Front. Oncol. Frontiers in Oncology Front. Oncol. 2234-943X Frontiers Media S.A. 10.3389/fonc.2022.1042789 Oncology Systematic Review Comparing the outcome between multicentric/multifocal breast cancer and unifocal breast cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis Zhang Yalan 1 2 Liu Fan 1 2 Gao Qianqian 1 Chai Yahui 1 2 Ren Yan 1 2 Tian Hongyou 1 2 Ma Bin 3 4 Song Ailin 1 2 * 1 Department of General Surgery, Lanzhou University Second Hospital, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, China 2 Second Clinical Medical College, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, China 3 Evidence-Based Medicine Center, School of Basic Medical Sciences, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, China 4 Key Laboratory of Evidence-Based Medicine and Knowledge Translation of Gansu Province, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, China

Edited by: Maria Rosaria De Miglio, University of Sassari, Italy

Reviewed by: Tibor Tot, Falun Hospital, Sweden; Marco Fogante, Marche Polytechnic University, Italy; Min Yan, Henan Provincial Cancer Hospital, China

*Correspondence: Ailin Song, songail@lzu.edu.cn

†These authors have contributed equally to this work

This article was submitted to Breast Cancer, a section of the journal Frontiers in Oncology

16 12 2022 2022 12 1042789 13 09 2022 28 11 2022 Copyright © 2022 Zhang, Liu, Gao, Chai, Ren, Tian, Ma and Song 2022 Zhang, Liu, Gao, Chai, Ren, Tian, Ma and Song

This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

Objective

This systematic review and meta-analysis compares the outcome between MMBC and unifocal breast cancer (UFBC), in order to provide a theoretical basis for the design of an appropriate clinical therapeutic strategy of MMBC patients.

Methods

PubMed, Embase, The Cochrane Library, Web of science, CNKI, WanFang Data, CBM and VIP database were searched from inception to July 2021, and observational studies reporting the outcome of patients with MMBC and UFBC were included. We extracted or calculated the mortality rates of MMBC and UFBC patients; and obtained the hazard ratios; odds ratios; relative risks; and the corresponding 95% confidence intervals from the eligible studies. All the meta-analyses were conducted by using the Stata 15.0 software.

Results

31 eligible studies comprising a total of 15,703 individuals were included. The meta-analysis revealed that MMBC did not have a significant association with poor overall survival (HR=1.04, 95% CI=0.96-1.12), disease-free survival (HR= 1.07, 95% CI= 0.84-1.36), breast cancer-specific survival (HR=1.42, 95% CI= 0.89-2.27), recurrence-free survival (HR= 0.878, 95% CI= 0.652-1.182), local recurrence-free survival (HR= 0.90, 95% CI= 0.57-1.42), and contralateral breast cancer risk (RR= 0.908, 95% CI= 0.667-1.234). However, MMBC appeared to have a correlation with a slightly higher risk of death (OR=1.31, 95% CI=1.18-1.45).

Conclusion

Patients with MMBC appeared to have a higher risk of death, however, it may not be independently associated with poorer outcomes. Considering the inter-study heterogeneity and other limitations, our results need to be validated by further multicenter prospective studies with a large sample size in the future.

Multicentric/multifocal breast cancer (MMBC) unifocal breast cancer (UFBC) prognosis systematic review meta-analysis

香京julia种子在线播放

    1. <form id=HxFbUHhlv><nobr id=HxFbUHhlv></nobr></form>
      <address id=HxFbUHhlv><nobr id=HxFbUHhlv><nobr id=HxFbUHhlv></nobr></nobr></address>

      1 Introduction

      In 2020, the estimated number of new breast cancer cases was about 2.26 million and cancer deaths were projected to be around 0.68 million worldwide (1). Globally, breast cancer is one of the most common cancers and the most frequent cause of cancer death among women.

      Breast cancer usually presents as a single lesion, but in unilateral breast cancer, multiple lesions may appear simultaneously or sequentially. To enable further study and differentiate it from the subtypes with only one separate lesion - unifocal breast cancer (UFBC), researchers have subdivided such cases into two categories. The first one is multicentric breast cancer (MCBC), wherein two or more tumors are present in more than one quadrant of the same breast, but some researchers suggest that regardless of whether the different lesions are present in multiple quadrants of the same breast, those separated by >4-5 cm from each other should be called MCBC (2, 3). The second one is multifocal breast cancer (MFBC), wherein two or more tumors are found in the same quadrant of the breast (4, 5). Regarding the minimum distance between the MFBC lesions, Lüttges et al. (6) suggested that it should be at least 2 cm, while Ustaalioglu et al. (7) suggested that the spacing distance over 1 mm was enough. However, other investigators suggested that independent lesions in the specimen needed to be observed by the naked eye (disregarding microscopic lesions) (3, 8).Moreover, others indicated that multiple lesions should be clearly separated by non-cancerous tissue or carcinoma in situ (5, 811). Considering the difficulties with measurement and precision, these two categories are often studied together, and called multicentric/multifocal breast cancer (MMBC) (9).

      At present, the prevalence of MMBC ranges between 6% - 77% (5, 1214). Although MMBC is a common occurrence, its clinicopathological characteristics, precise therapeutic strategies, and prognosis and survival are not well characterized. Past studies have shown that MMBC was correlated with an increase in the lymph-node involvement, less differentiation, HER-2 positivity and lymphovascular invasion as compared to UFBC (4, 13, 15). In terms of the prognosis, many studies have explored the differences between MMBC and UFBC, but the findings have been largely inconclusive. Some studies have shown that MMBC patients had a higher mortality rate and shorter survival than the UFBC patients, and suggested that MMBC as an independent prognostic risk factor (4, 16, 17). However, others reported that MMBC patients had a similar prognosis as the UFBC patients (5, 10, 18), in terms of the OS and the DFS. The eighth edition of the AJCC TNM staging system of breast cancer indicates that the overall prognostic impact of smaller lesions on MMBC is not considered. However, the guidelines also emphasize the importance of a comprehensive judgment in the real clinical practice, especially when synchronous invasive tumors are identified (19). Therefore, there are conflicting reports regarding the prognosis of MMBC and UFBC patients, and whether MMBC is associated with a poorer prognosis is controversial (4, 5, 9, 16, 17, 2024).

      Thus, the current study summarizes the studies related to the comparison of prognosis between MMBC and UFBC patients, and synthesizes a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the differences in the prognosis, in order to provide a theoretical basis for the design of an appropriate therapeutic strategy for treating MMBC patients.

      2 Methods

      The study was conducted in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) guidelines (25).

      2.1 Eligibility criteria

      The inclusion criteria for the study were as follows: (1) Participants: female patients with pathologically proven stages I-III of unilateral invasive breast cancer, aged ≥18 years, without contralateral breast cancer, without distant metastases, without any previous or concomitant malignant disease, without any limitation due to race or nationality; (2) Exposure: patients with clinically or image-based or pathologically diagnosed MMBC or UFBC; (3) Outcomes: mortality rates of MMBC and UFBC, overall survival (OS), disease-free survival (DFS), breast cancer-specific survival (BCSS), recurrence-free survival (RFS), local recurrence-free survival (LRFS), risk of contralateral breast cancer (CBC); (5) Type of study: case-control and cohort studies.

      The exclusion criteria were as follows: (1) articles without a clear definition of MMBC; (2) MFBC or MCBC only; (3) duplicate articles; (4) articles published in languages other than English or Chinese.

      2.2 Information sources and search strategy

      The following eight electronic databases were independently searched by two researchers (YLZ and FL) and the timeline was set at July 2021: PubMed; Embase; the Cochrane Library; Web of Science; CNKI; WanFang Data; CBM; and the VIP database. The references of the included studies and previous MMBC related systematic reviews were also checked, and the relevant literature was manually added if available. Before the final analyses, we re-searched the literature to ensure that any study meeting the inclusion criteria was included as far as possible. The detailed search strategies are showed in Appendix Table 1 .

      2.3 Study selection

      Two researchers (YLZ and FL) checked all the collected studies independently and if there was any disagreement between them, a discussion or the third reviewer (QQG)’s decision was taken into account. All the retrieved literature were imported into Endnote X9 software. After removing the duplicates, we firstly screened the articles by the title and abstract and then identified the final included studies through the full-text reading of previously screened literature. Then, we recorded the reasons for excluding the literature in the last two steps.

      2.4 Data collection

      Three researchers were involved in the data collection task. Two of them (YLZ and FL) independently collected the data from the included studies and recorded them in a pre-defined spreadsheet by using the Microsoft Excel 2021 software. The differences of opinion were discussed, and if they were still unresolved, a third Reviewer (QQG)’s opinion was taken into account. We extracted the following information from the included studies: (1) the first author’s name and the publication year, region where the study was conducted, study design, and recruitment period; (2) the sample size and age; (3) follow-up time; (4) definition of MMBC; (5) the AJCC edition used for the T-staging; (7) mortality rates of MMBC and UFBC patients. If the data needed further confirmation, the corresponding author of the article was contacted by email.

      2.5 Quality assessment

      The risk of bias was assessed by using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) (26), whose full mark was 9, a score of 8 to 9 was considered as low risk of bias (high quality literature), a score of 5~7 was considered as moderate risk (moderate quality literature), and a score of 0~4 was considered as high risk (low quality literature). The risk of bias was independently assessed by two researchers (YLZ and FL) and the discrepancies were resolved by discussion or a third reviewer’s (QQG) decision was taken into account.

      2.6 Statistical analysis

      In this study, we extracted or calculated the mortality rates for MMBC and UFBC patients, and the HRs, RRs and ORs with the corresponding 95% CIs were obtained from the multivariate analyses of the included studies. If two or more studies reported the data of an outcome, a meta-analysis was performed, otherwise, only a descriptive analysis was performed. All the meta-analyses were completed by using the Stata 15.0 software. The Cochrane’s Q-test was applied to evaluate the inter-study heterogeneity and the I2 statistic was used to quantify the degree of heterogeneity. If the studies were without statistical heterogeneity, the meta-analysis was conducted using the fixed-effects model. If I2 ≥50% and P<0.10, it indicated that there was a significant and substantial heterogeneity (27) among the studies, and hence a random-effects model was employed after excluding the significant clinical heterogeneity. When there was a significant clinical heterogeneity, sensitivity and subgroup analyses were used, or only a descriptive analysis was performed. P<0.05 was considered as statistically significant. The publication bias was evaluated using funnel plots or the Egger’s test when over 10 studies were included. When P > 0.05, it suggested the absence of publication bias. And if there was a publication bias, the trim-and-fill method was used to assess the further effect of publication bias on the results.

      3 Results 3.1 Search results

      The eight databases were searched and a total of 15,703 articles were retrieved. After removing the duplicate articles, 10,027 were available for further screening. 9933 articles were excluded after browsing the titles and abstracts, and the full-text was examined for 94 studies. Lastly, 31 articles (25, 711, 13, 14, 1618, 2024, 2839) met the eligibility criteria mentioned previously. The detailed selection procedures and statistics are shown in Figure 1 .

      Flowchart of literature selection.

      3.2 Study characteristics

      Among the included studies, four (5, 14, 18, 39) were prospective cohort studies, twenty-seven (24, 711, 13, 16, 17, 2024, 2838) were retrospective cohort studies, and one (23) was a retrospective age-matched cohort study. The total number of participants was 88,147 and the sample sizes ranged from 118 (29) to 25,320 (14). The follow-up for fifteen studies was over 60 months (4, 811, 14, 17, 20, 23, 29, 31, 33, 34, 36, 39), and seven studies were published within 5 years (5, 9, 2123, 33, 35). The detailed information is presented in Appendix Table 2 .

      3.3 Assessment of the quality of the included articles

      The quality of the included studies was evaluated using the NOS scale. Seventeen studies (3, 4, 7, 911, 14, 16, 17, 23, 28, 29, 3335, 38, 39) were of high quality, while fourteen (2, 5, 8, 13, 18, 2022, 24, 3032, 36, 37) were of moderate quality and none of the study was of low quality. The details are listed in Appendix Figure 1 .

      3.4 Outcomes Overall survival

      9 studies (7, 10, 13, 16, 20, 21, 30, 32, 39) were enrolled in the analysis of OS, 8 (7, 10, 13, 16, 20, 30, 32, 39) of them reported HRs and 1 (21) reported OR. The heterogeneity test was not statistically significant (I2 = 45.1%, P=0.059), and 8 HRs were selected for the meta-analysis using the fixed-effects model. The analysis revealed no statistically significant relationship between MMBC and poor OS in the multivariate analysis (HR=1.04, 95% CI= 0.96-1.12, I2 = 45.1%, P=0.059, 8 studies) ( Figure 2 ). Moreover, Djordjevic-Jovanovic et al. (21) reported no remarkable difference in the 5-year OS between UFBC and MMBC patients in a multivariate analysis (OR=0.91, 95% CI=0.65-1.21, P=0.51).

      Forest plot of OS comparing MMBC and UFBC.

      Disease-free survival

      In total, four studies (7, 16, 24, 30) were integrated into the HRs analysis of DFS. Heterogeneity tests showed statistical significance and therefore a random effects model was applied. The results indicated that compared to UFBC, MMBC was not associated with poorer DFS by multivariate analysis (HR=1.07, 95% CI=0.84-1.36, I2 = 76.6%, P=0.001, 4 studies) ( Figure 3 ).

      Forest plot of DFS comparing MMBC and UFBC.

      Breast cancer specific survival

      Four studies (4, 13, 17, 39) were included for the analysis of BCSS, 3 studies (13, 17, 39) reported HRs, and 1 study (4) reported RR. The 3 HRs were selected for the meta-analysis, and the heterogeneity was noticeable (I2 = 65.0%, P=0.022), thus we chose a random-effects model to perform the analysis. In the multivariate analysis, the meta-analysis showed that in comparison with UFBC, MMBC had no clear correlation with poorer BCSS (HR=1.42, 95% CI=0.89-2.27, 3 studies) ( Figure 4 ). Moreover, Boyages et al. (4) reported four RR values for BCSS from multivariate analysis. They used aggregate tumor size of each foci in MMBC or the dominant tumor size of MMBC to determine the “T-stage” and set a 2 cm tumor diameter boundary. The results showed that when the tumor diameter was less than 2 cm, there was no statistical difference in the 10-year BCSS between the UFBC and MMBC patients (Dominant: RR (95% CI) =0.86 (0.39-1.87), P=0.695; Aggregate: RR (95% CI) =1.00 (0.36-2.76), P=1.00). When the tumor diameter was greater than 2 cm, the results of the aggregate tumor size staging method also indicated no significant difference between the two groups, but the largest or the dominant tumor size staging system showed a different result (Dominant: RR (95% CI) =1.91(1.15-3.16), P=0.012; Aggregate: RR (95% CI) =1.13(0.82-2.09), P=0.267).

      Forest plot of BCSS comparing MMBC and UFBC.

      Recurrence-free survival

      The analysis of HRs for the RFS was comprised of two studies (13, 32). A fixed-effect model meta-analysis demonstrated that in the multivariate analysis, compared with UFBC, MMBC was not significantly associated with poorer RFS (HR= 0.878, 95% CI=0.652-1.182, I2 = 0.00%, P=0.977, 2 studies) ( Figure 5 ).

      Forest plot of RFS comparing MMBC and UFBC.

      Local recurrence-free survival

      For LRFS, three studies (5, 24, 39) were included in the HRs meta-analysis. The results were analyzed using a fixed-effects model, and suggested that MMBC was not significantly associated with poorer LRFS by multivariate analysis (HR=0.90, 95% CI=0.57-1.42, I2 = 48.2%, P=0.145, 3 studies) ( Figure 6 ).

      Forest plot of LRFS comparing MMBC and UFBC.

      Mortality rates

      10 studies (4, 9, 13, 14, 16, 17, 20, 23, 24, 32) described the mortality rates of MMBC and UFBC patients. Meta-analysis by fixed-effects model showed that in comparison with UFBC, MMBC was associated with a higher mortality (OR=1.31, 95% CI=1.18-1.45, I2 = 36.0%, P=0.12, 10 studies) ( Figure 7 ).

      Forest plot of the mortality rates of MMBC versus UFBC patients.

      Contralateral breast cancer

      Only one study (14) among the included literature reported the multivariate analysis results of CBC risk. Yerushalmi et al. (14) concluded that MMBC was not significantly associated with higher risk of CBC (RR=0.908, 95% CI=0.667-1.234, P = 0.537).

      4 Discussion

      In this review, we pooled the data for MMBC and UFBC with regards to the OS, DFS, RFS, BCSS, LRFS, mortality, and CBC aspects and performed a meta-analysis. The final results showed that MMBC patients had a similar prognosis as the UFBC patients, except for a slightly higher mortality rate.

      4.1 MMBC patients may have a slightly higher mortality rate

      In this paper, we found that MMBC patients had a slightly higher mortality rate than the UFBC patients (OR=1.31, 95% CI=1.18-1.45), which could mainly be because MMBC patients had a relatively high total tumor load and more aggressive biological behavior. In a previously published review, compared to UFBC, MMBC was shown to have a higher proportion of poorly differentiated tumors and a greater risk of vascular invasion (2), which suggested that MMBC was associated with extensive intra-ductal lesions and an invasive lobular carcinoma component, which might increase the risk of positive surgical margins (4042). At the same time, MMBC patients were more likely to develop tumor recurrence and metastases. And Neri et al. (17) found that MMBC was associated with the absence of ER and Her2-neu positive status which may reduce the possibility of MMBC patients benefiting from endocrine therapy and targeted therapy. Moreover, Lang et al. (43) reported a higher rate of axillary lymph node metastasis and a higher Ki67 proliferation index in MMBC patients compared to the UFBC patients, which to some extent suggested that MMBC patients might have a poorer outcome. However, previous studies (23, 44) reported that when controlling for the age, there was no significant difference in mortality between UFBC and MMBC patients (5.3% versus 7%, P = 0.89 with a median follow-up period of 3 years and 13% versus 14.7%, P = 0.89 with a median follow-up period of 7 years). And it is worth noting that more MMBC patients in this cohort opted for total mastectomy, which could have provided a survival benefit for patients these patients. Additionally, Yerushalmi et al. (39) reported that patients who underwent breast-conserving surgery in stages I-II also showed a similar mortality as compared to MMBC and UFBC patients, but the MMBC group had less severe disease compared to the UFBC patients. The results for the comparison of mortality rates between the two groups in our study showed that MMBC patients had a higher risk of death, but in the early stage breast cancer, appropriate surgery and adjuvant treatment may also offer survival benefits for MMBC patients (4, 5, 39). Therefore, early screening for breast cancer is important, and timely diagnosis and early intervention may not only provide a survival benefit, but also allow some patients to be suitable for and benefit from less invasive surgical modalities.

      4.2 MMBC per se may not represent a poorer prognosis

      The findings from the current study showed that there were no significant differences between UFBC and MMBC patients in terms of the OS, DFS, RFS, BCSS, and LRFS in multivariate analysis, which may be due to the fact that MMBC per se is not associated with a worse prognosis. It was reported that the MMBC patients were younger, had larger tumors, had greater involvement of lymph nodes, and many of them were in pre-menopausal stage in comparison to the UFBC patients (11, 13, 28, 45, 46). The above risk factors made MMBC patients more likely to undergo mastectomy as well as receive more adjuvant therapy to some extent. When these factors were controlled in the multivariate analysis, most of the studies showed that MMBC no longer had an independent effect on the OS and DFS. However, some studies still found that MMBC was an independent prognostic factor for the OS and DFS in multivariate analysis (11, 16, 47). Meanwhile, the results from a previous systematic review (48) showed that MMBC was associated with poorer OS, but after excluding one study (49) with significant heterogeneity, the results no longer showed that MMBC was associated with poorer OS. Upon reviewing recent studies (5, 9, 2123), we found that MMBC may be associated with some worse prognosis factors, but MMBC patients often had a similar prognosis as UFBC, which could be due to the advances in imaging technologies and pathological diagnostic techniques and the continuous optimization of the therapeutic options. Pre-operative breast MRI shows good utility in determining tumor boundaries and detection of additional tumor foci, and is not influenced by different histotypes, which helps to provide the best local treatment for MMBC patients (50). In the past, the majority of MMBC patients underwent mastectomy for the discerned higher risk for in-breast recurrence and less good cosmetic outcome. But in recent publications, breast conserving surgery can be performed in selected MMBC patients (51) and the use of daVinci Robot can improve cosmetic results (52).

      For the multivariate analysis of RFS, LRFS and BCSS, the general trend supported the finding that MMBC patients had a similar prognosis to that of UFBC patients. However, only few studies were included in these outcome indicators, which may affects the results reliability. A study on outcomes in 1163 MFBC/UFBC patients reported that MFBC was independently significantly associated with LRFS, DFS, and OS, but this study did not adjust for pathologic stage, T stage and nodal status (49). Thus, further prospective studies with larger samples are needed to confirm the above findings.

      Our meta-analysis results on DFS and BCSS indicated a significant and substantial heterogeneity among the included studies. And we think clinical factors cause heterogeneity mainly. With fewer studies included under each outcome indicators, the subgroup analysis may not produce meaningful results. But a decreased heterogeneity was also seen when we attempted to perform subgroup analysis based on some clinical factors ( Appendix Figure 2 ).

      4.3 MMBC may not increase the risk of CBC

      Among the included studies, only one study (14) reported the results related to the development of contralateral breast cancer in multivariate analysis. And the results supported the opinion that MMBC was only a representative of intra-mammary spreading, whereas CBC was an independent event. This finding may help to alleviate anxiety and panic among the patients with MMBC, as some patients may receive excessive treatment or even make a hasty decision to undergo prophylactic surgery after the diagnosis owing to their fear of developing CBC. Moreover, the study by Kurtz et al. (31) also showed a similar probability of CBC in MMBC and UFBC (3% versus 4%) patients. However, some of the current tools to assess the risk of CBC also incorporate MMBC as a risk term and have shown a better predictive power (53). There isn’t enough evidence regarding the association between MMBC and CBC, and it is hoped that more original studies will report relevant data to support CBC-related analysis.

      4.4 The prognostic role of the remaining lesions in MMBC needs further investigation

      Breast cancer is a heterogeneous group of diseases with regard to clinical manifestation, tumor morphology, and immunohistochemical differences within tumors (54). And a recent publication emphasized that MMBC has a higher risk of metastasis, recurrence, and a worse prognosis, compared to UFBC with similar staging (TNM), and sometimes the largest one is not always the most aggressive one, and more than one tumor should be evaluated (55). Data from Boyages et al. (4) on BCSS showed that the use of different criteria for assessing the tumor T-staging could influence the final results, which showed that for tumors >20 mm in diameter, MMBC was associated with poorer BCSS after using the largest or dominant tumor size of MMBC to assess the T-staging. On the other hand, when the aggregated diameter of the lesions were used to assess the tumor staging, MMBC and UFBC patients were found to have a similar prognosis. However, Duraker et al. (2) reported that MMBC and UFBC patients had similar prognosis regardless of whether the T-staging was assessed by using the largest tumor diameter or the aggregated diameter of all the lesions. Also, several studies (13, 28) have concluded that the current TNM staging could be a good assessment of MMBC tumor load, and also showed that the difference in the overall prognosis between MMBC and UFBC patients was not statistically significant. However, it is worth noting that Fushimi et al. (9) reported that MMBC was not associated with a worse prognosis, but at the same time showed that MMBC was a major prognostic factor for DFS after assessing the T-staging using the aggregated diameter of the lesions (HR= 2.710, 95% CI= 1.011-7.264, P= 0.048). Therefore, the method for assessing the T-stage of MMBC may influence the results for prognosis in multivariate analyses, and the prognostic impact of the remaining lesions in MMBC requires further investigation.

      4.5 Strengths and limitations

      In this systematic review and meta-analysis, several studies were included to assess the difference in the prognosis between MMBC and UFBC patients. Here, we searched eight databases using a relatively broad terminology and our search strategy ensured as far as possible, that none of the potentially relevant studies were excluded. However, the current study suffers from some limitations. First, most of the included studies were retrospective cohort studies which may existed selection bias and data analysis bias. Second, the definition and diagnostic criteria of MMBC was not completely consistent across all the included studies. These discrepancies affected the detection of MMBC, and it could have affected the reliability of the meta-analysis results. Third, as the heterogeneity among the included studies were significant and fewer studies were included under some of the outcome indicators, the source of heterogeneity was difficult to determine and limited the accuracy of our findings further. Finally, the limitation of the choice of language could have increased the publication or language bias.

      5 Conclusions

      In summary, patients with MMBC appeared to have a higher risk of death, however, it may be not independently associated with poor OS, DFS, RFS, BCSS, LRFS, and CBC risk. With appropriate surgical interventions and adjuvant therapies, the prognosis of patients with MMBC and UFBC was similar, but the prognostic impact of every lesion in MMBC still needs further investigation. Further multicenter prospective studies with larger sample size are needed for validating the findings from the current study.

      Data availability statement

      The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article/ Supplementary Material . Further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author.

      Author contributions

      All authors contributed to the study conception and design. Study selection, data extraction and analysis were performed by YZ, FL and QG. The first draft of the manuscript was written by YZ and all authors commented on previous versions of the manuscript. All authors contributed to the article and approved the submitted version.

      Funding

      This study was supported by Natural Science Foundation of Gansu Province, China (grant number: 20JR5RA342).

      Acknowledgments

      The authors would like to thank all the reviewers who participated in the review, as well as the Science and Technology Department of Gansu Province, the Center for Evidence-Based Medicine of Lanzhou University and the Second Hospital of Lanzhou University for their support.

      Conflict of interest

      The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

      Publisher’s note

      All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

      Supplementary material

      The Supplementary Material for this article can be found online at: /articles/10.3389/fonc.2022.1042789/full#supplementary-material

      References Latest global cancer data: cancer burden rises to 19.3 million new cases and 10.0 million cancer deaths in 2020 . Available at: https://www.iarc.who.int/faq/latest-global-cancer-data-2020-qa/. Duraker N Caynak ZC . Axillary lymph node status and prognosis in multifocal and multicentric breast carcinoma. Breast J (2014) 20(1):61–8. doi: 10.1111/tbj.12205 Katz A Strom EA Buchholz TA Theriault R Singletary SE McNeese MD . The influence of pathologic tumor characteristics on locoregional recurrence rates following mastectomy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Physics (2001) 50(3):735–42. doi: 10.1016/S0360-3016(01)01500-0 Boyages J Jayasinghe UW Coombs N . Multifocal breast cancer and survival: Each focus does matter particularly for larger tumours. Eur J Cancer (2010) 46(11):1990–6. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2010.03.003 Ozturk A Ilgun S Ucuncu M Gachayev F Ordu C Alco G . The effect of multifocal and multicentric tumours on local recurrence and survival outcomes in breast cancer. J BUON (2021) 26(1):196203. Lüttges J Kalbfleisch H Prinz P . Nipple involvement and multicentricity in breast cancer. a study on whole organ sections. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol (1987) 113(5):481–7. doi: 10.1007/BF00390043 Ustaalioglu BO Bilici A Kefeli U Seker M Oncel M Gezen C . The importance of Multifocal/Multicentric tumor on the disease-free survival of breast cancer patients single center experience. Am J Clin Oncol Cancer Clin Trials (2012) 35(6):580–6. doi: 10.1097/COC.0b013e31822d9cd6 Wilson LD Beinfield M Mckhann CF Haffty BG . Conservative surgery and radiation in the treatment of synchronous ipsilateral breast cancers. Cancer (1993) 72(1):137–42. doi: 10.1002/1097-0142(19930701)72:1<137::AID-CNCR2820720126>3.0.CO;2-E Fushimi A Yoshida A Yagata H Takahashi O Hayashi N Suzuki K . Prognostic impact of multifocal and multicentric breast cancer versus unifocal breast cancer. Surg Today (2019) 49(3):224–30. doi: 10.1007/s00595-018-1725-9 Pedersen L Gunnarsdottir KA Rasmussen BB Moeller S Lanng C . The prognostic influence of multifocality in breast cancer patients. Breast (2004) 13(3):188–93. doi: 10.1016/j.breast.2003.11.004 Tot T Gere M Pekár G Tarján M Hofmeyer S Hellberg D . Breast cancer multifocality, disease extent, and survival. Hum Pathol (2011) 42(11):1761–9. doi: 10.1016/j.humpath.2011.02.002 Jain S Rezo A Shadbolt B Dahlstrom JE . Synchronous multiple ipsilateral breast cancers: implications for patient management. Pathology (2009) 41(1):5767. doi: 10.1080/00313020802563502 Lynch SP Lei X Chavez-Macgregor M Hsu L Meric-Bernstam F Buchholz TA . Multifocality and multicentricity in breast cancer and survival outcomes. Ann Oncol (2012) 23(12):3063–9. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mds136 Yerushalmi R Kennecke H Woods R Olivotto IA Speers C Gelmon KA . Does multicentric/multifocal breast cancer differ from unifocal breast cancer? an analysis of survival and contralateral breast cancer incidence. Breast Cancer Res Treat (2009) 117(2):365–70. doi: 10.1007/s10549-008-0265-1 Aalders KC Kuijer A Straver ME Slaets L Litiere S Viale G . Characterisation of multifocal breast cancer using the 70-gene signature in clinical low-risk patients enrolled in the EORTC 10041/BIG 03-04 MINDACT trial. Eur J Cancer (2017) 79:98105. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2017.03.034 El-Sheredy HG El-Benhawy SA Matrawy K Ramadan R Hamed Y . Multifocal/multicentric versus unifocal breast cancer: What is the difference? Middle East J Cancer (2016) 7(2):6978. Neri A Marrelli D Megha T Bettarini F Tacchini D De Franco L . "Clinical significance of multifocal and multicentric breast cancers and choice of surgical treatment: a retrospective study on a series of 1158 cases". BMC Surg (2015) 15:1. doi: 10.1186/1471-2482-15-1 Fowble B Yeh IT Schultz DJ Solin LJ Rosato EF Jardines L . The role of mastectomy in patients with stage I-II breast cancer presenting with gross multifocal or multicentric disease or diffuse microcalcifications. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Physics (1993) 27(3):567–73. doi: 10.1016/0360-3016(93)90381-5 Giuliano AE Connolly JL Edge SB Mittendorf EA Rugo HS Solin LJ . Breast cancer-major changes in the American joint committee on cancer eighth edition cancer staging manual. CA Cancer J Clin (2017) 67(4):290303. doi: 10.3322/caac.21393 Boros M Voidazan S Moldovan C Georgescu R Toganel C Moncea D . Clinical implications of multifocality as a prognostic factor in breast carcinoma - a multivariate analysis study comprising 460 cases. Int J Clin Exp Med (2015) 8(6):9839–46. Djordjevic-Jovanovic L Karanikolic A Bojic T Pesic I Djordjevic M Marinkovic M . Characteristics and outcomes of patients with multifocal/ multicentric and unifocal breast cancer. J BUON (2017) 22(3):652–7. Karakas Y Dizdar O Aksoy S Hayran M Altundag K . The effect of total size of lesions in Multifocal/Multicentric breast cancer on survival. Clin Breast Cancer Karakas (2018) 18(4):320–7. doi: 10.1016/j.clbc.2017.11.002 Kuan LL Tiong LU Parkyn R Walters D Lai C Walsh D . Disease recurrence and survival in patients with multifocal breast cancer: a follow-up study with 7-year results. ANZ J Surg (2017) 87(10):E125–E8. doi: 10.1111/ans.13193 Shaikh T Tam TY Li T Hayes SB Goldstein L Bleicher R . Multifocal and multicentric breast cancer is associated with increased local recurrence regardless of surgery type. Breast J (2015) 21(2):121–6. doi: 10.1111/tbj.12366 Page MJ McKenzie JE Bossuyt PM Boutron I Hoffmann TC Mulrow CD . The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ (2021) 372:n71. doi: 10.1136/bmj.n71 Stang A . Critical evaluation of the Newcastle-Ottawa scale for the assessment of the quality of nonrandomized studies in meta-analyses. Eur J Epidemiol (2010) 25(9):603–5. doi: 10.1007/s10654-010-9491-z Higgins JP Thompson SG Deeks JJ Altman DG . Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses. Bmj (2003) 327(7414):557–60. doi: 10.1136/bmj.327.7414.557 Cabioglu N Ozmen V Kaya H Tuzlali S Igci A Muslumanoglu M . Increased lymph node positivity in multifocal and multicentric breast cancer. J Am Coll Surg (2009) 208(1):6774. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2008.09.001 Egan RL . Multicentric breast carcinomas: Clinical-radiographic-pathologic whole organ studies and 10-year survival. Cancer (1982) 49(6):1123–30. doi: 10.1002/1097-0142(19820315)49:6<1123::AID-CNCR2820490610>3.0.CO;2-R Joergensen LE Gunnarsdottir KA Lanng C Moeller S Rasmussen BB . Multifocality as a prognostic factor in breast cancer patients registered in Danish breast cancer cooperative group (DBCG) 1996-2001. Breast (2008) 17(6):587–91. doi: 10.1016/j.breast.2008.06.004 Kurtz JM Jacquemier J Amalric R Brandone H Ayme Y Hans D . Breast-conserving therapy for macroscopically multiple cancers. Ann Surg (1990) 212(1):3844. doi: 10.1097/00000658-199007000-00006 Litton JK Eralp Y Gonzalez-Angulo AM Broglio K Uyei A Hortobagyi GN . Multifocal breast cancer in women < or =35 years old. Cancer (2007) 110(7):1445–50. doi: 10.1002/cncr.22928 Mastropasqua MG Addante F Pirola S Ingravallo G Viale G . Correlation of size and focality with prognosis in small breast carcinoma: a single institution case series. Breast (2020) 54:164–9. doi: 10.1016/j.breast.2020.10.006 Middleton LP Vlastos G Mirza NQ Eva S Sahin AA . Multicentric mammary carcinoma: evidence of monoclonal proliferation. Cancer (2002) 94(7):1910–6. doi: 10.1002/cncr.10452 Milulescu A Ilie S Toesca A Filipescu A Clim N Mitran M . A retrospective study on multifocal and multicentric vs. unifocal breast cancer. preliminary results. Ginecoeu (2017) 13(2):5964. doi: 10.18643/gieu.2017.59 Pekar G Hofmeyer S Tabár L Tarján M Chen TH Yen AM . Multifocal breast cancer documented in large-format histology sections: long-term follow-up results by molecular phenotypes. Cancer (2013) 119(6):1132–9. doi: 10.1002/cncr.27877 Tan MP Sitoh NY Sitoh YY . Optimising breast conservation treatment for multifocal and multicentric breast cancer: A worthwhile endeavour? World J Surg (2016) 40(2):315–22. doi: 10.1007/s00268-015-3336-6 Wolters R Wöckel A Janni W Novopashenny I Ebner F Kreienberg R . Comparing the outcome between multicentric and multifocal breast cancer: What is the impact on survival, and is there a role for guideline-adherent adjuvant therapy? a retrospective multicenter cohort study of 8,935 patients. Breast Cancer Res Treat (2013) 142(3):579–90. doi: 10.1007/s10549-013-2772-y Yerushalmi R Tyldesley S Woods R Kennecke HF Speers C Gelmon KA . Is breast-conserving therapy a safe option for patients with tumor multicentricity and multifocality? Ann Oncol (2012) 23(4):876–81. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdr326 Bani MR Lux MP Heusinger K Wenkel E Magener A Schulz-Wendtland R . Factors correlating with reexcision after breast-conserving therapy. Eur J Surg Oncol (2009) 35(1):32–7. doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2008.04.008 Lagios MD . Pathologic features related to local recurrence following lumpectomy and irradiation. Semin Surg Oncol (1992) 8(3):122–8. Sabel MS Rogers K Griffith K Jagsi R Kleer CG Diehl KA . Residual disease after re-excision lumpectomy for close margins. J Surg Oncol (2009) 99(2):99103. doi: 10.1002/jso.21215 Lang Z Wu Y Li C Li X Wang X Qu G . Multifocal and multicentric breast carcinoma: A significantly more aggressive tumor than unifocal breast cancer. Anticancer Res (2017) 37(8):4593–8. doi: 10.18643/gieu.2017.59 Tiong LU Parkyn R Walters D Field J Lai C Walsh DC . Dilemma in multifocal breast cancer – largest versus aggregate diameter. ANZ J Surg (2011) 81(9):614–8. doi: 10.1111/j.1445-2197.2010.05569.x Coombs NJ Boyages J . Multifocal and multicentric breast cancer: does each focus matter? J Clin Oncol Off J Am Soc Clin Oncol (2005) 23(30):7497–502. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2005.02.1147 Rezo A Dahlstrom J Shadbolt B Rodins K Zhang Y Davis AJ . Tumor size and survival in multicentric and multifocal breast cancer. Breast (2011) 20(3):259–63. doi: 10.1016/j.breast.2011.01.005 Weissenbacher TM Zschage M Janni W Jeschke U Dimpfl T Mayr D . Multicentric and multifocal versus unifocal breast cancer: Is the tumor-node-metastasis classification justified? Breast Cancer Res Treat (2010) 122(1):2734. doi: 10.1007/s10549-010-0917-9 Vera-Badillo FE Napoleone M Ocana A Templeton AJ Seruga B Al-Mubarak M . Effect of multifocality and multicentricity on outcome in early stage breast cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Breast Cancer Res Treat (2014) 146(2):235–44. doi: 10.1007/s10549-014-3018-3 Chung AP Huynh K Kidner T Mirzadehgan P Sim MS Giuliano AE . Comparison of outcomes of breast conserving therapy in multifocal and unifocal invasive breast cancer. J Am Coll Surg (2012) 215(1):137–46. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2012.05.006 Prochowski Iamurri A Ponziani M Macchini M Fogante M Pistelli M De Lisa M . Evaluation of multifocality and multicentricity with breast magnetic resonance imaging in each breast cancer subtype. Clin Breast Cancer (2018) 18(2):e231–e5. doi: 10.1016/j.clbc.2017.10.012 Fang M Zhang X Zhang H Wu K Yu Y Sheng Y . Local control of breast conservation therapy versus mastectomy in multifocal or multicentric breast cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Breast Care (Basel Switzerland) (2019) 14(4):188–93. doi: 10.1159/000499439 Toesca A Peradze N Manconi A Galimberti V Intra M Colleoni M . Robotic nipple-sparing mastectomy for the treatment of breast cancer: Feasibility and safety study. Breast (2017) 31:51–6. doi: 10.1016/j.breast.2016.10.009 Völkel V Hueting TA Draeger T van Maaren MC de Munck L Strobbe LJA . Improved risk estimation of locoregional recurrence, secondary contralateral tumors and distant metastases in early breast cancer: the INFLUENCE 2.0 model. Breast Cancer Res Treat (2021) 189(3):817–26. doi: 10.1007/s10549-021-06335-z Polyak K . Heterogeneity in breast cancer. J Clin Invest (2011) 121(10):3786–8. doi: 10.1172/JCI60534 Onisâi M Dumitru A Iordan I Aliuş C Teodor O Alexandru A . Synchronous multiple breast cancers-do we need to reshape staging? Medicina (Kaunas Lithuania) (2020) 56(5). doi: 10.3390/medicina56050230
      ‘Oh, my dear Thomas, you haven’t heard the terrible news then?’ she said. ‘I thought you would be sure to have seen it placarded somewhere. Alice went straight to her room, and I haven’t seen her since, though I repeatedly knocked at the door, which she has locked on the inside, and I’m sure it’s most unnatural of her not to let her own mother comfort her. It all happened in a moment: I have always said those great motor-cars shouldn’t be allowed to career about the streets, especially when they are all paved with cobbles as they are at Easton Haven, which are{331} so slippery when it’s wet. He slipped, and it went over him in a moment.’ My thanks were few and awkward, for there still hung to the missive a basting thread, and it was as warm as a nestling bird. I bent low--everybody was emotional in those days--kissed the fragrant thing, thrust it into my bosom, and blushed worse than Camille. "What, the Corner House victim? Is that really a fact?" "My dear child, I don't look upon it in that light at all. The child gave our picturesque friend a certain distinction--'My husband is dead, and this is my only child,' and all that sort of thing. It pays in society." leave them on the steps of a foundling asylum in order to insure [See larger version] Interoffice guff says you're planning definite moves on your own, J. O., and against some opposition. Is the Colonel so poor or so grasping—or what? Albert could not speak, for he felt as if his brains and teeth were rattling about inside his head. The rest of[Pg 188] the family hunched together by the door, the boys gaping idiotically, the girls in tears. "Now you're married." The host was called in, and unlocked a drawer in which they were deposited. The galleyman, with visible reluctance, arrayed himself in the garments, and he was observed to shudder more than once during the investiture of the dead man's apparel. HoME香京julia种子在线播放 ENTER NUMBET 0016www.footballc.com.cn
      www.jgchain.com.cn
      ffwyqt.com.cn
      www.haoqian.net.cn
      kbwhsp.com.cn
      liujifutu.com.cn
      www.hosegroup.com.cn
      www.gxwns.com.cn
      www.ipopay.com.cn
      sjmrchat.com.cn
      处女被大鸡巴操 强奸乱伦小说图片 俄罗斯美女爱爱图 调教强奸学生 亚洲女的穴 夜来香图片大全 美女性强奸电影 手机版色中阁 男性人体艺术素描图 16p成人 欧美性爱360 电影区 亚洲电影 欧美电影 经典三级 偷拍自拍 动漫电影 乱伦电影 变态另类 全部电 类似狠狠鲁的网站 黑吊操白逼图片 韩国黄片种子下载 操逼逼逼逼逼 人妻 小说 p 偷拍10幼女自慰 极品淫水很多 黄色做i爱 日本女人人体电影快播看 大福国小 我爱肏屄美女 mmcrwcom 欧美多人性交图片 肥臀乱伦老头舔阴帝 d09a4343000019c5 西欧人体艺术b xxoo激情短片 未成年人的 插泰国人夭图片 第770弾み1 24p 日本美女性 交动态 eee色播 yantasythunder 操无毛少女屄 亚洲图片你懂的女人 鸡巴插姨娘 特级黄 色大片播 左耳影音先锋 冢本友希全集 日本人体艺术绿色 我爱被舔逼 内射 幼 美阴图 喷水妹子高潮迭起 和后妈 操逼 美女吞鸡巴 鸭个自慰 中国女裸名单 操逼肥臀出水换妻 色站裸体义术 中国行上的漏毛美女叫什么 亚洲妹性交图 欧美美女人裸体人艺照 成人色妹妹直播 WWW_JXCT_COM r日本女人性淫乱 大胆人艺体艺图片 女同接吻av 碰碰哥免费自拍打炮 艳舞写真duppid1 88电影街拍视频 日本自拍做爱qvod 实拍美女性爱组图 少女高清av 浙江真实乱伦迅雷 台湾luanlunxiaoshuo 洛克王国宠物排行榜 皇瑟电影yy频道大全 红孩儿连连看 阴毛摄影 大胆美女写真人体艺术摄影 和风骚三个媳妇在家做爱 性爱办公室高清 18p2p木耳 大波撸影音 大鸡巴插嫩穴小说 一剧不超两个黑人 阿姨诱惑我快播 幼香阁千叶县小学生 少女妇女被狗强奸 曰人体妹妹 十二岁性感幼女 超级乱伦qvod 97爱蜜桃ccc336 日本淫妇阴液 av海量资源999 凤凰影视成仁 辰溪四中艳照门照片 先锋模特裸体展示影片 成人片免费看 自拍百度云 肥白老妇女 女爱人体图片 妈妈一女穴 星野美夏 日本少女dachidu 妹子私处人体图片 yinmindahuitang 舔无毛逼影片快播 田莹疑的裸体照片 三级电影影音先锋02222 妻子被外国老头操 观月雏乃泥鳅 韩国成人偷拍自拍图片 强奸5一9岁幼女小说 汤姆影院av图片 妹妹人艺体图 美女大驱 和女友做爱图片自拍p 绫川まどか在线先锋 那么嫩的逼很少见了 小女孩做爱 处女好逼连连看图图 性感美女在家做爱 近距离抽插骚逼逼 黑屌肏金毛屄 日韩av美少女 看喝尿尿小姐日逼色色色网图片 欧美肛交新视频 美女吃逼逼 av30线上免费 伊人在线三级经典 新视觉影院t6090影院 最新淫色电影网址 天龙影院远古手机版 搞老太影院 插进美女的大屁股里 私人影院加盟费用 www258dd 求一部电影里面有一个二猛哥 深肛交 日本萌妹子人体艺术写真图片 插入屄眼 美女的木奶 中文字幕黄色网址影视先锋 九号女神裸 和骚人妻偷情 和潘晓婷做爱 国模大尺度蜜桃 欧美大逼50p 西西人体成人 李宗瑞继母做爱原图物处理 nianhuawang 男鸡巴的视屏 � 97免费色伦电影 好色网成人 大姨子先锋 淫荡巨乳美女教师妈妈 性nuexiaoshuo WWW36YYYCOM 长春继续给力进屋就操小女儿套干破内射对白淫荡 农夫激情社区 日韩无码bt 欧美美女手掰嫩穴图片 日本援交偷拍自拍 入侵者日本在线播放 亚洲白虎偷拍自拍 常州高见泽日屄 寂寞少妇自卫视频 人体露逼图片 多毛外国老太 变态乱轮手机在线 淫荡妈妈和儿子操逼 伦理片大奶少女 看片神器最新登入地址sqvheqi345com账号群 麻美学姐无头 圣诞老人射小妞和强奸小妞动话片 亚洲AV女老师 先锋影音欧美成人资源 33344iucoom zV天堂电影网 宾馆美女打炮视频 色五月丁香五月magnet 嫂子淫乱小说 张歆艺的老公 吃奶男人视频在线播放 欧美色图男女乱伦 avtt2014ccvom 性插色欲香影院 青青草撸死你青青草 99热久久第一时间 激情套图卡通动漫 幼女裸聊做爱口交 日本女人被强奸乱伦 草榴社区快播 2kkk正在播放兽骑 啊不要人家小穴都湿了 www猎奇影视 A片www245vvcomwwwchnrwhmhzcn 搜索宜春院av wwwsee78co 逼奶鸡巴插 好吊日AV在线视频19gancom 熟女伦乱图片小说 日本免费av无码片在线开苞 鲁大妈撸到爆 裸聊官网 德国熟女xxx 新不夜城论坛首页手机 女虐男网址 男女做爱视频华为网盘 激情午夜天亚洲色图 内裤哥mangent 吉沢明歩制服丝袜WWWHHH710COM 屌逼在线试看 人体艺体阿娇艳照 推荐一个可以免费看片的网站如果被QQ拦截请复制链接在其它浏览器打开xxxyyy5comintr2a2cb551573a2b2e 欧美360精品粉红鲍鱼 教师调教第一页 聚美屋精品图 中韩淫乱群交 俄罗斯撸撸片 把鸡巴插进小姨子的阴道 干干AV成人网 aolasoohpnbcn www84ytom 高清大量潮喷www27dyycom 宝贝开心成人 freefronvideos人母 嫩穴成人网gggg29com 逼着舅妈给我口交肛交彩漫画 欧美色色aV88wwwgangguanscom 老太太操逼自拍视频 777亚洲手机在线播放 有没有夫妻3p小说 色列漫画淫女 午间色站导航 欧美成人处女色大图 童颜巨乳亚洲综合 桃色性欲草 色眯眯射逼 无码中文字幕塞外青楼这是一个 狂日美女老师人妻 爱碰网官网 亚洲图片雅蠛蝶 快播35怎么搜片 2000XXXX电影 新谷露性家庭影院 深深候dvd播放 幼齿用英语怎么说 不雅伦理无需播放器 国外淫荡图片 国外网站幼幼嫩网址 成年人就去色色视频快播 我鲁日日鲁老老老我爱 caoshaonvbi 人体艺术avav 性感性色导航 韩国黄色哥来嫖网站 成人网站美逼 淫荡熟妇自拍 欧美色惰图片 北京空姐透明照 狼堡免费av视频 www776eom 亚洲无码av欧美天堂网男人天堂 欧美激情爆操 a片kk266co 色尼姑成人极速在线视频 国语家庭系列 蒋雯雯 越南伦理 色CC伦理影院手机版 99jbbcom 大鸡巴舅妈 国产偷拍自拍淫荡对话视频 少妇春梦射精 开心激动网 自拍偷牌成人 色桃隐 撸狗网性交视频 淫荡的三位老师 伦理电影wwwqiuxia6commqiuxia6com 怡春院分站 丝袜超短裙露脸迅雷下载 色制服电影院 97超碰好吊色男人 yy6080理论在线宅男日韩福利大全 大嫂丝袜 500人群交手机在线 5sav 偷拍熟女吧 口述我和妹妹的欲望 50p电脑版 wwwavtttcon 3p3com 伦理无码片在线看 欧美成人电影图片岛国性爱伦理电影 先锋影音AV成人欧美 我爱好色 淫电影网 WWW19MMCOM 玛丽罗斯3d同人动画h在线看 动漫女孩裸体 超级丝袜美腿乱伦 1919gogo欣赏 大色逼淫色 www就是撸 激情文学网好骚 A级黄片免费 xedd5com 国内的b是黑的 快播美国成年人片黄 av高跟丝袜视频 上原保奈美巨乳女教师在线观看 校园春色都市激情fefegancom 偷窥自拍XXOO 搜索看马操美女 人本女优视频 日日吧淫淫 人妻巨乳影院 美国女子性爱学校 大肥屁股重口味 啪啪啪啊啊啊不要 操碰 japanfreevideoshome国产 亚州淫荡老熟女人体 伦奸毛片免费在线看 天天影视se 樱桃做爱视频 亚卅av在线视频 x奸小说下载 亚洲色图图片在线 217av天堂网 东方在线撸撸-百度 幼幼丝袜集 灰姑娘的姐姐 青青草在线视频观看对华 86papa路con 亚洲1AV 综合图片2区亚洲 美国美女大逼电影 010插插av成人网站 www色comwww821kxwcom 播乐子成人网免费视频在线观看 大炮撸在线影院 ,www4KkKcom 野花鲁最近30部 wwwCC213wapwww2233ww2download 三客优最新地址 母亲让儿子爽的无码视频 全国黄色片子 欧美色图美国十次 超碰在线直播 性感妖娆操 亚洲肉感熟女色图 a片A毛片管看视频 8vaa褋芯屑 333kk 川岛和津实视频 在线母子乱伦对白 妹妹肥逼五月 亚洲美女自拍 老婆在我面前小说 韩国空姐堪比情趣内衣 干小姐综合 淫妻色五月 添骚穴 WM62COM 23456影视播放器 成人午夜剧场 尼姑福利网 AV区亚洲AV欧美AV512qucomwwwc5508com 经典欧美骚妇 震动棒露出 日韩丝袜美臀巨乳在线 av无限吧看 就去干少妇 色艺无间正面是哪集 校园春色我和老师做爱 漫画夜色 天海丽白色吊带 黄色淫荡性虐小说 午夜高清播放器 文20岁女性荫道口图片 热国产热无码热有码 2015小明发布看看算你色 百度云播影视 美女肏屄屄乱轮小说 家族舔阴AV影片 邪恶在线av有码 父女之交 关于处女破处的三级片 极品护士91在线 欧美虐待女人视频的网站 享受老太太的丝袜 aaazhibuo 8dfvodcom成人 真实自拍足交 群交男女猛插逼 妓女爱爱动态 lin35com是什么网站 abp159 亚洲色图偷拍自拍乱伦熟女抠逼自慰 朝国三级篇 淫三国幻想 免费的av小电影网站 日本阿v视频免费按摩师 av750c0m 黄色片操一下 巨乳少女车震在线观看 操逼 免费 囗述情感一乱伦岳母和女婿 WWW_FAMITSU_COM 偷拍中国少妇在公车被操视频 花也真衣论理电影 大鸡鸡插p洞 新片欧美十八岁美少 进击的巨人神thunderftp 西方美女15p 深圳哪里易找到老女人玩视频 在线成人有声小说 365rrr 女尿图片 我和淫荡的小姨做爱 � 做爱技术体照 淫妇性爱 大学生私拍b 第四射狠狠射小说 色中色成人av社区 和小姨子乱伦肛交 wwwppp62com 俄罗斯巨乳人体艺术 骚逼阿娇 汤芳人体图片大胆 大胆人体艺术bb私处 性感大胸骚货 哪个网站幼女的片多 日本美女本子把 色 五月天 婷婷 快播 美女 美穴艺术 色百合电影导航 大鸡巴用力 孙悟空操美少女战士 狠狠撸美女手掰穴图片 古代女子与兽类交 沙耶香套图 激情成人网区 暴风影音av播放 动漫女孩怎么插第3个 mmmpp44 黑木麻衣无码ed2k 淫荡学姐少妇 乱伦操少女屄 高中性爱故事 骚妹妹爱爱图网 韩国模特剪长发 大鸡巴把我逼日了 中国张柏芝做爱片中国张柏芝做爱片中国张柏芝做爱片中国张柏芝做爱片中国张柏芝做爱片 大胆女人下体艺术图片 789sss 影音先锋在线国内情侣野外性事自拍普通话对白 群撸图库 闪现君打阿乐 ady 小说 插入表妹嫩穴小说 推荐成人资源 网络播放器 成人台 149大胆人体艺术 大屌图片 骚美女成人av 春暖花开春色性吧 女亭婷五月 我上了同桌的姐姐 恋夜秀场主播自慰视频 yzppp 屄茎 操屄女图 美女鲍鱼大特写 淫乱的日本人妻山口玲子 偷拍射精图 性感美女人体艺木图片 种马小说完本 免费电影院 骑士福利导航导航网站 骚老婆足交 国产性爱一级电影 欧美免费成人花花性都 欧美大肥妞性爱视频 家庭乱伦网站快播 偷拍自拍国产毛片 金发美女也用大吊来开包 缔D杏那 yentiyishu人体艺术ytys WWWUUKKMCOM 女人露奶 � 苍井空露逼 老荡妇高跟丝袜足交 偷偷和女友的朋友做爱迅雷 做爱七十二尺 朱丹人体合成 麻腾由纪妃 帅哥撸播种子图 鸡巴插逼动态图片 羙国十次啦中文 WWW137AVCOM 神斗片欧美版华语 有气质女人人休艺术 由美老师放屁电影 欧美女人肉肏图片 白虎种子快播 国产自拍90后女孩 美女在床上疯狂嫩b 饭岛爱最后之作 幼幼强奸摸奶 色97成人动漫 两性性爱打鸡巴插逼 新视觉影院4080青苹果影院 嗯好爽插死我了 阴口艺术照 李宗瑞电影qvod38 爆操舅母 亚洲色图七七影院 被大鸡巴操菊花 怡红院肿么了 成人极品影院删除 欧美性爱大图色图强奸乱 欧美女子与狗随便性交 苍井空的bt种子无码 熟女乱伦长篇小说 大色虫 兽交幼女影音先锋播放 44aad be0ca93900121f9b 先锋天耗ばさ无码 欧毛毛女三级黄色片图 干女人黑木耳照 日本美女少妇嫩逼人体艺术 sesechangchang 色屄屄网 久久撸app下载 色图色噜 美女鸡巴大奶 好吊日在线视频在线观看 透明丝袜脚偷拍自拍 中山怡红院菜单 wcwwwcom下载 骑嫂子 亚洲大色妣 成人故事365ahnet 丝袜家庭教mp4 幼交肛交 妹妹撸撸大妈 日本毛爽 caoprom超碰在email 关于中国古代偷窥的黄片 第一会所老熟女下载 wwwhuangsecome 狼人干综合新地址HD播放 变态儿子强奸乱伦图 强奸电影名字 2wwwer37com 日本毛片基地一亚洲AVmzddcxcn 暗黑圣经仙桃影院 37tpcocn 持月真由xfplay 好吊日在线视频三级网 我爱背入李丽珍 电影师傅床戏在线观看 96插妹妹sexsex88com 豪放家庭在线播放 桃花宝典极夜著豆瓜网 安卓系统播放神器 美美网丝袜诱惑 人人干全免费视频xulawyercn av无插件一本道 全国色五月 操逼电影小说网 good在线wwwyuyuelvcom www18avmmd 撸波波影视无插件 伊人幼女成人电影 会看射的图片 小明插看看 全裸美女扒开粉嫩b 国人自拍性交网站 萝莉白丝足交本子 七草ちとせ巨乳视频 摇摇晃晃的成人电影 兰桂坊成社人区小说www68kqcom 舔阴论坛 久撸客一撸客色国内外成人激情在线 明星门 欧美大胆嫩肉穴爽大片 www牛逼插 性吧星云 少妇性奴的屁眼 人体艺术大胆mscbaidu1imgcn 最新久久色色成人版 l女同在线 小泽玛利亚高潮图片搜索 女性裸b图 肛交bt种子 最热门有声小说 人间添春色 春色猜谜字 樱井莉亚钢管舞视频 小泽玛利亚直美6p 能用的h网 还能看的h网 bl动漫h网 开心五月激 东京热401 男色女色第四色酒色网 怎么下载黄色小说 黄色小说小栽 和谐图城 乐乐影院 色哥导航 特色导航 依依社区 爱窝窝在线 色狼谷成人 91porn 包要你射电影 色色3A丝袜 丝袜妹妹淫网 爱色导航(荐) 好男人激情影院 坏哥哥 第七色 色久久 人格分裂 急先锋 撸撸射中文网 第一会所综合社区 91影院老师机 东方成人激情 怼莪影院吹潮 老鸭窝伊人无码不卡无码一本道 av女柳晶电影 91天生爱风流作品 深爱激情小说私房婷婷网 擼奶av 567pao 里番3d一家人野外 上原在线电影 水岛津实透明丝袜 1314酒色 网旧网俺也去 0855影院 在线无码私人影院 搜索 国产自拍 神马dy888午夜伦理达达兔 农民工黄晓婷 日韩裸体黑丝御姐 屈臣氏的燕窝面膜怎么样つぼみ晶エリーの早漏チ○ポ强化合宿 老熟女人性视频 影音先锋 三上悠亚ol 妹妹影院福利片 hhhhhhhhsxo 午夜天堂热的国产 强奸剧场 全裸香蕉视频无码 亚欧伦理视频 秋霞为什么给封了 日本在线视频空天使 日韩成人aⅴ在线 日本日屌日屄导航视频 在线福利视频 日本推油无码av magnet 在线免费视频 樱井梨吮东 日本一本道在线无码DVD 日本性感诱惑美女做爱阴道流水视频 日本一级av 汤姆avtom在线视频 台湾佬中文娱乐线20 阿v播播下载 橙色影院 奴隶少女护士cg视频 汤姆在线影院无码 偷拍宾馆 业面紧急生级访问 色和尚有线 厕所偷拍一族 av女l 公交色狼优酷视频 裸体视频AV 人与兽肉肉网 董美香ol 花井美纱链接 magnet 西瓜影音 亚洲 自拍 日韩女优欧美激情偷拍自拍 亚洲成年人免费视频 荷兰免费成人电影 深喉呕吐XXⅩX 操石榴在线视频 天天色成人免费视频 314hu四虎 涩久免费视频在线观看 成人电影迅雷下载 能看见整个奶子的香蕉影院 水菜丽百度影音 gwaz079百度云 噜死你们资源站 主播走光视频合集迅雷下载 thumbzilla jappen 精品Av 古川伊织star598在线 假面女皇vip在线视频播放 国产自拍迷情校园 啪啪啪公寓漫画 日本阿AV 黄色手机电影 欧美在线Av影院 华裔电击女神91在线 亚洲欧美专区 1日本1000部免费视频 开放90后 波多野结衣 东方 影院av 页面升级紧急访问每天正常更新 4438Xchengeren 老炮色 a k福利电影 色欲影视色天天视频 高老庄aV 259LUXU-683 magnet 手机在线电影 国产区 欧美激情人人操网 国产 偷拍 直播 日韩 国内外激情在线视频网给 站长统计一本道人妻 光棍影院被封 紫竹铃取汁 ftp 狂插空姐嫩 xfplay 丈夫面前 穿靴子伪街 XXOO视频在线免费 大香蕉道久在线播放 电棒漏电嗨过头 充气娃能看下毛和洞吗 夫妻牲交 福利云点墦 yukun瑟妃 疯狂交换女友 国产自拍26页 腐女资源 百度云 日本DVD高清无码视频 偷拍,自拍AV伦理电影 A片小视频福利站。 大奶肥婆自拍偷拍图片 交配伊甸园 超碰在线视频自拍偷拍国产 小热巴91大神 rctd 045 类似于A片 超美大奶大学生美女直播被男友操 男友问 你的衣服怎么脱掉的 亚洲女与黑人群交视频一 在线黄涩 木内美保步兵番号 鸡巴插入欧美美女的b舒服 激情在线国产自拍日韩欧美 国语福利小视频在线观看 作爱小视颍 潮喷合集丝袜无码mp4 做爱的无码高清视频 牛牛精品 伊aⅤ在线观看 savk12 哥哥搞在线播放 在线电一本道影 一级谍片 250pp亚洲情艺中心,88 欧美一本道九色在线一 wwwseavbacom色av吧 cos美女在线 欧美17,18ⅹⅹⅹ视频 自拍嫩逼 小电影在线观看网站 筱田优 贼 水电工 5358x视频 日本69式视频有码 b雪福利导航 韩国女主播19tvclub在线 操逼清晰视频 丝袜美女国产视频网址导航 水菜丽颜射房间 台湾妹中文娱乐网 风吟岛视频 口交 伦理 日本熟妇色五十路免费视频 A级片互舔 川村真矢Av在线观看 亚洲日韩av 色和尚国产自拍 sea8 mp4 aV天堂2018手机在线 免费版国产偷拍a在线播放 狠狠 婷婷 丁香 小视频福利在线观看平台 思妍白衣小仙女被邻居强上 萝莉自拍有水 4484新视觉 永久发布页 977成人影视在线观看 小清新影院在线观 小鸟酱后丝后入百度云 旋风魅影四级 香蕉影院小黄片免费看 性爱直播磁力链接 小骚逼第一色影院 性交流的视频 小雪小视频bd 小视频TV禁看视频 迷奸AV在线看 nba直播 任你在干线 汤姆影院在线视频国产 624u在线播放 成人 一级a做爰片就在线看狐狸视频 小香蕉AV视频 www182、com 腿模简小育 学生做爱视频 秘密搜查官 快播 成人福利网午夜 一级黄色夫妻录像片 直接看的gav久久播放器 国产自拍400首页 sm老爹影院 谁知道隔壁老王网址在线 综合网 123西瓜影音 米奇丁香 人人澡人人漠大学生 色久悠 夜色视频你今天寂寞了吗? 菲菲影视城美国 被抄的影院 变态另类 欧美 成人 国产偷拍自拍在线小说 不用下载安装就能看的吃男人鸡巴视频 插屄视频 大贯杏里播放 wwwhhh50 233若菜奈央 伦理片天海翼秘密搜查官 大香蕉在线万色屋视频 那种漫画小说你懂的 祥仔电影合集一区 那里可以看澳门皇冠酒店a片 色自啪 亚洲aV电影天堂 谷露影院ar toupaizaixian sexbj。com 毕业生 zaixian mianfei 朝桐光视频 成人短视频在线直接观看 陈美霖 沈阳音乐学院 导航女 www26yjjcom 1大尺度视频 开平虐女视频 菅野雪松协和影视在线视频 华人play在线视频bbb 鸡吧操屄视频 多啪啪免费视频 悠草影院 金兰策划网 (969) 橘佑金短视频 国内一极刺激自拍片 日本制服番号大全magnet 成人动漫母系 电脑怎么清理内存 黄色福利1000 dy88午夜 偷拍中学生洗澡磁力链接 花椒相机福利美女视频 站长推荐磁力下载 mp4 三洞轮流插视频 玉兔miki热舞视频 夜生活小视频 爆乳人妖小视频 国内网红主播自拍福利迅雷下载 不用app的裸裸体美女操逼视频 变态SM影片在线观看 草溜影院元气吧 - 百度 - 百度 波推全套视频 国产双飞集合ftp 日本在线AV网 笔国毛片 神马影院女主播是我的邻居 影音资源 激情乱伦电影 799pao 亚洲第一色第一影院 av视频大香蕉 老梁故事汇希斯莱杰 水中人体磁力链接 下载 大香蕉黄片免费看 济南谭崔 避开屏蔽的岛a片 草破福利 要看大鸡巴操小骚逼的人的视频 黑丝少妇影音先锋 欧美巨乳熟女磁力链接 美国黄网站色大全 伦蕉在线久播 极品女厕沟 激情五月bd韩国电影 混血美女自摸和男友激情啪啪自拍诱人呻吟福利视频 人人摸人人妻做人人看 44kknn 娸娸原网 伊人欧美 恋夜影院视频列表安卓青青 57k影院 如果电话亭 avi 插爆骚女精品自拍 青青草在线免费视频1769TV 令人惹火的邻家美眉 影音先锋 真人妹子被捅动态图 男人女人做完爱视频15 表姐合租两人共处一室晚上她竟爬上了我的床 性爱教学视频 北条麻妃bd在线播放版 国产老师和师生 magnet wwwcctv1024 女神自慰 ftp 女同性恋做激情视频 欧美大胆露阴视频 欧美无码影视 好女色在线观看 后入肥臀18p 百度影视屏福利 厕所超碰视频 强奸mp magnet 欧美妹aⅴ免费线上看 2016年妞干网视频 5手机在线福利 超在线最视频 800av:cOm magnet 欧美性爱免播放器在线播放 91大款肥汤的性感美乳90后邻家美眉趴着窗台后入啪啪 秋霞日本毛片网站 cheng ren 在线视频 上原亚衣肛门无码解禁影音先锋 美脚家庭教师在线播放 尤酷伦理片 熟女性生活视频在线观看 欧美av在线播放喷潮 194avav 凤凰AV成人 - 百度 kbb9999 AV片AV在线AV无码 爱爱视频高清免费观看 黄色男女操b视频 观看 18AV清纯视频在线播放平台 成人性爱视频久久操 女性真人生殖系统双性人视频 下身插入b射精视频 明星潜规测视频 mp4 免賛a片直播绪 国内 自己 偷拍 在线 国内真实偷拍 手机在线 国产主播户外勾在线 三桥杏奈高清无码迅雷下载 2五福电影院凸凹频频 男主拿鱼打女主,高宝宝 色哥午夜影院 川村まや痴汉 草溜影院费全过程免费 淫小弟影院在线视频 laohantuiche 啪啪啪喷潮XXOO视频 青娱乐成人国产 蓝沢润 一本道 亚洲青涩中文欧美 神马影院线理论 米娅卡莉法的av 在线福利65535 欧美粉色在线 欧美性受群交视频1在线播放 极品喷奶熟妇在线播放 变态另类无码福利影院92 天津小姐被偷拍 磁力下载 台湾三级电髟全部 丝袜美腿偷拍自拍 偷拍女生性行为图 妻子的乱伦 白虎少妇 肏婶骚屄 外国大妈会阴照片 美少女操屄图片 妹妹自慰11p 操老熟女的b 361美女人体 360电影院樱桃 爱色妹妹亚洲色图 性交卖淫姿势高清图片一级 欧美一黑对二白 大色网无毛一线天 射小妹网站 寂寞穴 西西人体模特苍井空 操的大白逼吧 骚穴让我操 拉好友干女朋友3p