Front. Microbiol.Frontiers in MicrobiologyFront. Microbiol.1664-302XFrontiers Media S.A.10.3389/fmicb.2024.1464257MicrobiologyOriginal ResearchThe nasal mycobiome of individuals with allergic rhinitis and asthma differs from that of healthy controls in composition, structure and functionPérez-LosadaMarcos12*Castro-NallarEduardo34García-HuidobroJenaro5BoechatJosé Laerte67DelgadoLuis678RamaTiago Azenha68OliveiraManuela9101Department of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Computational Biology Institute, Milken Institute School of Public Health, The George Washington University, Washington, DC, United States2CIBIO-InBIO, Centro de Investigação em Biodiversidade e Recursos Genéticos, Universidade do Porto, Campus Agrário de Vairão, Vairão, Portugal3Departamento de Microbiología, Facultad de Ciencias de la Salud, Universidad de Talca, Talca, Chile4Centro de Ecología Integrativa, Universidad de Talca, Talca, Chile5Centro de Investigaciones Médicas, Escuela de Medicina, Universidad de Talca, Talca, Chile6Serviço de Imunologia Básica e Clínica, Departamento de Patologia, Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade do Porto, Porto, Portugal7Centro de Investigação em Tecnologias e Serviços de Saúde (CINTESIS@RISE), Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade do Porto, Porto, Portugal8Serviço de Imunoalergologia, Unidade Local de Saúde São João (ULS São João), Porto, Portugal9UCIBIO, Research Unit on Applied Molecular Biosciences, Forensic Sciences Research Laboratory, University Institute of Health Sciences (1H-TOXRUN, IUCS-CESPU), Avenida Central de Gandra, Gandra, Portugal10Associate Laboratory i4HB—Institute for Health and Bioeconomy, University Institute of Health Sciences—CESPU, Avenida Central de Gandra, Gandra, Portugal
Edited by: Alina Maria Holban, University of Bucharest, Romania
Reviewed by: Richard George Douglas, The University of Auckland, New Zealand
Elopy Sibanda, National University of Science and Technology, Zimbabwe
Yu Sun, South China Agricultural University, China
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
Allergic rhinitis (AR) and asthma (AS) are two of the most common chronic respiratory diseases and a major public health concern. Multiple studies have demonstrated the role of the nasal bacteriome in AR and AS, but little is known about the airway mycobiome and its potential association to airway inflammatory diseases. Here we used the internal transcriber spacers (ITS) 1 and 2 and high-throughput sequencing to characterize the nasal mycobiome of 339 individuals with AR, AR with asthma (ARAS), AS and healthy controls (CT). Seven to ten of the 14 most abundant fungal genera (Malassezia, Alternaria, Cladosporium, Penicillium, Wallemia, Rhodotorula, Sporobolomyces, Naganishia, Vishniacozyma, and Filobasidium) in the nasal cavity differed significantly (p ≤ 0.049) between AS, AR or ARAS, and CT. However, none of the same genera varied significantly between the three respiratory disease groups. The nasal mycobiomes of AR and ARAS patients showed the highest intra-group diversity, while CT showed the lowest. Alpha-diversity indices of microbial richness and evenness only varied significantly (p ≤ 0.024) between AR or ARAS and CT, while all disease groups showed significant differences (p ≤ 0.0004) in microbial structure (i.e., beta-diversity indices) when compared to CT samples. Thirty metabolic pathways (PICRUSt2) were differentially abundant (Wald’s test) between AR or ARAS and CT patients, but only three of them associated with 5-aminoimidazole ribonucleotide (AIR) biosynthesis were over abundant (log2 Fold Change >0.75) in the ARAS group. AIR has been associated to fungal pathogenesis in plants. Spiec-Easi fungal networks varied among groups, but AR and ARAS showed more similar interactions among their members than with those in the CT mycobiome; this suggests chronic respiratory allergic diseases may disrupt fungal connectivity in the nasal cavity. This study contributes valuable fungal data and results to understand the relationships between the nasal mycobiome and allergy-related conditions. It demonstrates for the first time that the nasal mycobiota varies during health and allergic rhinitis (with and without comorbid asthma) and reveals specific taxa, metabolic pathways and fungal interactions that may relate to chronic airway disease.
allergyasthmaITSmycobiomenasal cavityPortugalrhinitisPTDC/ASP-PES/27953/2017POCI-01-0145-FEDER-027953IF/00764/2013European Regional Development Fund10.13039/501100008530Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia10.13039/501100001871FCTEuropean Social Fund10.13039/501100004895Ministério da Educação e Ciência10.13039/501100003381section-at-acceptanceInfectious Agents and Disease
Allergic rhinitis and asthma are two of the most common chronic airway diseases in Western countries inflicting a relevant health and economic burden to society (Todo-Bom et al., 2007; Sa-Sousa et al., 2012; Fonseca et al., 2021). In Portugal, allergic rhinitis has a prevalence of 9–10% in children and adolescents and 26.1% in adults (Todo-Bom et al., 2007; Falcão et al., 2008; Muc et al., 2014); while asthma has a prevalence of 8.4% in children and adolescents and 6.8% in adults (Sa-Sousa et al., 2012; Muc et al., 2014; Ferreira-Magalhaes et al., 2016).
Allergic rhinitis is considered an inflammation of the nasal mucosa, characterized by sneezing, congestion, itching, and rhinorrhea (Steelant et al., 2016; Steelant et al., 2018; Acevedo-Prado et al., 2022; Savoure et al., 2022). Similarly, asthma is a multifactorial condition of the airways characterized by obstruction, inflammation, and mucous production (Mims, 2015; Licari et al., 2018; Dharmage et al., 2019). Allergic rhinitis and asthma frequently coexist (Compalati et al., 2010; Pite et al., 2014; Ferreira-Magalhaes et al., 2015; Small et al., 2018; Bousquet et al., 2019)—more than 46% of the Portuguese patients with asthma also show allergic rhinitis (Valero et al., 2009; Acevedo-Prado et al., 2022). This suggests that they may represent a combined airway inflammatory disease with several pathophysiological, epidemiological, and clinical connections within the concept of a united airway disease (Bergeron and Hamid, 2005; Pawankar, 2006; Kim et al., 2008; Compalati et al., 2010; Bousquet et al., 2023).
Multiple metataxonomic and metagenomic studies have already demonstrated that the upper airway bacteriome is a gatekeeper of respiratory health and plays a significant role in the onset, development, and severity of both allergic rhinitis (Lal et al., 2017; Bender et al., 2020; Gan et al., 2021; Chen et al., 2022; Kim et al., 2022; Azevedo et al., 2023; Pérez-Losada et al., 2023a,b) and asthma (Bogaert et al., 2011; Brar et al., 2012; Huang and Boushey, 2014; Castro-Nallar et al., 2015; Dickson and Huffnagle, 2015; Huang and Boushey, 2015; Pérez-Losada et al., 2015; Teo et al., 2015; Pérez-Losada et al., 2016a,b; Pérez-Losada et al., 2017; Dinwiddie et al., 2018; Frati et al., 2018; Pérez-Losada et al., 2018; Hufnagl et al., 2020; Losol et al., 2021; Raita et al., 2021). These same studies have also shown that the nasal cavity is a major reservoir for opportunistic bacterial pathogens, which can spread to other sections of the respiratory tract and potentially induce respiratory illnesses (Garcia-Rodriguez and Fresnadillo Martinez, 2002; Hilty et al., 2010; Bogaert et al., 2011; Dickson et al., 2013; Biesbroek et al., 2014; Huang and Boushey, 2015; Pérez-Losada et al., 2015; Teo et al., 2015; Pérez-Losada et al., 2016b; Prevaes et al., 2016; Huang, 2017; Lal et al., 2017; Pérez-Losada et al., 2017; Esposito and Principi, 2018; Pérez-Losada et al., 2018; Gan et al., 2021; Chen et al., 2022; Kim et al., 2022).
Less is known, however, about the human mycobiome and its role in chronic airway diseases (Goldman et al., 2018; Rick et al., 2020; van Tilburg Bernardes et al., 2020; Oliveira et al., 2023). The recent inclusion of fungi in human microbiome research has revealed that they are also implicated in asthma onset and development in susceptible individuals (Carpagnano et al., 2016; Goldman et al., 2018; Rick et al., 2020; van Tilburg Bernardes et al., 2020; Yuan et al., 2023), although very few studies have surveyed the upper airways (Jung et al., 2015; Yuan et al., 2023). Similarly, to the best of our knowledge, only one study so far has characterized the airway mycobiome of patients with allergic rhinitis (Jung et al., 2015); hence, the taxonomic composition and interactions, and functional diversity of the fungal communities inhabiting the nose remain unknown, or poorly understood at best, in both asthmatic and rhinitic patients.
In this study, we have used the internal transcriber spacer (ITS) 1 and 2 and next-generation sequencing to characterize the nasal mycobiomes of children and adults with allergic rhinitis (with and without asthma comorbidity), asthma and healthy controls. We describe unique fungal taxonomic and functional profiles across those four clinical groups and compare their composition, structure, metabolism, and network interactions.
Materials and methodsParticipants
All participants enrolled in this study were part of the ASMAPORT Project (PTDC/SAU-INF/27953/2017). This study was approved by the “Comissão de Ética para a Saúde” of the Centro Hospitalar Universitário São João/Faculdade de Medicina (Porto, Portugal) in March 2017, Parecer_58-17. Written consent was obtained from all independent participants or their legal guardians using the informed consent documents approved by the Comissão de Ética.
ASMAPORT was a cross-sectional study of Portuguese children and adults designed to investigate host-microbe during asthma and rhinitis. Participants were recruited from northern Portugal while attending the outpatient clinic of the Serviço de Imunoalergologia in the Centro Hospitalar Universitário São João from July 2018 to January 2020. Healthy volunteers from the Porto area with no history of respiratory illness were also enrolled but did not complete the questionnaire or provide clinical information. The diagnosis of allergic rhinitis was confirmed by an allergy specialist based on clinical criteria and a positive skin prick or specific IgE test to at least one clinically relevant inhalant allergen in the region (Pereira et al., 2006; Bousquet et al., 2009). Diagnosis of asthma was confirmed by the attending physician based in the presence of typical symptoms in the previous 12 months or a positive bronchodilator responsiveness testing with salbutamol (Silva et al., 2019). Further details are provided in Pérez-Losada et al. (2023a,b).
Sampling
A total of 339 individuals participated in this study (Supplementary Table S1). They were categorized into four clinical groups: allergic rhinitis (AR = 47), allergic rhinitis with asthma (ARAS = 155), asthma (AS = 12), and healthy controls (CT = 125 individuals). Samples were collected by swabbing the right and left nostrils. Further detail is provided in Pérez-Losada et al. (2023a). Because of the sample size of the AS group, we have only used AS in some of the pairwise comparisons and applied statistical tests that are moderately robust to small sample sizes (see below). Similar considerations were also implemented in other microbiome studies of asthma and rhinitis including small groups or cohorts (Hilty et al., 2010; Castro-Nallar et al., 2015; Pérez-Losada et al., 2015; Lal et al., 2017; Fazlollahi et al., 2018; Pérez-Losada et al., 2023a,b).
High-throughput sequencing
Total DNA was extracted from swabs using the ZymoBIOMICS™ DNA Miniprep Kit D4300. DNA extractions were prepared for sequencing using the Schloss’ MiSeq_WetLab_SOP protocol in Kozich et al. (2013). DNA samples were amplified and sequenced for the ITS1-ITS2 region (~230 bp) following the protocols used in the Earth Microbiome Project (Thompson et al., 2017) and primer ITS1F Fwd: CTTGGTCATTTAGAGGAAGTAA and primer ITS2 Rev: GCTGCGTTCTTCATCGATGC—https://earthmicrobiome.org. All samples were sequenced in a single run of the Illumina MiSeq sequencing platform at the University of Michigan Medical School. Negative controls processed as above showed no PCR band on an agarose gel. We used eight water and reagent negative controls and five mock communities (i.e., reference samples with a known composition) to detect contaminating microbial DNA within reagents and measure the sequencing error rate. We did not find evidence of contamination and our sequencing error rate was as low as 0.0051%.
Mycobiome analyses
Internal transcriber spacer amplicon sequence variants (ASV) in each sample were inferred using dada2 version 1.18 (Callahan et al., 2016) and following author’s recommendations for the ITS region.1 Reads were filtered using standard parameters, with no uncalled bases, maximum of two expected errors and truncating reads at a quality score of 2 or less. Forward and reverse reads were merged and chimeras were identified. Taxonomic assignment was performed against the UNITE v9.0 2023-07-18 database (Nilsson et al., 2019) using the implementation of the RDP naive Bayesian classifier available in the dada2 R package (Wang et al., 2007; Quast et al., 2013). ASV sequences were aligned in MAFFT (Katoh and Standley, 2013) and used to build a tree with FastTree (Price et al., 2010). The resulting ASV tables and phylogenetic tree were imported into phyloseq (McMurdie and Holmes, 2013) for further analysis. Sequence files and associated metadata and BioSample attributes for all samples used in this study have been deposited in the NCBI (PRJNA1107919). Metadata and ASV abundances with corresponding taxonomic classifications are presented in Supplementary Tables S1, S2, respectively.
We normalized our samples using the negative binomial distribution (McMurdie and Holmes, 2014) implemented in the Bioconductor package DESeq2 (Love et al., 2014). This approach simultaneously accounts for library size differences and biological variability and has increased sensitivity if groups include less than 20 samples (Weiss et al., 2017). Taxonomic and phylogenetic alpha-diversity (within-sample) were estimated using Chao1 richness and Shannon, Abundance-based Coverage Estimator (ACE), and Phylogenetic Diversity (PD) indices. Beta-diversity (between-sample) was estimated using phylogenetic Unifrac (unweighted and weighted), Bray–Curtis and Jaccard distances, and dissimilarity between samples was explored using principal coordinates analysis (PCoA).
Differences in taxonomic composition (phyla and genera) and alpha-diversity indices between disease groups (AR, ARAS, and AS) and healthy individuals (CT) were assessed using linear models (mixed and standard) analysis to account for the non-independence of subjects (random effect)—lmer4 R package (Bates et al., 2015). We also included age, season and sex as covariables in all our initial model comparisons. Lineal models with randomized subjects were not better than those without random effects, as suggested by their similar or lower scores for the Akaike Information Criterion (AIC) and Bayesian Information Criterion (BIC). Additionally, none of the covariables were significant for any of the taxonomic and diversity indices compared. Beta-diversity indices were compared using permutational multivariate ANOVA (adonis)—vegan R package (Dixon, 2003). We applied the Benjamini–Hochberg method at alpha = 0.05 to correct for multiple hypotheses testing (Cook, 1977; Benjamini and Hochberg, 1995). All the analyses were performed in R (R Development Core Team, 2008) and RStudio (RStudio Team, 2015).
Functional analyses
Metabolic pathways were predicted by imputation of gene families and genomes as implemented in PICRUSt2 (Douglas et al., 2020). Briefly, we used the fungi ITS reference database provided by the developers to align our ITS sequences (minimum alignment 0.6) and then place them onto an ITS phylogenetic tree. Using ASV abundances obtained in dada2, we predicted gene family profiles and ultimately sample pathway abundances. Pathways were annotated using the MetaCyc database (Caspi et al., 2020) and differential pathway abundance among groups was determined in DESeq2 (Wald test; adjusted p value <0.01). Statistical analyses and visualization were conducted using functions in the ggpicrust R package (Yang et al., 2023).
Network analyses
Changes in fungal community structure were explored using covariation network analysis as implemented in Spiec-Easi (Kurtz et al., 2015). We estimated networks for AR, ARAS, and CT at the genus level (abundance filter threshold = 0.0005; mb method; greedy clustering). Network estimation, statistics, and visualization was carried out in the microeco R package (Liu et al., 2021).
Results
We collected nasal swabs from a cohort of 339 participants (214 individuals with respiratory disease and 125 healthy controls) from northern Portugal comprised mainly of children and young adults (Supplementary Table S1). The median age of the participants was 12.5 ± 5.0 years and 53.7% were female. Subjects with respiratory disease were subdivided into three groups: AR (47), ARAS (155), and AS (12 subjects). We sequenced the ITS1-ITS2 gene to characterize the nasal mycobiome of each participant. Twenty-two samples (i.e., technical replicates) from the following groups were sequenced twice due to seemingly faint PCR bands in agarose gels: AR (seven samples), ARAS (13 samples), and CT (two samples). ASV singletons and samples with <1,014 reads were eliminated, rendering a final data set of 306 samples with the following distribution: AR (42 samples from 36 individuals), ARAS (142 samples from 130 individuals), AS (12 samples from 12 individuals), and CT (110 samples from 108 individuals).
Mycobiome taxonomic diversity and structure
Our nasal mycobiome (306 samples after quality control) dataset comprised 6,145,342 clean reads, ranging from 1,014 to 223,989 sequences per sample (mean = 20,082.8) and a total of 5,635 ASVs (Supplementary Table S2). AR samples had 570 unique ASVs, ARAS samples had 2,202, AS samples had 138 and CT samples had 1,615 (Supplementary Figure 1). The four groups shared 122 ASVs, the disease groups shared 78 ASVs, while other pairs and trios shared a variable number, ranging from 1 to 323 ASVs (Supplementary Figure 1).
The nasal mycobiome sequences across all 306 filtered samples were classified into two dominant (>1% abundance) Phyla: Ascomycota (54.0%) and Basidiomycota (44.9%) (Table 1). Those Phyla comprised 14 dominant (>1%) genera (Table 1; Figure 1), being the most abundant Cladosporium (23.0%), Wallemia (8.9%), Malassezia (8.3%), and Rhodotorula (8.2%). All the other detected phyla and genera accounted for <1% of the total ITS sequences each.
Mean relative proportions (%) of fungal phyla and genera in the nasal mycobiome of participants with allergic rhinitis (AR), AR with comorbid asthma (ARAS), asthma (AS) and healthy controls (CT).
Mean relative proportions (%)
Linear model test significance
All
AR
ARAS
AS
CT
AR-CT
ARAS-CT
AS-CT
AR-ARAS
AR-AS
ARAS-AS
Phylum
Ascomycota
54
49.2
56.2
79.2
48.6
ns
ns
ns
ns
ns
ns
Basidiomycota
44.9
49.6
43.3
20.4
49.4
ns
ns
ns
ns
ns
ns
Genus
Malassezia
8.3
0.3
1.3
0.2
23.7
<0.0001
<0.0001
<0.0001
ns
ns
ns
Alternaria
3.2
3.6
3.6
1.6
2.7
0.024
0.0003
ns
ns
ns
ns
Cladosporium
23
23.3
28.6
63.6
7.5
<0.0001
<0.0001
<0.0001
ns
ns
ns
Penicillium
2.4
1.8
3.3
1.4
1.6
0.049
<0.0001
0.031
ns
ns
ns
Aspergillus
4
3.6
3.4
1.9
5.4
ns
ns
ns
ns
ns
ns
Candida
4.7
4.2
4.7
4.6
5.2
ns
ns
ns
ns
ns
ns
Aleurina
2.4
0.1
0.2
0.3
7
ns
ns
ns
ns
ns
ns
Wallemia
8.9
15.8
11.8
2.7
2.5
<0.0001
<0.0001
0.0063
ns
ns
ns
Rhodotorula
8.2
12.2
12.1
3.5
1.6
<0.0001
<0.0001
0.0008
ns
ns
ns
Sporobolomyces
1.2
1.1
2
0.9
0.1
<0.0001
<0.0001
ns
ns
ns
ns
Naganishia
1.4
2.9
1.2
0.4
1
0.016
0.0026
ns
ns
ns
ns
Vishniacozyma
1.4
2.9
1.5
0.9
0.6
<0.0001
<0.0001
0.0023
ns
ns
ns
Sistotrema
1
0.5
0.6
1.5
1.7
ns
ns
ns
ns
ns
ns
Filobasidium
1.4
1.5
1.4
2.8
1.1
0.0009
<0.0001
0.019
ns
ns
ns
p values for significant pairwise comparisons (linear model test) between groups are also displayed. ns, not significant.
Alpha-diversity estimates (Chao1, Shannon, ACE, and phylogenetic diversity) and statistical significance (linear model test) in nasal fungal communities from participants with allergic rhinitis (AR), AR with comorbid asthma (ARAS), asthma (AS), and healthy controls (CT). ns, not significant; *p ≤ 0.05; ****p ≤ 0.0001.
ASV2 of the genus Cladosporium comprised the nasal core microbiome (prevalence ≥90%) of the respiratory disease patients and accounted for 12.8% of their total reads. No core mycobiome was detected for the control samples. ASV2 may represent the more stable and consistent member of the nasal mycobiomes (Backhed et al., 2012; Shade and Handelsman, 2012) in the disease patients.
We also compared the mean relative abundance of specific taxa in subjects with respiratory disease and healthy controls. None of the two dominant fungal phyla (Ascomycota and Basidiomycota) comprising the nasal microbiome showed significant differences in their mean relative proportions between the groups compared (Table 1). Of the 14 dominant fungal genera comprising the nasal microbiome (Figure 1; Table 1), 7–10 genera showed significant differences in their mean relative proportions between all respiratory disease group (AS, AR or ARAS) and CT after FDR correction. However, none of the same genera varied significantly between the three respiratory disease groups (Table 1).
Alpha-diversity indices (Shannon, Chao1, ACE, and PD) of microbial community richness and evenness varied among clinical groups (Figure 2; Supplementary Table S3). AR and ARAS showed the highest diversity for all indices, while CT showed the lowest. ARAS–CT and AR–CT comparisons were significantly distinct for Shannon, Chao1, and ACE after FDR correction (Wilcoxon test; p ≤ 0.024). All the other pairwise comparisons, including those of PD estimates, were not significant.
Bar plots of mean relative proportions of the top fungal genera in the nasal cavity of participants with allergic rhinitis (AR), AR with comorbid asthma (ARAS), asthma (AS), and healthy controls (CT).
To characterize the structure of the nasal mycobiomes (beta diversity), we applied principal coordinates analysis (PCoAs) to Unifrac (unweighted and weighted), Bray–Curtis and Jaccard distance matrices. All the PCoAs showed partial segregation of the mycobiotas from each clinical group (Figure 3). Subsequently, adonis analyses detected significant differences (p ≤ 0.0004) in beta-diversity between each of the respiratory disease groups (AS, AR and ARAS) and the healthy controls for all the distances. None of the pairwise comparisons between respiratory disease groups resulted significant. This suggests that the nasal mycobiomes of AS, AR and ARAS participants may differ from those of healthy individuals in a similar compositional manner.
Principal coordinates analysis (PCoA) plots of beta-diversity estimates (Unifrac, Bray-Curtis and Jaccard indices) and statistical significance (Adonis test) in nasal fungal communities from participants with allergic rhinitis (AR), AR with comorbid asthma (ARAS), asthma (AS), and healthy controls (CT). ns, not significant.
Mycobiome functional diversity
To understand whether different disease groups exhibited differences in the nasal mycobiome functional capabilities, we inferred the functional potential of AR, ARAS, and CT groups. We found significant differences (adjusted p-value <0.01) in abundance in 30 pathways (MetaCyc annotated) between AR and CT or ARAS (Figure 4). Most changes in pathway abundance represented pathways enriched in CT compared to AR or ARAS with negative or nearly zero log2 Fold Change (FC). Only three pathways associated with 5-aminoimidazole ribonucleotide biosynthesis were over abundant (log2 FC > 0.75) in ARAS patients (Figure 4B). These pathways are associated with the de novo biosynthesis of purine nucleotides and of thiamin (PWY-6121; PWY-6122; PWY-6277). Interestingly, the comparison AR versus ARAS yielded no significant results (p-value >0.1), suggesting both conditions share a similar nasal mycobiome functional signature.
Spiec-Easi networks of fungal taxa in the nasal mycobiomes of participants with allergic rhinitis (AR), AR with comorbid asthma (ARAS) and healthy controls (CT). Nodes represent taxa connected by edges whose width (0.1–0.4) is proportional to the strength of their association. Cyan and pink edges indicate positive and negative correlations, respectively.
Mycobiome interactions
We further wanted to investigate potential direct or indirect interactions among fungal groups. We inferred inverse covariance networks using the Spiec-Easi model to compare the structure and connectivity of the nasal mycobiome. In the CT network, we identified seven modules of interacting fungi (Figure 5) with a degree of connectivity between 1 and 2, indicating very low connectivity. Likewise, betweenness centrality, a measure of importance of a node in a network, was also low (range 0–2). In turn, in the ARAS network (Figure 5), degree of connectivity ranged between 1 and 7, indicating higher connectivity. Some fungal genera were connected up to other 7 genera, and of those, Cystobasidium, Pseudopithomyces, Peniophora, and Debaryomyces, presented high betweenness centrality (e.g., Peniophora > 90), highlighting their role as hubs in the ARAS mycobiome. The AR network showed a degree of connectivity and betweenness centrality of 1–4 and 0–30, respectively (Figure 5). It shared similarities with the ARAS network, where Phlebia and Debaryomyces were also highly connected (4 and 5 in AR; 2 and 5 in ARAS). Node overlap between the three networks varied; ARAS and AR shared 23.6% of the nodes, ARAS and CT shared 14.6% and AR and CT shared 9.1%. Edge overlap was limited between networks (<5%), suggesting the overall structure of the networks is different.
Differential abundance analysis (Wald’s test; adjusted p value <0.01) of functional profiles in the nasal mycobiomes of participants with allergic rhinitis (AR) and healthy controls (CT) (A), and AR participants with comorbid asthma (ARAS) and CT (B).
Discussion
The role of the fungal communities residing in the upper airways in allergic rhinitis and asthma is practically unknown (Jung et al., 2015; Yuan et al., 2023). Here we present the results of a cross-sectional study comparing the nasal mycobiome of 339 individuals with allergic rhinitis (with and without comorbid asthma), asthma and healthy controls.
The nasal mycobiomes were composed of basically two phyla (Ascomycota and Basidiomycota) and 14 genera (Figure 1; Table 1). These two phyla and all dominant genera have been previously described in the airways of both healthy, asthmatic and rhinitic individuals, although with different abundances (Jung et al., 2015; Carpagnano et al., 2016; Goldman et al., 2018; Rick et al., 2020; van Tilburg Bernardes et al., 2020; Yuan et al., 2023). We detected common opportunistic pathogenic fungi like Malassezia, Aspergillus, Candida, and Penicillium (Badiee and Hashemizadeh, 2014). Moreover, exposure to Alternaria spores has been associated with AR symptoms (Andersson et al., 2003; Oliveira et al., 2023). This confirms at fungal level what is already known for bacteria, that the nasal cavity is a major reservoir for opportunistic pathogens that can cause allergic rhinitis and asthma (Garcia-Rodriguez and Fresnadillo Martinez, 2002; Hilty et al., 2010; Bogaert et al., 2011; Dickson et al., 2013; Biesbroek et al., 2014; Huang and Boushey, 2015; Pérez-Losada et al., 2015; Teo et al., 2015; Pérez-Losada et al., 2016b; Prevaes et al., 2016; Huang, 2017; Lal et al., 2017; Pérez-Losada et al., 2017; Esposito and Principi, 2018; Pérez-Losada et al., 2018; Gan et al., 2021; Chen et al., 2022; Kim et al., 2022; Pérez-Losada et al., 2023a).
Healthy participants differed greatly in fungal composition from those with chronic respiratory illnesses. The nasal mycobiome of healthy controls contained 28.7% unique ASVs, while the AR, ARAS and AS mycobiomes contained 10.1, 39.1, and 2.4% unique ASVs, respectively (Supplementary Table S2; Supplementary Figure 1). These ASVs are potential biomarkers of disease for each group. Further metataxonomic and metagenomic studies are needed to confirm these results and their potential as therapeutic targets for rhinitis and asthma (Castro-Nallar et al., 2015; Pérez-Losada et al., 2015; Pérez-Losada et al., 2023a,b).
Fungal phyla (Ascomycota and Basidiomycota) did not vary significantly in their mean relative proportions between groups, but up to 71% of the dominant genera varied significantly between healthy samples and respiratory disease groups (Table 1). The most striking differences were observed between AR or ARAS and CT, where 10 of 14 genera varied in their mean relative abundances, respectively. Alternaria, Cladosporium, Penicillium, Wallemia, Rhodotorula, Sporobolomyces, Naganishia, Vishniacozyma and Filobasidium were significantly more abundant in AR and ARAS, while Malassezia was significantly more abundant in healthy controls. A previous study of the nasal vestibule (Jung et al., 2015) in four patients with allergic rhinitis and four controls showed that Basidiomycota and Malassezia were highly abundant in all samples (>92%); nonetheless, no significant differences were reported among groups. This disagrees with our findings here and could result from the low sample size, fungal gene sequenced (i.e., large ribosomal subunit) or geographic region (i.e., Seoul metropolitan area) in Jung et al.’s study. Seven fungal genera varied significantly between AS and CT, despite the small sample size of this group. As before, Malassezia was also much more abundant in CT, while the other genera varied less in their mean relative abundances. Previous studies have also revealed significant differences in the mycobiota of asthmatic patients for Cladosporium, Rhodotorula, Malassezia or Penicillium (van Woerden et al., 2013; Goldman et al., 2018; Sharma et al., 2019; Yuan et al., 2023). Compositional changes in these fungal groups may provide insights into the pathobiology of allergic rhinitis and asthma. Further studies are required to confirm our findings and untangle the relationship between fungal colonization, dysbiosis and chronic inflammatory disease (Nguyen et al., 2015; Goldman et al., 2018; Rick et al., 2020; van Tilburg Bernardes et al., 2020; Yuan et al., 2023).
Fungal alpha-diversity (species richness and evenness) was significantly higher in ARAS and AR compared to CT for all indices but PD (Figure 2). The only study that explored the diversity of the nasal mycobiota in individuals with rhinitis (Jung et al., 2015) also reported higher estimates of Shannon diversity for the AR group. If confirmed, this may suggest that allergic rhinitis (with or without asthma comorbidity) may increase microbial diversity in the upper airways, as seen in previous studies of the bacteriome (Choi et al., 2014; Gan et al., 2021; Kim et al., 2022; Pérez-Losada et al., 2023a,b).
AR, ARAS, and AS samples displayed significant differences in community structure (i.e., beta-diversity) compared to those of healthy controls (Figure 3). This pattern held for all the distance metrics used, whether accounting for phylogenetic diversity or not. No differences were observed between AR and ARAS groups. A previous study of the nasal mycobiota (Jung et al., 2015) has also revealed that AR and CT communities were considerably differentiated. Another study (2020) has also shown specific community structuring associated with distinct bacterial composition of the lung in AS vs. CT. Hence, as indicated before (Pérez-Losada et al., 2023a,b), these results suggest that fungal compositional shifts may be a reliable predictor of allergic rhinitis or asthma in the upper airways, given their lower stochasticity associated to dysbiosis (Ma et al., 2019; Ma, 2020).
The functional component of the allergic rhinitis mycobiome is largely underexplored. Here, we used an imputation method to indirectly explore the functional potential of the nasal mycobiome (Figure 4). We found modest yet significant differences in metabolic pathway abundance when comparing the AR to CT groups. Pathway relative overexpression was high for three pathways related to 5-aminoimidazole ribonucleotide (AIR) biosynthesis in the ARAS group (log2 FC > 0.75). AIR is a key intermediate for purine nucleotide biosynthesis and a precursor to 4-amino-2-methyl-5-hydroxymethylpyrimidine, the first product of pyrimidine biosynthesis. No studies so far have investigated AIR biosynthesis in the airway microbiome, but, interestingly, studies of the gut bacteriome have related AIR biosynthesis to several clinical conditions and diseases (hyperuricemia, inflammatory bowel disease and colorectal cancer) (Ma et al., 2021; Sheng et al., 2021). The impact (if any) of fungal AIR biosynthesis in human health has not been investigated. Purine metabolism is necessary to synthesize DNA and RNA, and in plant pathogenic fungi is associated with fungal growth and pathogenesis (Sun et al., 2024). Some authors (Chitty and Fraser, 2017) have reviewed the literature regarding purine acquisition and synthesis in human pathogenic fungi, finding that purines are essential in diverse processes such as signal transduction, energy metabolism and DNA synthesis, turning AIR biosynthesis into a potential therapeutic target. More studies are needed to test whether AIR biosynthesis in the human airway mycobiome is associated with respiratory diseases such as allergic rhinitis or asthma.
We have also explored mycobiome interactions to better understand the role of fungi in the nasal cavity (Figure 5). Direct or indirect interactions are usually inferred based on co-occurrence or co-variation of microbes’ abundance. For instance, positive interactions might be indicative of syntrophy (a relationship in which one or both organisms benefit nutritionally from the presence of the other), while negative interactions may indicate competition. The CT and AR groups showed fewer significant interactions, all of which were positive, suggesting either similar roles of fungi in the community or syntrophy. In turn, the ARAS group exhibited more diverse relationships with multiple modules with positive and negative interactions among fungal taxa. Previous research has shown that these patterns of co-abundance and exclusion seem to be stable across body sites in the healthy human microbiome and that its alteration can be indicative of underlying disease processes (Faust et al., 2012). In previous studies of the bacteriome in patients with allergic rhinitis (Pérez-Losada et al., 2018; Pérez-Losada et al., 2023a,b) or of the mycobiome in asthmatics (Huang et al., 2020; Liu et al., 2020), co-occurrence networks in diseased participants exhibited different interactions than in healthy controls. Our novel analyses of the airway mycobiome in rhinitic patients seem to confirm those results, although with the allergic rhinitis and comorbid asthma group (ARAS) exhibiting a higher and more diverse mycobiome network. Interestingly, in spite of the multiple connections of rhinitis and asthma and the proposed concept of a united airway disease (Compalati et al., 2010), recent omic data (Dizier et al., 2007; Lemonnier et al., 2020) suggest that rhinitis alone and rhinitis with comorbid asthma may represent two distinct diseases with different allergen sensitization and disease onset (Siroux et al., 2018), rhinitis severity (Savoure et al., 2023) and treatment response (Sousa-Pinto et al., 2022). Moreover, the hypothesis that these two distinct diseases are possibly modulated by the microbiome has been recently proposed (Bousquet et al., 2023). Further research is needed to explore the role of fungi in chronic inflammation, particularly in allergic individuals.
Our study highlights significant differences in the nasal mycobiome composition, structure, and function between individuals with allergic rhinitis and asthma and healthy controls. These findings have profound implications for understanding innate and adaptive host immune responses to fungi in the airways (Bartemes and Kita, 2018; Silva-Gomes et al., 2024). The nasal mycobiome can modulate the local immune environment. Fungal components, such as cell wall polysaccharides (e.g., β-glucans), are known to interact with pattern recognition receptors on immune cells, leading to the activation of various immune pathways (Brown et al., 2012; Bartemes and Kita, 2018). This interaction can exacerbate or alleviate inflammation in the respiratory tract, influencing the severity of allergic reactions. Altered nasal mycobiome profiles, such as those revealed here, may contribute to allergic sensitization. Fungi can also produce potent allergens that trigger Th2-mediated immune responses, characterized by increased production of IgE and activation of mast cells and eosinophils (Noverr and Huffnagle, 2004; Noverr et al., 2004; Bartemes and Kita, 2018). This immune activation plays a critical role in the pathogenesis of allergic rhinitis and asthma. The nasal epithelial barrier’s integrity and the effectiveness of innate immune defenses are closely linked to mycobiome composition. Dysmycobiosis, i.e., imbalance in the fungal community, can compromise these defenses, making individuals more susceptible to infections and exacerbations of allergic conditions (Iliev and Leonardi, 2017). Our findings are supported by previous research demonstrating that distinct nasal mycobiome profiles can activate different immunological responses. For instance, van Woerden et al. (2013) showed that fungal dysbiosis in asthmatic patients correlates with altered immune responses, including increased airway inflammation. A recent review (Jafarlou, 2024) has highlighted that fungal diseases are emerging as a significant global health threat, with the potential to cause a pandemic with widespread outbreaks and significant morbidity and mortality. There is already growing evidence that the lung mycobiome has a significant impact on clinical outcome of chronic respiratory diseases such as asthma (Nguyen et al., 2015). Little is known, however, about allergic rhinitis or the role of the nasal cavity mycobiota (Jung et al., 2015). We showed that nasal dysmycobiosis may contribute to allergic rhinitis with or without asthma comorbidity and warrants further research to elucidate the relationship between the nasal mycobiota and airway pathology.
This study has several limitations. Metataxonomic approaches suffer from the inherent limitations of collecting sequence data from a single gene target (ITS here) (Hilton et al., 2016; Pérez-Losada et al., 2022). PCR amplification biases can also impact microbial compositional assessments. ITS1-2 has limited resolution at the species and sometimes genus level for taxonomic assignment. Although the composition of the described nasal mycobiomes is similar to those reported by others in the nasal cavity of healthy and diseased individuals (Jung et al., 2015; Carpagnano et al., 2016; Goldman et al., 2018; Rick et al., 2020; van Tilburg Bernardes et al., 2020; Yuan et al., 2023). The sample size of the asthmatic (AS) group is relatively small, although we have tried to account for it using statistical approaches moderately robust to small sample sizes. The metabolic potential of the mycobiomes was predicted by imputation of gene families and genomes in PICRUSt2 instead of inferred using shotgun metagenomics; hence functional profiles should be interpreted with caution. This study focuses on a cohort of Portuguese individuals for whom we have collected limited demographic and clinical data (i.e., heath status, season, age, and sex) for all the participants. It is uncertain to what extent our results can be generalized to other countries and cohorts, but since clinical practices in Portugal for treating rhinitis and asthma follow international guidelines and recommendations and nasal mycobiomes characterized here resembled those described in other studies of cohorts from United States, Europe, and Asia, we feel like our insights are broadly applicable. Nonetheless, future research should address the impact of other demographic, clinical and environmental factors on the diversity of airway mycobiomes (Cavaleiro Rufo et al., 2017; Zhang et al., 2023; Paciencia et al., 2024). The relevance of detecting fungi associated with specific phenotypes of disease is unknown, dual-transcriptomic studies coupled with longitudinal sampling (as opposed to the cross-sectional sampling design used here) can help to clarify whether specific microbes are drivers or bystanders in rhinitic and asthmatic patients. Future microbiome research should address this issue.
Data availability statement
The datasets presented in this study can be found in online repositories. The names of the repository/repositories and accession number(s) can be found at: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/, PRJNA1107919.
Ethics statement
The studies involving humans were approved by Comissão de Ética para a Saúde of the Centro Hospitalar Universitário São João/Faculdade de Medicina (Porto, Portugal) in March 2017 (Parecer_58-17). The studies were conducted in accordance with the local legislation and institutional requirements. Written informed consent for participation in this study was provided by the participants’ legal guardians/next of kin.
Author contributions
MP-L: Conceptualization, Data curation, Formal analysis, Funding acquisition, Investigation, Methodology, Project administration, Resources, Software, Supervision, Validation, Visualization, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing. EC-N: Conceptualization, Data curation, Formal analysis, Investigation, Methodology, Software, Validation, Visualization, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing. JG-H: Formal analysis, Methodology, Software, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing. JB: Data curation, Methodology, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing. LD: Conceptualization, Data curation, Funding acquisition, Investigation, Methodology, Project administration, Supervision, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing. TR: Data curation, Methodology, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing. MO: Conceptualization, Data curation, Funding acquisition, Investigation, Methodology, Project administration, Supervision, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing.
Funding
The author(s) declare that financial support was received for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article. This study was co-funded by the EU via European Regional Development Fund (ERDF) and by national funds via the Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia (FCT) and the project PTDC/ASP-PES/27953/2017—POCI-01-0145-FEDER-027953. MP-L was supported by the FCT under the “Programa Operacional Potencial Humano—Quadro de Referência Estratégico” Nacional funds from the European Social Fund and Portuguese “Ministério da Educação e Ciência” IF/00764/2013.
We thank all the patients and healthy volunteers who kindly provided biological samples for this study. We also thank all the clinicians, nurses, and technical staff of the Serviço de Imunoalergologia do Centro Hospitalar Universitário São João in Porto (Portugal), namely José Plácido, André Moreira, Carla Martins, and Artur Vilela, who contributed to the project logistic planning, execution of diagnostic tests, sample collection, and collection and interpretation of clinical data.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Publisher’s note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Supplementary material
The Supplementary material for this article can be found online at: /articles/10.3389/fmicb.2024.1464257/full#supplementary-material
UpSet plots of amplicon sequence variants (ASVs) in the nasal mycobiome of participants with allergic rhinitis (AR), AR with comorbid asthma (ARAS), asthma (AS) and healthy controls (CT).
ReferencesAcevedo-PradoA.Seoane-PilladoT.Lopez-Silvarrey-VarelaA.SalgadoF. J.CruzM. J.Faraldo-GarciaA.. (2022). Association of rhinitis with asthma prevalence and severity. Sci. Rep.12:6389. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-10448-w, PMID: 35430600AnderssonM.DownsS.MitakakisT.LeuppiJ.MarksG. (2003). Natural exposure to Alternaria spores induces allergic rhinitis symptoms in sensitized children. Pediatr. Allergy Immunol.14, 100–105. doi: 10.1034/j.1399-3038.2003.00031.x, PMID: 12675755AzevedoA. C.HilarioS.GoncalvesM. F. M. (2023). Microbiome in nasal mucosa of children and adolescents with allergic rhinitis: a systematic review. Children10:226. doi: 10.3390/children10020226, PMID: 36832355BackhedF.FraserC. M.RingelY.SandersM. E.SartorR. B.ShermanP. M.. (2012). Defining a healthy human gut microbiome: current concepts, future directions, and clinical applications. Cell Host Microbe12, 611–622. doi: 10.1016/j.chom.2012.10.012, PMID: 23159051BadieeP.HashemizadehZ. (2014). Opportunistic invasive fungal infections: diagnosis & clinical management. Indian J. Med. Res.139, 195–204, PMID: 24718393BartemesK. R.KitaH. (2018). Innate and adaptive immune responses to fungi in the airway. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol.142, 353–363. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2018.06.015, PMID: 30080527BatesD.MaechlerM.BolkerB.WalkerS. (2015). Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. J. Stat. Softw.67, 1–48. doi: 10.18637/jss.v067.i01BenderM. E.ReadT. D.EdwardsT. S.HargitaM.CutlerA. J.WisselE. F.. (2020). A comparison of the bacterial nasal microbiome in allergic rhinitis patients before and after immunotherapy. Laryngoscope130, E882–E888. doi: 10.1002/lary.28599, PMID: 32181890BenjaminiY.HochbergY. (1995). Controlling the false discovery rate: a practical and powerful approach to multiple testing. J. R. Stat. Soc. Ser. B Methodol.57, 289–300. doi: 10.1111/j.2517-6161.1995.tb02031.xBergeronC.HamidQ. (2005). Relationship between asthma and rhinitis: epidemiologic, pathophysiologic, and therapeutic aspects. Allergy, Asthma Clin. Immunol.1, 81–87. doi: 10.1186/1710-1492-1-2-81, PMID: 20529228BiesbroekG.TsivtsivadzeE.SandersE. A.MontijnR.VeenhovenR. H.KeijserB. J.. (2014). Early respiratory microbiota composition determines bacterial succession patterns and respiratory health in children. Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med.190, 1283–1292. doi: 10.1164/rccm.201407-1240OC, PMID: 25329446BogaertD.KeijserB.HuseS.RossenJ.VeenhovenR.van GilsE.. (2011). Variability and diversity of nasopharyngeal microbiota in children: a metagenomic analysis. PLoS One6:e17035. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0017035, PMID: 21386965BousquetP. J.BurbachG.HeinzerlingL. M.EdenharterG.BachertC.Bindslev-JensenC.. (2009). GA2LEN skin test study III: minimum battery of test inhalent allergens needed in epidemiological studies in patients. Allergy64, 1656–1662. doi: 10.1111/j.1398-9995.2009.02169.x, PMID: 19824887BousquetJ.HellingsP. W.AgacheI.AmatF.Annesi-MaesanoI.AnsoteguiI. J.. (2019). Allergic rhinitis and its impact on asthma (ARIA) phase 4 (2018): change management in allergic rhinitis and asthma multimorbidity using mobile technology. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol.143, 864–879. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2018.08.049, PMID: 30273709BousquetJ.MelenE.HaahtelaT.KoppelmanG. H.TogiasA.ValentaR.. (2023). Rhinitis associated with asthma is distinct from rhinitis alone: the ARIA-MeDALL hypothesis. Allergy78, 1169–1203. doi: 10.1111/all.15679, PMID: 36799120BrarT.NagarajS.MohapatraS. (2012). Microbes and asthma: the missing cellular and molecular links. Curr. Opin. Pulm. Med.18, 14–22. doi: 10.1097/MCP.0b013e32834dccc0, PMID: 22113000BrownG. D.DenningD. W.GowN. A.LevitzS. M.NeteaM. G.WhiteT. C. (2012). Hidden killers: human fungal infections. Sci. Transl. Med.4:165rv113. doi: 10.1126/scitranslmed.3004404CallahanB. J.McMurdieP. J.RosenM. J.HanA. W.JohnsonA. J.HolmesS. P. (2016). DADA2: high-resolution sample inference from Illumina amplicon data. Nat. Methods13, 581–583. doi: 10.1038/nmeth.3869, PMID: 27214047CarpagnanoG. E.MalerbaM.LacedoniaD.SuscaA.LogriecoA.CaroneM.. (2016). Analysis of the fungal microbiome in exhaled breath condensate of patients with asthma. Allergy Asthma Proc.37, 41–46. doi: 10.2500/aap.2016.37.3943, PMID: 27178886CaspiR.BillingtonR.KeselerI. M.KothariA.KrummenackerM.MidfordP. E.. (2020). The MetaCyc database of metabolic pathways and enzymes—a 2019 update. Nucleic Acids Res.48, D445–D453. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkz862, PMID: 31586394Castro-NallarE.ShenY.FreishtatR. J.Pérez-LosadaM.ManimaranS.LiuG.. (2015). Integrating metagenomics and host gene expression to characterize asthma-associated microbial communities. BMC Med. Genet.8:50. doi: 10.1186/s12920-015-0121-1, PMID: 26277095Cavaleiro RufoJ.MadureiraJ.PacienciaI.AguiarL.PereiraC.SilvaD.. (2017). Indoor fungal diversity in primary schools may differently influence allergic sensitization and asthma in children. Pediatr. Allergy Immunol.28, 332–339. doi: 10.1111/pai.12704ChenM.HeS.MilesP.LiC.GeY.YuX.. (2022). Nasal bacterial microbiome differs between healthy controls and those with asthma and allergic rhinitis. Front. Cell. Infect. Microbiol.12:841995. doi: 10.3389/fcimb.2022.841995ChittyJ. L.FraserJ. A. (2017). Purine acquisition and synthesis by human fungal pathogens. Microorganisms5:33. doi: 10.3390/microorganisms5020033, PMID: 28594372ChoiC. H.PoroykoV.WatanabeS.JiangD.LaneJ.deTineoM.. (2014). Seasonal allergic rhinitis affects sinonasal microbiota. Am. J. Rhinol. Allergy28, 281–286. doi: 10.2500/ajra.2014.28.4050, PMID: 25197913CompalatiE.RidoloE.PassalacquaG.BraidoF.VillaE.CanonicaG. W. (2010). The link between allergic rhinitis and asthma: the united airways disease. Expert Rev. Clin. Immunol.6, 413–423. doi: 10.1586/eci.10.15, PMID: 20441427CookR. D. (1977). Detection of influential observation in linear regression. Technometrics19, 15–18. doi: 10.1080/00401706.1977.10489493DharmageS. C.PerretJ. L.CustovicA. (2019). Epidemiology of asthma in children and adults. Front. Pediatr.7:246. doi: 10.3389/fped.2019.00246, PMID: 31275909DicksonR. P.Erb-DownwardJ. R.HuffnagleG. B. (2013). The role of the bacterial microbiome in lung disease. Expert Rev. Respir. Med.7, 245–257. doi: 10.1586/ers.13.24, PMID: 23734647DicksonR. P.HuffnagleG. B. (2015). The lung microbiome: new principles for respiratory bacteriology in health and disease. PLoS Pathog.11:e1004923. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1004923, PMID: 26158874DinwiddieD. L.DensonJ. L.KennedyJ. L. (2018). Role of the airway microbiome in respiratory infections and asthma in children. Pediatr. Allergy Immunol. Pulmonol.31, 236–240. doi: 10.1089/ped.2018.0958, PMID: 30595952DixonP. (2003). VEGAN, a package of R functions for community ecology. J. Veg. Sci.14, 927–930. doi: 10.1111/j.1654-1103.2003.tb02228.xDizierM. H.BouzigonE.Guilloud-BatailleM.GeninE.OryszczynM. P.Annesi-MaesanoI.. (2007). Evidence for a locus in 1p31 region specifically linked to the co-morbidity of asthma and allergic rhinitis in the EGEA study. Hum. Hered.63, 162–167. doi: 10.1159/000099828, PMID: 17310125DouglasG. M.MaffeiV. J.ZaneveldJ. R.YurgelS. N.BrownJ. R.TaylorC. M.. (2020). PICRUSt2 for prediction of metagenome functions. Nat. Biotechnol.38, 685–688. doi: 10.1038/s41587-020-0548-6, PMID: 32483366EspositoS.PrincipiN. (2018). Impact of nasopharyngeal microbiota on the development of respiratory tract diseases. Eur. J. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. Dis.37, 1–7. doi: 10.1007/s10096-017-3076-7, PMID: 28795339FalcãoH.RamosE.MarquesA.BarrosH. (2008). Prevalence of asthma and rhinitis in 13 year old adolescents in Porto, Portugal. Rev. Port. Pneumol.14, 747–768. doi: 10.1016/S0873-2159(15)30285-3FaustK.SathirapongsasutiJ. F.IzardJ.SegataN.GeversD.RaesJ.. (2012). Microbial co-occurrence relationships in the human microbiome. PLoS Comput. Biol.8:e1002606. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1002606, PMID: 22807668FazlollahiM.LeeT. D.AndradeJ.OguntuyoK.ChunY.GrishinaG.. (2018). The nasal microbiome in asthma. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol.142, 834–843.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2018.02.020, PMID: 29518419Ferreira-MagalhaesM.PereiraA. M.Sa-SousaA.Morais-AlmeidaM.AzevedoI.AzevedoL. F.. (2015). Asthma control in children is associated with nasal symptoms, obesity, and health insurance: a nationwide survey. Pediatr. Allergy Immunol.26, 466–473. doi: 10.1111/pai.12395, PMID: 25939454Ferreira-MagalhaesM.Sa-SousaA.Morais-AlmeidaM.PiteH.AzevedoL. F.AzevedoM. I.. (2016). Asthma-like symptoms, diagnostic tests, and asthma medication use in children and adolescents: a population-based nationwide survey. J. Asthma53, 269–276. doi: 10.3109/02770903.2015.1095926, PMID: 26444577FonsecaJ.Taveira-GomesT.PereiraA. M.Branco-FerreiraM.Carreiro-MartinsP.Alves-CorreiaM.. (2021). ARIA 2019: an integrated care pathway for allergic rhinitis in Portugal. Acta Medica Port.34, 144–157. doi: 10.20344/amp.13777, PMID: 33275547FratiF.SalvatoriC.IncorvaiaC.BellucciA.Di CaraG.MarcucciF.. (2018). The role of the microbiome in asthma: the gut(−)lung Axis. Int. J. Mol. Sci.20:123. doi: 10.3390/ijms20010123, PMID: 30598019GanW.YangF.MengJ.LiuF.LiuS.XianJ. (2021). Comparing the nasal bacterial microbiome diversity of allergic rhinitis, chronic rhinosinusitis and control subjects. Eur. Arch. Otorrinolaringol.278, 711–718. doi: 10.1007/s00405-020-06311-1, PMID: 32860131Garcia-RodriguezJ. A.Fresnadillo MartinezM. J. (2002). Dynamics of nasopharyngeal colonization by potential respiratory pathogens. J. Antimicrob. Chemother.50, 59–73. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkf506, PMID: 12556435GoldmanD. L.ChenZ.ShankarV.TybergM.VicencioA.BurkR. (2018). Lower airway microbiota and mycobiota in children with severe asthma. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol.141, 808–811.e7. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2017.09.018, PMID: 29031597HiltonS. K.Castro-NallarE.Pérez-LosadaM.TomaI.McCaffreyT. A.HoffmanE. P.. (2016). Metataxonomic and metagenomic approaches vs. culture-based techniques for clinical pathology. Front. Microbiol.7:484. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2016.00484, PMID: 27092134HiltyM.BurkeC.PedroH.CardenasP.BushA.BossleyC.. (2010). Disordered microbial communities in asthmatic airways. PLoS One5:e8578. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0008578, PMID: 20052417HuangY. J. (2017). Nasopharyngeal microbiota: gatekeepers or fortune tellers of susceptibility to respiratory tract infections?Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med.196, 1504–1505. doi: 10.1164/rccm.201707-1470ED, PMID: 28800258HuangY. J.BousheyH. A. (2014). The microbiome and asthma. Ann. Am. Thorac. Soc.11, S48–S51. doi: 10.1513/AnnalsATS.201306-187MG, PMID: 24437406HuangY. J.BousheyH. A. (2015). The microbiome in asthma. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol.135, 25–30. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2014.11.011HuangC.YuY.DuW.LiuY.DaiR.TangW.. (2020). Fungal and bacterial microbiome dysbiosis and imbalance of trans-kingdom network in asthma. Clin. Transl. Allergy10:42. doi: 10.1186/s13601-020-00345-8, PMID: 33110490HufnaglK.Pali-SchollI.Roth-WalterF.Jensen-JarolimE. (2020). Dysbiosis of the gut and lung microbiome has a role in asthma. Semin. Immunopathol.42, 75–93. doi: 10.1007/s00281-019-00775-y, PMID: 32072252IlievI. D.LeonardiI. (2017). Fungal dysbiosis: immunity and interactions at mucosal barriers. Nat. Rev. Immunol.17, 635–646. doi: 10.1038/nri.2017.55, PMID: 28604735JafarlouM. (2024). Unveiling the menace: a thorough review of potential pandemic fungal disease. Front. Fungal Biol.5:1338726. doi: 10.3389/ffunb.2024.1338726, PMID: 38711422JungW. H.CrollD.ChoJ. H.KimY. R.LeeY. W. (2015). Analysis of the nasal vestibule mycobiome in patients with allergic rhinitis. Mycoses58, 167–172. doi: 10.1111/myc.12296, PMID: 25675851KatohK.StandleyD. M. (2013). MAFFT multiple sequence alignment software version 7: improvements in performance and usability. Mol. Biol. Evol.30, 772–780. doi: 10.1093/molbev/mst010, PMID: 23329690KimH.BouchardJ.RenziP. M. (2008). The link between allergic rhinitis and asthma: a role for antileukotrienes?Can. Respir. J.15, 91–98. doi: 10.1155/2008/416095, PMID: 18354749KimH. J.KimJ. H.HanS.KimW. (2022). Compositional alteration of the nasal microbiome and Staphylococcus aureus-characterized dysbiosis in the nasal mucosa of patients with allergic rhinitis. Clin. Exp. Otorhinolaryngol.15, 335–345. doi: 10.21053/ceo.2021.01928, PMID: 35680131KozichJ. J.WestcottS. L.BaxterN. T.HighlanderS. K.SchlossP. D. (2013). Development of a dual-index sequencing strategy and curation pipeline for analyzing amplicon sequence data on the MiSeq Illumina sequencing platform. Appl. Environ. Microbiol.79, 5112–5120. doi: 10.1128/AEM.01043-13, PMID: 23793624KurtzZ. D.MullerC. L.MiraldiE. R.LittmanD. R.BlaserM. J.BonneauR. A. (2015). Sparse and compositionally robust inference of microbial ecological networks. PLoS Comput. Biol.11:e1004226. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1004226, PMID: 25950956LalD.KeimP.DelisleJ.BarkerB.RankM. A.ChiaN.. (2017). Mapping and comparing bacterial microbiota in the sinonasal cavity of healthy, allergic rhinitis, and chronic rhinosinusitis subjects. Int. Forum Allergy Rhinol.7, 561–569. doi: 10.1002/alr.21934, PMID: 28481057LemonnierN.MelenE.JiangY.JolyS.MenardC.AguilarD.. (2020). A novel whole blood gene expression signature for asthma, dermatitis, and rhinitis multimorbidity in children and adolescents. Allergy75, 3248–3260. doi: 10.1111/all.14314, PMID: 32277847LicariA.BrambillaI.MarsegliaA.De FilippoM.PaganelliV.MarsegliaG. L. (2018). Difficult vs. severe asthma: definition and limits of asthma control in the pediatric population. Front. Pediatr.6:170. doi: 10.3389/fped.2018.00170, PMID: 29971223LiuC.CuiY.LiX.YaoM. (2021). Microeco: an R package for data mining in microbial community ecology. FEMS Microbiol. Ecol.97:fiaa255. doi: 10.1093/femsec/fiaa255, PMID: 33332530LiuH. Y.LiC. X.LiangZ. Y.ZhangS. Y.YangW. Y.YeY. M.. (2020). The interactions of airway bacterial and fungal communities in clinically stable asthma. Front. Microbiol.11:1647. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2020.01647, PMID: 32849339LosolP.ChoiJ. P.KimS. H.ChangY. S. (2021). The role of upper airway microbiome in the development of adult asthma. Immune Netw.21:e19. doi: 10.4110/in.2021.21.e19, PMID: 34277109LoveM. I.HuberW.AndersS. (2014). Moderated estimation of fold change and dispersion for RNA-seq data with DESeq2. Genome Biol.15:550. doi: 10.1186/s13059-014-0550-8, PMID: 25516281MaZ. S. (2020). Testing the Anna Karenina principle in human microbiome-associated diseases. iScience23:101007. doi: 10.1016/j.isci.2020.101007, PMID: 32305861MaZ. S.LiL.GotelliN. J. (2019). Diversity-disease relationships and shared species analyses for human microbiome-associated diseases. ISME J.13, 1911–1919. doi: 10.1038/s41396-019-0395-y, PMID: 30894688MaY.ZhangY.XiangJ.XiangS.ZhaoY.XiaoM.. (2021). Metagenome analysis of intestinal bacteria in healthy people, patients with inflammatory bowel disease and colorectal cancer. Front. Cell. Infect. Microbiol.11:599734. doi: 10.3389/fcimb.2021.599734, PMID: 33738265McMurdieP. J.HolmesS. (2013). Phyloseq: an R package for reproducible interactive analysis and graphics of microbiome census data. PLoS One8:e61217. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0061217, PMID: 23630581McMurdieP. J.HolmesS. (2014). Waste not, want not: why rarefying microbiome data is inadmissible. PLoS Comput. Biol.10:e1003531. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1003531, PMID: 24699258MimsJ. W. (2015). Asthma: definitions and pathophysiology. Int. Forum Allergy Rhinol.5, S2–S6. doi: 10.1002/alr.21609MucM.Mota-PintoA.PadezC. (2014). Prevalence of asthma and rhinitis symptoms among children living in Coimbra, Portugal. Rev. Port. Pneumol.20, 208–210. doi: 10.1016/j.rppneu.2013.08.002, PMID: 24373330NguyenL. D.ViscogliosiE.DelhaesL. (2015). The lung mycobiome: an emerging field of the human respiratory microbiome. Front. Microbiol.6:89. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2015.00089, PMID: 25762987NilssonR. H.LarssonK. H.TaylorA. F. S.Bengtsson-PalmeJ.JeppesenT. S.SchigelD.. (2019). The UNITE database for molecular identification of fungi: handling dark taxa and parallel taxonomic classifications. Nucleic Acids Res.47, D259–D264. doi: 10.1093/nar/gky1022, PMID: 30371820NoverrM. C.HuffnagleG. B. (2004). Does the microbiota regulate immune responses outside the gut?Trends Microbiol.12, 562–568. doi: 10.1016/j.tim.2004.10.008NoverrM. C.NoggleR. M.ToewsG. B.HuffnagleG. B. (2004). Role of antibiotics and fungal microbiota in driving pulmonary allergic responses. Infect. Immun.72, 4996–5003. doi: 10.1128/IAI.72.9.4996-5003.2004, PMID: 15321991OliveiraM.OliveiraD.LisboaC.BoechatJ. L.DelgadoL. (2023). Clinical manifestations of human exposure to Fungi. J. Fungi9:381. doi: 10.3390/jof9030381, PMID: 36983549PacienciaI.SharmaN.HuggT. T.RantalaA. K.HeibatiB.Al-DelaimyW. K.. (2024). The role of biodiversity in the development of asthma and allergic sensitization: a state-of-the-science review. Environ. Health Perspect.132:66001. doi: 10.1289/EHP13948, PMID: 38935403PawankarR. (2006). Allergic rhinitis and asthma: are they manifestations of one syndrome?Clin. Exp. Allergy36, 1–4. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2222.2006.02420.xPereiraC.ValeroA.LoureiroC.DavilaI.Martinez-CoceraC.MurioC.. (2006). Iberian study of aeroallergens sensitisation in allergic rhinitis. Eur Ann Allergy Clin Immunol38, 186–194, PMID: 16929745Pérez-LosadaM.AlamriL.CrandallK. A.FreishtatR. J. (2017). Nasopharyngeal microbiome diversity changes over time in children with asthma. PLoS One12:e0170543. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0170543, PMID: 28107528Pérez-LosadaM.AutheletK. J.HoptayC. E.KwakC.CrandallK. A.FreishtatR. J. (2018). Pediatric asthma comprises different phenotypic clusters with unique nasal microbiotas. Microbiome6:179. doi: 10.1186/s40168-018-0564-7, PMID: 30286807Pérez-LosadaM.Castro-NallarE.BendallM. L.FreishtatR. J.CrandallK. A. (2015). Dual transcriptomic profiling of host and microbiota during health and disease in pediatric asthma. PLoS One10:e0131819. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0131819Pérez-LosadaM.Castro-NallarE.Laerte BoechatJ.DelgadoL.Azenha RamaT.Berrios-FariasV.. (2023a). Nasal Bacteriomes of patients with asthma and allergic rhinitis show unique composition, structure, function and interactions. Microorganisms11:683. doi: 10.3390/microorganisms11030683, PMID: 36985258Pérez-LosadaM.Castro-NallarE.Laerte BoechatJ.DelgadoL.Azenha RamaT.Berrios-FariasV.. (2023b). The oral bacteriomes of patients with allergic rhinitis and asthma differ from that of healthy controls. Front. Microbiol.14:1197135. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2023.1197135, PMID: 37440882Pérez-LosadaM.CrandallK. A.FreishtatR. J. (2016a). Comparison of two commercial DNA extraction kits for the analysis of nasopharyngeal bacterial communities. AIMS Microbiol.2, 108–119. doi: 10.3934/microbiol.2016.2.108Pérez-LosadaM.CrandallK. A.FreishtatR. J. (2016b). Two sampling methods yield distinct microbial signatures in the nasopharynges of asthmatic children. Microbiome4:25. doi: 10.1186/s40168-016-0170-5, PMID: 27306800Pérez-LosadaM.NarayananD. B.KolbeA. R.Ramos-TapiaI.Castro-NallarE.CrandallK. A.. (2022). Comparative analysis of metagenomics and metataxonomics for the characterization of vermicompost microbiomes. Front. Microbiol.13:854423. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2022.854423, PMID: 35620097PiteH.PereiraA. M.Morais-AlmeidaM.NunesC.BousquetJ.FonsecaJ. A. (2014). Prevalence of asthma and its association with rhinitis in the elderly. Respir. Med.108, 1117–1126. doi: 10.1016/j.rmed.2014.05.002PrevaesS. M.de Winter-de GrootK. M.JanssensH. M.de Steenhuijsen PitersW. A.Tramper-StrandersG. A.WyllieA. L.. (2016). Development of the nasopharyngeal microbiota in infants with cystic fibrosis. Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med.193, 504–515. doi: 10.1164/rccm.201509-1759OC, PMID: 26492486PriceM. N.DehalP. S.ArkinA. P. (2010). FastTree 2--approximately maximum-likelihood trees for large alignments. PLoS One5:e9490. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0009490QuastC.PruesseE.YilmazP.GerkenJ.SchweerT.YarzaP.. (2013). The SILVA ribosomal RNA gene database project: improved data processing and web-based tools. Nucleic Acids Res.41, D590–D596. doi: 10.1093/nar/gks1219, PMID: 23193283R Development Core Team (2008). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria.RaitaY.Pérez-LosadaM.FreishtatR. J.HarmonB.MansbachJ. M.PiedraP. A.. (2021). Integrated omics endotyping of infants with respiratory syncytial virus bronchiolitis and risk of childhood asthma. Nat. Commun.12:3601. doi: 10.1038/s41467-021-23859-6, PMID: 34127671RickE. M.WoolnoughK. F.SeearP. J.FairsA.SatchwellJ.RichardsonM.. (2020). The airway fungal microbiome in asthma. Clin. Exp. Allergy50, 1325–1341. doi: 10.1111/cea.13722RStudio Team (2015). Integrated development for R. RStudio, IncBoston, MA.Sa-SousaA.Morais-AlmeidaM.AzevedoL. F.CarvalhoR.JacintoT.Todo-BomA.. (2012). Prevalence of asthma in Portugal—the Portuguese National Asthma Survey. Clin. Transl. Allergy2:15. doi: 10.1186/2045-7022-2-15, PMID: 22931550SavoureM.BousquetJ.JaakkolaJ. J. K.JaakkolaM. S.JacqueminB.NadifR. (2022). Worldwide prevalence of rhinitis in adults: a review of definitions and temporal evolution. Clin. Transl. Allergy12:e12130. doi: 10.1002/clt2.12130, PMID: 35344304SavoureM.BousquetJ.LeynaertB.RenuyA.SirouxV.GoldbergM.. (2023). Rhinitis phenotypes and multimorbidities in the general population: the CONSTANCES cohort. Eur. Respir. J.61:2200943. doi: 10.1183/13993003.00943-2022, PMID: 36202419ShadeA.HandelsmanJ. (2012). Beyond the Venn diagram: the hunt for a core microbiome. Environ. Microbiol.14, 4–12. doi: 10.1111/j.1462-2920.2011.02585.x, PMID: 22004523SharmaA.LaxmanB.NaureckasE. T.HogarthD. K.SperlingA. I.SolwayJ.. (2019). Associations between fungal and bacterial microbiota of airways and asthma endotypes. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol.144, 1214–1227.e7. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2019.06.025, PMID: 31279011ShengS.ChenJ.ZhangY.QinQ.LiW.YanS.. (2021). Structural and functional alterations of gut microbiota in males with hyperuricemia and high levels of liver enzymes. Front Med8:779994. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2021.779994, PMID: 34869502SilvaD.SeveroM.PacienciaI.RufoJ.MartinsC.MoreiraP.. (2019). Setting definitions of childhood asthma in epidemiologic studies. Pediatr. Allergy Immunol.30, 708–715. doi: 10.1111/pai.13111Silva-GomesR.CaldeiraI.FernandesR.CunhaC.CarvalhoA. (2024). Metabolic regulation of the host-fungus interaction: from biological principles to therapeutic opportunities. J. Leukoc. Biol.116, 469–486. doi: 10.1093/jleuko/qiae045, PMID: 38498599SirouxV.BallardiniN.SolerM.LupinekC.BoudierA.PinI.. (2018). The asthma-rhinitis multimorbidity is associated with IgE polysensitization in adolescents and adults. Allergy73, 1447–1458. doi: 10.1111/all.13410, PMID: 29331026SmallP.KeithP. K.KimH. (2018). Allergic rhinitis. Allergy, Asthma Clin. Immunol.14:51. doi: 10.1186/s13223-018-0280-7, PMID: 30263033Sousa-PintoB.SchunemannH. J.Sa-SousaA.VieiraR. J.AmaralR.AntoJ. M.. (2022). Comparison of rhinitis treatments using MASK-air(R) data and considering the minimal important difference. Allergy77, 3002–3014. doi: 10.1111/all.15371SteelantB.FarreR.WawrzyniakP.BelmansJ.DekimpeE.VanheelH.. (2016). Impaired barrier function in patients with house dust mite-induced allergic rhinitis is accompanied by decreased occludin and zonula occludens-1 expression. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol.137, 1043–1053.e5. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2015.10.050SteelantB.SeysS. F.Van GervenL.Van WoenselM.FarreR.WawrzyniakP.. (2018). Histamine and T helper cytokine-driven epithelial barrier dysfunction in allergic rhinitis. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol.141, 951–963.e8. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2017.08.039, PMID: 29074456SunM.DaiP.CaoZ.DongJ. (2024). Purine metabolism in plant pathogenic fungi. Front. Microbiol.15:1352354. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2024.1352354, PMID: 38384269TeoS. M.MokD.PhamK.KuselM.SerralhaM.TroyN.. (2015). The infant nasopharyngeal microbiome impacts severity of lower respiratory infection and risk of asthma development. Cell Host Microbe17, 704–715. doi: 10.1016/j.chom.2015.03.008, PMID: 25865368ThompsonL. R.SandersJ. G.McDonaldD.AmirA.LadauJ.LoceyK. J.. (2017). A communal catalogue reveals Earth’s multiscale microbial diversity. Nature551, 457–463. doi: 10.1038/nature24621, PMID: 29088705Todo-BomA.LoureiroC.AlmeidaM. M.NunesC.DelgadoL.Castel-BrancoG.. (2007). Epidemiology of rhinitis in Portugal: evaluation of the intermittent and the persistent types. Allergy62, 1038–1043. doi: 10.1111/j.1398-9995.2007.01448.xValeroA.PereiraC.LoureiroC.Martinez-CoceraC.MurioC.RicoP.. (2009). Interrelationship between skin sensitization, rhinitis, and asthma in patients with allergic rhinitis: a study of Spain and Portugal. J Investig Allergol Clin Immunol19, 167–172, PMID: 19610258van Tilburg BernardesE.GutierrezM. W.ArrietaM. C. (2020). The fungal microbiome and asthma. Front. Cell. Infect. Microbiol.10:583418. doi: 10.3389/fcimb.2020.583418, PMID: 33324573van WoerdenH. C.GregoryC.BrownR.MarchesiJ. R.HoogendoornB.MatthewsI. P. (2013). Differences in fungi present in induced sputum samples from asthma patients and non-atopic controls: a community based case control study. BMC Infect. Dis.13:69. doi: 10.1186/1471-2334-13-69, PMID: 23384395WangQ.GarrityG. M.TiedjeJ. M.ColeJ. R. (2007). Naive Bayesian classifier for rapid assignment of rRNA sequences into the new bacterial taxonomy. Appl. Environ. Microbiol.73, 5261–5267. doi: 10.1128/AEM.00062-07, PMID: 17586664WeissS.XuZ. Z.PeddadaS.AmirA.BittingerK.GonzalezA.. (2017). Normalization and microbial differential abundance strategies depend upon data characteristics. Microbiome5:27. doi: 10.1186/s40168-017-0237-y, PMID: 28253908YangC.MaiJ.CaoX.BurberryA.CominelliF.ZhangL. (2023). ggpicrust2: an R package for PICRUSt2 predicted functional profile analysis and visualization. Bioinformatics39:btad470. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btad470, PMID: 37527009YuanH.LiuZ.DongJ.BacharierL. B.JacksonD.MaugerD.. (2023). The fungal microbiome of the upper airway is associated with future loss of asthma control and exacerbation among children with asthma. Chest164, 302–313. doi: 10.1016/j.chest.2023.03.034, PMID: 37003356ZhangM.TangH.YuanY.OuZ.ChenZ.XuY.. (2023). The role of indoor microbiome and metabolites in shaping children’s nasal and oral microbiota: a pilot multi-omic analysis. Meta13:1040. doi: 10.3390/metabo13101040
‘Oh, my dear Thomas, you haven’t heard the terrible news then?’ she said. ‘I thought you would be sure to have seen it placarded somewhere. Alice went straight to her room, and I haven’t seen her since, though I repeatedly knocked at the door, which she has locked on the inside, and I’m sure it’s most unnatural of her not to let her own mother comfort her. It all happened in a moment: I have always said those great motor-cars shouldn’t be allowed to career about the streets, especially when they are all paved with cobbles as they are at Easton Haven, which are{331} so slippery when it’s wet. He slipped, and it went over him in a moment.’ My thanks were few and awkward, for there still hung to the missive a basting thread, and it was as warm as a nestling bird. I bent low--everybody was emotional in those days--kissed the fragrant thing, thrust it into my bosom, and blushed worse than Camille. "What, the Corner House victim? Is that really a fact?" "My dear child, I don't look upon it in that light at all. The child gave our picturesque friend a certain distinction--'My husband is dead, and this is my only child,' and all that sort of thing. It pays in society." leave them on the steps of a foundling asylum in order to insure [See larger version] Interoffice guff says you're planning definite moves on your own, J. O., and against some opposition. Is the Colonel so poor or so grasping—or what? Albert could not speak, for he felt as if his brains and teeth were rattling about inside his head. The rest of[Pg 188] the family hunched together by the door, the boys gaping idiotically, the girls in tears. "Now you're married." The host was called in, and unlocked a drawer in which they were deposited. The galleyman, with visible reluctance, arrayed himself in the garments, and he was observed to shudder more than once during the investiture of the dead man's apparel. HoME香京julia种子在线播放
ENTER NUMBET 0016gschain.com.cn jijjrj.com.cn www.fhjszp.com.cn hisealine.org.cn hmdeyiju.com.cn laimaiche.com.cn www.superong.org.cn www.nb9dx.net.cn www.neurub.com.cn www.ryupqm.com.cn