Edited by: Pina Filippello, University of Messina, Italy
Reviewed by: Eilin Kristine Erevik, University of Bergen, Norway; Vittorio Lenzo, Università per stranieri Dante Alighieri, Italy
†These authors share first authorship
This article was submitted to Educational Psychology, a section of the journal Frontiers in Psychology
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
This study had two aims: to test the effect and the effect size of specific problematic Internet use (SPIU) [online shopping, online pornography, social network site (SNS) usage, and Internet gaming] on generalized problematic Internet use (GPIU) and to reveal the gender differences in GPIU and SPIU for students from the elementary school level to the university level. In total, 5,215 Chinese students (2,303 males, mean age = 16.20 years, range = 10–23 years) from four types of schools (elementary school, junior high school, senior high school, and university) provided self-report data on demographic variables (gender and educational levels), online shopping, online pornography, SNS usage, Internet gaming, and GPIU. After calculations had been controlled for demographic variables, the results indicated that (i) online shopping, online pornography, SNS usage, and Internet gaming positively predicted GPIU—and Internet gaming was the most critical predictor of GPIU—and that (ii) gender differences were revealed in Internet gaming and GPIU in all educational levels, except at senior high school where the gender differences in GPIU were not significant. Significant gender differences were found for online shopping and online pornography for all educational levels above elementary school. These results provided further understanding of the association between GPIU and SPIU and gender differences in PIU, which suggested that gender differences across different educational levels should be considered in interventions of PIU.
香京julia种子在线播放
In the past decade, an increasing body of research has been conducted on problematic Internet use (PIU) in both adolescents and adults (
Although the cognitive–behavioral model distinguishes GPIU from SPIU, the model ignores the association between GPIU and SPIU. For example, individuals who spent a large amount of time on Internet gaming also tended to have high scores on GPIU, but it does not mean that individuals with high scores on GPIU have used Internet gaming a lot: it may be that these individuals have spent the time on other Internet activities. Therefore, SPIU was significantly associated with GPIU (e.g.,
Gender differences in terms of PIU have been debated in literature on the topic. Some studies have indicated that male students had higher levels of PIU than female students and that female students engage more in SNS such as Facebook, Qzone, and WeChat, where they upload pictures as an act of self-expression, self-advertisement, and/or for communication/relationship maintenance (e.g.,
Educational level difference was another critical factor that could influence gender differences in PIU (
There were two aims in the present study: one was to test the effect size of SPIU (online shopping, online pornography, SNS usage, and Internet gaming) on GPIU and another was to examine the gender differences both in SPIU and GPIU for students from the elementary school level to the university level. A structural equation modeling (SEM) analysis was used to evaluate the effect size of each SPIU on GPIU, and difference tests were used to examine gender differences in SPIU and GPIU. We hypothesized that (i) each of the SPIUs tends to have a different effect size on GPIU and that (ii) the gender differences in SPIU and GPIU tend to change across different educational levels.
In total, 5,500 students (all of them were contacted in the class) from five cities in China completed the self-reported questionnaires. Two hundred and eighty-five participants (5.18%) were excluded from the analyses due to excessive missed responses and uniform responses (missing data of participants were not included in later data analysis), resulting in a final sample of 5,215 respondents (94.82%; mean age = 16.19 years, standard deviation = 3.10). More specifically, 546 elementary school students (264 males, aged from 11 to 13 years; mean age = 11.59 years, standard deviation = 0.60), 1,710 junior school students (822 males, aged from 12 to 15 years; mean age = 13.50 years, standard deviation = 0.99), 688 senior school students (303 males, aged from 15 to 18 years; mean age = 16.22 years, standard deviation = 1.09), and 2,271 university students (914 males, aged from 17 to 21 years; mean age = 19.25 years, standard deviation = 1.74) took part in this survey; all the universities and schools were selected randomly. Additionally, all of the students’ parents were notified and given the option of refusing to allow their child’s participation. Parental consent forms were distributed to all the students. Almost 99.8% of the students’ parents (due to the young age of the children who participated) returned the consent forms, providing permission for their children’s to take part.
Online shopping was assessed using the Online Shopping Addiction Scale (
The viewing of online pornography was assessed using the Online Pornography Scale (
SNS usage was assessed using the Facebook Usage Scale (
Internet gaming was assessed using the Internet gaming disorder test (
GPIU was assessed using the Problematic Internet Use Scale (
Firstly, SEM was used to test the regression coefficients of online shopping, online pornography, SNS usage, and Internet gaming on GPIU; the largest standardized regression coefficient was the most critical predictor of GPIU. Secondly, multivariate analysis of variance (MANOVA) was used to test the gender differences in online shopping, online pornography, SNS usage, Internet gaming, and GPIU across the different educational levels. SEM analyses were conducted using MPLUS 7.0 and a robust maximum likelihood estimation with microarray background correction (
The skewness and kurtosis values for each variable are presented in
Skewness and kurtosis values for each variable.
Elementary school | 1.84 | 0.49 | 1.73 | 1.31 | 0.34 | –0.72 | 1.42 | 0.24 | 0.87 | 0.61 |
Junior high school | 1.29 | 1.58 | 2.37 | 0.71 | 0.04 | –0.68 | 0.78 | 0.21 | 0.40 | –0.08 |
Senior high school | 0.96 | 0.41 | 2.63 | 0.73 | –0.35 | –0.41 | 0.96 | 0.34 | 0.23 | –0.12 |
University | 0.82 | 0.82 | 1.98 | 0.46 | –0.57 | 0.41 | 0.86 | 0.46 | 0.34 | 0.07 |
Mean, standard deviation, and Pearson’s correlation values of the studied variables.
1. Educational level | 2.90 ± 1.08 | 1 | ||||||
2. Gender | 1.55 ± 0.52 | 0.08** | 1 | |||||
3. Online shopping | 40.10 ± 20.37 | 0.25** | 0.12** | 1 | ||||
4. Online pornography | 19.70 ± 12.17 | 0.08** | −0.19** | 0.34** | 1 | |||
5. SNS usage | 19.15 ± 6.00 | 0.30** | 0.04** | 0.05** | 0.08** | 1 | ||
6. Internet gaming | 24.45 ± 12.93 | 0.00 | −0.31** | 0.40** | 0.21** | 0.18** | 1 | |
7. GPIU | 37.28 ± 13.28 | 0.18** | –0.02 | 0.22** | 0.43** | 0.51** | 0.53** | 1 |
SEM analyses were used to test the effects of online shopping, online pornography, SNS usage, and Internet gaming on GPIU (the total scores of each variable were used as the observed variables).
Effects of online shopping, online pornography, SNS usage, and Internet gaming on GPIU.
MANOVA was used to determine gender differences in relation to online shopping, online pornography, SNS usage, Internet gaming, and GPIU in students from elementary school to university level. The results indicated that the gender × educational level interaction exerted a significant main effect on online shopping [
The present study evaluated the association between SPIU and GPIU and found that the effect of Internet gaming on GPIU was bigger than the effects of online shopping, online pornography, and SNS usage, which was an important finding. Although the cognitive–behavioral model had distinguished the SPIU and GPIU, it did not distinguish the association between SPIU and GPIU. From this point of view, the results of the present study expanded the cognitive–behavioral model to some extent. Additionally, the results of the present study have found that gender differences in SPIU and GPIU were different across educational levels, which was also important for the development of a cognitive–behavioral model. Although some previous studies have found gender differences and educational level differences in SPIU and GPIU (e.g.,
Based on the aforementioned findings, online shopping, online pornography, SNS usage, and Internet gaming were predictors of GPIU, which is consistent with previous studies (
However,
This study was the first to evaluate gender differences in SPIU and GPIU in students from the elementary school level to the university level. The results indicated that from elementary school to university, gender differences in SPIU and GPIU tended to be changeable. More specifically, this could be as follows:
Firstly, for elementary school students, no gender differences were revealed in online shopping, online pornography, and SNS usage, whereas male students reported higher scores than female students in Internet gaming and GPIU. This is because, in elementary school, both male and female students rarely use the Internet to engage in online shopping, online pornography, and SNS usage due to being too young, whereas male students tended to use the Internet to engage in gaming-related activities for entertainment. It is possible that male students reported a higher score than female students in GPIU exclusively due to Internet gaming. In a previous study, intrinsic motivation was examined, which is related to the pleasure and satisfaction from engaging in a behavior, to explain the gender differences in Internet gaming. It is possible that males tended to have more experience with video games, which could help them overcome the challenges related to specific Internet games (
Secondly, in junior high school students, males reported higher scores than females in terms of online pornography, Internet gaming, and GPIU, whereas they scored lower in online shopping, and there were no gender differences in SNS usage. For online pornography,
Thirdly, in senior high school students, males reported higher scores than females in online pornography and Internet gaming, but lower scores in online shopping, whereas there were no gender differences in SNS usage and GPIU. Similarly, for junior high school students, online pornography and Internet gaming were the two most crucial predictors for male students’ GPIU, whereas online shopping was the most critical predictor for female students’ GPIU. However, no gender differences were noted in GPIU. This may have been because female students’ engagement in online shopping increased faster with age than male students, which led to the gender differences in GPIU decreasing. Although male students’ viewing of online pornography increased faster with age than did female students’, the results of this study indicated that, after controlling for demographic variables, online shopping played a more crucial role than online pornography in predicting GPIU. The absence of an observed gender difference in GPIU may be due to the increase in online shopping for female students.
Finally, in university students, male participants reported higher scores than females in online pornography and Internet gaming, but lower scores in online shopping, SNS usage, and GPIU. Gender stereotypes can be used to interpret gender differences in the motivations for Internet use. More specifically, the perceived characteristics of female students are interdependence, a need to nurture, and a concern for others. They are more likely to use social media platforms such as Facebook, Qzone, and WeChat to obtain social or emotional support from others such as family members and peers who share similar experiences (
In summary, gender differences in online shopping, online pornography, SNS usage, Internet gaming, and GPIU were dynamic and changeable in students from the elementary school level to the university level. To interpret these results, it is necessary to explain inconsistent conclusions from other studies.
According to our findings, some implications for the treatment and prevention of GPIU in school students are provided. Firstly, although, after controlling for demographic variables, online shopping, online pornography, SNS usage, and Internet gaming could positively predict GPIU, Internet gaming was the most important predictor of GPIU. Therefore, this finding suggests that interventions could be aimed at those participating in Internet gaming. Similarly, a previous study has suggested that education and training about the risks of excessive or compulsive Internet gaming can alleviate many symptoms of GPIU (
Although the present study evaluated the effects of SPIU on GPIU and also examined the gender differences in these effects from elementary school to university level, there were also several limitations. Firstly, a cross-sectional design was used, which made it difficult to make a causal inference. Therefore, more future studies are needed to further evaluate the results of the present study. Secondly, the data of the present study have some skewness and kurtosis values that fall out of the accepted range, which may lead to analytical errors. Therefore, future studies should further verify the results of the present study with satisfactory skewness and kurtosis values. Finally, only Chinese students were evaluated in the present study, which made it difficult to generalize the results of the present study into other countries. More studies are needed to further verify the results of the present study, with samples from other countries.
The raw data supporting the conclusions of this article will be made available by the authors, without undue reservation.
The present study was conducted in accordance with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards, with the approval of the Human Research Ethics Committee of Qingdao University of science and technology. Written informed consent to participate in this study was provided by the participants’ legal guardian/next of kin.
YT and TZ wrote the manuscript and data analysis. QS and LS conducted data analysis and interpretation of data for the manuscript. SC and NQ polished the manuscript and checked the manuscript.
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
We thank for the insightful and constructive reviews which were provided by the reviewers; thank for editor and Frontiers in Psychology to provide us the opportunity to revise our manuscript and publish our manuscript.