of bereavement MHC over time is important for cancer spouses—a population at greater risk of developing psychiatric disorders after the death of their spouse. This was one of the few population-based studies in the US that examined diagnoses of MHCs among lung cancer spouses after the death of a partner.

      Bereaved lung cancer spouses have been observed to be particularly at risk compared to non-cancer caregivers and even caregivers of decedents with other cancer types, and lung cancer caregivers’ distress can exceed even that of patients themselves (3). Hu et al.’s analyses of two national registries in Sweden and Denmark observed that spouses of lung cancer had a 45% higher risk of new MHCs compared to spouses of patients with less aggressive cancers (e.g., prostate cancer spouses HR = 1.05, any cancer HR = 1.14) after the diagnosis of cancer in their partners (6). However, there is limited epidemiologic research comparing differences in bereavement MHCs by cancer types in the US, except for a few. A 2021 study by Hess et al. using IBM MarketScan Administrative Data in the US observed that lung cancer caregivers had the highest proportions of new MHC-related diagnoses (18.9%) in the first year after a cancer patient’s diagnosis compared with gastric (17.8%), colorectal (14.7%), sarcoma (14.3%), and breast cancer (10.1%) caregivers (7). Taken together, these findings support that lung cancer spouses may be a particularly at-risk caregiving population; however, future research comparing across cancer types is needed to verify these outcomes among spouses of other cancer patients in the US population.

      While we anticipated that the female sex of the surviving spouse would be associated with greater MHCs, our cause-specific analysis did not find a statistically significant difference after accounting for earlier mortality in male spouses. This finding may be due to the lower reporting and help-seeking behaviors of male individuals for MHCs in general (35). Our previous studies examining prescriptions of antidepressants and anxiolytics in families of decedents in the last year of life observed higher proportions of antidepressant prescriptions among wives compared with husbands (36), supporting the possibility that female individuals seek more care for MHCs. However, gender differences in the timing of symptoms may influence these findings. Other registry-based studies have found that male individuals exhibit prolonged grief symptoms more acutely, while female individuals have a more protracted trajectory of symptoms (20). Given our observation of earlier mortality in male individuals, there is a possibility that more acute and severe mental health symptoms associated with earlier mortality in male individuals may have affected these findings. While outside the scope of our study, future studies comparing outcomes with a non-bereaved matched cohort are recommended to better distinguish the gender effect of bereavement on mental health and mortality.

      Losing a spouse is among the most difficult life events for adults, and 10–20% of bereaved spouses will develop severe or prolonged grief responses (37). Our findings support the finding that having a previously diagnosed mood or stress-related disorder was associated with over four times higher risk of having an MHC, which is in line with findings from other survey-based epidemiologic studies of complicated grief (38). Future studies should also examine serious mental health diagnoses such as schizophrenia, bipolar, major depressive disorders (39), or co-occurring substance or alcohol use disorders (6, 40, 41) to better identify the most at-risk individuals who may benefit from targeted support in bereavement.

      We focused on MHCs that were documented in administrative data, which may reflect a sample with more severe MHC who were diagnosed or treated in healthcare settings (42). It is important to note that these data may neither capture mental health outcomes for individuals with subclinical but meaningful levels of symptoms nor cases if individuals do not seek health care for their MHCs. A study of 168 bereaved cancer caregivers of lung and gastrointestinal cancer patients found that 30.4% of caregivers self-reported clinical levels of depressive symptoms, while 43.4% reported clinically significant levels of anxiety after the death of their loved one (43). Thus, it is possible that the prevalence of MHCs may be higher in the bereaved lung cancer spouse population than these findings observed.

      The greater risk of MHC in this caregiver population may be due to the unique stresses of lung cancer caregiving (4, 10, 11). While we hypothesized that greater overall healthcare utilization in deceased patients would be associated with greater bereavement MHC, this association was not supported in our findings. A possibility may be that we assessed the number of inpatient and emergency department visits beginning after patients’ cancer diagnoses, which may fail to capture the more stressful contexts of high-intensity care that cluster toward the end of life (44). In addition, dyadic effects may also exist, as poorer bereavement mental health in caregivers has been associated with perceived distress in their loved one prior to death (43). These factors associated with the end-of-life care context would be important to examine in future analyses.

      Population studies observed that bereaved cancer spouses have an increased risk of psychiatric disorders if their partners had advanced cancers and cancers with poorer prognoses (6). Our findings add that longer survival among cancer decedents was associated with a lower risk of MHCs in bereavement. A possibility is that longer survival may facilitate greater emotional adjustment in spouses of cancer patients, particularly when death is expected (45). This finding is in contrast with our previous analysis of the hospice patient population that observed that longer hospice duration was positively associated with mortality risk for bereaved husbands but not wives in the general population (46). These findings collectively suggest that gender and trajectories of decline may play a modifying role in the end-of-life cancer caregiving stress experience.

      Although we adjusted for multiple factors, our findings were unable to account for psychosocial factors or cultural influences on bereavement that can serve a protective or risk role. For example, perceived interpersonal support is protective for psychological wellbeing and health-related quality of life among cancer caregivers (47, 48). Additionally, caregiving and subsequent bereavement may be perceived as normative and a fulfillment of a spousal responsibility, influenced by certain cultural or ethnic backgrounds (49). Conversely, some cultures and communities may hold beliefs that discourage seeking bereavement support (50) or mental health services more broadly (51). Future research integrating self-reported or qualitative methods and exploring bereavement mental health outcomes in more racially and ethnically diverse samples may be helpful in distinguishing the contribution of psychosocial and cultural influences.

      Finally, while our study did not have access to individual-level household income, our findings supported that socioeconomic status may be protective of spousal bereavement MHC. While indirect, this finding supports the implications that dyadic factors may continue to influence surviving members of dyads after the death of a partner. The higher level of educational attainment may be associated with greater income or wealth for the surviving partner, which should be examined in future studies using individual-level measures of socioeconomic status. Examining the socioeconomic influences associated with bereavement is important as financial hardship in surviving spouses has been associated with an increased risk of suicidal ideation (38).

      Limitations

      While the strengths of this study were a population sample and the use of objective data, limitations include the retrospective nature of the study and the potential for detection bias. Individuals who do not have healthcare encounters in inpatient, ambulatory surgery, or emergency department settings or do not seek care for MHCs are not represented in these data. Studies using self-reported data may observe different findings. Future studies should evaluate MHCs using other measures, including self-reported measures. Due to the smaller sample and rarer occurrences of MHC, we limited the examination of additional predictors to prevent overfitting of the data. Thus, there is a possibility of potentially unmeasured confounders, such as access to social support, cultural factors, and the end-of-life caregiving context. Additionally, data from this study were specific to a single state, which poses implications for generalizability. Nevertheless, population data allow us to minimize selection bias compared with smaller, prospective samples, which is a strength of this study.

      Conclusion

      Bereavement is a major life stressor that can contribute to mental health morbidity and is one of the major stressors associated with serious illness caregiving. Building population-level evidence for the pervasive impacts of cancer caregiving is important to guide care delivery across the cancer continuum and beyond. Future research should investigate these outcomes in a more nationally representative sample and investigate other mental health outcomes that may be relevant to difficult loss. Nevertheless, our findings hold implications of greater mental health assessment and support for bereaved partners that may be at risk for greater mental health challenges after the loss of a spouse to lung cancer, such as lung cancer spouses that have pre-existing MHCs.

      Data availability statement

      The data analyzed in this study is subject to the following licenses/restrictions: use of the data held by the Utah Population Database (UPDB) and its data contributors are regulated. Under an Executive Order, the Utah Resource for Genetic and Epidemiologic Research (RGE) is responsible for regulatory oversight of all projects using data from the UPDB. Access to datasets from the UPDB (including those constructed for this application) is governed and approved by the RGE committee, which includes representatives of the data providers whose data are included in UPDB. An RGE protocol is ancillary to an Institutional Review Board (IRB) protocol, which may be held external to the University of Utah. Data may only be transferred from the University of Utah to an external institution with RGE approval and a fully executed data transfer agreement. Requests to access these datasets should be directed to Nicola Camp, Nicola.camp@hci.utah.edu.

      Ethics statement

      The study involving humans were approved by the University of Utah Institutional Review Board. The study was conducted in accordance with the local legislation and institutional requirements. A waiver of informed consent was obtained for the limited dataset and secondary data analysis in accordance with the national legislation and institutional requirements.

      Author contributions

      DT: Conceptualization, Funding acquisition, Investigation, Project administration, Supervision, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing. KD: Data curation, Formal analysis, Investigation, Methodology, Validation, Visualization, Writing – review & editing. JC: Conceptualization, Investigation, Methodology, Supervision, Writing – review & editing. LE: Investigation, Resources, Writing – review & editing. MA: Investigation, Writing – review & editing. EI: Investigation, Writing – review & editing. CS: Investigation, Writing – review & editing. KO: Conceptualization, Investigation, Supervision, Writing – review & editing.

      Funding

      The author(s) declare that financial support was received for the research and/or publication of this article. This study was funded by the University of Utah’s Vice President for Research Incentive Seed Grant (PI: DT). LE was supported by an NIA award (K07AG068185). We also acknowledge funding from the College of Nursing Emma Eccles Jones Nursing Research Center for publication fees. This study was also partially supported by the Huntsman Cancer Institute Comprehensive Cancer Center at the University of Utah P30CA042014, utilizing Cancer Biostatistics and Cancer Bioinformatics Shared Resources. We acknowledge the Pedigree and Population Resource of Huntsman Cancer Institute (Huntsman Cancer Foundation), the Utah Population Database (National Cancer Institute P30 CA2014, University of Utah, University of Utah’s Clinical and Translational Science Institute), the Utah Department of Health Data (NCRR R01 RR021746, PI: G. Mineau; Utah Department of Health, University of Utah), and the Utah Cancer Registry (National Cancer Institute’s SEER Program, Contract No. HHSN261201800016I, US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention’s National Program of Cancer Registries, Cooperative Agreement No. NU58DP006320, University of Utah, and the Huntsman Cancer Foundation). The support and resources of the Center for High Performance Computing at the University of Utah are gratefully acknowledged. The computational resources used were partially funded by the NIH Shared Instrumentation Grant 1S10OD021644-01A1.

      We acknowledge Dr. Mia Hashibe for her guidance on the initial cohort design. We acknowledge the support of the University of Utah’s Family Caregiving Collaborative (K07AG068185; PI: LE).

      Conflict of interest

      The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

      Generative AI statement

      The authors declare that no Gen AI was used in the creation of this manuscript.

      Publisher’s note

      All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

      Author disclaimer

      The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the NIH.

      Supplementary material

      The Supplementary material for this article can be found online at: /articles/10.3389/fpubh.2025.1539180/full#supplementary-material

      References Hasdenteufel M Quintard B. Psychosocial factors affecting the bereavement experience of relatives of palliative-stage cancer patients: a systematic review. BMC Palliat Care. (2022) 21:212. doi: 10.1186/s12904-022-01096-y, PMID: 36451118 Kim Y Shaffer KM Carver CS Cannady RS. Quality of life of family caregivers 8 years after a relative's cancer diagnosis: follow-up of the National Quality of life survey for caregivers. Psychooncology. (2016) 25:26674. doi: 10.1002/pon.3843, PMID: 25976620 Li J Li C Zou J Cheng F-Q Peng L Deng L-H . Prevalence and influencing factors of the dyadic psychological stress among patients with lung cancer and their family caregivers: a cross-sectional study. BMC Nurs. (2025) 24:13. doi: 10.1186/s12912-024-02635-z, PMID: 39762831 Geng HM Chuang DM Yang F Yang Y Liu WM Liu LH . Prevalence and determinants of depression in caregivers of cancer patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Medicine. (2018) 97:e11863. doi: 10.1097/md.0000000000011863, PMID: 30278483 Bedaso A Dejenu G Duko B. Depression among caregivers of cancer patients: updated systematic review and meta-analysis. Psycho-Oncology. (2022) 31:180920. doi: 10.1002/pon.6045, PMID: 36209385 Hu K Liu Q László KD Wei D Yang F Fall K . Risk of psychiatric disorders among spouses of patients with cancer in Denmark and Sweden. JAMA Netw Open. (2023) 6:560. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.49560, PMID: 36602801 Hess LM Wong-Jacobson SH Peterson PM. Health and resource burden of a cancer diagnosis on the caregiver: an analysis of administrative claims data. BMC Health Serv Res. (2021) 21:894. doi: 10.1186/s12913-021-06938-8, PMID: 34461888 American Cancer Society. Lung Cancer Survival Rates: American Cancer Society; (2024). Available online at: https://www.cancer.org/cancer/types/lung-cancer/detection-diagnosis-staging/survival-rates.html (Accessed December 3, 2024). Hendriksen E Rivera A Williams E Lee E Sporn N Cases MG . Manifestations of anxiety and coping strategies in patients with metastatic lung cancer and their family caregivers: a qualitative study. Psychol Health. (2019) 34:88699. doi: 10.1080/08870446.2019.1579909, PMID: 31155947 Hendriksen E Williams E Sporn N Greer J DeGrange A Koopman C. Worried together: a qualitative study of shared anxiety in patients with metastatic non-small cell lung cancer and their family caregivers. Support Care Cancer. (2015) 23:103541. doi: 10.1007/s00520-014-2431-9, PMID: 25277959 Lippiett KA Richardson A Myall M Cummings A May CR. Patients and informal caregivers' experiences of burden of treatment in lung cancer and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD): a systematic review and synthesis of qualitative research. BMJ Open. (2019) 9:e020515. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-020515, PMID: 30813114 Carmack Taylor CL Badr H Lee JH Fossella F Pisters K Gritz ER . Lung cancer patients and their spouses: psychological and relationship functioning within 1 month of treatment initiation. Annals Behav Med. (2008) 36:12940. doi: 10.1007/s12160-008-9062-7, PMID: 18797978 Smith CEP Kamal AH Kluger M Coke P Kelley MJ. National Trends in end-of-life Care for Veterans with Advanced Cancer in the veterans health administration: 2009 to 2016. J Oncol Pract. (2019) 15:e56875. doi: 10.1200/jop.18.00559, PMID: 31046573 Nipp RD El-Jawahri A Fishbein JN Gallagher ER Stagl JM Park ER . Factors associated with depression and anxiety symptoms in family caregivers of patients with incurable cancer. Annals Oncol. (2016) 27:160712. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdw205, PMID: 27177859 Takao A Arao H Yamamoto S Aoki M Kouda K Morita T . Nationwide survey on caregiver burden when supporting terminal Cancer patients with dementia: bereaved family Members' perspective. J Palliat Care. (2023) 38:32635. doi: 10.1177/08258597231169625, PMID: 37066441 Ng JH Luk BH Lee NP. Gender differences in cancer spousal caregiving: a systematic review. Palliat Support Care. (2023) 21:8809. doi: 10.1017/S1478951523000731, PMID: 37334489 Stahl ST Arnold AM Chen JY Anderson S Schulz R. Mortality after bereavement: the role of cardiovascular disease and depression. Psychosom Med. (2016) 78:697703. doi: 10.1097/psy.0000000000000317.P, PMID: 26894326 Liu H Umberson D Xu M. Widowhood and mortality: gender, race/ethnicity, and the role of economic resources. Ann Epidemiol. (2020) 45:6975.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.annepidem.2020.02.006, PMID: 32336656 Sullivan AR Fenelon A. Patterns of widowhood mortality. J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. (2014) 69B:5362. doi: 10.1093/geronb/gbt079 Lundorff M Bonanno GA Johannsen M O'Connor M. Are there gender differences in prolonged grief trajectories? A registry-sampled cohort study. J Psychiatr Res. (2020) 129:16875. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychires.2020.06.030, PMID: 32739617 Yoon H Park GR Kim J. Psychosocial trajectories before and after spousal loss: does gender matter? Soc Sci Med. (2022) 294:114701. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2022.114701, PMID: 35007946 Maccallum F Lundorff M Johannsen M Farver-Vestergaard I O'Connor M. An exploration of gender and prolonged grief symptoms using network analysis. Psychol Med. (2023) 53:17707. doi: 10.1017/S0033291721003391, PMID: 34503594 McLean S Gomes B Higginson IJ. The intensity of caregiving is a more important predictor of adverse bereavement outcomes for adult-child than spousal caregivers of patients who die of cancer. Psychooncology. (2017) 26:31622. doi: 10.1002/pon.4132, PMID: 27139519 Maura G Blotière PO Wastesson JW Johnell K. Spousal bereavement and four-year trajectories of medication use: a nationwide register-based study in Swedish older adults. J Am Geriatr Soc. (2024) 72:204859. doi: 10.1111/jgs.18950, PMID: 38720614 Aday LA Andersen R. A framework for the study of access to medical care. Health Serv Res. (1974) 9:20820. PMID: 4436074 Utah Office of Administrative Rules. Insurance administration rule 262: health data authority health insurance claims reporting. Utah: Utah Office of Administrative Rules (2024). Garvin JH Herget KA Hashibe M Kirchhoff AC Hawley CW Bolton D . Linkage between Utah all payers claims database and central Cancer registry. Health Serv Res. (2019) 54:70713. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.13114, PMID: 30675913 Utah Department of Health & Human Services. About the Utah all payer claims database Salt Lake City, UT: Utah Department of Health & Human Services; (2025). Available online at: https://healthcarestats.utah.gov/about-the-data/#:~:text=About%20the%20Utah%20All%20Payer%20Claims%20Database&text=As%20of%20December%202021%2C%20the,most%20people%20in%20the%20state (Accessed April 2, 2025). Codden RR Sweeney C Ofori-Atta BS Herget KA Wigren K Edwards S . Accuracy of patient race and ethnicity data in a central cancer registry. Cancer Causes Control. (2024) 35:68594. doi: 10.1007/s10552-023-01827-3, PMID: 38019367 Frayne SM Miller DR Sharkansky EJ Jackson VW Wang F Halanych JH . Using administrative data to identify mental illness: what approach is best? Am J Med Qual. (2010) 25:4250. doi: 10.1177/1062860609346347, PMID: 19855046 Rubin DB Schenker N. Multiple imputation in healthcare databases: an overview and some applications. Stat Med. (1991) 10:58598. doi: 10.1002/sim.4780100410, PMID: 2057657 Harrell EF. Hmisc: Harrell Miscellaneous. (2025). R package version 5.2-4. Available at: https://github.com/harrelfe/hmisc Harrell F. Jr. Package ‘rms’. R package version 8.0-0. (2025). Available at: https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/rms/rms.pdf Van Buuren S Groothuis-Oudshoorn K. Mice: multivariate imputation by chained equations in R. J Stat Softw. (2011) 45:167. doi: 10.18637/jss.v045.i03 Roxo L Silva M Perelman J. Gender gap in health service utilisation and outcomes of depression: a cross-country longitudinal analysis of European middle-aged and older adults. Prev Med. (2021) 153:106847. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2021.106847, PMID: 34662596 Iacob E Hollingshaus M Utz R Tay D Ornstein KA Alexander R . Caregiving at end-of-life: How do family structure and dementia status impact antidepressant and anxiolytic prescriptions among families? Alzheimer’s Dement. (2025). doi: 10.1002/alz.14590 Seiler A von Känel R Slavich GM. The psychobiology of bereavement and health: a conceptual review from the perspective of social signal transduction theory of depression. Front Psych. (2020) 11:565239. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2020.565239, PMID: 33343412 Viola M Gang J Maciejewski PK Prigerson HG. Associations of financial hardship with suicidal ideation among bereaved cancer caregivers. J Psychosoc Oncol. (2023) 41:22634. doi: 10.1080/07347332.2022.2067803, PMID: 35510901 Tay DL Thygesen LC Kozlov E Ornstein KA. Serious mental illness exacerbation post-bereavement: a population-based study of partners and adult children. Clin Epidemiol. (2022) 14:106577. doi: 10.2147/clep.S372936, PMID: 36164496 Stewart SA Copeland AL Cherry KE. Risk factors for substance use across the lifespan. J Genet Psychol. (2023) 184:14562. doi: 10.1080/00221325.2022.2130025, PMID: 36300651 Bottomley JS Williams JL Pavlacic JM Gex KS Rheingold AA. Bereavement and problematic alcohol use: prevalence and predictors among a national sample of bereaved adults. Alcohol Clin Exp Res. (2025) 49:17584. doi: 10.1111/acer.15496 Davis KA Sudlow CL Hotopf M. Can mental health diagnoses in administrative data be used for research? A systematic review of the accuracy of routinely collected diagnoses. BMC Psychiatry. (2016) 16:111. doi: 10.1186/s12888-016-0963-x, PMID: 27455845 El-Jawahri A Greer JA Park ER Jackson VA Kamdar M Rinaldi SP . Psychological distress in bereaved caregivers of patients with advanced Cancer. J Pain Symptom Manag. (2021) 61:48894. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2020.08.028, PMID: 32882355 Matsuzaka S Ohba A Masukawa K Aoyama M Morita T Kizawa Y . Factors associated with the preparedness for bereavement in families of patients with cancer: a secondary analysis of a nationwide bereaved family survey. Psychooncology. (2024) 33:e6276. doi: 10.1002/pon.6276, PMID: 38282233 Tang ST Hsieh C-H Chou W-C Chang W-C Chen J-S Wen F-H. Course of changes in emotional preparedness for death and its associations with caregiving outcomes for family caregivers of terminally ill cancer patients over their last year of life. J Pain Symptom Manag. (2021) 61:97482. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2020.09.033, PMID: 32991973 Hollingshaus M Smith KR Meeks H Ornstein K Iacob E Tay D . Mortality risk following end-of-life caregiving: a population-based analysis of hospice users and their families. Soc Sci Med. (2024) 348:116781. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2024.116781, PMID: 38547806 Yoo H Shin DW Jeong A Kim SY Yang H-k Kim JS . Perceived social support and its impact on depression and health-related quality of life: a comparison between cancer patients and general population. Jpn J Clin Oncol. (2017) 47:72834. doi: 10.1093/jjco/hyx064, PMID: 28531292 García-Torres F Jacek Jabłoński M Gómez Solís Á Moriana JA Jaén-Moreno MJ Moreno-Díaz MJ . Social support as predictor of anxiety and depression in cancer caregivers six months after cancer diagnosis: a longitudinal study. J Clin Nurs. (2020) 29:9961002. doi: 10.1111/jocn.15123, PMID: 31793095 Große J Treml J Kersting A. Impact of caregiver burden on mental health in bereaved caregivers of cancer patients: a systematic review. Psychooncology. (2018) 27:75767. doi: 10.1002/pon.4529, PMID: 28805954 Aaron SP Supiano K Elk R Wallace B. Towards a framework for a culturally centered evidence based prolonged grief group therapy intervention. Int J Palliat Nurs. (2025) 31:10918. doi: 10.12968/ijpn.2024.0027, PMID: 40135530 Miller E Bosun-Arjie SF Ekpenyong MS. Black and ethnic minority carers perceptions on mental health services and support in the United Kingdom: a systematic review. J Public Ment Health. (2021) 20:298311. doi: 10.1108/JPMH-12-2020-0152
      ‘Oh, my dear Thomas, you haven’t heard the terrible news then?’ she said. ‘I thought you would be sure to have seen it placarded somewhere. Alice went straight to her room, and I haven’t seen her since, though I repeatedly knocked at the door, which she has locked on the inside, and I’m sure it’s most unnatural of her not to let her own mother comfort her. It all happened in a moment: I have always said those great motor-cars shouldn’t be allowed to career about the streets, especially when they are all paved with cobbles as they are at Easton Haven, which are{331} so slippery when it’s wet. He slipped, and it went over him in a moment.’ My thanks were few and awkward, for there still hung to the missive a basting thread, and it was as warm as a nestling bird. I bent low--everybody was emotional in those days--kissed the fragrant thing, thrust it into my bosom, and blushed worse than Camille. "What, the Corner House victim? Is that really a fact?" "My dear child, I don't look upon it in that light at all. The child gave our picturesque friend a certain distinction--'My husband is dead, and this is my only child,' and all that sort of thing. It pays in society." leave them on the steps of a foundling asylum in order to insure [See larger version] Interoffice guff says you're planning definite moves on your own, J. O., and against some opposition. Is the Colonel so poor or so grasping—or what? Albert could not speak, for he felt as if his brains and teeth were rattling about inside his head. The rest of[Pg 188] the family hunched together by the door, the boys gaping idiotically, the girls in tears. "Now you're married." The host was called in, and unlocked a drawer in which they were deposited. The galleyman, with visible reluctance, arrayed himself in the garments, and he was observed to shudder more than once during the investiture of the dead man's apparel. HoME香京julia种子在线播放 ENTER NUMBET 0016l9jkxa.net.cn
      kwchain.com.cn
      www.kokty.com.cn
      ksldfjk.com.cn
      ubdex.net.cn
      nxtianli.org.cn
      www.siqzsq.com.cn
      nlzj.com.cn
      w88bet.com.cn
      nvjiao.com.cn
      处女被大鸡巴操 强奸乱伦小说图片 俄罗斯美女爱爱图 调教强奸学生 亚洲女的穴 夜来香图片大全 美女性强奸电影 手机版色中阁 男性人体艺术素描图 16p成人 欧美性爱360 电影区 亚洲电影 欧美电影 经典三级 偷拍自拍 动漫电影 乱伦电影 变态另类 全部电 类似狠狠鲁的网站 黑吊操白逼图片 韩国黄片种子下载 操逼逼逼逼逼 人妻 小说 p 偷拍10幼女自慰 极品淫水很多 黄色做i爱 日本女人人体电影快播看 大福国小 我爱肏屄美女 mmcrwcom 欧美多人性交图片 肥臀乱伦老头舔阴帝 d09a4343000019c5 西欧人体艺术b xxoo激情短片 未成年人的 插泰国人夭图片 第770弾み1 24p 日本美女性 交动态 eee色播 yantasythunder 操无毛少女屄 亚洲图片你懂的女人 鸡巴插姨娘 特级黄 色大片播 左耳影音先锋 冢本友希全集 日本人体艺术绿色 我爱被舔逼 内射 幼 美阴图 喷水妹子高潮迭起 和后妈 操逼 美女吞鸡巴 鸭个自慰 中国女裸名单 操逼肥臀出水换妻 色站裸体义术 中国行上的漏毛美女叫什么 亚洲妹性交图 欧美美女人裸体人艺照 成人色妹妹直播 WWW_JXCT_COM r日本女人性淫乱 大胆人艺体艺图片 女同接吻av 碰碰哥免费自拍打炮 艳舞写真duppid1 88电影街拍视频 日本自拍做爱qvod 实拍美女性爱组图 少女高清av 浙江真实乱伦迅雷 台湾luanlunxiaoshuo 洛克王国宠物排行榜 皇瑟电影yy频道大全 红孩儿连连看 阴毛摄影 大胆美女写真人体艺术摄影 和风骚三个媳妇在家做爱 性爱办公室高清 18p2p木耳 大波撸影音 大鸡巴插嫩穴小说 一剧不超两个黑人 阿姨诱惑我快播 幼香阁千叶县小学生 少女妇女被狗强奸 曰人体妹妹 十二岁性感幼女 超级乱伦qvod 97爱蜜桃ccc336 日本淫妇阴液 av海量资源999 凤凰影视成仁 辰溪四中艳照门照片 先锋模特裸体展示影片 成人片免费看 自拍百度云 肥白老妇女 女爱人体图片 妈妈一女穴 星野美夏 日本少女dachidu 妹子私处人体图片 yinmindahuitang 舔无毛逼影片快播 田莹疑的裸体照片 三级电影影音先锋02222 妻子被外国老头操 观月雏乃泥鳅 韩国成人偷拍自拍图片 强奸5一9岁幼女小说 汤姆影院av图片 妹妹人艺体图 美女大驱 和女友做爱图片自拍p 绫川まどか在线先锋 那么嫩的逼很少见了 小女孩做爱 处女好逼连连看图图 性感美女在家做爱 近距离抽插骚逼逼 黑屌肏金毛屄 日韩av美少女 看喝尿尿小姐日逼色色色网图片 欧美肛交新视频 美女吃逼逼 av30线上免费 伊人在线三级经典 新视觉影院t6090影院 最新淫色电影网址 天龙影院远古手机版 搞老太影院 插进美女的大屁股里 私人影院加盟费用 www258dd 求一部电影里面有一个二猛哥 深肛交 日本萌妹子人体艺术写真图片 插入屄眼 美女的木奶 中文字幕黄色网址影视先锋 九号女神裸 和骚人妻偷情 和潘晓婷做爱 国模大尺度蜜桃 欧美大逼50p 西西人体成人 李宗瑞继母做爱原图物处理 nianhuawang 男鸡巴的视屏 � 97免费色伦电影 好色网成人 大姨子先锋 淫荡巨乳美女教师妈妈 性nuexiaoshuo WWW36YYYCOM 长春继续给力进屋就操小女儿套干破内射对白淫荡 农夫激情社区 日韩无码bt 欧美美女手掰嫩穴图片 日本援交偷拍自拍 入侵者日本在线播放 亚洲白虎偷拍自拍 常州高见泽日屄 寂寞少妇自卫视频 人体露逼图片 多毛外国老太 变态乱轮手机在线 淫荡妈妈和儿子操逼 伦理片大奶少女 看片神器最新登入地址sqvheqi345com账号群 麻美学姐无头 圣诞老人射小妞和强奸小妞动话片 亚洲AV女老师 先锋影音欧美成人资源 33344iucoom zV天堂电影网 宾馆美女打炮视频 色五月丁香五月magnet 嫂子淫乱小说 张歆艺的老公 吃奶男人视频在线播放 欧美色图男女乱伦 avtt2014ccvom 性插色欲香影院 青青草撸死你青青草 99热久久第一时间 激情套图卡通动漫 幼女裸聊做爱口交 日本女人被强奸乱伦 草榴社区快播 2kkk正在播放兽骑 啊不要人家小穴都湿了 www猎奇影视 A片www245vvcomwwwchnrwhmhzcn 搜索宜春院av wwwsee78co 逼奶鸡巴插 好吊日AV在线视频19gancom 熟女伦乱图片小说 日本免费av无码片在线开苞 鲁大妈撸到爆 裸聊官网 德国熟女xxx 新不夜城论坛首页手机 女虐男网址 男女做爱视频华为网盘 激情午夜天亚洲色图 内裤哥mangent 吉沢明歩制服丝袜WWWHHH710COM 屌逼在线试看 人体艺体阿娇艳照 推荐一个可以免费看片的网站如果被QQ拦截请复制链接在其它浏览器打开xxxyyy5comintr2a2cb551573a2b2e 欧美360精品粉红鲍鱼 教师调教第一页 聚美屋精品图 中韩淫乱群交 俄罗斯撸撸片 把鸡巴插进小姨子的阴道 干干AV成人网 aolasoohpnbcn www84ytom 高清大量潮喷www27dyycom 宝贝开心成人 freefronvideos人母 嫩穴成人网gggg29com 逼着舅妈给我口交肛交彩漫画 欧美色色aV88wwwgangguanscom 老太太操逼自拍视频 777亚洲手机在线播放 有没有夫妻3p小说 色列漫画淫女 午间色站导航 欧美成人处女色大图 童颜巨乳亚洲综合 桃色性欲草 色眯眯射逼 无码中文字幕塞外青楼这是一个 狂日美女老师人妻 爱碰网官网 亚洲图片雅蠛蝶 快播35怎么搜片 2000XXXX电影 新谷露性家庭影院 深深候dvd播放 幼齿用英语怎么说 不雅伦理无需播放器 国外淫荡图片 国外网站幼幼嫩网址 成年人就去色色视频快播 我鲁日日鲁老老老我爱 caoshaonvbi 人体艺术avav 性感性色导航 韩国黄色哥来嫖网站 成人网站美逼 淫荡熟妇自拍 欧美色惰图片 北京空姐透明照 狼堡免费av视频 www776eom 亚洲无码av欧美天堂网男人天堂 欧美激情爆操 a片kk266co 色尼姑成人极速在线视频 国语家庭系列 蒋雯雯 越南伦理 色CC伦理影院手机版 99jbbcom 大鸡巴舅妈 国产偷拍自拍淫荡对话视频 少妇春梦射精 开心激动网 自拍偷牌成人 色桃隐 撸狗网性交视频 淫荡的三位老师 伦理电影wwwqiuxia6commqiuxia6com 怡春院分站 丝袜超短裙露脸迅雷下载 色制服电影院 97超碰好吊色男人 yy6080理论在线宅男日韩福利大全 大嫂丝袜 500人群交手机在线 5sav 偷拍熟女吧 口述我和妹妹的欲望 50p电脑版 wwwavtttcon 3p3com 伦理无码片在线看 欧美成人电影图片岛国性爱伦理电影 先锋影音AV成人欧美 我爱好色 淫电影网 WWW19MMCOM 玛丽罗斯3d同人动画h在线看 动漫女孩裸体 超级丝袜美腿乱伦 1919gogo欣赏 大色逼淫色 www就是撸 激情文学网好骚 A级黄片免费 xedd5com 国内的b是黑的 快播美国成年人片黄 av高跟丝袜视频 上原保奈美巨乳女教师在线观看 校园春色都市激情fefegancom 偷窥自拍XXOO 搜索看马操美女 人本女优视频 日日吧淫淫 人妻巨乳影院 美国女子性爱学校 大肥屁股重口味 啪啪啪啊啊啊不要 操碰 japanfreevideoshome国产 亚州淫荡老熟女人体 伦奸毛片免费在线看 天天影视se 樱桃做爱视频 亚卅av在线视频 x奸小说下载 亚洲色图图片在线 217av天堂网 东方在线撸撸-百度 幼幼丝袜集 灰姑娘的姐姐 青青草在线视频观看对华 86papa路con 亚洲1AV 综合图片2区亚洲 美国美女大逼电影 010插插av成人网站 www色comwww821kxwcom 播乐子成人网免费视频在线观看 大炮撸在线影院 ,www4KkKcom 野花鲁最近30部 wwwCC213wapwww2233ww2download 三客优最新地址 母亲让儿子爽的无码视频 全国黄色片子 欧美色图美国十次 超碰在线直播 性感妖娆操 亚洲肉感熟女色图 a片A毛片管看视频 8vaa褋芯屑 333kk 川岛和津实视频 在线母子乱伦对白 妹妹肥逼五月 亚洲美女自拍 老婆在我面前小说 韩国空姐堪比情趣内衣 干小姐综合 淫妻色五月 添骚穴 WM62COM 23456影视播放器 成人午夜剧场 尼姑福利网 AV区亚洲AV欧美AV512qucomwwwc5508com 经典欧美骚妇 震动棒露出 日韩丝袜美臀巨乳在线 av无限吧看 就去干少妇 色艺无间正面是哪集 校园春色我和老师做爱 漫画夜色 天海丽白色吊带 黄色淫荡性虐小说 午夜高清播放器 文20岁女性荫道口图片 热国产热无码热有码 2015小明发布看看算你色 百度云播影视 美女肏屄屄乱轮小说 家族舔阴AV影片 邪恶在线av有码 父女之交 关于处女破处的三级片 极品护士91在线 欧美虐待女人视频的网站 享受老太太的丝袜 aaazhibuo 8dfvodcom成人 真实自拍足交 群交男女猛插逼 妓女爱爱动态 lin35com是什么网站 abp159 亚洲色图偷拍自拍乱伦熟女抠逼自慰 朝国三级篇 淫三国幻想 免费的av小电影网站 日本阿v视频免费按摩师 av750c0m 黄色片操一下 巨乳少女车震在线观看 操逼 免费 囗述情感一乱伦岳母和女婿 WWW_FAMITSU_COM 偷拍中国少妇在公车被操视频 花也真衣论理电影 大鸡鸡插p洞 新片欧美十八岁美少 进击的巨人神thunderftp 西方美女15p 深圳哪里易找到老女人玩视频 在线成人有声小说 365rrr 女尿图片 我和淫荡的小姨做爱 � 做爱技术体照 淫妇性爱 大学生私拍b 第四射狠狠射小说 色中色成人av社区 和小姨子乱伦肛交 wwwppp62com 俄罗斯巨乳人体艺术 骚逼阿娇 汤芳人体图片大胆 大胆人体艺术bb私处 性感大胸骚货 哪个网站幼女的片多 日本美女本子把 色 五月天 婷婷 快播 美女 美穴艺术 色百合电影导航 大鸡巴用力 孙悟空操美少女战士 狠狠撸美女手掰穴图片 古代女子与兽类交 沙耶香套图 激情成人网区 暴风影音av播放 动漫女孩怎么插第3个 mmmpp44 黑木麻衣无码ed2k 淫荡学姐少妇 乱伦操少女屄 高中性爱故事 骚妹妹爱爱图网 韩国模特剪长发 大鸡巴把我逼日了 中国张柏芝做爱片中国张柏芝做爱片中国张柏芝做爱片中国张柏芝做爱片中国张柏芝做爱片 大胆女人下体艺术图片 789sss 影音先锋在线国内情侣野外性事自拍普通话对白 群撸图库 闪现君打阿乐 ady 小说 插入表妹嫩穴小说 推荐成人资源 网络播放器 成人台 149大胆人体艺术 大屌图片 骚美女成人av 春暖花开春色性吧 女亭婷五月 我上了同桌的姐姐 恋夜秀场主播自慰视频 yzppp 屄茎 操屄女图 美女鲍鱼大特写 淫乱的日本人妻山口玲子 偷拍射精图 性感美女人体艺木图片 种马小说完本 免费电影院 骑士福利导航导航网站 骚老婆足交 国产性爱一级电影 欧美免费成人花花性都 欧美大肥妞性爱视频 家庭乱伦网站快播 偷拍自拍国产毛片 金发美女也用大吊来开包 缔D杏那 yentiyishu人体艺术ytys WWWUUKKMCOM 女人露奶 � 苍井空露逼 老荡妇高跟丝袜足交 偷偷和女友的朋友做爱迅雷 做爱七十二尺 朱丹人体合成 麻腾由纪妃 帅哥撸播种子图 鸡巴插逼动态图片 羙国十次啦中文 WWW137AVCOM 神斗片欧美版华语 有气质女人人休艺术 由美老师放屁电影 欧美女人肉肏图片 白虎种子快播 国产自拍90后女孩 美女在床上疯狂嫩b 饭岛爱最后之作 幼幼强奸摸奶 色97成人动漫 两性性爱打鸡巴插逼 新视觉影院4080青苹果影院 嗯好爽插死我了 阴口艺术照 李宗瑞电影qvod38 爆操舅母 亚洲色图七七影院 被大鸡巴操菊花 怡红院肿么了 成人极品影院删除 欧美性爱大图色图强奸乱 欧美女子与狗随便性交 苍井空的bt种子无码 熟女乱伦长篇小说 大色虫 兽交幼女影音先锋播放 44aad be0ca93900121f9b 先锋天耗ばさ无码 欧毛毛女三级黄色片图 干女人黑木耳照 日本美女少妇嫩逼人体艺术 sesechangchang 色屄屄网 久久撸app下载 色图色噜 美女鸡巴大奶 好吊日在线视频在线观看 透明丝袜脚偷拍自拍 中山怡红院菜单 wcwwwcom下载 骑嫂子 亚洲大色妣 成人故事365ahnet 丝袜家庭教mp4 幼交肛交 妹妹撸撸大妈 日本毛爽 caoprom超碰在email 关于中国古代偷窥的黄片 第一会所老熟女下载 wwwhuangsecome 狼人干综合新地址HD播放 变态儿子强奸乱伦图 强奸电影名字 2wwwer37com 日本毛片基地一亚洲AVmzddcxcn 暗黑圣经仙桃影院 37tpcocn 持月真由xfplay 好吊日在线视频三级网 我爱背入李丽珍 电影师傅床戏在线观看 96插妹妹sexsex88com 豪放家庭在线播放 桃花宝典极夜著豆瓜网 安卓系统播放神器 美美网丝袜诱惑 人人干全免费视频xulawyercn av无插件一本道 全国色五月 操逼电影小说网 good在线wwwyuyuelvcom www18avmmd 撸波波影视无插件 伊人幼女成人电影 会看射的图片 小明插看看 全裸美女扒开粉嫩b 国人自拍性交网站 萝莉白丝足交本子 七草ちとせ巨乳视频 摇摇晃晃的成人电影 兰桂坊成社人区小说www68kqcom 舔阴论坛 久撸客一撸客色国内外成人激情在线 明星门 欧美大胆嫩肉穴爽大片 www牛逼插 性吧星云 少妇性奴的屁眼 人体艺术大胆mscbaidu1imgcn 最新久久色色成人版 l女同在线 小泽玛利亚高潮图片搜索 女性裸b图 肛交bt种子 最热门有声小说 人间添春色 春色猜谜字 樱井莉亚钢管舞视频 小泽玛利亚直美6p 能用的h网 还能看的h网 bl动漫h网 开心五月激 东京热401 男色女色第四色酒色网 怎么下载黄色小说 黄色小说小栽 和谐图城 乐乐影院 色哥导航 特色导航 依依社区 爱窝窝在线 色狼谷成人 91porn 包要你射电影 色色3A丝袜 丝袜妹妹淫网 爱色导航(荐) 好男人激情影院 坏哥哥 第七色 色久久 人格分裂 急先锋 撸撸射中文网 第一会所综合社区 91影院老师机 东方成人激情 怼莪影院吹潮 老鸭窝伊人无码不卡无码一本道 av女柳晶电影 91天生爱风流作品 深爱激情小说私房婷婷网 擼奶av 567pao 里番3d一家人野外 上原在线电影 水岛津实透明丝袜 1314酒色 网旧网俺也去 0855影院 在线无码私人影院 搜索 国产自拍 神马dy888午夜伦理达达兔 农民工黄晓婷 日韩裸体黑丝御姐 屈臣氏的燕窝面膜怎么样つぼみ晶エリーの早漏チ○ポ强化合宿 老熟女人性视频 影音先锋 三上悠亚ol 妹妹影院福利片 hhhhhhhhsxo 午夜天堂热的国产 强奸剧场 全裸香蕉视频无码 亚欧伦理视频 秋霞为什么给封了 日本在线视频空天使 日韩成人aⅴ在线 日本日屌日屄导航视频 在线福利视频 日本推油无码av magnet 在线免费视频 樱井梨吮东 日本一本道在线无码DVD 日本性感诱惑美女做爱阴道流水视频 日本一级av 汤姆avtom在线视频 台湾佬中文娱乐线20 阿v播播下载 橙色影院 奴隶少女护士cg视频 汤姆在线影院无码 偷拍宾馆 业面紧急生级访问 色和尚有线 厕所偷拍一族 av女l 公交色狼优酷视频 裸体视频AV 人与兽肉肉网 董美香ol 花井美纱链接 magnet 西瓜影音 亚洲 自拍 日韩女优欧美激情偷拍自拍 亚洲成年人免费视频 荷兰免费成人电影 深喉呕吐XXⅩX 操石榴在线视频 天天色成人免费视频 314hu四虎 涩久免费视频在线观看 成人电影迅雷下载 能看见整个奶子的香蕉影院 水菜丽百度影音 gwaz079百度云 噜死你们资源站 主播走光视频合集迅雷下载 thumbzilla jappen 精品Av 古川伊织star598在线 假面女皇vip在线视频播放 国产自拍迷情校园 啪啪啪公寓漫画 日本阿AV 黄色手机电影 欧美在线Av影院 华裔电击女神91在线 亚洲欧美专区 1日本1000部免费视频 开放90后 波多野结衣 东方 影院av 页面升级紧急访问每天正常更新 4438Xchengeren 老炮色 a k福利电影 色欲影视色天天视频 高老庄aV 259LUXU-683 magnet 手机在线电影 国产区 欧美激情人人操网 国产 偷拍 直播 日韩 国内外激情在线视频网给 站长统计一本道人妻 光棍影院被封 紫竹铃取汁 ftp 狂插空姐嫩 xfplay 丈夫面前 穿靴子伪街 XXOO视频在线免费 大香蕉道久在线播放 电棒漏电嗨过头 充气娃能看下毛和洞吗 夫妻牲交 福利云点墦 yukun瑟妃 疯狂交换女友 国产自拍26页 腐女资源 百度云 日本DVD高清无码视频 偷拍,自拍AV伦理电影 A片小视频福利站。 大奶肥婆自拍偷拍图片 交配伊甸园 超碰在线视频自拍偷拍国产 小热巴91大神 rctd 045 类似于A片 超美大奶大学生美女直播被男友操 男友问 你的衣服怎么脱掉的 亚洲女与黑人群交视频一 在线黄涩 木内美保步兵番号 鸡巴插入欧美美女的b舒服 激情在线国产自拍日韩欧美 国语福利小视频在线观看 作爱小视颍 潮喷合集丝袜无码mp4 做爱的无码高清视频 牛牛精品 伊aⅤ在线观看 savk12 哥哥搞在线播放 在线电一本道影 一级谍片 250pp亚洲情艺中心,88 欧美一本道九色在线一 wwwseavbacom色av吧 cos美女在线 欧美17,18ⅹⅹⅹ视频 自拍嫩逼 小电影在线观看网站 筱田优 贼 水电工 5358x视频 日本69式视频有码 b雪福利导航 韩国女主播19tvclub在线 操逼清晰视频 丝袜美女国产视频网址导航 水菜丽颜射房间 台湾妹中文娱乐网 风吟岛视频 口交 伦理 日本熟妇色五十路免费视频 A级片互舔 川村真矢Av在线观看 亚洲日韩av 色和尚国产自拍 sea8 mp4 aV天堂2018手机在线 免费版国产偷拍a在线播放 狠狠 婷婷 丁香 小视频福利在线观看平台 思妍白衣小仙女被邻居强上 萝莉自拍有水 4484新视觉 永久发布页 977成人影视在线观看 小清新影院在线观 小鸟酱后丝后入百度云 旋风魅影四级 香蕉影院小黄片免费看 性爱直播磁力链接 小骚逼第一色影院 性交流的视频 小雪小视频bd 小视频TV禁看视频 迷奸AV在线看 nba直播 任你在干线 汤姆影院在线视频国产 624u在线播放 成人 一级a做爰片就在线看狐狸视频 小香蕉AV视频 www182、com 腿模简小育 学生做爱视频 秘密搜查官 快播 成人福利网午夜 一级黄色夫妻录像片 直接看的gav久久播放器 国产自拍400首页 sm老爹影院 谁知道隔壁老王网址在线 综合网 123西瓜影音 米奇丁香 人人澡人人漠大学生 色久悠 夜色视频你今天寂寞了吗? 菲菲影视城美国 被抄的影院 变态另类 欧美 成人 国产偷拍自拍在线小说 不用下载安装就能看的吃男人鸡巴视频 插屄视频 大贯杏里播放 wwwhhh50 233若菜奈央 伦理片天海翼秘密搜查官 大香蕉在线万色屋视频 那种漫画小说你懂的 祥仔电影合集一区 那里可以看澳门皇冠酒店a片 色自啪 亚洲aV电影天堂 谷露影院ar toupaizaixian sexbj。com 毕业生 zaixian mianfei 朝桐光视频 成人短视频在线直接观看 陈美霖 沈阳音乐学院 导航女 www26yjjcom 1大尺度视频 开平虐女视频 菅野雪松协和影视在线视频 华人play在线视频bbb 鸡吧操屄视频 多啪啪免费视频 悠草影院 金兰策划网 (969) 橘佑金短视频 国内一极刺激自拍片 日本制服番号大全magnet 成人动漫母系 电脑怎么清理内存 黄色福利1000 dy88午夜 偷拍中学生洗澡磁力链接 花椒相机福利美女视频 站长推荐磁力下载 mp4 三洞轮流插视频 玉兔miki热舞视频 夜生活小视频 爆乳人妖小视频 国内网红主播自拍福利迅雷下载 不用app的裸裸体美女操逼视频 变态SM影片在线观看 草溜影院元气吧 - 百度 - 百度 波推全套视频 国产双飞集合ftp 日本在线AV网 笔国毛片 神马影院女主播是我的邻居 影音资源 激情乱伦电影 799pao 亚洲第一色第一影院 av视频大香蕉 老梁故事汇希斯莱杰 水中人体磁力链接 下载 大香蕉黄片免费看 济南谭崔 避开屏蔽的岛a片 草破福利 要看大鸡巴操小骚逼的人的视频 黑丝少妇影音先锋 欧美巨乳熟女磁力链接 美国黄网站色大全 伦蕉在线久播 极品女厕沟 激情五月bd韩国电影 混血美女自摸和男友激情啪啪自拍诱人呻吟福利视频 人人摸人人妻做人人看 44kknn 娸娸原网 伊人欧美 恋夜影院视频列表安卓青青 57k影院 如果电话亭 avi 插爆骚女精品自拍 青青草在线免费视频1769TV 令人惹火的邻家美眉 影音先锋 真人妹子被捅动态图 男人女人做完爱视频15 表姐合租两人共处一室晚上她竟爬上了我的床 性爱教学视频 北条麻妃bd在线播放版 国产老师和师生 magnet wwwcctv1024 女神自慰 ftp 女同性恋做激情视频 欧美大胆露阴视频 欧美无码影视 好女色在线观看 后入肥臀18p 百度影视屏福利 厕所超碰视频 强奸mp magnet 欧美妹aⅴ免费线上看 2016年妞干网视频 5手机在线福利 超在线最视频 800av:cOm magnet 欧美性爱免播放器在线播放 91大款肥汤的性感美乳90后邻家美眉趴着窗台后入啪啪 秋霞日本毛片网站 cheng ren 在线视频 上原亚衣肛门无码解禁影音先锋 美脚家庭教师在线播放 尤酷伦理片 熟女性生活视频在线观看 欧美av在线播放喷潮 194avav 凤凰AV成人 - 百度 kbb9999 AV片AV在线AV无码 爱爱视频高清免费观看 黄色男女操b视频 观看 18AV清纯视频在线播放平台 成人性爱视频久久操 女性真人生殖系统双性人视频 下身插入b射精视频 明星潜规测视频 mp4 免賛a片直播绪 国内 自己 偷拍 在线 国内真实偷拍 手机在线 国产主播户外勾在线 三桥杏奈高清无码迅雷下载 2五福电影院凸凹频频 男主拿鱼打女主,高宝宝 色哥午夜影院 川村まや痴汉 草溜影院费全过程免费 淫小弟影院在线视频 laohantuiche 啪啪啪喷潮XXOO视频 青娱乐成人国产 蓝沢润 一本道 亚洲青涩中文欧美 神马影院线理论 米娅卡莉法的av 在线福利65535 欧美粉色在线 欧美性受群交视频1在线播放 极品喷奶熟妇在线播放 变态另类无码福利影院92 天津小姐被偷拍 磁力下载 台湾三级电髟全部 丝袜美腿偷拍自拍 偷拍女生性行为图 妻子的乱伦 白虎少妇 肏婶骚屄 外国大妈会阴照片 美少女操屄图片 妹妹自慰11p 操老熟女的b 361美女人体 360电影院樱桃 爱色妹妹亚洲色图 性交卖淫姿势高清图片一级 欧美一黑对二白 大色网无毛一线天 射小妹网站 寂寞穴 西西人体模特苍井空 操的大白逼吧 骚穴让我操 拉好友干女朋友3p