Edited by: Antonio Metastasio, Camden and Islington NHS Foundation Trust, United Kingdom
Reviewed by: Serdar M. Dursun, University of Alberta, Canada; Paul Glue, University of Otago, New Zealand
This article was submitted to Psychological Therapies, a section of the journal Frontiers in Psychiatry
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
Accumulating clinical evidence shows that psychedelic therapy, by synergistically combining psychopharmacology and psychological support, offers a promising transdiagnostic treatment strategy for a range of disorders with restricted and/or maladaptive habitual patterns of emotion, cognition and behavior, notably, depression (MDD), treatment resistant depression (TRD) and addiction disorders, but perhaps also anxiety disorders, obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD), Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) and eating disorders. Despite the emergent transdiagnostic evidence, the specific clinical dimensions that psychedelics are efficacious for, and associated underlying neurobiological pathways, remain to be well-characterized. To this end, this review focuses on pre-clinical and clinical evidence of the acute and sustained therapeutic potential of psychedelic therapy in the context of a transdiagnostic dimensional systems framework. Focusing on the Research Domain Criteria (RDoC) as a template, we will describe the multimodal mechanisms underlying the transdiagnostic therapeutic effects of psychedelic therapy, traversing molecular, cellular and network levels. These levels will be mapped to the RDoC constructs of negative and positive valence systems, arousal regulation, social processing, cognitive and sensorimotor systems. In summarizing this literature and framing it transdiagnostically, we hope we can assist the field in moving toward a mechanistic understanding of how psychedelics work for patients and eventually toward a precise-personalized psychedelic therapy paradigm.
香京julia种子在线播放
Translational Psychedelic science is evolving rapidly (
While results from ongoing well-powered double-blind randomized controlled trials (RCTs) will determine whether psychedelic therapy translates into clinical benefits for non-psychotic disorders in clinical psychiatry (
A precise mechanistic understanding of psychedelics is challenging because of the synergistic action of pharmacotherapy and psychotherapy, together with the induction of a wide range of complex subjective experiences with marked individual variation (
Psilocybin (phosphoryloxy-N,N- dimethyltryptamine) |
5-HT1, 5-HT2, 5-HT6 and 5-HT7 partial agonists | Onset 10–40 min po, peak 90–100 min, duration 4–6 h (most effects abate 6–8 h) |
N,N-dimethyltryptamine (DMT) |
5-HT1, 5- HT2, 5-HT6, and 5-HT7 partial agonists | DMT IM onset within 2–5 min and can last 30–60 min |
2,5-dimethoxy-4- iodoamphetamine (DOI) |
5-HT2A, 5-HT2B, 5-HT2C agonists | onset 1-2 h, duration 16–24 h |
Mescaline | Peak within 2 h po, duration up to 8 h | |
Lysergic acid diethylamide (LSD) | 5-HT1, 5-HT2, 5-HT6 and 5-HT7 partial agonists D1 and D2 dopamine receptors and adrenergic receptors | po onset 30–45 min, peak 1–2.5 h, duration 9–12 h |
The belief-recalibration process proposed by the REBUS model illustrates one mechanism through which psychedelic therapy may operate as a transdiagnostic therapeutic option for a broad range of disorders, particularly those with overly constrained beliefs or behaviors, such as major depression, anxiety and addiction disorders (
As we accumulate more knowledge about the precise mechanisms of action, and how this might vary across individuals, we can begin to refine personalized treatment strategies. Currently available strategies to refine therapeutic outcomes include dose (and interval) optimization, modification of psychological interventions (perhaps dependent on the level of complexity or severity) and optimization of environmental ambiances/cues (setting) (
In this review, we aim to anchor the accumulation of basic and applied research in psychedelics to the National Institute of Mental Health's Research Domain Criteria (RDoC), thereby adding structure to a fast-growing field. The transdiagnostic dimensional RDoC constructs are negative and positive valence systems, arousal regulation, social processing, cognitive and sensorimotor systems (
Transdiagnostic psychedelic therapy and domains of the research domain criteria (RDoC).
Transdiagnostic psychedelic therapy and units of analysis of the research domain criteria (RDoC).
Personalized-precision psychiatry is impeded by two major issues that are partially related— (i) the reliance on categorical diagnostic systems and high levels of comorbidity and heterogeneity (
There are emerging signals that deconstructing categorical diagnoses into dimensional constructs may facilitate enhanced treatment precision. A recent clinical trial adopting an RDoC approach to the investigation of a selective κ-opioid receptor blocker for anhedonia across mood and anxiety disorders showed that this compound increased fMRI ventral striatum activation during reward anticipation compared to placebo (
The evolving neuroscientific framework of the RDoC aims to integrate developmental processes and environmental inputs over the trajectory of the life course to determine the mechanisms underlying normal-range functioning and then how disruptions correspond to psychopathology. It is anticipated that the identification of targetable biosignatures that either cut across traditional disorder categories or that are unique to specific clinical phenomenon will improve outcomes for people with mental health disorders.
In the sections that follow, we will consider if and how psychedelic therapy operates across the RDoC domains in the hope that harnessing an integrative neuroscience systems model, encompassing environmental information exchange processes, may add the precision we need to transition to personalized psychedelic therapy practices that are transdiagnostic and evidence based. Although well-powered longitudinal clinical studies will be required to determine whether transdiagnostic dimensional biotypes or psycho-biotypes will optimize therapeutic response rates to psychedelic therapy (
NVS are primarily responsible for responses to aversive (threat) situations or context, such as fear, anxiety, and loss (
At the behavioral unit of analysis, the loss construct includes attentional biases to negative information, loss of motivation/drive, sadness, shame and rumination and is a component of several disorders but shares most features with depressive disorders (
Negative valence systems.
Randomized, double-blind | Psilocybin 1 mg ( |
−6.6 points on change from baseline in MADRS total scores in 25 mg vs. the 1 mg dose at week 3 ( |
( |
||
Double-blind, randomized, controlled | 59 MDD (20F) |
Two psilocybin 25 mg po 3 weeks apart plus 6 weeks of daily placebo (psilocybin group) |
No significant difference between groups in QIDS, mean (±SE) changes in the scores from baseline to week 6 were −8.0 ± 1.0 points in the psilocybin group and −6.0 ± 1.0 in escitalopram group |
( |
|
Randomized waitlist control trial |
24 MDD (16F) |
Psilocybin (20 mg/70 kg and 30 mg/70 kg) |
Significant decrease in GRID-HAMD and QIDS-SR scores at weeks 1 and 4 in the immediate treatment group compared to delayed treatment group |
( |
|
Open label |
12 TRD (6F) |
Psilocybin (10 and 25 mg 7 days later) | Significant reduction in depressive and anxiety symptoms and improvement in anhedonia scores from baseline to 1 week and 3 months |
( |
|
Randomized placebo-controlled trial |
29 TRD |
Ayahuasca |
Significant reduction in depressive symptoms (MADRS) at D1, D2, and D7 vs. placebo |
( |
|
Open label |
17 MDD (14F) (3: mild, 13:moderate, 1:severe) |
Ayahuasca |
Significant decrease in MADRS and HAM-D (and subscales of the BPRS) across all time points |
( |
|
Open label |
6 MDD (4F) (2:mild, 3:moderate, 1:severe) |
Ayahuasca |
HAMD: significant decrease at D1, D7, D21 vs. baseline |
( |
|
Randomized, double-blind, cross-over trial, counterbalanced | 51 (25F) |
Psilocybin (1 or 3 mg/70 kg) and |
Significant antidepressant and anxiolytic effects (HAMA, GRID-HAM-D) |
( |
|
Double-blind, placebo-controlled, crossover | 29 (18F) |
Psilocybin (0.3 mg/kg) |
Immediate and sustained reductions in anxiety and depression symptoms (HADS, BDI, STAI-S and STAI-T) that remained significant until final follow-up. |
( |
|
Double-blind, randomized, active placebo-controlled pilot, then into open-label crossover | 12 (4F) |
LSD (200 mcg) ( |
2-months: significant reductions in STAI, sustained at 12 months |
( |
|
Double-blind placebo-controlled cross-over trial | 12 (11F) |
Psilocybin (0.2 mg/kg) or niacin (250 mg) |
Significant decreases were observed in STAI scores at 3-months follow-up, and BDI scores at 6-months |
( |
|
Open label proof-of-concept pilot |
9 (2F) |
Psilocybin po (25, 100, 200, and 300 mcg/kg at 1-week intervals) | 23–100% decrease in YBOCS score (no dose response) | ( |
An open-label feasibility study of psilocybin therapy (10 mg) then 7 days later 25 mg, of 12 people diagnosed with treatment-resistant depression (TRD) showed that 67% of participants had significantly reduced depression symptoms (measured by MADRS) at 1 week, with 40% of participants showing a sustained response at 3 months post-dose (
A randomized, waiting list-controlled clinical trial, though still without a placebo control, confirmed the immediate and sustained antidepressant effects of psilocybin therapy in (non-treatment resistant) MDD (
It is established that the limbic system and specifically the amygdala (
In contrast to the above studies in HCs, which generally show decreases in amygdala reactivity, an open label study of 19 antidepressant free TRD subjects, found increased amygdala responses to emotional faces 1 day after psilocybin (
The corticolimbic system and the immuno-endocrine system are intrinsically linked. However, at this point limited conclusions can be drawn about the loss construct and immuno-endocrine mechanisms. An 8-week social isolation model in juvenile marmosets, resulted in decreased fecal cortisol levels in both ayahuasca and saline treated groups, though in the male animals, ayahuasca reduced scratching behavior and increased feeding (
A non-controlled study of 11 HCs, that analyzed salivary cortisol and immune markers 30 min before after 90 min after inhaled 5-methoxy-N,N-dimethyltryptamine (5-MeO-DMT) found a significant increase in cortisol levels and decrease in IL-6 concentrations, whereas there were no changes in CRP and IL-1β (
When threat systems become excessively or repeated activated, which then exceeds an organism's ability to meet the demands (allostatic overload), psychopathology may ensue (
A recent study in male mice using the relatively selective 5-HT2A/2C receptor agonist DOI (1-(2,5-Dimethoxy-4-iodophenyl)-2-aminopropane) showed that it accelerated fear extinction, reduced immobility time in the FST, increased the density of transitional dendritic spines in the frontal cortex, and for the first time showed epigenetic changes in enhancer regions of genes involved in synaptic assembly which lasted for 7 days, in conjunction with more transient transcriptomic changes (
From the neuroendocrine mechanistic perspective, a study of psilocybin treatment in male mice, showed that psilocybin acutely increased plasma corticosterone and anxiety like behaviors in the open field test (OFT) (
Another rodent study comparing psilocybin to the N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor antagonist—ketamine—showed that rats that received psilocybin and 5-min weekly arena exposure for the first 3 weeks exhibited significantly less anxiety-like behavior in the elevated plus-maze (EPM) compared to controls, whereas rats that received the ketamine and weekly arena exposure did not display a significant decrease in anxiety in the EPM (
In humans, dysregulated fear and threat responses underlie a range of psychiatric disorders and psychedelic therapy may revise dysregulated or maladaptive fear/threat responses. A review of 20 human studies of psychedelics in ICD-10 anxiety disorders from 1940 to 2000, albeit of sub-optimal methodological rigor (e.g., lack of control groups, blinding and standardization), indicated improvements in anxiety levels (
One of the notable conditions associated with dysregulated fear conditioning (and avoidance of conditioned contextual cues), together with emotional regulation, and dysfunctional neural activity in cortico-amygdala circuits, involving exaggerated amygdala and attenuated mPFC activity, is Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) (
While PTSD overlaps with other conditions in the domains of hypervigilance, avoidance and altered emotional valance, the vivid re-experiencing of the trauma is perhaps a point of divergence from many other conditions. Memory reconsolidation dysregulation is a cardinal clinical feature of PTSD and memories can be strengthened or weakened according to new experiences. Classical psychedelics have the capacity to acutely enhance the vividness and recall of autobiographical memories (
It is not known whether psychedelic therapy has the potential to augment therapies, such as cognitive processing therapy or prolonged exposure therapy in PTSD or indeed in any other anxiety disorder. However, there are preliminary indicators that psychedelic therapy may be useful in PTSD (
Excessive fear/anxiety may lead to maladaptive patterns of avoidance. Some of the potential therapeutic subjective experiences induced by psychedelics involve the transition from experiential (
The neural circuitry underling aggressive reactions (in the context of negative emotions) involve amygdala hyper-responsivity coupled with hypoactivity of prefrontal regions, which overlaps with threat processing circuitry (
In terms of other personality traits, data suggests that psychedelics may increase openness (
In terms of RDoC, structural and functional neuroplasticity broadly falls under molecular and cellular units of analysis and probably applies, at least some degree, to all domains. The ability of psychedelics to rapidly rewire neural circuitry by engaging plasticity mechanisms has given rise to the term—“psychoplastogens” (
The classical psychedelics may share glutamatergic activity-dependent neuroplastic effects with ketamine (
In mice, a single dose of psilocybin resulted in a 10% increase in spine size and density in the medial frontal cortex, which occurred within 24 h and persisted for 1 month (
A recent pre-clinical study compared ketamine to Tabernanthalog (TBG)—a water-soluble, non-hallucinogenic, non-toxic analog of ibogaine (
Notwithstanding the gap between animal and human studies in demonstrating molecular changes in plasticity, there are indicators of alignment with the pre-clinical data. For example, a magnetic resonance spectroscopy (MRS) imaging study in HCs showed psilocybin modulated glutamate levels in the medial PFC (
PVS are primarily responsible for responses to positive motivational situations or contexts, such as reward seeking, consummatory behavior, and reward/habit learning.
Reward-pathway dysfunction is associated with a range of disorders (
The functional interaction between 5-HT and dopamine systems across molecular and neural networks was further expounded by a recent study in mice showing psilocybin increased FC between 5-HT-associated networks and resting-state networks of the murine DMN, thalamus, and midbrain, whereas it decreased FC within dopamine-associated striatal networks (
In healthy humans, a structural MRI study showed a positive correlation between psilocybin induced feelings of unity, bliss, spiritual experience, and insightfulness subscales of the 5-Dimensional Altered States of Consciousness Rating Scale (5D-ASC) and right hemisphere rostral anterior cingulate thickness in HCs after controlling for sex and age (
A Positron emission tomography (PET) study in healthy humans showed that psilocybin increased striatal dopamine concentrations, and this increase correlated with euphoria and depersonalization phenomena (
The multi-layered complexities underlying addiction disorders are not only limited to reward and habit dysregulation but may include other constructs such as impulsivity and compulsivity (
Consistent with this, a subsequent online survey (
A pilot study of psilocybin and cognitive-behavioral therapy in people with tobacco addiction reported that 12 of 15 participants (80%) showed 7-day point prevalence abstinence at 6-month follow-up (
Reward hyposensitivity and decreased approach motivation is related to anhedonia, a cardinal feature of the Depression (
RDoC's Arousal/Regulatory Systems are responsible for generating activation of neural systems as appropriate for various contexts and providing appropriate homeostatic regulation of such systems as energy balance and sleep (
Arousal is a continuum of sensitivity of the organism to stimuli, both external and internal. Several interacting systems are involved in arousal regulation, including but not limited to, the sympathomedullary and the immuno-endocrine system, which act as mediators to alter neural circuitry and function, particularly in the corticolimbic system. Psychedelics are highly context sensitive, “non-specific amplifiers” (
Psychedelics activate the sympathetic nervous system, including blood pressure, heart rate, body temperature, and pupillary dilation, probably
As discussed above, psychedelics also acutely stimulate the neuroendocrine system. In a seminal randomized placebo-controlled study of healthy experienced psychedelic users, IV DMT acutely and dose dependently increased blood cortisol, corticotropin, and other hormones such as prolactin and growth hormone (and ß-endorphin) (
Psychedelics modulate the immune system
Sleep interference is almost ubiquitous across psychiatric disorders (
RDoC broadly defines systems for social processes as mediating responses in interpersonal settings of various types, including perception and interpretation of others' actions (
Systems for social processes.
Double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel group | 60 HCs |
Psilocybin (0.17 mg/kg) | Psilocybin associated with acutely elevated medial PFC glutamate, correlated with negatively experienced ego dissolution |
( |
|
Participants blind to dose | 8 HCs |
Psilocybin between 3 and 30 mg | Subjective intensity ratings positively correlated with neocortical 5-HT2AR occupancy and plasma psilocin levels |
( |
|
Double-blind placebo controlled |
39 HCs (experienced meditators) (15F) |
Psilocybin 315 mcg/kg | Psilocybin associated with increased meditation depth and positively experienced ego-dissolution |
( |
|
Double blind, randomized, counterbalanced, crossover | 24 HCs (6F) |
(1) Placebo + placebo (179 mg mannitol/1 mg aerosil, po) |
LSD decreased the response to participation in self-initiated compared with other-initiated social interaction in the posterior cingulate cortex (PCC) and the temporal gyrus, more precisely the angular gyrus |
( |
|
Open-label uncontrolled | 16 HCs (6F) |
Ayahuasca |
Reductions in glutamate + glutamine, creatine, and N-acetylaspartate+N-acetylaspartylglutamate in the PCC |
( |
|
Within-subjects, counterbalanced |
15 HCs (2F) |
(1) receiving saline injection (“placebo,” PCB-session), 12 min task-free fMRI scan, eyes closed |
Psilocybin-induced ego-dissolution was associated with decreased FC between the medial temporal lobe and high-level cortical regions and with a “disintegration” of the salience network and reduced interhemispheric communication |
( |
|
Double-blind, randomized | 75 HCs (25 each group) (45F) |
(1) 1 mg/70 kg on sessions 1 and 2) with moderate-level (“standard”) support for spiritual-practice (LD-SS) |
High-dose psilocybin produced greater acute and persisting effects vs. low dose |
( |
|
Double-blind, randomized, counterbalanced, cross-over study | HCs ( |
Psilocybin 0.215 mg/kg po | Reduced feeling of social exclusion |
( |
|
Double-blind, randomized, placebo, controlled, within-subject design with 2 sessions (separated by 10 days) | HCs ( |
Psilocybin 0.215 mg/kg po | Increased explicit and implicit emotional empathy, compared with placebo |
( |
|
Double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled, crossover | 40 HCs (20F) |
LSD (200 μg po) in 16 HCs |
Subjective closeness to others, openness, and trust increased by LSD, enhanced explicit and implicit emotional empathy and impaired the recognition of sad and fearful faces, enhanced the participants' desire to be with other people and increased their prosocial behavior | ( |
Experiences of disconnection or exclusion are common across psychiatric disorders and can manifest as social withdrawal, apathy, and anhedonia (
In keeping with possible increases in openness (
There are preliminary indictors that classical psychedelics may enhance certain types of empathy (
Notwithstanding the challenges of disentangling self from self-as social agent, current thinking implicates altered self-processing as the primary mode of action of psychedelic therapy with downstream implications for social processing systems (
In contrast to disorders of constrained “self-focus,” which may benefit from a “broader spectrum of thought patterns and emotions” induced by psychedelic therapy (
The intensity of psilocybin induced subjective experiences, including ego dissolution are dose dependent and appear to correlate with cerebral 5-HT2ARs occupancy and plasma psilocin levels (
An MRS study in HCs showed that psilocybin acutely elevated mPFC glutamate, which was associated with negatively experienced ego dissolution, whereas lower levels in hippocampal glutamate secondary to psilocybin, were associated with positively experienced ego dissolution (
One of the higher-order brain networks modulated by psychedelics that has gained attention in recent years is the DMN, associated with a range of experiences and conditions (
Psychedelics reliably alter DMN circuitry and studies in HCs reported decreases in rsFC within the DMN induced by psilocybin (
Unsurprisingly given the complex multi-modal nature of self-processing, a single neural correlate such as the DMN may not fully capture the complexities of the self-processing concept (
From a personalized point of view, a study suggested that baseline brain connectivity may be a useful predictive marker (
In contrast to the aforementioned psychedelic induced acute decreases in DMN integrity in HCs, an open-labeled study in TRD (
The RDoC organizes cognitive systems into attention, working memory, perception, memory (declarative), language, and cognitive control constructs.
Cognitive control refers to a “system that modulates the operation of other cognitive and emotional systems, in the service of goal-directed behavior, when prepotent modes of responding are not adequate to meet the demands of the current context. Additionally, control processes are engaged in the case of novel contexts, where appropriate responses need to be selected from among competing alternatives” (
Psychedelics transiently impair certain aspects of cognition in a dose-dependent manner (
The complex relationship between cognitive flexibility, neural flexibility, and emotion has recently been highlighted by an open-label study of 24 patients with MDD (
A retrospective survey self-report survey of U.S. Veterans in a psychedelic clinical program, reported significant reductions in cognitive impairment as measured by the Medical Outcomes Study—Cognitive Functioning subscale (
The acute impairment in some executive domains induced by psychedelic compounds is especially relevant to neurodevelopmental disorders such as schizophrenia, which notwithstanding the inter-individual variability are associated with deficits in cognitive flexibility (
A recent study focused on the claustrum, a thin sheet of gray matter, embedded in the white matter of the cerebral hemispheres and situated between the putamen and the insular cortex, with a rich supply of 5-HT2A receptors and glutamatergic connectivity to the cerebral cortex. The claustrum is thought to be associated with cognitive task switching (
OCD, frequently comorbid with anxiety and depression, involves deficits in cognitive control, goal-directed planning habit, reward processing (
Currently registered clinical trials with psychedelics: potential for future integration of outcomes with RDoC.
Psilocybin 25mg, po, once (3-and 6-mo follow-up) Mannitol | TLFB, MET |
Potential threat (anxiety) Sustained threat | Reward responsiveness: |
Attention working and Declarative memory Cognitive control: goal selection, updating, response selection; inhibition/suppression | Affiliation and attachment |
Circadian rhythms sleep and wakefulnessarousal | ||
Psilocybin 25mg/70 kg po at week 4, 25-40 mg/70 kg po at week 8 Psilocybin 25-40mg/70 kg at 38 weeks Diphenhydramine 50mg po at week 4, 50-100mg po at week 8 | PACS, AASE, Readiness rulers, TLFB, SIP |
|||||||
Psilocybin 25mg po once Blood psilocin levels | 11-DASC, MEQ, AWE-S, EDI, PACS, AASE, MAAS | |||||||
Psilocybin (30mg/70kg) 13-week CBT for smoking cessation | Subgroup; 50 (25 per group) MRI week 2 before Target Quit Date & week 5 (if abstinent 3rd MRI at 3 months)urinary cotinine, Breath Carbon Monoxide (CO) | Potential threat (anxiety) Sustained threat | Reward responsiveness: |
Attention Working and declarative memory Cognitive control: goal selection, updating, response selection; inhibition/suppression | Affiliation and attachment |
Circadian rhythms sleep and wakefulness arousal | ||
Psilocybin 0.36 mg/kg po Diphenhydramine 100mg po | fMRI: DMN rsFC |
|||||||
Psilocybin two doses po 4 weeks apart augmentation buprenorphine/ naloxone, plus guided counselling | OCS, MEQ, TLFB, GSES, MLQ, BPI, GQ, COWS | |||||||
Psilocybin twice (25mg & 30mg two weeks apart) plus 6-week psychotherapy during residential rehabilitation program | Self-report methamphetamine use and urine Stimulant Craving Questionnaire-Brief, BDI, SDS, GAD-7, Experiences in Close Relationships-Short form CRP, IL-6, TNF-a, IL-8, IL-10 | Reward responsiveness |
Affiliation and attachment perception and understanding of self and others | Habit | ||||
Four moderate to high doses psilocybin, 20mg at the first session, then remain at previous dose, or increase by 5mg up to a max 30mg | HADS, EDQLS, EDE-Q, ANSOCQ |
Acute threat (fear) Potential threat (anxiety) Sustained threat | Reward responsiveness: |
Attention working and declarative memory Cognitive control: goal selection, updating, response selection; inhibition/suppression | Perception: |
Circadian rhythms sleep and wakefulnessarousal | Sensorimotor dynamics |
|
3 doses of psilocybin, max 25mg po | RMQ, EDE, EDE-Q |
|||||||
Psilocybin 25mg po once | EDE, PASTAS, BISS, YBC-EDS-SRQ, EDI, EDE-QS, QIDS, CIA, ED-RR, 5D-ASC | |||||||
Psilocybin (15mg/70 kg week 4 and 15 or 25mg/70kg week 6) | CSDD, QOL-AD | Loss Potential threat (anxiety) Sustained threat | Reward responsiveness: |
Attention working and declarative memory Cognitive control Language | Affiliation and attachment |
Circadian rhythms sleep and wakefulness arousal | ||
Psilocybin 10mg if tolerated 25mg 2 weeks later | MADRS, HAM-A, PROMIS apathy & Positive Affect and Well-Being scales neuro-qol (depression & lower extremity function, cognitive function, fatigue, concern with death and dying, social roles and activities scales | Loss Potential threat (anxiety) Sustained threat | Reward responsiveness |
Attention Working and declarative memory Cognitive control Language | Affiliation and attachment perception and understanding of self | Circadian rhythms sleep and wakefulness arousal | Sensorimotor dynamics | |
Psilocybin 25mg po oncbrief Motivational Interviewing intervention | GRID-HAMD, TLFB, QIDS-SR, STAI blood GGT, carbohydrate deficient transferrin, AST/ALT ratio | Loss Potential threat (anxiety) Sustained threat | Reward responsiveness |
Affiliation and attachment perception and understanding of self | Circadian rhythms sleep and wakefulness arousal | |||
Treatment arm: 100μg LSD (first session) and 100 or 200μg LSD (second session) po control arm 25μg LSD (first session) and 25μg LSD (second session) po | IDS-SR/C, BDI, SCL-90, EAQ, EHS, JHS, TAS, VAS, SCQ, 5D-ASC, MS, |
Loss Potential threat (anxiety) Sustained threat | Reward responsiveness | Affiliation and attachment |
Circadian rhythms sleep and wakefulness arousal | |||
Psilocybin 0.215 mg/kg, po, once mannitol po (placebo) | BDI, MADRS, 5D-ASC |
|||||||
Psilocybin 25mg po once or niacin 100mg po (placebo) | MADRS, SDS web surveys & telephone interviews at months 2, 3, 4, 5 and 6, 8, 10, 12, 14, 16, 18, 20, 22 and 24 | |||||||
2 experimental sessions 4 weeks apart two of the following three: 1) placebo 2) psilocybin (0.1mg/kg) 3) psilocybin (0.3mg/kg) | GRID-HAM-D, QIDS-SR16 |
|||||||
Psilocybin 25mg po once Comparator: single intranasal 125mg ketamine/saline | QIDS, HAMD, MADRS |
|||||||
open label, non-randomized, crossover, fixed order; 0.1 mg/kg DMT IV 0.3 mg/kg DMT IV | ASC, VAS (anxiety, tolerability), reinforcing effects |
|||||||
Double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled N,N- DMT fumarate IV (SPL026) | Safety and tolerability data |
|||||||
Psilocybin 25mg po once as adjuvant to SSRI | MADRS, CGI | Loss Potential threat (anxiety) Sustained threat | Reward responsiveness | Affiliation and attachment perception and understanding of self | Circadian rhythms sleep and wakefulness arousal | |||
Psilocybin 25mg po once | MADRS | |||||||
Open label, non-randomized, 5-MeO-DMT (GH001), inhalation | Safety and tolerability |
|||||||
Psilocybin 25mg po | MADRS | Loss Potential threat (anxiety) Sustained threat | Reward responsiveness |
|||||
Psilocybin 0.25mg/kg, po, once niacin 250mg | Y-BOCS, A-YBOCS, MADRS, BDI, OBQ-44, OCI-R, OC-TCDQ, STAI, Q-LESQ-SF, MEQ, BABS, COM-R, SMiLE, CEQ, 5D-ASC, PANAS-X, PEQ, NRS, PEBS, IDAQ, MBDS, IOS, EPQ, AUDIT, UFEC, DUDIT, SRNU, PSQI, URICA, CGI, SDS, LOT-R, PI-R |
Acute threat (fear) Potential threat (anxiety) Others; uncertainty intolerance | reward learning & responsiveness to reward |
Cognitive control goal selection, updating, representation, and maintenanceresponse selection, inhibition, or suppression, performance monitoring | Affiliation and attachment |
Circadian rhythms sleep and wakefulness arousal | Motor actions |
|
3 groups; psilocybin 100mcg/kg psilocybin 300mcg/kg lorazepam 1mg po, once weekly for 8 weeks | YBOCS, MADRSEEG; |
|||||||
Psilocybin 25mg po once | BDD-YBOCS | Acute threat (fear) Potential threat (anxiety) | Cognitive control | Perception; |
||||
Psilocybin plant medicine microdosing 1gm to 1/5 gm every 2nd day for 8 weeks | GAF, BAM, PTSD Checklist for DSM-5 (PCL-5) | Sustained threat Loss | Attention working and declarative memory Cognitive control | Affiliation and attachment |
Circadian rhythms sleep and wakefulness arousal | |||
Psilocybin 25mg | Sustained threat Loss | Attention working and declarative memory Cognitive control | Affiliation and attachment |
Circadian rhythms sleep and wakefulness arousal | ||||
Two dosing sessions 3 weeks apart dose 1: 25mg psilocybin dose 2: 25 or 30mg (if dose 1 exhibits limited acute subjective response) comparator: diphenhydramine 75mg (or 100mg) | HAM-A, GAD-7, QIDS-SR, Mini-SPIN, AG-D, PDSS-SR, SDS, PWI, UBCS, AUDIT, DUDIT, self-reported number of cigarettes smoked, AIM, IAM, FIM | Potential threat (anxiety) Sustained threat | Reward responsiveness |
Attention working and declarative memory Cognitive control | Affiliation and attachment |
Circadian rhythms sleep and wakefulness arousal | ||
Psilocybin 0.36 mg/kg po or dextromethorphan 2.6 mg/kg po | Self-reported pain severity, PGIC, BPI | Loss | Reward responsiveness | Cognitive control Perception: somatosensory | Affiliation and attachment |
circadian rhythms sleep and wakefulness arousal | Sensorimotor |
|
Psilocybin 0.0143 mg/kg po, psilocybin 0.143 mg/kg capsule placebo: microcrystalline cellulose capsule | Migraine headache days, frequency, duration, intensity of pain/photophobia/nausea/vomiting/ phonophobia, functional disability | Potential threat (anxiety) | Perception; somatosensory & visual | Circadian rhythms sleep and wakefulness arousal | ||||
LSD microdosing | Reward anticipation, delay, receipt | Cognitive control working memory verbal fluency, executive function |
Eating disorders also involve elements of altered cognitive control/reward processing (
The “psychological flexibility” concept lacks precise definition, but broadly refers to the ability to recognize and adapt to various situational demands and shift mind-sets/behavioral repertoires (
Psychedelics acutely and dose dependently impair attention (
A computational analysis of semantic and non-semantic language in HCs who received IV LSD (75 μg) and placebo reported that LSD was associated with unconstrained speech (increased verbosity and a reduced lexicon) which was noted to be similar to speech changes during manic psychoses (
Psychedelics may induce visual imagery (
Psychedelics over-engage primary sensory cortices and mostly encompasses visual hallucinations (often geometric) with preserved insight monitoring whereas hallucinations in psychosis, are mostly related to overactivation of associative networks, mainly include auditory hallucinations and poor reality monitoring (
Similar to the previously discussed vulnerability to adverse effects of psychedelics in people with incoherent self-concept/aberrant salience in the context of psychosis spectrum disorder, baseline dysfunction in the some of the perceptual systems may increase the risk of adverse events in psychedelic therapy. For example, there is limited high-quality data on the rare condition—Hallucinogen Persisting Perception Disorder (HPPD) (
Sensorimotor systems are primarily responsible for the control and execution of motor behaviors, and their refinement during learning and development (
The highly complex Functional neurological disorders (FNDs), previously known as conversion disorders, involve not only sensorimotor, but also salience, central executive, and limbic networks (
In keeping with an interconnected systems based psychiatry paradigm that conceptualizes the individual as a complex composite of interacting systems across all levels of organization, it has been proposed that the microbial ecosystem (microbiome) may serve as an additional transdiagnostic unit of analysis in the RDoC framework (
The precise-personalized transdiagnostic paradigm is not without critics and major challenges. As yet, it has not delivered discernible translational benefits to patients (
However, the precise-personalized integrative neuroscience framework is at an early evolutionary stage (
Notwithstanding the reliance on clinical measures, currently available strategies to optimize therapeutic outcomes involve refinement of pharmacotherapy and psychotherapy schedules, though the precise ratio has yet to be determined. It appears that body weight adjusted dosing, albeit over a narrow dosing range of 20–30 mg, may have limited impact on the subjective effects of psilocybin (
There are preliminary indicators that the advances in the mechanistic understanding of psychedelics may translate into more precise-personalized approaches (
Psychedelic science and its translational corollary psychedelic therapy are evolving rapidly. Advances in the mechanistic understanding of the underlying pathways, which involve multiple interacting systems may also prompt the development of novel compounds lacking undesirable properties. Several large scale RCTs will determine whether psychedelic therapy translates into the psychiatric clinic for a range of non-psychotic spectrum disorders. Given the translatable transdiagnostic antidepressant, anxiolytic, and anti-addictive therapeutic potential of psychedelic therapy, deconstructing categorical psychiatric diagnoses according to dimensional systems and constructs that align with neurobiological systems may advance more targeted applications, with the possibility of optimizing therapeutic outcomes. As such, integration of the RDoC transdiagnostic dimensional framework with psychedelic therapy as it advances toward the psychiatric clinic has potential to progress an interconnected systems based precise-personalized psychedelic therapy paradigm and narrow the translational gap between neuroscience and psychiatry.
Further insights can be gained from clinical studies in progress with psychedelic therapy although the extent to which they have been designed with this in mind may hamper efforts at integration. Additionally, evolution of multimodal prediction estimation algorithms based on dimensional psychobiological signatures may optimize the delivery of psychedelic therapy and ultimately augment clinical assessments. Apart from the vitally important context (as broadly defined), exploratory studies have proposed baseline functional connectivity patterns and cingulate cortical thickness, autonomic nervous system activity, together with psychological factors as therapeutic predictors. Further unraveling the complex and dynamic molecular cascades and information processing pathways across all levels of analysis from micro to macro, within and between psychiatric disorders and how they converge on the acute and sustained therapeutic subjective trajectory may enhance a more complete systems level understanding of psychedelic therapy and is an important objective for translational neuroscience.
This is a narrative review which attempts to conceptualize psychedelic therapy in the context of an evolving RDoC framework and primarily focuses on the effects of psychedelics. The psychotherapy aspect as it relates to RDoC is underdeveloped. This review does not focus on a systematic analysis of the potential side-effects/risks of psychedelic therapy.
JK wrote the manuscript. CG, GC, JP, AH, CK, and VO'K edited the manuscript. All authors contributed to the article and approved the submitted version.
VO'K was supported by the Health Research Board (HRB) through HRB Grant Code: 201651.12553 and the Meath Foundation, Tallaght University Hospital. VO'K was the Principal Investigator (PI) on the COMPASS trials (COMP001, 003, 004) in Ireland. JK is sub-PI on the COMPASS trials (COMP 001, 003, 004) in Ireland. GC was supported by the HRB through (HRA POR/2011/23 and HRA-POR-2-14-647) and supported by a NARSAD Young Investigator Grant from the Brain and Behavior Research Foundation (Grant Number 20771). CG was supported by grant funding from MQ: Transforming mental health (MQ16IP13), the Global Brain Health Institute (18GPA02), and Science Foundation Ireland (19/FFP/6418).
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
We would like to thank Paul Quinlan who designed