Front. Mar. Sci. Frontiers in Marine Science Front. Mar. Sci. 2296-7745 Frontiers Media S.A. 10.3389/fmars.2022.885614 Marine Science Review Recent Advances in Photocatalytic Removal of Microplastics: Mechanisms, Kinetic Degradation, and Reactor Design HamdWael 1 * DaherElie A. 2 TofaTajkia Syeed 3 DuttaJoydeep 4 * 1Chemical Engineering Department, Faculty of Engineering, University of Balamand, El-Koura, Lebanon 2Petrochemical Engineering Department, Faculty of Engineering III, Scientific Research Center in Engineering (CRSI), Lebanese University, Hadat, Lebanon 3Department of Civil Engineering (CE), Military Institute of Science and Technology (MIST), Mirpur Cantonment, Dhaka, Bangladesh 4Functional Materials, Department of Applied Physics, School of Engineering Sciences, KTH Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm, Sweden

Edited by: Carlos Gravato, University of Lisbon, Portugal

Reviewed by: Kyu-Jung Chae, Korea Maritime and Ocean University, South Korea; Bommanna Loganathan, Murray State University, United States

*Correspondence: Wael Hamd, wael.hamd@balamand.edu.lb; Joydeep Dutta, joydeep@kth.se

This article was submitted to Marine Pollution, a section of the journal Frontiers in Marine Science

29 07 2022 2022 9 885614 28 02 2022 23 05 2022 Copyright © 2022 Hamd, Daher, Tofa and Dutta 2022 Hamd, Daher, Tofa and Dutta

This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

Plastic products are used in almost all aspects of our daily life. Due to their low cost, portability, durability, and resistance to degradation, these products are affecting the health of the environment and biota on a global scale. Thus, the removal and mineralization of microplastics is an important challenge in the 21st century. Advanced oxidation processes (AOPs) have recently been identified as a viable treatment technique for tackling recalcitrant organic molecules and polymers. However, information on kinetic degradation mechanisms and photocatalytic reactor design is insufficient. This review discusses the fundamentals of photocatalysis and photo-Fenton processes in addition to the photocatalytic degradation mechanisms. We also introduce different characterization techniques of the major microplastic pollutants such as PE, PP, PVC, PS, PMMA, and PA66. In addition, a detailed overview of the major existing photocatalytic plants and the scaling-up methods of photoreactors are discussed.

microplastics advanced oxidation processes photocatalysis microplastics characterization photocatalytic reactor design reactor upscaling H2020-BG- 2016–2017-grant number 774586 H2020 European Research Council10.13039/100010663

香京julia种子在线播放

    1. <form id=HxFbUHhlv><nobr id=HxFbUHhlv></nobr></form>
      <address id=HxFbUHhlv><nobr id=HxFbUHhlv><nobr id=HxFbUHhlv></nobr></nobr></address>

      1 Introduction

      It is rare to experience similar growth in production and usage as the plastics industry has done in the span of 60 years, plasticizing the modern world, and justifiably dubbing the 20th and 21st centuries the “Plastics Age” (Porta, 2021).

      By the middle of the 19th century, and in the wake of industrialized goods production, inventors were attempting to tackle a new economic problem, resulting from the increasing scarcity of natural-derived materials. It was then that the first synthetic polymer was produced by John Wesley Hyatt around 1869 from the treatment of cellulose polymer and camphor (Evode et al., 2021). As research progressed, the dawn of the 20th century witnessed the production of the “Bakelite”, the first synthetic plastic, by Leo Hendrik Baekeland in 1907 (Geyer et al., 2017). Owing to its remarkable versatility and utility, plastics went into large-scale production to accompany the technological revolution that followed the beginning of the so‐called post‐World War II in what was known as the “Great Acceleration of population, industry and resource utilization” (Porta, 2021). Today, plastics and plastic-based materials are produced in millions of tons at a rate exceeding two hundred million tons per annum (Nabi et al., 2021). Plastic fabrication is expected to increase twofold in the next 20 years if current trends continue (Lebreton and Andrady, 2019).

      However, plastics, the wonder material of the 1960s, became a victim of its own success. As a result of the huge production and inefficient waste management practices, plastic debris has progressively invaded the environment from the poles to the equator, and from the depths of the oceans to the tops of mountains, jeopardizing the aquatic and terrestrial ecosystem (Browne et al., 2010). As of 2015, it is appraised that only about 9% of the 6,300 Mt of produced plastic litter was recycled, 12% was incinerated, and 79% was dumped in landfills or the natural environment (Geyer et al., 2017). Over 5 trillion pieces of plastic, weighing over 260,000 tons, are now hovering over the ocean’s surface (Eriksen et al., 2014). If current production and waste management trends continue, by 2050, plastics are anticipated to account for up to 54 wt% of all discharged anthropogenic leftover into the environment, with 12,000 Mt ending up in landfills or aquatic media (Geyer et al., 2017; Cao et al., 2021). Plastics are a versatile material made up of long-chain synthetic polymers with tenacious characteristics, mainly processed from petroleum-based products, and consuming approximately 1.6 billion L of oil annually (Knoblauch et al., 2018). Recent studies estimated that plastic production would require in the next 30 years roughly 20% of petroleum products consumed globally and would account for 15% of the annual carbon emissions (Lebreton and Andrady, 2019).

      Plastics pollutants are broadly defined into five categories depending on their dimensions: megaplastics (over 1 m), macroplastics (below 1 m), mesoplastics (below 2.5 cm), microplastics (MPs) (below 5 mm), and nanoplastics (under 1 µm) (Thompson et al., 2004; Wright et al., 2013; Law and Thompson, 2014; Wang et al., 2017). Within this scope and since 2004, the term “microplastics” has been popularly adopted by scientists and environmentalists (Hartmann et al., 2019). More recently, MPs are termed as “synthetic solid plastic particle or polymeric matrix with regular or irregular shapes and a size ranging from 1 μm to 5 mm” (Frias and Nash, 2019).

      Following their unabated discharge, MPs have been found in seawater, coasts (Zhou et al., 2016), estuarine sediments (Qiu et al., 2015), rivers (Sanchez et al., 2014), lakes (Wang et al., 2017), soils (Zhou et al., 2019), and air (Abbasi et al., 2018), among others, outnumbering the large portion of plastic debris (Hale et al., 2020). Moreover, these small invaders are of great environmental concern, especially due to their size; it is accessible to a wide range of organisms, starting from the smallest species such as zooplankton to the bigger ones, with potential physical and toxicological issues (Law and Thompson, 2014; Hodson et al., 2017; He et al., 2018).

      Due to their small size, ingested MPs can circulate throughout the food web up to the food chains of human consumers (Revel et al., 2018). According to reports, a human being could consume between 39,000 and 52,000 MPs per year through food and beverages, while 4,000 MPs to 90,000 MPs could be added annually if tap and bottled water are respectively consumed (Cox et al., 2019). Recent studies suggest that MPs of micrometer size or smaller could adversely affect human health (Rist et al., 2018; Chen et al., 2020).

      Conventional wastewater treatment plants (WWTPs) were found to be ineffective when it comes to MPs removal. These MPs are barely detectable on the macroscopic scale, and can easily escape capture by WWTPs ultimately ending up in the aquatic environment (Murphy et al., 2016; Lasee et al., 2017). Following the water treatment via WWTPs and drinkable water treatment plants (DWTPs), a ~70% removal efficiency of microfibers (MPFs) was only achieved, with treated wastewater containing up to ~347 of undetected MPFs/L (Sol et al., 2021). Furthermore, studies about WWTPs from different locations revealed an abundance of MPs in the treated water between 5.00 × 105 and 1.39 × 1010 particles on a daily basis (Liu et al., 2021).

      The failure of conventional WWTPs to effectively remove MPs explains the carried-out efforts by scientists and engineers to develop suitable innovative technologies capable of treating these particles and neutralizing their harmful effects. In this regard, technologies for removing MPs, including physical, chemical, and biological treatments, were developed (Mumford et al., 2012; Talvitie et al., 2017; Ziajahromi et al., 2017; Sun et al., 2019). However, these methods show some main drawbacks (see Figure 1), such as the further required treatment of resulting sludge (Kim et al., 2022), production of secondary MPs, and non-reusability, making them unattractive to be employed for tackling the MPs in the environment (Dey et al., 2021).

      Drawbacks of some of the MPs removal technologies.

      In order to overcome these restraints, it was vital to search for more advanced and efficient technologies.

      In this view, advanced oxidation processes (AOPs) are considered environmental-friendly methods and were proposed as tertiary treatment for different types of wastewater effluents owing to their versatility and ability to remove non-biodegradable and chemically stable pollutants (Konstas and Konstantinou, 2019; Zhang et al., 2019; Antonopoulou et al., 2021). The principle of AOPs is based on physicochemical transformations that result in molecular disintegration, simplification of the chemical structure, and finally mineralization. Such processes involve the formation of highly reactive radical species involving the hydroxyl (HO), superoxide ( O 2 · ) , hydroperoxyl ( HO 2 · ) , alkoxyl (RO), sulfate ( SO 4 · ) and chlorine (Cl) radicals (Vione et al., 2014; Potakis et al., 2017; Alfaifi et al., 2018). A general classification of the AOPs is shown in Figure 2.

      Homogeneous and Heterogeneous Advanced Oxidation Processes.

      Among AOPs, photocatalysis and Fenton processes show a relatively high degradation rate and efficiency, making them a promising alternative for degrading various recalcitrants like MPs (Mokhbi et al., 2019; Kim et al., 2022). Yet, the employment of these techniques at an industrial scale remains very challenging due to the interference of several parameters that could affect the degradation process such as (i) the type and size of MPs, (ii) the light source and its intensity, in addition to (iii) the design of the photoreactor. Therefore, this work reviews, in an extensive manner, recent advances in photocatalysis technology, mechanism, and kinetics of MPs photodegradation, as well as the upscaling of photocatalytic reactors.

      2 Recent Advances in Photocatalysis Technology 2.1 Fundamentals of Photocatalysis

      This technology could fall into two primary subgroups: homogeneous and heterogeneous photocatalytic systems. Homogeneous systems are broadly employed due to their high reaction rate, short process time, and high accessibility, yet they present some critical drawbacks such as high cost, cumbersome extraction, complicated recycling procedures, and reactor corrosion (Ali et al., 2014; Cui et al., 2018). Moreover, implementing process-engineering strategies in photocatalytic processes favors heterogeneous photocatalysis due to the higher stability and ease of recovering heterogeneous photocatalysts.

      Generally, photocatalysts are semiconductor (SC) materials that are photoactive. When an SC is irradiated by a light source of photonic energy (hv) larger than that of its bandgap (Ebg), an excited electron shifts from the valence band (VB) to the vacant conduction band (CB), and an electron (e)–hole (h+) pair is created (Zhang et al., 2018). Consequently, the nature of the light source critically affects the concentration of (e)–(h+) pairs and therefore the effectiveness of the system. Regardless of the type of pollutants, molecules, or MPs particles, the principle of photocatalytic degradation is quite similar and mainly grounded on the oxidation by ROS to transform the toxic product into less harmful components (Kim et al., 2022). The steps of such a mechanism are explained in Figure 3. As seen, while a part of the photo-generated electron–holes (1) recombine within 10 to 100 ns through radiative (photoluminescence) or non-radiative (energy release) processes (5), the rest generate a charge carrier capable of spatially separating on the catalytic surface (2) (Alfaifi et al., 2018; Hoffmann et al., 1995 Habib et al., 2020; Danish et al., 2021).

      Photocatalytic degradation steps of microplastics at the surface of the semiconductor under light irradiation: (1) (e−) – (h+) seperation, (2) Diffusion of the charge carriers on the surface of the photocatalyst, (3),(4) light-driven catalytic oxidation and reduction takes place on the active sites of the catalyst, (5) (e) – (h+) recombination inside the catalyst, (6) (e) – (h+) recombination at the catalyst surface.

      Upon reaching the surface, these electron–hole pairs could either recombine again (6) or undergo electronic transfers with the localized states of the adsorbed molecules (3),(4). In this regard, the protons’ reduction [ENHE (H+/H2) = 0.0 eV] and water oxidation [ENHE (O2/H2O) = 1.23 eV] are the main reference energy levels that acquire a particular relevance concerning most SCs (as seen in Figure S1) (Tong et al., 2012).

      Generally, metal oxide SCs have their valence bands with the main contribution from oxygen 2p orbitals, at 1–3 eV below the O2/H2O redox couple, while transition metal oxides with conduction bands mainly constituted by d orbitals of the metal have the position of their s orbital close to, or below the H2O reduction potential (Coronado, 2013). Thus, in aqueous media, a photo-activated SC enables the generation of reactive oxygen species (ROS) such as hydroxyl radical (OH) and superoxide radical ( O 2 · ) , which exhibit strong oxidation of organic matters, leading to the total mineralization of recalcitrant organic particles into less harmful products such as H2O and CO2 (Ganguly et al., 2019; Habib et al., 2020; Saravanan et al., 2020).

      SC photocatalysts can be classified into three main categories: single, double (binary), and three (ternary) components (Figure 4). The usage of classical single components shows certain limits related to the large amount of electron–hole recombination, low absorption of the visible region, and poor conduction of the charge carrier (Pawar and Lee, 2015). Although binary and ternary photocatalysts have been showing a better performance compared to the single components, they present many downsides when used alone (Xu et al., 2019).

      Flow chart of some binary and ternary semiconductor photocatalysts.

      For instance, SCs with sulfides or nitrides (binary SC) possess a narrow bandgap but are unstable in the aqueous medium (Mishra and Chun, 2015). Moreover, using metal oxides in their pure form presents limited adsorption capacity, lower recovery, reusability, and higher recombination rates (Mohamed et al., 2020). For example, TiO2-based SCs have been studied, and widely used for photocatalytic applications, yet, they present poor quantum yield due to the fast recombination rate of photogenerated electron–hole pairs, poor and selective adsorption, and short-lived photo-generated carriers (Adekoya et al., 2017; Lum et al., 2019). Another broadly used metal oxide, zinc oxide (ZnO), is prone to be soluble in both alkaline and acidic medium (Saravanan et al., 2020). In addition, certain ternary SCs have an enough narrow Ebg that renders them active under visible light, yet they do not possess appropriate band edge potentials to perform diverse reactions (Xu et al., 2019). For this reason, optimum formulations of performant photocatalytic systems can be achieved by either coupling large bandgap binary/ternary SCs with narrower bandgap binary/ternary ones, or coupling modified/unmodified SCs into nanocomposites, or even by adopting the two-step photoexcitation system known as Z-scheme (1st, 2nd, and 3rd generations) (Yadav et al., 2018; Xu et al., 2019; Chung et al., 2019).

      3 Photo-Fenton Process

      Fenton oxidation processes, another classic category of AOPs, is one of the most popular and interesting techniques due to its satisfying depuration ability (at room temperature and barometric pressure), a broad spectrum of applications, interference resiliency, procedure simplicity, and quick degradation/mineralization of recalcitrant organics (Hamd and Dutta, 2020). The process was first brought to light by Fenton et al. in 1894 (Fenton, 1894) in its basic form, consisting of the catalytic reaction of H2O2 with iron ions (Fe2+) and producing hydroxyl radical (OH), the second-highest oxidized species with a potential E°C(OH/H2O) = +2.8 Vs NHE as shown in (Rn. 1).

      Fe 2 + + H 2 O 2 Fe 3 + + OH + OH

      However, besides the oxidation of Fe2+ to Fe3+, the technique requires the generation of the Fe2+ species throughout its reduction to Fe3+ to generate OH (Rn. 2). With the rate of the reduction reaction ~6,000 times lower than that of the oxidation, the efficiency of the oxidation/reduction cycle of Fe(III)/Fe(II) is dramatically hindered and leads to the accumulation of Fe3+ in the solution (Song et al., 2006; Martínez-Huitle et al., 2015).

      Fe 3 + + H 2 O 2 Fe 2 + + H + + HO 2

      Facing the fact that Fe3+ begins to precipitate at >pH = 3 to form the so-called iron sludge (oxyhydroxide) (Xue et al., 2018), which is considered a heavy pollutant, and leads to severe losses of ferric ions in the medium, homogenous Fenton is recommended to be performed in strong acidic medium (Hamd and Dutta, 2020)..

      To overcome this inconvenience and to expand the application pH of the technology, various approaches have been adopted such as coupling homogeneous Fenton with UV-vis/solar irradiation, using chelating agents (CAs), or employing heterogeneous Fenton systems (Hamd and Dutta, 2020).

      3.1 Coupling of Homogeneous Fenton Process With Light (Photo-Fenton)

      The generation of stable hydroxo-iron(III) complexes such as [Fe(OOH)]2+ and [Fe(OH)]2+ by the interaction of Fe3+ ions with H2O2 and OH results in a poor regeneration of iron(III) ions (Rn. 3,4) (Ahmed et al., 2011):

      Fe 3 + + H 2 O 2   [ Fe ( OOH ) ] 2 + + H + Fe 3 + + OH [ Fe ( OH ) ] 2 +

      Herein, this rate could be increased by the introduction of a UV-vis (<580 nm) irradiation source, thus reducing sludge formation and maintaining the oxidation/reduction cycle in a step that produces greater amounts of OH radicals (Rn. 5) (Babuponnusami and Muthukumar, 2014; Lee et al., 2014).

      [ Fe ( OH ) ] 2 + + h v Fe 2 + + O 2 H λ <   580  nm

      Nevertheless, several key parameters have to be considered including (i) the initial concentration of recalcitrant molecules, (ii) the initial concentration of Fenton reagents, (iii) the operating temperature, and, most critically, (iv) the pH (Hamd and Dutta, 2020). For instance, at pH > 3.5, various aspects are noticed:

      -OH radicals generation by the decomposition of H2O2 is hindered due to the deficiency of H+ (Walling et al. 1975). (2019).

      - H2O2 decomposition to water and oxygen is accelerated at pH > 5 (Meeker and United States Patent Office, 1963).

      - OH radicals’ oxidation potential is shrunken as pH values increase (E°C = 2.8–1.95 V at pH 0–14) (Samet et al., 2009).

      - Production of ferric oxyhydroxide (FeOOH) at pH > 4 decreases the degradation rate (Tang and Huang, 1996).

      - The increased stability of H2O2 owing to the generation of , H 3 O 2 + blocks the formation of OH radicals.

      3.1.1 Role of Chelating Agents in Homogeneous Photo-Fenton Processes in Preventing Sludge Formation

      To extend the working pH of homogeneous photo-Fenton processes, organic/inorganic ligands known as CAs, e.g., EDTA (ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid), EDDS (ethylenediamine-N,N’-disuccinic acid), oxalate, NTA (nitrilotriacetic acid), CMCD (carboxymethyl β-cyclodextrin), tartrate, citrate, and succinate, are used (Luna et al., 2012). Moreover, various advantages were proved to come along with the usage of CAs, including:

      - Increase quantum yield of OH radicals.

      - Improving Fe3+ reduction to Fe2+, resulting in additional OH radicals, as shown in the case of oxalate ion (Rn. 6, 7):

      Fe III ( C 2 O 4 ) 2 + h v  Fe II ( C 2 O 4 ) + C 2 O 4 ( 200  nm    λ     280  nm ) Fe II ( C 2 O 4 ) 2 + H 2 O 2  Fe III ( C 2 O 4 ) + + OH + OH +

      More interestingly, the usage of CAs such as EDTA is broadly recommended in the heterogeneous photo-Fenton process (detailed in the next section). Adsorption of EDTA on magnetite, for example, could promote Fe3O4 dissolution, resulting in an improved catalytic reaction (He et al., 2015). Nevertheless, the high concentration of some of the CAs should be controlled because they may be strongly competing with H2O2 species for the boundless active catalytic sites (Huang et al., 2013).

      3.2 Heterogeneous Photo-Fenton Processes

      The advantage of the heterogeneous photo-Fenton processes relies upon extending the medium pH towards more practical ranges because catalytic reactions take place at the active region on the solid catalyst’s surface, therefore reducing the leaching of iron ions, decreasing the production of the iron sludge, and permitting the reusability of the catalyst (Liu et al., 2017; Hamd and Dutta, 2020).

      Basically, two main interfacial mechanisms were proposed based on the two-stage degradation kinetic process (Figure S2) (He et al., 2015; Hamd and Dutta, 2020):

      - Slow induction period mainly consisting of heterogeneous reactions and surface iron leaching (homogeneous reactions).

      - Leaching of surface iron (homogeneous reactions), accompanied by quick induction time on the catalyst surface for heterogeneous catalytic reactions.

      In heterogeneous Fenton systems, hydroxyl radical OH (the main oxidant species) is commonly produced either from heterogeneous catalytic reactions between the surficial FeII (≡FeII) and H2O2 (Rn. 8) (Lin and Gurol, 1998) or from the outer-sphere reaction of uncomplexed Fe2+ ions with H2O2 (Rn. 10) (Remucal and Sedlak, 2011):

      Fe II + H 2 O 2 Fe III OH + OH

      As for other oxidants such as hydroperoxyl radical ( HO 2 · ) and superoxide anion ( O 2 · ) , they are produced by reactions involving surface-complexed FeIII (≡FeIII − OH) and H2O2, OH and H2O2, in addition to reactions involving carbon-centered R and oxygen (Rn. 9-11) (Santos-Juanes et al., 2011; He et al., 2015).

      Fe III OH + H 2 O 2 Fe II OH + H 2 O + HO 2 HO + H 2 O 2 HO 2 / O 2 + H 2 O R + O 2 R ( H + ) + HO 2

      Owing to the proportionality of the catalytic decomposition rate of hydrogen peroxide to its own concentration and the surface area of the goethite as well (Huang et al., 2001; Kwan and Voelker, 2003), the proposed mechanism of H2O2 decomposition by Lin and Gurol seems to be the most reasonable (Rn. 12-18) (Lin and Gurol, 1998):

      Fe III OH + H 2 O 2 ( H 2 O 2 ) s ( H 2 O 2 ) s ( Fe II O 2 H ) + H 2 O ( Fe II O 2 H ) Fe II + HO 2 HO 2 H + + O 2  pKa = 4.85 ± 0.1 Fe III OH + HO 2 / O 2 Fe II + H 2 O / OH + O 2 OH  Fe II + Fe III OH OH + ( H 2 O 2 ) s Fe III OH + HO 2 + H 2  O

      Besides these reactions, coupling the system with solar irradiation, photocatalysis could occur owing to the narrow bandgaps (2.0–2.3 eV) of iron oxide (Gulshan et al., 2010). The introduction of sunlight to heterogeneous photo-Fenton processes was found to be beneficial compared to UV light sources due to the noticeable decrease in operating expenses and the photolysis of ferric complexes, which takes place at wavelengths of approximately 600 nm and provides the catalytic medium with a higher number of OH radicals (Hamd and Dutta, 2020).

      4 Application of AOPs for Degradation of Microplastics

      Among the AOP techniques, heterogeneous photocatalysis and photo-Fenton process proved to be an efficient means for the removal of MPs present in water. Photocatalytic water treatment has already reached the stage of the industrial pilot. Although the efficacy of the photocatalytic process has been well established in families of very different organic compounds such as dyes (Guillard et al., 2003; Saggioro et al., 2015; Berkani et al., 2020), pesticides (Herrmann and Guillard, 2000; Kaur and Kaur, 2021), saturated/unsaturated hydrocarbons (Herrmann, 1999; Ul haq et al., 2020), and phenols (Liao et al., 2009; Wang et al., 2009; Mozia et al., 2012; Mohamed et al., 2020), the application of photocatalysis for the treatment of micro- and nano-plastics has been attempted for just a few years. For instance, Tian et al. (2019) conducted a photocatalytic degradation of polystyrene (PS) nanoplastics in water and air mediums under a 254-nm irradiation source utilizing (Hartmann et al., 2019) C radioisotope tracer technology (Tian et al., 2019). PS nanoplastics mineralized more readily in water (17.1 ± 0.55%) than in air (6.17 ± 0.1%), proving the importance of the aqueous medium in improving the photo-transformation of the PS nanoplastics. Recently, Nabi et al. (2020) carried out a photocatalytic degradation of PS microspheres in addition to polyethylene (PE), over TiO2 nanoparticle films under an ultraviolet irradiation source (Nabi et al., 2020). After 12 h, a TiO2 nanoparticle film produced with Triton X-100 demonstrated near-complete mineralization (98.40%) of 400-nm PS and a significant photodegradation rate of PE after 36 h, resulting in CO2.

      Li et al. (2020) used a polypyrrole/TiO2 (PPy/TiO2) nanocomposite as a photocatalyst to degrade PE plastic under sunlight irradiation (Li et al., 2020). The photocatalyst was synthesized using sol-gel and emulsion polymerization processes. They discovered that exposing PE plastic to solar radiation for 240 h lowered its weight by 35.4% and 54.4% of Mw, respectively. The degradation of PE was attributed to the strong existing interaction between the interface of PE and PPy/TiO2 photocatalyst as demonstrated by FTIR spectroscopic studies. Ariza-Tarazona et al. (2019) used N-TiO2 exposed to visible light to photocatalyze the breakdown of genuine samples of HDPE MPs isolated from a commercial facial cleanser (Ariza-Tarazona et al., 2019). The photocatalyst showed a high capacity for mass loss of HDPE MPs in both solid and aqueous environments. It was also demonstrated that the ambient conditions, interactions between pollutants and photocatalyst, and the catalytic surface area should all be properly established or tailored to avoid photocatalyst deactivation. Lee et al. (2020) carried out a photocatalytic degradation of polyamides microfibers PA66 over different TiO2 doses (Lee et al., 2020). With the employment of 100 mg of TiO2/L, the degradation efficiency reached its optimum under UVC irradiation, and PA66 microfibers lost 97% of their mass (in 48 h). These photocatalytic conditions produced a modest level of by-products (less than 10 mg/L COD). As a result, photocatalysis using TiO2 and UVC could be a viable option for treating microfibers in WWTPs. Furthermore, we have recently published in Dutta’s group two interesting papers about the photocatalytic degradation of PE films and PP beads in water flow. In the first work, Tofa et al. (2019) used visible-light-triggered heterogeneous zinc oxide photocatalysts to successfully degrade a 1 cm × 1 cm low-density polyethylene (LDPE) film (Tofa et al., 2019).. The carbonyl index of residues increased by 30%, as did the brittleness, which was accompanied by a high number of wrinkles, cracks, and cavities on the surface. The oxidation degree turned out to be directly proportional to the catalytic surface area. In another work, Uheida et al. (2020) suggested a unique MPs removal approach that uses coated glass fiber substrates with ZnO photocatalyst to trap low-density polypropylene (PP) (Uheida et al., 2020). Irradiating PP MPs for 2 weeks with visible light resulted in a 65% reduction in mean particle volume. GC/MS was used to identify the primary photodegradation by-products, which were determined to be predominantly harmless compounds. Finally, Colburn et al. (2020) suggested a new idea for MPs removal by introducing beforehand a 2 wt% catalyst anatase TiO2 to the HDPE or LDPE films during their synthesis (Colburn et al., 2020). Photo degradation under ambient conditions and solar irradiations could be a scalable and cost-effective defense strategy against plastic litter. A summary of some appealing works published in the last two decades is chronologically presented in Table 1.

      Main studies of MPs’ photocatalysis.

      Photocatalysts MPs type MPs appearance Light source Irradiation time Degradation system Reaction conditions MPs characterization technique Efficiency References
      TiO2 powder PVC Powder UV 300 h Solid PVC film size = 75 cm × 50 × 30 µm; 200 W mercury lamp (1.5 mW/cm2); distance = 22 cm UV-VIS, FTIR, GPC, XPS, SEM 27% Cho et al. (2001) (Cho and Choi, 2001)
      TiO2; TiO2/CuPc nanoparticles PS Appliance Fluorescent light 250 h Solid PS appliance: 0.5 g; dropped on the catalyst films; 8 W fluorescent lamp (1.75 mW/cm2); distance = 7 cm Weight loss, UV-VIS, SEM N/A Shang et al. (2003) (Shang et al., 2003)
      TiO2 nanotube, TiO2 nanoparticles LDPE Film UV and visible light 15 days; 45 days Solid Initial LDPE film size = 3 cm × 3 cm; 18 W UV lamp of wavelength 315 nm (2.54 mW/cm2); 5 W halogen (6.76 mW/cm2); distance = 5 cm XRD, EDS, UV-Vis, SEM, UTM, FTIR CI = 1.2; CI = 1.39 Ali et al. (2016) (Ali et al., 2016)
      ZnO nanorods LDPE Film Visible light 175 h Liquid LDPE film of size (1 cm2); 50 W dichroic halogen lamp (6–70 Klux); distance = 10 cm SEM, optical microscope, FTIR, DMA CI = 1.38 Tofa et al. (2019) (Tofa et al., 2019)
      Pt-ZnO nanorods LDPE Film Visible light 175 h Liquid LDPE film of size (1 cm2); 50 W dichroic halogen lamp (6–70 Klux); distance = 10 cm SEM, optical microscope, FTIR, DSC, TGA CI = 1.6 Tofa et al. (2019) (Tofa et al., 2019)
      ZnO nanorods PP Particle Visible light 456 h Liquid Initial PP MP particles = ~ 70 mg, ~ 104 particles/L; 120 W tungsten halogen lamp (60 mW/cm2); distance = 20 cm SEM, optical microscope, FTIR, DSC, GC-MS, TGA 65% Uheida et al. (2020) (Uheida et al., 2020)
      BiOCl nanoflower and nanodisk PS Composite film Visible light 90 h Solid Initial PS film size = 78 cm2; 500 W halogen luminaire lamp; distance = 5 cm XRD, UV-Vis, SEM, AFM, FTIR N/A Sarwan et al. (2020) (Sarwan et al., 2020)
      PPy/TiO2 PE Composite Sunlight 240 h Liquid Experiment carried out on a sunny day under ambient conditions from 10:00 a.m. to 4:00 p.m. GPC, AFM, FT-IR, weight loss 54.4% Li et al. (2020) (Li et al., 2020)
      TiO2 nanoparticles PS Microspheres UV 12 h Liquid PS spheres: 400 nm; dropped on the catalyst films; UV lamp (<365 nm); distance = 10 cm FE-SEM, Raman Spectroscopy, GC, HPPI-TOFMS 98.40% Nabi et al. (2020) (Nabi et al., 2020)
      LDPE Film UV and visible light 36 h Solid UV lamp (<254 nm and <365 nm); distance = 10 cm FE-SEM, Raman Spectroscopy, GC, HPPI-TOFMS N/A
      TiO2 powder PA66 Microfiber UVA 105 h Liquid PA66: 10 µm; 8 W UVA lamp (365 nm); distance = 5 cm Weight loss, FTIR, COD, SEM 19% Lee et al. (2020) (Lee et al., 2020)
      PA66 Microfiber UVC 105 h Liquid PA66: 10 µm; 8 W UVC lamp (254 nm); distance = 5 cm Weight loss, FTIR, COD, SEM 27%
      Protein-based porous N-TiO2 HDPE Scrubs Visible light 20 h Liquid HDPE MPs = 60 g; 27 W fluorescent lamp (λ = 400) ATR-FTIR, SEM, weight loss 6.40% Ariza-Tarazona et al. (2020) (Ariza-Tarazona et al., 2019)
      HDPE Scrubs Visible light 8 h Liquid PS NPs = 30.9 ml; 27 W fluorescent lamp (λ = 400) ATR-FTIR, SEM, weight loss 2.86%
      Mesoporous N- TiO2 nanoparticles LDPE Film Visible light 50 h Liquid 0.4 wt/v% of MPs; 50 W visible lamp (400–800 nm); room temperature; stirring = 300 rpm; distance = 21.5 cm; pH = 3 Optical microscope, FTIR, mass loss ~1% Llorente-García et al. (2020) (Llorente-García et al., 2020)
      HDPE Bead Visible light 50 h Liquid 0.4 wt/v% of MPs; 50 W visible lamp (400–800 nm); room temperature; stirring = 300 rpm; distance = 21.5 cm; pH = 4 Optical microscope, FTIR, mass loss 4.65%
      C, N-TiO2 Powders HDPE Scrub Visible light 50 h Liquid 50 ml of a 0.4 wt./vol % HDPE MPs; 50 W visible LED lamp (57.2 ± 0.3 W/m2); pH 3; distance = 25 cm FEI E-SEM, EDS optical microscope, FTIR 71.77 ± 1.88% Vital-Grappin et al. (2021) (Vital-Grappin et al., 2021)
      TiO2-nanotubular structure PS Nanoparticles UV 50 h Liquid 0.9% w/v of PS-NPs; UV lamp (0.021 mW/cm2); distance = 10 cm Turbidity, TOC, FTIR, GC-MS 19.70% Domínguez-Jaimes et al. (2021) (Domínguez-Jaimes et al., 2021)
      TiO2-barrier structure PS Nanoparticles UV 50 h Liquid 0.9% w/v of PS-NPs; UV lamp (0.021 mW/cm2); distance = 10 cm Turbidity, TOC, FTIR, GC-MS 15.00%
      TiO2-mixed structure PS Nanoparticles UV 50 h Liquid 0.9% w/v of PS-NPs; UV lamp (0.021 mW/cm2); distance = 10 cm Turbidity, TOC, FTIR, GC-MS 23.50%
      BiOCl PE Microspheres UV 10 h Liquid 1 g/L PE; 250 W Xe lamp (<420 nm) FTIR, SEM 5.38% Jiang et al. (2021) (Jiang et al., 2021)
      NiAl2O4 LDPE Film Visible light 5 h Liquid Initial LDPE film size = 3 cm × 3 cm; 350 W halide lamp; distance = 25 cm Weight loss, FTIR, XPS 12.50% Venkataramana et al. (2021) (Venkataramana et al., 2021)
      TiO2/β-SiC alveolar foams PMMA Nanobeads UV-A 7 h Liquid 300 mg of commercial monodisperse solution; Philips T5 15 W 10 Actinic BL (112 mW/cm2); fow rate = 10 ml/min; pH = 6.3; distance = 1 cm TOC 50% Allé et al. (2021) (Allé et al., 2021)

      N/A, Not Applicable.

      On the other hand, Fenton’s reagent method also has a very positive influence on the treatment process, especially for non-degradable organic pollutants. Fenton’s reagent removes or degrades a wide variety of contaminants in an aqueous solution either alone or in combination with other processes. Fenton process was successfully used in textile (Arslan-Alaton et al., 2007; Liu et al., 2007; Nadeem et al., 2020), pharmaceutical (Martínez et al., 2003; Molina et al., 2020), dyeing (Gulkaya et al., 2006; Wang, 2008; Salgado et al., 2020), olive oil mills (Rivas et al., 2001; Beltrán-Heredia et al., 2001; RuÃz-Delgado et al., 2020), oil (Sivagami et al., 2019; Gamaralalage et al., 2019), and cosmetics industries (Bautista et al., 2007; De Andrade et al., 2020), as well as in the reduction of polynuclear aromatic hydrocarbons (Beltrán et al., 1998; Singa et al., 2021), the treatment of brines (Rivas et al., 2003), the degradation of phenol and bisphenols (Carriazo et al., 2005; Zulfiqar et al., 2021), the treatment of effluent from herbicides and pesticides production industry (Sangami and Manu, 2017; Zhao and Zhang, 2021), the treatment of landfill leachates (Tejera et al., 2021; Filho et al., 2021), the degradation of recalcitrant oil spill components anthracene and pyrene (Sekar and DiChristina, 2017; RuÃz-Delgado et al., 2020), the inactivation of Escherichia coli K12 (Rivas et al., 2001), the treatment of recalcitrant industrial wastewater (Cai et al., 2021), and the treatment of high-molecular-weight melanoidin molecules (Raji et al., 2021). More details about Fenton technology for the treatment of recalcitrant organic molecules in several industries can be checked out in our recently published book chapter (Hamd and Dutta, 2020).

      In addition, the Fenton process was also used for tackling MPs: After 6 h of potentiostatic electrolysis at −0.7 V vs. Ag/AgCl at 100°C, Miao et al. (2020) demonstrated that an EF-like technique based on TiO2/C cathode was successfully used to degrade PVC MPs with 56 wt% elimination and 75% dechlorination efficiency (Miao et al., 2020). As a result, this method offers a viable and environmentally benign strategy for the degradation of PVC MPs, with the potential to be extended to additional chlorinated species of plastics such as 2,4-dichlorophenol, PE, PP, and PS. Moreover, Liu et al. (2019) showed a significant fragmentation of PS and PE MPs during the oxidation processes by K2S2O8 and after Fenton treatment (Liu et al., 2019). After 30 days of heat-activated K2S2O8 treatment, the sizes of almost all MPs were decreased from 40–50 μm to <30 μm and 80.1% and 97.4% of PS and PE were below 20 μm, respectively. The fragmentation processes and the degradation rates seemed to differ between PS and PE probably due to the differences in the molecular structure and tensile strength between the two polymers.

      Based on the above, heterogeneous photocatalysis was successfully coupled with physical or chemical processes altering the degradation kinetics and/or overall efficiency to promote the global performance of the technology. For instance, when combining heterogeneous photocatalysis with biological treatment, membrane reactor, membrane photoreactor, or physical adsorption, the photocatalytic mechanisms are not affected but the efficiency of the overall process is improved. When heterogeneous photocatalysis is coupled with ultrasonic irradiation, ozonation, electrochemical treatment, or photo-Fenton reaction, the photocatalytic mechanisms are in this case modified, thus improving the efficiency of the process (Augugliaro et al., 2006). Therefore, various researchers have combined the Fenton reactions with photocatalysis to create a novel wastewater treatment approach. Utilizing this strategy, a win–win situation could be attained. This will not only extend the lifetime of produced charge carriers, yet it will also accelerate the Fe3+/Fe2+ cycle, resulting in increased mineralization of pollutants and a reduction in iron sludge. As an example, Figure 5 depicts a hypothesized CdS/CNT-TiO2 process for photo-Fenton degradation of methylene blue when exposed to visible light. As seen, the photo-induced electron ( e cb ) generated on TiO2’s surface can be scavenged by O2, while the photo-induced hole ( h vb + ) reacts with OH or H2O. In addition, the adsorbed Fe3+ on TiO2’s surface can be reduced by the transfer of electrons, accelerating the Fe3+/Fe2+ cycle and impeding the electron–hole recombination. Lastly, the electron transfer between the excited state of the photosensitizer (MB*) and Fe3+ leads to the regeneration of Fe2+ ions and therefore increases the kinetic rate of the degradation process (Kim and Kan, 2015).

      Proposed mechanism of CdS/CNT-TiO2/photo-Fenton degradation of methylene blue under visible light irradiation. Reproduced with permission (Kim and Kan, 2015).

      5 Photocatalytic Mechanism of Microplastics Degradation

      The solid-state photocatalytic degradation of polymer started back in 1970, yet the investigations on the removal of MPs in an aqueous environment have recently started and the mechanism is not fully known (Padervand et al., 2020; Xu et al., 2021).

      Light absorption, electron–hole separation, and the generation of highly ROS such as O 2 · / · OH / HO 2 · are the three main stages in a photocatalysis process. These radicals start the degradation process within the polymeric chain when exposed to light and humidity. The fundamental photocatalytic degradation mechanism of plastic can be classified into four steps: initiation, propagation, branching, and termination (Rabek Jan, 2012).

      The initiation step is caused either by the abstraction of hydrogen or by the session of the C–C bond at the impure centers, generating alkyl radicals of MPs. The presence of photocatalyst increases the generation of alkyl radicals using active species. Peroxy-radicals and hydroperoxides are formed during chain propagation. Further oxidation stimulates chain branching and scission with the generation of low-molecular-weight oxygenated compounds like hydroxyl, peroxide, and carbonyl groups leading to micro-cracks within the polymeric surface (Cho and Choi, 2001; Shang et al., 2003; Zhao et al., 2007; Yousif and Haddad, 2013; Ali et al., 2016; Tofa et al., 2019; Miao et al., 2020). The general mechanism of photo-oxidative degradation reactions of MPs is shown in Table 2 below, reproduced with permission from (Singh and Sharma, 2008; Tofa, 2018).

      The general mechanism of photocatalytic degradation of MPs.

      Steps Reactions
      Initiation -H + energy (hν) → (polymer alkyl radical) + H+ -H + OH → (polymer alkyl radical) + H+
      Chain Propagation + O2 → OO (polymer per-oxyradical)MPOO + PH → POOH (polymer hydroperoxide) + P
      Chain Branching OOH → O (polymer alkoxy radical) + OH2OOH → OO + O + H2OO + H → OH + H + OH (hydroxyl radical) → + H2O
      Chain scission/Termination 2OO → inert products2 → MP-MPOO + → OO
      -H – Microplastic

      Tofa et al. (2019) (Tofa et al., 2019), Sarwan et al. (2020) (Sarwan et al., 2020), and Cho et al. (2001) (Cho and Choi, 2001) proposed photocatalytic degradation mechanisms of LDPE, PVC, and PS, respectively. LDPE film was exposed to visible light irradiation for 175 h using ZnO and Pt-ZnO as catalysts in the study of Tofa et al. (2019) (Tofa et al., 2019). They observed that alkoxy radicals are the key interim species that produced carboxylic groups like aldehydes, ester, ketones, and carboxylic acids in the photo-oxidation process and found ketone as the key species that undergoes further oxidation and results in complete mineralization, similar to solid-phase LDPE degradation using TiO2 conducted by Ali et al. (2016) (Ali et al., 2016). The proposed degradation mechanism is adapted with permission from Tofa et al. (2019), and shown in Figure S3A.

      The degradation mechanism in Figure S3B of solid-phase PVC was proposed by Cho et al. (2001) (Cho and Choi, 2001). Distinctive wrinkles and cavities occurred on the surface of PVC after 100 h of irradiation using TiO2 under UV light. It was clear from the weight loss study that photocatalytic degradation was much faster than photolytic degradation. Miao et al. (2020) reported identical reactions when experimented on a liquid-phase condition of PVC (Miao et al., 2020).

      Sarwan et al. (2020) conducted photocatalysis of PS film under visible light using Bismuth oxychloride (BiOCl) nanoflower and nanodisk for 90 h in a liquid phase and a mechanism in Figure 6 was proposed (Sarwan et al., 2020). Similar research but in a solid phase was conducted by Shang et al. (2003) on PS plastic under the sunlight with the formation of a small number of by-products. The solid-phase photocatalytic oxidation of PS plastic film was conducted using TiO2 and TiO2/CuPc (copper phthalocyanine) powder for 250 h (Shang et al., 2003). They revealed that the degradation kinetics depended on the number of ROS generation.

      The photocatalytic degradation mechanism of PS film. Reproduced with permission (Yousif and Haddad, 2013).

      As discussed above, the photocatalytic degradation of MPs either in the solid phase or in the liquid phase is in good agreement with the basic principles: initiation, chain propagation, branching cross-linking, and session.

      6 Characterization Techniques of Microplastics

      Various characterization techniques are available for observing the degradability of MPs, which can be broadly classified into elemental, morphological, thermal, mechanical, and chemical analyses (Kumar et al., 2009). Table 3 illustrates the most often accessible options and their applications.

      General techniques for characterization of MPs.

      Categories Technique Application References
      Elemental composition Gel permeation chromatography, GPC Elemental analysis: molecular weight, chemical composition, binding states Izunobi et al. (2011) (Izunobi and Higginbotham, 2011), De los Santos-Villarreal et al. (2013) (De los Santos-Villarreal and Elizalde, 2013), Liang et al. (2013) (Liang et al., 2013), and Carraher et al. (2013) (Carraher, 2018)
      Nuclear magnetic resonance, NMR
      Viscometry
      Osmometry
      X-ray photoelectronSpectroscopy, XPS Surface profiling Gelasco et al. (2014) (Celasco et al., 2014)
      Morphological properties Optical microscopy, OMScanning electron microscopy, SEM Surface texture; restricted thickness (5–40 mm); low costVacuum technique; morphology, image analysis Tofa et al. (2019) (Tofa et al., 2019) and Liang et al. (2013) (Liang et al., 2013)
      Transmission electron microscopy, TEM Detailed imaging and analysis; chemical information; interface Motaung et al. (2012) (Motaung et al., 2012)
      Profilometer nondestructive; rapid; determining surface irregularities, fractures, and roughness Ali et al.(2016) (Ali et al., 2016)
      Thermal properties Differential scanning calorimetry, DSC Kinetics and phase transitions; oxidative stability Gregory et al. (1998) (Gregory, 1998) and Gill et al. (2010) (Gill et al., 2010)
      Thermogravimetry analysis, TGA Polymer type; composition; weight loss; kinetic parameters Zhao et al. (2007) (Zhao et al., 2007), Liang et al. (2013) (Liang et al., 2013), Celasco et al. (2014) (Celasco et al., 2014), and Uheida et al. (2021) (Uheida et al., 2020)
      Mechanical properties Universal testing machine, UTM Determination of tensile strength; % elongation, elastic modulus; destructive method Zhao et al. (2007) (Zhao et al., 2007), Liang et al. (2013) (Liang et al., 2013), and Ali et al.(2016) (Ali et al., 2016)
      Dynamic mechanical analyzer, DMA Determination of viscous and elastic modulus; destructive method Menard et al. (2020) (Menard and Menard, 2020), and Lup et al. (2021) (Luo et al., 2021)
      Lorentz contact resonance, LCR
      Degradation kinetics Mass balance Simple; low-cost technique; degradation kinetics Liang et al. (2013) (Liang et al., 2013), and Ariza-Tarazona et al. (2019) (Ariza-Tarazona et al., 2019)
      Turbidimetry Monitoring of nanoplastics in an aqueous environment Ma et al. (2019) (Ma et al., 2019), and Domínguez-Jaimes et al. (2021) (Domínguez-Jaimes et al., 2021)
      Chemical oxygen demand, COD Cheap; degree of mineralization; degradation kinetics Rajamanickam et al. (2016) (Rajamanickam and Shanthi, 2016)
      Total organic carbon, TOC Low cost; concentration of total organic compounds; reaction kinetics Giroto et al. (2010) (Giroto et al., 2010) and Allé et al. (2021) (Allé et al., 2021)
      Degraded products Gas chromatography, GC Separates and analyzes volatile organic compounds of high molecular weight. Hakkarainen et al. (2006) (Hakkarainen and Karlsson, 2006)
      Gas chromatography-mass spectrometry, GC-MS Separate, quantify, and identify unknown species; qualitative and quantitative evaluations Medeiros et al. (2018) (Medeiros, 2018)
      Liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry, LC-MS Separate, quantify, and identify a wide range of species; molecular weight; end group analysis Perez et al. (2016) (Perez et al., 2016)
      Fourier transformation infrared, FTIR spectroscopy Non-destructive; cheap; identification and detection of structural transformation; determine the degree of oxidation Ali et al. (2016) (Ali et al., 2016) and Almond et al. (2020) (Almond et al., 2020)
      6.1 Elemental Composition

      Elemental composition is an analytic tool for identifying the composition of copolymers, plastic blends, and molecular weight. Each plastic material has a characteristic molecular weight, chemical composition, and binding state that may alter after photocatalytic degradation.

      Many studies have determined molecular weight through tools like gel permeation chromatography (GPC), nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR), viscosimetry, and osmometry, which have limited application to only soluble plastics. GPC, also known as size exclusion chromatography, is a fast, efficient, and most commonly used technique that measures a wide range of molecular weight and polydispersity index (De los Santos-Villarreal and Elizalde, 2013). Liang et al. (2013) conducted a high-temperature GPC analysis to determine the fluctuations in the molecular weight of the LDPE film before and after UV irradiation in which the temperature of the GPC injector, column, and the detector was kept at 150°C (Liang et al., 2013). 1,2,4-trichlorobenzene was employed in the mobile phase with an elution rate of 1.00 ml/min. The photo-irradiation of LDPE composites decreased the molecular weight to smaller values due to the production of low-molecular-weight compounds.

      NMR spectroscopy is comparatively expensive but accurate, providing information (both qualitative and quantitative) on molecular structure, molecular weights, molecular weight distribution, chain orientation, and molecular motion of any unknown MP that is incomparable to other methods (De los Santos-Villarreal and Elizalde, 2013; Carraher, 2018). In a work carried out by Izunobi and Higginbotham et al. (2011), R-methoxy-ω-aminopolyethylene glycol and R-methoxy-polyethylene glycol-block-poly-ϵ-(benzyloxycarbonyl)-L-lysine were dissolved in N-deuterated dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO-d6); the solution was observed on a spectrometer (499.8 MHz) at 60°C to obtain NMR spectra (Izunobi and Higginbotham, 2011). They mentioned the inability of determining weight-average molecular weight (Mw) unlike the GPC method; therefore, its potential in molecular weight determination is not appreciated.

      In contrast, osmometry and viscosimetry are relatively cheaper, less efficient, and suitable for MPs having high- and low-molecular-weight determination, respectively (De los Santos-Villarreal and Elizalde, 2013; Carraher, 2018).

      Tools like x-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) has a broad application in detecting relative composition, depth profiling, and chemical state from the surface of MPs. Such a system is expensive, requires high vacuum conditions, and provides only surface information. Yet, XPS provides straightforward and non-destructive surface characterization information of chemical bonding, and the total elemental composition of any MP. Each element demonstrates characteristic peaks and relative abundance when exposed to x-rays (Andrade, 1985). Celasco et al. (2014) used XPS for measuring surface texture and copolymer thickness in polyethylene glycol (PEG) nanocapsules prepared by solvent displacement method (Celasco et al., 2014). Miao et al. (2020) analyzed the elemental composition of PVC MPs before and after electrocatalytic oxidation using high-resolution XPS (Miao et al., 2020). The PVC surface morphology transformed significantly as identified by the change in the number of C, O, and Cl atoms.

      6.2 Surface Morphology

      The photodegradation of MPs generally starts at the external bulk surface and gradually goes deep (Tofa et al., 2019). Therefore, it is of immense importance to investigate the surface condition to understand the effects of degradation on the mechanical and physical properties of MPs. There are numerous techniques and tools for a surface analysis whose usability depends on different purposes. Here, we discuss a few conventional optical techniques and their serviceability in characterizing synthetic plastic materials.

      A simple optical microscope has been a common technique to study the surface topography of a bulk structure in a reflected light mode. Tofa et al. (2019) (Tofa et al., 2019), Llorente-García et al. (2020) (Llorente-García et al., 2020), Uheida et al. (2020) (Uheida et al., 2020), and Vital-Grappin et al. (2021) (Vital-Grappin et al., 2021) used optical microscopes to observe the surface texture after the exposure. An optical microscope has underlying limitations of high magnification and restricted sample thickness between 5 and 40 mm. Digital imaging with scanning electron microscopy (SEM), transmission electron microscopy (TEM), and scanning probe microscopies are often used for image analysis and image processing (Galloway et al., 2002; Bonnet, 2004).

      SEM offers both higher focus and larger depth of field and is a widely applicable technique for determining surface morphology, texture, and composition. A focused beam containing electrons is exerted to reach nano-scale imaging. MPs’ surfaces must be coated with conductive materials to obtain any acceptable image (Carraher, 2018). SEM has been used to determine wrinkles, cracks, and cavities of varying sizes on commercial grade LDPE films as a result of photo-oxidation (Tofa et al., 2019). Liang et al. (2013) used SEM to display surface morphology and the chalking phenomenon of LDPE composite films after UV irradiation for 230 h (Liang et al., 2013). The image analysis found 1- to 2-µm-wide and 0.5- to 1-mm-deep cavities all over the LDPE/TiO2 and LDPE/MPS-TiO2 film surfaces.

      Another useful, versatile, and high-resolution microscopy technique for different imaging competencies is TEM. It enables observing detailed structural information at an atomic level; magnifications may reach up to one million under good conditions. Images are usually detailed, offer bright field and dark field, and can capture chemical information of the sample. The imaging and the analytical capabilities improve when coupled with a spectrometer (Burge et al., 1982; Bonnet, 2004; Carraher, 2018). In a study by Motaung et al. (2012), TEM was used for imaging the TiO2-polymethylmethacrylate (TiO2-PMMA) nanocomposites (Motaung et al., 2012).

      6.3 Thermal Properties

      Common instrumentation for monitoring thermal properties includes thermo-gravimetric analysis (TGA) and differential scanning calorimetry (DSC). DSC is a commonly used thermal analysis that is applied to determine the melting point, heat of fusion, crystallinity percentage, crystallization kinetics, phase transitions, and oxidative stability. The heat absorbed or radiated by any MP as a function of temperature against time is measured with DSC (Gill et al., 2010). The thermal analysis provides phase transition information, e.g., melting and glass-to-rubber transition to the crystalline and amorphous phases, respectively (Aguilar-Vega, 2013). Uheida et al. (2020) carried out DSC measurements on visible light-exposed PP MPs irradiated at different lengths to investigate the change in the crystallization behavior (Uheida et al., 2020). They observed a shift in the melting point to lower temperatures due to the degradation of the polymeric chain.

      While DSC measures the heat quantity, TGA measures the rate of change of weight as a function of temperature in a controlled environment. It has a wide application in determining the thermal and oxidative stabilities, and in the identification and composition of plastic material. Many studies have used TGA to confirm the change in the thermal properties and determined kinetic parameters after photocatalytic degradation of MPs by monitoring the weight loss (Liang et al., 2013; Uheida et al., 2020; Zhao and Zhang, 2021).

      6.4 Mechanical Properties

      Tensile tests are used to determine nominal tensile strength, elongation, and elastic modulus (Aguilar-Vega, 2013). Usually, tensile testing, a destructive method, is conducted following ASTM 882-85, the universal testing machine (UTM). Analysis of several studies shows that photocatalytic degradation has an adverse effect on the tensile strength of films. The samples become brittle and fragile. Also, percent elongation decreases as carbonyl group formation increases (Zhao et al., 2007; Liang et al., 2013; Ali et al., 2016).

      A dynamic mechanical analyzer (DMA) is extensively used for measuring viscoelastic properties of MPs at a molecular level where a minor deformation is applied to a given sample. This permits the materials to undergo cyclic loading, which causes both elastic and viscous deformation. The amorphous and crystalline parts of the material cause elastic component deformation, while the viscous part is induced by the movement of polymer segments (Menard and Menard, 2020). In the work of Tofa et al. (2019) photo-irradiated LDPE films were exposed to a DMA that resulted in the strain as a function of temperature at a frequency of 1 Hz (Tofa et al., 2019). The result elucidated the loss of elasticity after photocatalytic activities due to chain scission of LDPE films.

      Recently, Luo et al. (2021) used a Lorentz contact resonance (LCR) technique for determining the viscoelastic properties of nanoscale TiO2-coated MPs by measuring the contact stiffness between the AFM probes and MPs (Luo et al., 2021). It provides a high-resolution map of different phases on extremely thin films. A greater frequency was associated with a stiffer MPs material, while a lower frequency was associated with a smoother material. The MPs became stiffer with increasing irradiation, forming wrinkles, cracks, and fragmentation.

      6.5 Kinetic Degradation of Microplastics

      The determination of kinetics is of immense importance to understanding the degradation mechanism and predicting the stability and life span. Here, we discuss a few simple techniques for determining the degradation kinetics of MPs.

      The utilization of weighing balance is a simple, low-cost technique to study weight loss during photocatalytic degradation (Liang et al., 2013; Ali et al., 2016; Ariza-Tarazona et al., 2019). For Lee et al. (2020), weight loss was determined to evaluate the photocatalytic degradation kinetics of the PA66 microfibers using different doses of TiO2 and by changing UV wavelength (Lee et al., 2020). It was elucidated that the shorter UV wavelengths were more efficient in damaging PA66 microfibers in comparison with the longer ones. They discovered that the initial kinetic rate is precisely proportional to the catalyst dose.

      Turbidity is a measure of the degree of losing transparency due to the presence of suspended particulates in the water. A turbidimeter, a cheap, widely used tool for monitoring drinking water quality, measures this haziness in water (Gregory, 1998). Ma et al. (2019) used a turbidimeter to observe the elimination of PE using coagulant AlCl3.6H2O and FeCl3.6H2O at different doses. Under low pH, a 5 mM dose AlCl3.6H2O ensured higher removal efficiency of PE particles (Ma et al., 2019). A pseudo-first-order kinetics of PS after in an aqueous environment was calculated using turbidity data (Domínguez-Jaimes et al., 2021).

      Chemical oxygen demand (COD) in addition to total organic carbon (TOC) could be employed to evaluate the mineralization of MPs. COD is a measure of the requirement of oxygen for the oxidation of both organic and inorganic matters present in water, by a strong chemical oxidant. COD can evaluate the degree of mineralization that had generated during the photocatalytic process of MPs (Rajamanickam and Shanthi, 2016; Lee et al., 2020). On the other side, TOC has been in practice for exploring the concentration of total organic compounds (TOCs) in aqueous solution before and after photooxidative degradation (Giroto et al., 2010). For instance, polymethylmethacrylate and PS nanobead solutions were degraded using UV irradiation of TiO2/β−SiC alveolar foams, wherein reaction kinetics and TOC value were found to increase with the shorter wavelength. The TOC value ensures the breakdown of PS MP in suspension (Allé et al., 2021). Another research group used a TOC analyzer to investigate the degree of mineralization of PVC as a function of temperature using an electro-Fenton technology. Under the electrocatalysis process combined with high temperature (100°C), TOC can greatly increase. They also suggested that TOC values can be relied on reflecting the decomposition of PVC MPs (Miao et al., 2020).

      6.6 Characterization Techniques for Produced By-Products

      GC, GC-MS, and FTIR are the most commonly used tools for assessing MP degradation and by-products. The chromatograph is a destructive technique. In contrast, FTIR is a non-invasive method to identify and characterize transformation in chemical structure.

      GC is the most popular analytical tool for monitoring by-products after degradation. GC is not suitable for the analysis of organic compounds having high molecular weight or low vaporization temperatures (Hakkarainen and Karlsson, 2006). Zhao et al. (2007) utilized GC to determine the concentration of CO2 and volatile organics generated during photocatalytic degradation of PE under solar and UV light. They proposed that CO2 is the key element produced from the photocatalytic degradation of PE plastic (Zhao et al., 2007). Other volatile organics like methane, ethene, ethane, propane, acetaldehyde, formaldehyde, and acetone were also detected, albeit of a lesser amount. GC was also used to study the photocatalytic degradation of PS plastic exposed to fluorescent light, and generation of volatile organic compounds followed by CO2 evolution was confirmed (Shang et al., 2003).

      Polymer degradation constituents have been investigated by many scientists using GC-MS (Barlow et al., 1961). It permits both qualitative and quantitative evaluations (Medeiros, 2018). GC-MS analyzed obtained by-products from photocatalytic degradation of PP MPs over ZnO nanorods. It has been found that ethynyloxy/acetyl radicals, hydroxypropyl, butyraldehyde, acetone, propenal, and the pentyl group are the most abundant degraded by-products (Uheida et al., 2020). During the investigation of degraded species after oxidation of PVC MPs via an electro-Fenton system, short-chained organics like alkenes, alcohols, monocarboxylic acids, dicarboxylic acids, and esters were detected (Miao et al., 2020).

      LC-MS is a highly sensitive tool, mostly suitable for MP identification, sensing lower volatile compounds of high polarity, determining molecular weight, and conducting end group analysis of polymers. Sample preparation is comparatively easy, and it has the ability to recognize and measure a wider range of compounds (Perez et al., 2016). Tapia et al. (2019) recently used LC-MS and developed a method for identifying the degradation compounds of a cross-linked polyester for biomedical relevance (Tapia et al., 2019). They used both LC-MS and LC-MS/MS for characterizing structural isomers and their corresponding structures.

      ATR-FTIR spectroscopy is a widely used non-destructive technology for measuring infrared spectra for a variety of materials, especially for indicating the structural transformation in MP structure after degradation. This is an inexpensive, sensitive, and time-saving analytical method that provides an indirect result of the extent of oxidation of polymeric materials. The functional group within polymeric compounds vibrates at its own characteristic frequency due to the absorption of IR light. FTIR spectroscopy is applicable for the identification and detection of structural transformation in plastic materials (Tofa et al., 2019; Almond et al., 2020). Numerous studies on chemical transformation within polymeric chains using FTIR have been reported (Cho and Choi, 2001; Shang et al., 2003; Tofa et al., 2019).

      7 Scaling-Up of the Photocatalytic Reactors

      While the coupling of AOP technologies is very beneficial to increasing the photocatalytic activity of the process, the performance of photoreactors remains dependent on several factors such as (i) the operational mode; (ii) the several phases that exist in the reactor; (iii) the hydrodynamics; and (iv) the reacting mixture’s composition and operating conditions. Because photocatalytic oxidation reactions are caused by absorbed photons with adequate energy values by the SC particles, the photoreactor and radiation sources are the most important components of a photocatalytic/Fenton process (Sacco et al., 2020).

      Dedicated photocatalytic reactors for water treatment can fall into two categories: (1) reactors with photocatalyst deployed as suspended particles requiring a supplementary downstream separation unit for photocatalyst recovery, and (2) reactors with a supported photocatalyst, which allows continuous operation (Pozzo et al., 2000; Chong et al., 2010). Although both configurations can be used to treat wastewater streams, when designing field-scale photoreactors, several parameters must be considered, including pollutant concentration (COD initial load), flow type and rates, light intensity, solar irradiation area, dissolved oxygen concentration in water in a state of equilibrium with the atmospheric air (Gutierrez-Mata et al., 2017), and the electrical energy per order EE/O (given in kWh in European countries) necessary to eliminate a contaminant by one order of magnitude (90%) in 1 m3 of polluted water (Bolton et al., 2001; Vaiano et al., 2019). The composition and concentration of real wastewater effluents, as well as fluctuations in the photonic solar flux throughout the degradation process, make field-scale reactors a highly difficult challenge (Gutierrez-Mata et al., 2017). Due to the difficulties in controlling all the parameters cited above, for the scale-up of a photoreactor, often mathematical models are prepared including several sub-models (Cassano et al., 1995; Fagan et al., 2016) such as the radiation emission model, the radiation absorption-scattering model, the kinetic model, and the fluid-dynamic model (Cassano and Alfano, 2000). Such interconnected sub-models produce a complicated scheme of integral–differential equations that necessitate numerical solutions (Alvarado-Rolon et al., 2018). The local volumetric rate energy absorption (LVREA), which is termed as the energy attributable to the absorbed photons/(time and volume) inside the photoreactor, is a function of the photocatalytic reaction rate. This energy (LVREA) is highly reliant on the analytical solution of the radiation transfer equation (RTE), which is linked to the categories of lights and reactor geometry (Satuf et al., 2007).

      Numerical computing approaches such as the statistical Monte Carlo method (MC) or analytical simplified methods such as the two-flux model (TFM) and the six-flux model (SFM) can also be used (Kim and Kan, 2015). MC, however, needs large computational processors, and TFM and SFM are limited to flat slab geometries (Li Puma, 2005; Moreira et al., 2010). CFD models were developed for scaling-up of dedicated photoreactors for wastewater treatment taking into account model pollutants, such as oxalic acid (Denny et al., 2009), phenol (Jamali et al., 2013), poly(vinyl alcohol) (Ghafoori et al., 2014), tributyl phosphate (TBP), tri (2-chloroethyl) phosphate (TCEP) (Moghaddami and Raisee, 2012), rhodamine B (Kumar and Bansal, 2013), methylene blue (Vaiano et al., 2015a), and emerging contaminants such as atrazine (Bagheri and Mohseni, 2015).

      8 Selection of Reactor Design for Up-Scaling

      Before deciding to scale up a photoreactor, the performance of each configuration should be first established. As a result, photoreactor energy efficiency is measured by the quantum yield, which is the ratio of reaction rate over the light absorption rate (Kim and Kan, 2015). The quantum yield is then transformed into a photochemical thermodynamic efficiency factor, which is denoted by (Serrano and De Lasa, 1997):

      η = Q u s e d Q a b s o r b e d = r O H   × Δ H O H   × W Q a b s o r b e d

      Where rOH is the rate of OH radical formation (mol/g of catalyst), ΔHOH is the enthalpy of OH radical formation (J/mol), and W is the mass of catalyst (g). The energy efficiency factors cannot be employed for the specified reactor performance comparison because the treated volume and reactor footprint parameters are not integrated into the above equation (Gaya and Abdullah, 2008). Consequently, figures of merit in terms of collector area per mass (ACM ), which is the required collector area required to degrade 1 kg of pollutant in 1 h following a solar radiation of 1000 W/m2 intensity, and collector area per order (ACO ), which is the required collector area to reduce the pollutant concentration in 1 m3 by one order of magnitude (Bolton et al., 2001), were suggested for comparison of advanced oxidation technology (AOT) reactors of various configurations, as shown in the following equation (Bandala and Estrada, 2007; Rao et al., 2012):

      A C M = A r × E ¯ s × t × 1000 M × V t × E s 0 × t 0 ( C i C f ) A C O = A r × E ¯ s × t V t × E s 0 × t 0 × l o g C i C f

      where ACM and ACO are in m2/kg and m2/m3 order, respectively, Ar is the actual reactor area (m2), t and t0 are irradiance and reference time (h), E ¯ s and  E s 0 are the average solar irradiance and reference solar irradiance (W/m2), Vt is the treated volume (L), M is the molar mass (g/mol), and Ci and Cf are the initial and final pollutant molar concentrations, respectively. Therefore, the geometry of photocatalytic reactors would be preferably selected in such a way that the emitted irradiations are collected in maximum values.

      9 Photocatalytic Reactor: Configuration and Commercialization

      Photochemical systems in addition to reactors have adopted conventional solar thermal collector designs, including parabolic troughs and non-concentrating collectors because the required hardware for solar photocatalysis is quite comparable to that required for thermal applications (Goswami, 1997). However, it should be noted that contrary to solar thermal processes, solar photochemical processes utilize solely high energy with short-wavelength photons. For instance, a TiO2 photocatalyst operates under UV or near-UV sunlight (300 to 400 nm), and a photo-Fenton heterogeneous photocatalyst operates within sunlight wavelength radiation below 580 nm.

      The prime benefits and shortcomings of concentrating and non-concentrating collectors for solar photocatalytic applications are as listed in Table 4 (Malato et al., 2007).

      Comparisons between parabolic and non-concentrating solar photoreactors.

      Advantages Disadvantages
      Concentrating collectors

      - Turbulent flow

      - Direct radiation solely in addition to water overheating

      - Compounds free vaporization

      - High cost due to sun tracking system

      - More practical usage of supported catalysts

      - Low optical efficiency

      - Smaller reactor tube area

      - Low quantum efficiency (r = k I <1 with TiO2)

      Non concentrating reactors

      - Diffused and direct radiation

      - Laminar flow with low mass transfer

      - No heating

      - Vaporization of reactants

      - Cost effective

      - Contamination of reactants

      - High optical efficiency

      - Weather resistance, chemical inertness, and UV transmission

      - High quantum efficiency (r = K I with TiO2)

      Quantitative comparisons of photoreactor designs are quite challenging due to the broad diversity of photoreactor designs, operating conditions, photocatalyst design and preparation, changes in solar intensity, and kinds of pollutants. As a result, the comparisons are primarily qualitative and centered on the practical aspects of each design (Braham and Harris, 2009).

      9.1 Parabolic Trough Reactors

      A parabolic trough reactor (PTR) focuses solar energy on a transparent tube located along the parabolic focal line and whereby the reactant fluid flows using a long, reflective parabolic surface (see Figure 7). Concentration factors of 5 to 30 suns are commonly utilized for photocatalytic applications, while a concentration factor of 70 suns has been observed utilizing a parabolic dish reflector (Alfano et al., 2000; Malato et al., 2002; Oyama et al., 2004).

      Parabolic troughs reactor types with (A) single and (B) double axis solar tracking. Reproduced with permission (Malato et al., 2007).

      Increasing the intensity of the incoming light allows the use of a reduced quantity of photocatalyst leading to a reduction of the operating costs, as well as simplified catalyst separation and recycling (Goswami et al., 2004). This also enables the use of a smaller diameter absorber tube, allowing for higher operational pressures, which is beneficial in industrial-scale plants where hundreds of meters of absorber tubing and associated components can result in considerable pressure losses (Alfano et al., 2000).

      PTR configuration was applied in Sandia National Laboratory, New Mexico (SNL) for the treatment of 1,100 L of polluted water by salicylic acid using TiO2 slurry. The employed PTR was 218 m long and 2.1 m wide, with a 38-mm-diameter borosilicate glass pipe. With a total aperture size of 465 m2 and a concentrating ratio of 50, the device was able to achieve 96% degradation in just 40 min. The same system was used for treating other molecules such as trichloroethylene, tetrachloroethylene, chloroform, trichloroethane, carbon tetrachloride, and methylene chloride (Prairie et al., 1991). CIEMAT71, a Spanish corporation, and an American partnership consisting of the National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL), Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (LLNL), and Sandia National Laboratories (SNL) built similar systems (Mehos et al., 1992). The CIEMAT development consisted of 12 “Helioman” units that were placed in sequence at the Plataforma Solar de Almeria (PSA) in Spain. Four parabolic trough aluminized reflectors with an overall collection area of 29.2 m2 and two-axis tracking constituted each Helioman. The concentration factor of this configuration is approximately 6 suns, and the photonic efficiency (expressed as moles of degraded contaminant per incident mole of photons inside the reactor) was registered as ∼1% (Malato et al., 2002). This PTR configuration turned out to be efficient for the photocatalytic degradation of pentachlorophenol (Minero et al., 1993), oxalic acid (Bandala et al., 2004), and 2,4-chlorophenol (Malato et al., 1997) contaminants in water. In addition, for the treatment of trichloroethylene by a suspended photocatalyst supplied at 0.8 g/L, the NREL consortium used single-axis tracking PTRs stacked in series over two drive trains with a collection area of 78 m2 each and a concentration factor of ∼20 suns (Mehos et al., 1992). A significant decrease in trichloroethylene concentration in contaminated groundwater beneath the level considered drinkable (from 106 ppb to <0.5 ppb) was observed in this installation.

      However, there are various drawbacks associated with the use of PTR reactors. PTR can only collect and benefit from direct sunlight, which reduces the overall quantity of collectible solar radiation and makes the use of a solar tracking system inevitable, making their use quite expensive and inefficient on cloudy days. Overheating of the reaction solution is another key flaw of PTR (Blanco-Galvez et al., 2007). While heating the reaction fluid is normally good for enhancing the reaction rate (Falconer and Magrini-Bair, 1998), it may become unpleasant at higher concentration factors because of the possible formation of unwanted products through direct photolysis. Overheating can also lead to leaks and corrosion (Adesina, 2004), and can affect treatment efficiency. Moreover, an increase in the temperature leads to a decrease in the solubility of oxygen in the water and therefore bubble generation. Because O2 is required for reaction completion (Prairie et al., 1991), the endless contribution of oxygen to the reaction or addition of scavengers such as hydrogen peroxide/sodium persulfate becomes essential for the process (Minero et al., 1993), which will complicate the water purification procedure and deteriorate its practicality. Because of the elevated operation cost related to water cooling, the existence of moving parts, and solar tracking devices, PTRs are not generally considered for scaling-up and commercialization.

      Finally, the National Solar Thermal Test Facility at Sandia Laboratories in Albuquerque, New Mexico (USA) constructed the first outdoor engineering-scale reactor in 1989 (Figure 7, left), and the PSA in 1990 designed and built the very first PTC engineering scaled-up solar photochemical facility designated for the detoxification of water in Europe (Figure 7, right) (Minero et al., 1993; Malato et al., 2007).

      9.2 Compound Parabolic Concentrator

      The reflector geometry in CPC grants reflection of indirect light onto the absorber tube surface leading to an increase in the total quantity of photons and allowing the photoreactor to operate on overcast days when direct beams are unavailable (Bockelmann et al., 1995). As a result, by employing a CPC setup, many of the issues related to PTR could be avoided. Therefore, according to the following equation, the concentration factor and the acceptance angle of a CPC are directly associated:

      C C P C = 1 sin θ a = a 2 π r

      where CCPC is the concentration factor, θa is the acceptance half-angle, α is the width of the reflector aperture, and r is the radius of the absorber tube. As a result, a CPC with a concentration factor equal to 1 sun (no concentration) will possess an acceptance half-angle equal to ~90°C, which means that all received light beams by the aperture (direct and diffuse) would be reflected in the absorber tube. The enhancement in the CPC performance over that of the PTRs was shown to range between 30% and 200% (Parra et al., 2001; McLoughlin et al., 2004a) owing to the ability of CPCs to harvest diffused beams and to usethem more efficiently (as a consequence of homogeneously illuminating the absorber tube) (McLoughlin et al., 2004b; Malato et al., 2007). Likewise, no sun tracking technology is required, decreasing the system’s complexity and cost dramatically.

      However, CPC reactors use a greater quantity of catalyst and wide absorber tubes compared to PTRs, making it necessary to work at low operating pressures (Fernández et al., 2005; Tanveer and Tezcanli Guyer, 2013). A schematic illustration and photo of a compound parabolic collector (CPC) are shown in Figure 8 (Fendrich et al., 2018).

      Schematic drawing and picture of a compound parabolic collector (CPC). Reproduced with permission (Fendrich et al., 2018).

      The CPC design was employed in several pilot-scale assemblies. The PSA in Spain built a modular array of six CPC modules for the degradation of dichlorophenol solutions with a maximum concentration of 200 mg/L. Not more than 100 min was enough to remove the pollutant when using an overall collection area equal to 8.9 m (2216). Such CPC configurations were effectively employed for the degradation of a wide spectrum of water contaminants, such as bacteria (Fernández et al., 2005) pharmaceuticals (Augugliaro et al., 2005), municipal wastewater (Kositzi et al., 2004), pesticides (Oller et al., 2006), and other resistant compounds (Sarria et al., 2004).

      A non-concentrating CPC design using suspended photocatalytic technology was also developed in the European “Solardetox” project for the treatment of commercial wastewater by building a modular system having each module made up of 16 parallel, 1.5-m tubes backed by CPC reflectors (Blanco et al., 1999; Malato et al., 2002). A full-size demo plant was built in HIDROCEN, Madrid (Blanco-Galvez et al., 2007). In a recirculating batch mode, the facility is completely automated and capable of treating 1,000 L of persistent non-biodegradable chlorinated industrial water pollutants. The plant has an overall aperture area of 100 m2 and is made up of two rows of 21 CPC collectors connected in series (each one is 1.5 m × 1.5 m and contains 16 parallel glass tubes with an inner diameter of 29.2 mm) (Blanco et al., 1999). Similar collectors were utilized for treating paper mill effluents in Brazil and Germany (Machado et al., 2003; Sattler et al., 2004; Eduardo da Hora Machado et al., 2004) and paper mill effluents (Amat et al., 2005), surfactants (Amat et al., 2004), and textile dyes (Prieto et al., 2005) in Spain.

      A new CPC-based plant was constructed in 2004 to treat pesticides remaining in water after the recycling of plastics. Recycling of plastic containers was followed by industrial cleansing of the shredded plastic, resulting in water polluted with very harmful persistent chemicals (pesticides). In a batch process, this photo-Fenton-based treatment was able to mineralize up to 80% of the TOC in the washing water (Fallmann et al., 1999; Sagawe et al., 2001; Rossetti et al., 2004). Photocatalysis mineralizes approximately 95% of the pollutants, while the activated carbon filter eliminates the remaining 5%. The plant includes four parallel rows consisting of 14 photocatalytic reactor modules built with 20 tubes/module, 2.7 m2/module, and installed on a 37°C inclined platform, based on CPC solar collectors (local latitude). The overall collector surface area is 150 m2, and the combined volume of the photoreactor is 1,061 L (Blanco-Galvez et al., 2007).

      In 2006, a new initiative was taken by effectively treating saline industrial wastewater with approximately 0.6 g/L of non-biodegradable α-methylphenylglycine (MPG) and 0.4–0.6 g/L TOC utilizing a combination of solar photo-Fenton and aerobic biological processes. It was made up of a solar CPCs photo-Fenton reactor (100 m2) and an aerobic biological treatment plant with a 1-m3 capacity fixed biomass activated sludge reactor. The combined system reached approximately 95% mineralization, wherein the photo-Fenton pre-treatment degraded 50% of the initial TOC, and the aerobic biological treatment eliminated 45% (Malato et al., 2007).

      Zapata et al. (2010) established an approach for the development of a large-scale combination of solar photo-Fenton and aerobic biological systems for the remediation of commercially available pesticides using CPC reactors (Zapata et al., 2010). The industrial plant was made of a scaled-up biological treatment plant mainly consisting of two 1,230-L IBRs, a total collector with a 150-m2 surface, and an overall photoreactor volume of 1,060 L. The combined industrial-scale system (photo-Fenton/bio) has an efficiency of 84%, with 35% belonging to the photo-Fenton treatment and 49% related to the biological process.

      Solwater is an alternative project that disinfected bacterially contaminated water using CPC photoreactor technology with a supported photocatalyst and photosensitive dyes. This project is funded by the European Union and conducted in South America. Following 3 months of deployment, the removal efficiency was diminished due to the deposition of calcium carbonate over the photocatalyst and the photosensitizer (Navntoft et al., 2007). This decrease in TiO2 efficiency was similarly observed when CPC packed with supported TiO2 on glass beads was employed for remediating of resulting BTEX spiked molecules from secondary wastewater treatment (Miranda-García et al., 2001). Extending the efficiency of the reactor was achieved by using a filter of ~0.35 μm, and an anionic and cationic ion-exchange resin as a pretreating stage. Catalyst fouling problem was also seen in tubular type reactors packed with supported TiO2 on silica spheres for urban wastewater treatment. Following a single month of treatment, iron sludge fouled the catalyst and dramatically reduced its efficiency (Nakano et al., 2004).

      A CPC pilot-scale packed bed reactor made up of 5 Pyrex tubes (1.9 m length and 22.2 mm outer diameter) joined successively was employed for handling 21 L of triclosan solution over supported TiO2 on volcanic mesoporous stones (Martínez et al., 2014). Finally, Silva et al. propose and tested a new approach for the remediation of landfill leachates following an aerobic treatment on a pilot scale (Silva et al., 2017). This approach consists of an aerobic activated sludge biological pre-oxidation (ASBO), coagulation, and sedimentation steps, and photo-oxidation through a CPC (10 modules, 20.8 m2) photo-Fenton (PF) reactor. The optimal option for treating 100 m3/day of leachate with a COD value less than 150 ppm and 1,000 mg O2/L was a blend of solar and artificial radiation, considering the energetic needs across the year.

      Finally, a variation of CPC called tubular reactor with an aperture and gross areas of 10 m2 and 37.2 m2 was respectively installed in a field test facility at Tyndall Air Force Base, Florida to tackle spiked water with BTEX in a recirculating batch mode (Vargas and Núñez, 2010). A total of 530 L of sieved groundwater was recycled with TiO2 slurry and 100 mg/L of H2O2. The removal of 75% of BTEX was achieved after 3 h. Recently, Vargas et al. (2010), reported a tubular pilot plant (TPP) using slurry TiO2 for the treatment of 15 L of contaminated water with industrial oil hydrocarbons (Vargas and Núñez, 2010). Dibenzothiophene (DBT) and naphthalene (NP) attained ~90% mineralization in 60 min when all pH values were tested; meanwhile, p-nitrophenol (PNP) reached ~40% in 180 min when pH = 6 and 10 were employed using slurry TiO2.

      Although CPC suffers from optical losses and tube aging (Malato et al., 2002; De Lasa et al., 2005), reactor clogging, catalyst fouling, the need for oxygen injection, and high pumping costs, it is still a fitting technology for pilot-scale and larger-scale operations. Extensive testing of photocatalysis and solar thermal engineering led to tremendous knowledge and understanding in the design and operation of photocatalytic systems incorporating CPC photoreactors, resulting in an attainable design and scaling-up of a plant based on such technology.

      9.3 Inclined Plate Collectors

      Inclined plate collectors (IPC) are flattened or curved panels that maintain a thin (about 1 mm) laminar flow of wastewater (normally 0.15–1.0 L/min). It offers the advantage of ensuring great mass transfer across various segments of the reactor throughout the large surface supporting the photocatalyst, in a structure known as a “thin-film fixed bed reactor” (TFFBR) (Ollis and Turchi, 1990; Fendrich et al., 2018). This configuration allows the non-concentrated photons to first travel throughout the reactant fluid before attaining the photocatalyst. Therefore, water overheating heating is not an issue (Tian et al., 2017). IPCs are perceived to be highly well suited to small-scale applications with limited amounts of fluid to be treated (Zhang et al., 2018). A schematic illustration of an IPC is shown in Figure 9 (Fendrich et al., 2018).

      Examples of inclined plate collectors prototype using TiO2 nanoparticles coated on transparent beads for the remediation of methylene blue under solar illumination. Reproduced with permission (Fendrich et al., 2018).

      Furthermore, the IPC may be closed or kept exposed to the atmosphere. When closed (flat plate reactor), they require purging with O2 or supplying with oxidants, in addition to glazing. When exposed to the atmosphere (failing film reactor), purging reaction solution with air and oxygen becomes unnecessary, as further increased efficiency is realized by excluding reactor covering from absorbing light beams, and therefore eradicating the likely formation of a photocatalyst opaque film on the inner surface (Braham and Harris, 2009). However, during severe gusts, falling film reactors suffer from a loss of homogeneity and dryness of the catalysts (Bockelmann et al., 1995; Gernjak et al., 2004).

      A TFFBR pilot plant was installed in a textile factory in Menzel Temime, Tunisia for the treatment of two commercial textile azo dyes using supported TiO2 in a recirculating batch configuration. The pilot plant was composed of 2 reactors, each having a total illuminated area of 50 m2 capable to treat a volume of 730 L. Seventy percent of degradation was attained in 8 h with an initial TOC in the water of 44.8 mg/L (Zayani et al., 2009).

      9.4 Double-Skin Sheet Reactor

      Originally reported by van Well et al. (1997), the engineering of a double-skin sheet reactor (DSSR) is straightforward (Van Well et al., 1997). DSSR is a non-concentrating reactor composed of commercial Plexiglas (transmission of light above 320 nm) double-skin sheet. It benefits from the employment of direct/diffuse radiation, as well as the maintenance of a turbulent flow regime that bypasses mass transfer boundaries between the photocatalyst and pollutants. However, it may be solely utilized in a low-throughput slurry mode, and it has low optical efficiency and bubble entrapment (De Lasa et al., 2005). Moreover, being a closed reactor, it needs purging of reaction solution with O2 or supplementing with additional oxidants (Bahnemann, 1999), which makes them unsuitable for commercialization. It was demonstrated that the present photocatalytic process using DSSR is inapt for tackling a large volume of effluent water. For instance, the projected areas necessary to decrease TOCs to 5% out of their initial concentration in 100 m3/day of effluents were extremely large and unviable, spanning from 5,350 m2 for lubricating oil effluent to a huge 106,100 m2 for chlorinated organics effluent (Gulyas et al., 2005).

      Nonetheless, a pilot plant composed of 12 DSSRs (2.45 m × 0.94 m) working in a recirculating batch mode with an overall surface area of 27.6 m2 and loaded with 5 g/L of TiO2 was installed in 1998 at the Volkswagen plant in Wolfsburg to handle 500 L/day of treated wastewater via biological approaches. The reduction of TOC reached 40% after 5.5 h beneath UV-solar irradiation (13.3 W/m2) (Dillert et al., 1999).

      9.5 Step Photoreactor

      The cascade falling film principle is used in the step photoreactor to ensure adequate sunlight exposure and oxygenation of the effluent to be treated. The STEP solar reactor (Figure 10) is composed of a rectangular (2 m × 0.5 m = 1 m2) 70-mm-high stainless-steel staircase vessel with 21 steps (Malato et al., 2007). To prevent water evaporation, it has a Pyrex glass (UV-transparent) lid. For the degradation of 4-chlorophenol, formetanate, and dyes, such reactors are set on a stationary rack inclined at 37°C, Almeria’s latitude. The photocatalyst-support sheet was 1.36 m2 in size. Twenty-five liters of DI water with the specified organic compounds was cycled in the dark at 7.5 L min−1 at the start of the experiment. For the entire degradation of 4-chlorophenol and formetanate, the STEP solar reactor was shown to be as competent as the CPC. In STEP reactor trials, however, both dyes took more time to be treated. The reactor was used to treat 25 L of water in a recirculating batch configuration. This setup was utilized to treat 25 L of an aqueous pesticide mixture with an initial TOC concentration of 8 mg/L in a recirculating batch mode. Exposed to a UV-A intensity of 30 W/m2, 80% degradation was obtained in 4.5 h (Chan et al., 2001). However, owing to high capital costs caused primarily by the cover material, in addition to film problems, the need for reaction solution purging with O2 or oxidant supplementation, and regular cleaning requirements, the STEP reactor became problematic for scale-up and commercialization. An example of a STEP reactor constructed at the PSA is shown in Figure 10. The major types of pilot-scale photoreactors are listed in Table 5.

      Non-concentrating STEP solar collector tested at Platforma Solar de Almeria (SPAIN). Reproduced with permission (Malato et al., 2007).

      Major types of pilot-scale photoreactors.

      Reactor type Total Aperture Area (m2) Pollutants Type of Photocatalyst Location References
      Parabolic Trough Reactors 29.2–465 Salicylic acid, trichloroethylene, tetrachloroethylene, chloroform, trichloroethane, carbon tetrachloride, methylene chloride, pentachlorophenol, oxalic acid, and 2,4-chlorophenol TiO2 slurry New Mexico (SNL)Plataforma Solar de Almeria (PSA) Malato et al. (2007) (Malato et al., 2007)Malato et al. (2002) (Malato et al., 2002)
      Compound Parabolic Concentrator 8.9–150 Dichlorophenol, bacteria, dye effluents, pharmaceuticals, municipal wastewater, pesticides, chlorinated industrial water contaminants, paper mill effluents; surfactants, α-methylphenylglycine, commercial pesticides, BTEX, landfill leachates, Dibenzothiophene (DBT), naphthalene (NP), p-nitrophenol (PNP) TiO2 photo-Fenton reagents, photo-Fenton/aerobic biological system Plataforma Solar de Almeria (PSA)HIDROCEN, MadridTyndall Air Force Base, Florida Malato et al. (1997) (Malato et al., 1997)Blanco-Galvez et al. (2007) (Blanco-Galvez et al., 2007)Vargas et al. (2010) (Vargas and Núñez, 2010)
      Inclined Plate Collectors 50 Commercial textile azo dyes TiO2 Menzel Temime, Tunisia Zayani et al. (2009) (Zayani et al., 2009)
      Double-Skin Sheet Reactor 27.6 Lubricating oil refinery effluent, chlorinated organics, biologically pretreated wastewater TiO2 Volkswagen plant in Wolfsburg Dillert et al. (1999) (Dillert et al., 1999)

      To our knowledge, a pilot-scale photocatalytic reactor for the degradation of MPs does not exist yet. However, we took a big step in this framework during the CLAIM H2020 EU project where we successfully implemented a lab-scale photocatalytic reactor for the degradation of invisible MPs such as PP, PE, PVC, and nylon. For instance, 2 weeks of visible light irradiation of PP MPs resulted in a 65% decrease in average particle volume. The successful outcomes of the experimental work prove the efficiency of the designed reactors and suggest their prospects for employment in scaled-up water and wastewater treatment.

      Finally, it should be noted that other reactor designs are proposed in the literature to treat wastewater but are not attractive for scale-up and commercialization due to the above-mentioned disadvantages: the use of the laminar flow regime, the need to purge with oxygen or to supply oxidants, the requirement of additional support for glazing, high cost, low optical efficiency, the need for a tracking sunlight system, mechanical aspects, and climatic conditions. These reactors include the slurry bubble column reactor (used to treat nitrobenzene, chlorobenzene, and phenol) (Kamble et al., 2004), the flat plate column reactor (used for tackling aqueous solution of methylene blue) (Vaiano et al., 2015b), the pebble bed photoreactor (used for tackling water containing dye molecules) (Rao et al., 2012), the flat-packed bed reactor (used for the remediation of DI water inoculated with Escherichia coli) ( Hanaor and Sorrell, 2014), the optical fiber photoreactors (used to treat 4-chlorophenol) (Peill and Hoffmann, 1997), and the fountain/water bell photocatalytic reactor and the rotating disk reactor (Braham and Harris, 2009).

      10 Conclusions

      This review examined the applications of AOPs, more specifically photocatalysis and Fenton processes, coupled with other techniques for the treatment of recalcitrant organic molecules and MPs. The efficiency of these technologies is mainly related to the generation of ROS such as OH, HO 2 · , and O 2 · , inducing the degradation of the polymeric chains in MPs. TiO2 and ZnO in the form of nanoparticles, nanotubes, and nanorods are by far the most widely used photocatalysts for the degradation of the major types of MPs such as PE, PP, PVC, nylons, and others in the form of nanocomposites, films, or powders. The general mechanism of photocatalytic degradation of MPs involves the following steps: initiation, chain propagation, chain branching, chain scission, and termination. Characterization techniques like mass balance, turbidimetry, COD, and TOC are widely used to determine the rate of the photocatalytic reaction. The physicochemical, thermal, and mechanical properties of MPs are usually obtained through a large number of methods such as GPC, NMR, XPS (elemental composition), SEM, TEM (morphology), DSC, TGA (thermal), UTM, and DMA (mechanical). Regarding the characterization of by-products, classic techniques like GC-MS, LC-MS, and FTIR are extensively reported. Until now, there are no notable studies on the use of photocatalytic reactors at the scale of a pilot plant for the degradation of MPs, and it was very important to review the scaling-up methods applied to some commercial photocatalytic reactors employed for tackling various organic molecules. To control the parameters affecting the performances of photocatalytic reactors on the industrial scale, the use of complex mathematical and numerical methods is often necessary. Among the described designs, CPC techniques are now best fitted for a pilot-scale setup and beyond. The design and scale-up of a photocatalytic plant for MPs degradation based on CPC are reasonably feasible due to the extensive knowledge and expertise in the development and implementation of photocatalytic-based CPCs in both photocatalysis and solar thermal engineering.

      Finally, it has to be noted that the decision of applying AOP technologies at an industrial scale for MPs degradation is intimately related to the degradation rate of pollutants. More specifically, the plant’s capital cost is proportionally affected by the degradation kinetics of the process (i.e., photo-Fenton and photocatalysis) and by the consumption of chemicals and materials (hydrogen peroxide and photocatalysts), which, in turn, are strongly reliant on the concentration and type of pollutants (Comninellis et al., 2008).

      Author Contributions

      WH: Conceptualization, Methodology, Investigation, and Writing—original draft. ED: Writing—review and editing. TT: Writing—review and editing. JD: Conceptualization, Methodology, and Writing—review and editing. All authors contributed to the article and approved the submitted version.

      Funding

      This work has been supported by CLAIM Project: H2020-BG-2016–2017 [grant number 774586], “Cleaning Litter by developing and Applying Innovative Methods in European seas”.

      Conflict of Interest

      The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

      Publisher’s Note

      All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

      Supplementary Material

      The Supplementary Material for this article can be found online at: /articles/10.3389/fmars.2022.885614/full#supplementary-material

      References Abbasi S. Sarafraz-Yazdi A. Amiri A. Ghaemi F. (2018). Development of Novel Magnetic Solid-Phase Extraction Sorbent Based on Fe3O4/Carbon Nanosphere/Polypyrrole Composite and Their Application to the Enrichment of Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons From Water Samples Prior to GC–FID Analysis. J. Iran. Chem. Soc. 15 (1), 153161. doi: 10.1007/s13738-017-1218-6 Adekoya D.O. Tahir M. Amin N.A.S. (2017). G-C3N4/(Cu/TiO2) Nanocomposite for Enhanced Photoreduction of CO2 to CH3OH and HCOOH Under UV/visible Light. J. CO2 Utiliz. 18, 261274. doi: 10.1016/j.jcou.2017.02.004 Adesina A. A. (2004). Industrial Exploitation of Photocatalysis: Progress, Perspectives and Prospects. Catalys. Survey. Asia. 8 (4), 265273. doi: 10.1007/s10563-004-9117-0 Aguilar-Vega M. (2013). “Structure and Mechanical Properties of Polymers,” in Handbook of Polymer Synthesis, Characterization, and Processing. Eds. Saldívar-Guerra E. Vivaldo-Lima E. (Hoboken, NJ, USA: John Wiley & Sons, Inc), 425434. doi: 10.1002/9781118480793.ch21 Ahmed B. Limem E. Abdel-Wahab A. Nasr B. (2011). Photo-Fenton Treatment of Actual Agro-Industrial Wastewaters. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 50 (11), 66736680. doi: 10.1021/ie200266d Alfaifi B. Ullah H. Alfaifi S. Tahir A. Mallick T. (2018). Photoelectrochemical Solar Water Splitting: From Basic Principles to Advanced Devices. Veruscri. Funct. Nanomater. 2 (12), BDJOC3. doi: 10.22261/FNAN.BDJOC3 Alfano O. M. Bahnemann D. Cassano A. E. Dillert R. Goslich R. (2000). Photocatalysis in Water Environments Using Artificial and Solar Light. Catalys. Today 58 (2-3), 199230. doi: 10.1016/s0920-5861(00)00252-2 Ali S. S. Qazi I. A. Arshad M. Khan Z. Voice T. C. Mehmood C. (2016). Photocatalytic Degradation of Low Density Polyethylene (LDPE) Films Using Titania Nanotubes. Environ. Nanotechnol. Monit. Manage. 5, 4453. doi: 10.1016/j.enmm.2016.01.001 Ali M.E. Rahman M.M. Sarkar S.M. Hamid S.B.A. (2014). Heterogeneous Metal Catalysts for Oxidation Reactions. J. Nanomater. 2014, ID 192038. doi: 10.1155/2014/192038 Allé P. H. Garcia-Muñoz P. Adouby K. Keller N. Robert D. (2021). Efficient Photocatalytic Mineralization of Polymethylmethacrylate and Polystyrene Nanoplastics by Tio2/β-SiC Alveolar Foams. Environ. Chem. Lett. 19 (2), 18031808. doi: 10.1007/s10311-020-01099-2 Almond J. Sugumaar P. Wenzel M. N. Hill G. Wallis C. (2020). Determination of the Carbonyl Index of Polyethylene and Polypropylene Using Specified Area Under Band Methodology With ATR-FTIR Spectroscopy. e-Polymers. 20 (1), 369381. doi: 10.1515/epoly-2020-0041 Alvarado-Rolon O. Natividad R. Romero R. Hurtado L. Ramírez-Serrano A. (2018). Modelling and Simulation of the Radiant Field in an Annular Heterogeneous Photoreactor Using a Four-Flux Model. Int. J. Photoener. 1678385, 116. doi: 10.1155/2018/1678385 Amat A. M. Arques A. López F. Miranda M. A. (2005). Solar Photo-Catalysis to Remove Paper Mill Wastewater Pollutants. Solar. Energy 79 (4), 393401. doi: 10.1016/j.solener.2005.02.021 Amat A. M. Arques A. Miranda M. A. Seguıí S. (2004). Photo-Fenton Reaction for the Abatement of Commercial Surfactants in a Solar Pilot Plant. Solar. Energy 77 (5), 559566. doi: 10.1016/j.solener.2004.03.028 Andrade J. D. (1985). Surface and Interfacial Aspects of Biomedical Polymers: Volume 1 Surface Chemistry and Physics (Boston, MA: Springer US). Antonopoulou M. Kosma C. Albanis T. Konstantinou L. (2021). An Overview of Homogeneous and Heterogeneous Photocatalysis Applications for the Removal of Pharmaceutical Compounds From Real or Synthetic Hospital Wastewaters Under Lab or Pilot Scale. Sci. Total. Environ. 765, 144163. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.144163 Ariza-Tarazona M. C. Villarreal-Chiu J. F. Barbieri V. Siligardi C. Cedillo-González E. I. (2019). New Strategy for Microplastic Degradation: Green Photocatalysis Using a Protein-Based Porous N-TiO2 Semiconductor. Ceram. Int. 45 (7), 96189624. doi: 10.1016/j.ceramint.2018.10.208 Arslan-Alaton I. Kabdaşlı I. Teksoy S. (2007). Effect of Fenton's Treatment on the Biodegradability of Chromium-Complex Azo Dyes. Water Sci. Technol. 55 (12), 107112. doi: 10.2166/wst.2007.388 Augugliaro V. García-López E. Loddo V. Malato-Rodríguez S. Maldonado I. Marcì G. . (2005). Degradation of Lincomycin in Aqueous Medium: Coupling of Solar Photocatalysis and Membrane Separation. Solar. Energy 79 (4), 402408. doi: 10.1016/j.solener.2005.02.020 Augugliaro V. Litter M. Palmisano L. Soria J. (2006). The Combination of Heterogeneous Photocatalysis With Chemical and Physical Operations: A Tool for Improving the Photoprocess Performance. J. Photochem. Photobiol. C.: Photochem. Rev. 7 (4), 127144. doi: 10.1016/j.jphotochemrev.2006.12.001 Babuponnusami A. Muthukumar K. (2014). A Review on Fenton and Improvements to the Fenton Process for Wastewater Treatment. J. Environ. Chem. Eng. 2 (1), 557572. doi: 10.1016/j.jece.2013.10.011 Bagheri M. Mohseni M. (2015). A Study of Enhanced Performance of VUV/UV Process for the Degradation of Micropollutants From Contaminated Water. J. Hazard. Mater. 294, 18. doi: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2015.03.036 Bahnemann D. (1999). “Photocatalytic Detoxification of Polluted Waters,” in The Handbook of Environmental Chemistry (Reactions and Processes), vol. 2 . Ed. Boule P. (Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer). doi: 10.1007/978-3-540-69044-3_11 Bandala E. R. Arancibia-Bulnes C. A. Orozco S. L. Estrada C. A. (2004). Solar Photoreactors Comparison Based on Oxalic Acid Photocatalytic Degradation. Solar. Energy 77 (5), 503512. doi: 10.1016/j.solener.2004.03.021 Bandala E. R. Estrada C. (2007). Comparison of Solar Collection Geometries for Application to Photocatalytic Degradation of Organic Contaminants. J. Solar. Energy Eng. 129 (1), 2226. doi: 10.1115/1.2390986 Barlow A. Lehrle R. S. Robb J. C. (1961). Direct Examination of Polymer Degradation by Gas Chromatography: I. Appl. To. Polym. Anal. Char. Polym. 2, 2740. doi: 10.1016/0032-3861(61)90005-2 Bautista P. Mohedano A. F. Gilarranz M. A. Casas J. A. Rodriguez J. J. (2007). Application of Fenton Oxidation to Cosmetic Wastewaters Treatment. J. Hazard. Mater. 143 (1-2), 128134. doi: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2006.09.004 Beltrán F. J. González M. Ribas F. J. Alvarez P. (1998). Fenton Reagent Advanced Oxidation of Polynuclear Aromatic Hydrocarbons in Water. Water, Air, & Soil Pollution 105, 3-4, 685700. doi: 10.1023/a:1005048206991 Beltrán-Heredia J. Torregrosa J. García J. Dominguez J. R. Tierno J. C. (2001). Degradation of Olive Mill Wastewater by the Combination of Fenton's Reagent and Ozonation Processes With an Aerobic Biological Treatment. Water Sci. Technol. 44 (5), 103108. doi: 10.2166/wst.2001.0262 Berkani M. Bouchareb M. K. Bouhelassa M. Kadmi Y. (2020). Photocatalytic Degradation of Industrial Dye in Semi-Pilot Scale Prototype Solar Photoreactor: Optimization and Modeling Using ANN and RSM Based on Box-Wilson Approach. Top. Catalys. 63, 964975. doi: 10.1007/s11244-020-01320-0 Blanco-Galvez J. Fernaíndez-Ibaínãez P. Malato-Rodriíguez S. (2007). Solar Photocatalytic Detoxification and Disinfection of Water: Recent Overview. Solar. Energy Eng. 129 (1), 415. doi: 10.1115/1.2390948 Blanco J. Malato S. Fernández P. Vidal A. Morales A. Trincado P. . (1999). Compound Parabolic Concentrator Technology Development to Commercial Solar Detoxification Applications. Solar. Energy 67 (4-6), 317330. doi: 10.1016/s0038-092x(00)00078-5 Bockelmann D. Weichgrebe D. Goslich R. Bahnemann D. (1995). Concentrating Versus non-Concentrating Reactors for Solar Water Detoxification. Solar. Energy Mater. Solar. Cells 38 (1-4), 441451. doi: 10.1016/0927-0248(95)00005-4 Bolton J. R. Bircher K. G. Tumas W. Tolman C. A. (2001). Figures-Of-Merit for the Technical Development and Application of Advanced Oxidation Technologies for Both Electric- and Solar-Driven Systems (IUPAC Technical Report). Pure. Appl. Chem. 73 (4), 627637. doi: 10.1351/pac200173040627 Bonnet N. (2004). Some Trends in Microscope Image Processing. Micron 35 (8), 635653. doi: 10.1016/j.micron.2004.04.006 Braham R. J. Harris A. T. (2009). Review of Major Design and Scale-Up Considerations for Solar Photocatalytic Reactors. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 48 (19), 88908905. doi: 10.1021/ie900859z Browne M.A. Galloway T.S. Thompson R.C. (2010). Spatial Patterns of Plastic Debris Along Estuarine Shorelines. Environ. Sci. Technol. 44 (9), 34043409. doi: 10.1021/es903784e Burge R. E. Browne M. T. Charalambous P. Clark A. Wu J. K. (1982). Multiple Signals in STEM. J. Microscop. 127 (1), 4760. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2818.1982.tb00396.x Cai Q. Q. Lee B. C. Y. Ong S. L. Hu J. Y. (2021). Fluidized-Bed Fenton Technologies for Recalcitrant Industrial Wastewater Treatment-Recent Advances, Challenges and Perspective. Water Res. 190, 116692. doi: 10.1016/j.watres.2020.116692 Cao Y. Zhao M. Ma X. Song Y. Zuo S. Li H. . (2021). Critical Review on the Interactions of Microplastics With Heavy Metals: Mechanism and Their Combined Effect on Organisms and Humans. Sci. Total. Environ. 788, 147620. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.147620 Carraher C. E. (2018). Carraher’s Polymer Chemistry. Tenth edition (Boca Raton: CRC Press, Taylor & Francis Group). Carriazo J. Guélou E. Barrault J. Tatibouët J. M. Molina R. Moreno S. (2005). Catalytic Wet Peroxide Oxidation of Phenol by Pillared Clays Containing Al–Ce–Fe. Water Res. 39 (16), 38913899. doi: 10.1016/j.watres.2005.06.034 Cassano A. E. Alfano O. M. (2000). Reaction Engineering of Suspended Solid Heterogeneous Photocatalytic Reactors. Catalys. Today 58 (2-3), 167197. doi: 10.1016/s0920-5861(00)00251-0 Cassano A. E. Martin C. A. Brandi R. J. Alfano O. M. (1995). Photoreactor Analysis and Design: Fundamentals and Applications. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 34 (7), 21552201. doi: 10.1021/ie00046a001 Celasco E. Valente I. Marchisio D. L. Barresi A. A. (2014). Dynamic Light Scattering and X-Ray Photoelectron Spectroscopy Characterization of PEGylated Polymer Nanocarriers: Internal Structure and Surface Properties. Langmuir 30 (28), 83268335. doi: 10.1021/la501198v Chan A. H. Porter J. F. Barford J. P. Chan C. K. (2001). Photocatalytic Thin Film Cascade Reactor for Treatment of Organic Compounds in Wastewater. Water Sci. Technol. 44 (5), 187195. doi: 10.2166/wst.2001.0283 Chen G. Feng Q. Wang J. (2020). Mini-Review of Microplastics in the Atmosphere and Their Risks to Humans. Sci. Total. Environ. 703, 135504. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.135504 Cho S. Choi W. (2001). Solid-Phase Photocatalytic Degradation of PVC–TiO2 Polymer Composites. J. Photochem. Photobiol. A.: Chem. 143 (2–3), 221228. doi: 10.1016/S1010-6030(01)00499-3 Chong M. N. Jin B. Chow C. W. K. Saint C. (2010). Recent Developments in Photocatalytic Water Treatment Technology: A Review. Water Res. 44 (10), 03027. doi: 10.1016/j.watres.2010.02.039 Chung Y.-H. Han K. Lin C.-Y. O’Neill D. Mul G. Mei B. . (2019). Photocatalytic Hydrogen Production by Photo-Reforming of Methanol With One-Pot Synthesized Pt-Containing TiO2 Photocatalysts. Catal. Today 356, 95100. doi: 10.1016/j.cattod.2019.07.042 Colburn T. W. Toops T. J. Wereszczak A. A. (2020). Industrial Scalable Additives for Enhanced Decomposition of Plastic Waste Through Photocatalysis. Acad. J. Polymer Sci., 4(2) 555633. doi: 10.19080/AJOP.2020.04.555633. United States. Comninellis C. Kapalka A. Malato S. Parsons S. A. Poulios I. Mantzavinos D. (2008). Advanced Oxidation Processes for Water Treatment: Advances and Trends for R&D. J. Chem. Technol. Biotechnol. 83 (6), 769776. doi: 10.1002/jctb.1873 Coronado J. (2013). “Chapter 2 Photons, Electrons and Holes: Fundamentals of Photocatalysis With Semiconductor,” in Design of Advanced Photocatalytic Materials for Energy and Environmental Applications London. Eds. Coronado J. Fresno F. Hernández-Alonso M. D. Portela R. (London:Springer-Verlag), 534. ISBN 978-1-4471-5061-9. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4471-5061-9 Cox K.D. Covernton G.A. Davies H.L. Dower J.F. Juanes F. Dudas S.E. (2019). Human Consumption of Microplastics. Environ. Sci. Technol. 53 (12), 70687074. doi: 10.1021/acs.est.9b01517 Cui X. Li W. Ryabchuk P. Junge K. Beller M. (2018). Bridging Homogeneous and Heterogeneous Catalysis by Heterogeneous Single-Metal-Site Catalysts. Nat. Catalys. 1 (6), 385397. doi: 10.1038/s41929-018-0090-9 Danish M. S. S. Estrella L. L. Alemaida I. M. A. Lisin A. Moiseev N. Ahmadi M. . (2021). Photocatalytic Applications of Metal Oxides for Sustainable Environmental Remediation. Metals 11 (1), 80. doi: 10.3390/met11010080 De Andrade P. M. Dufrayer C. R. Ionashiro E. Y. De Brito N. N. (2020). The Use of Metallurgical Waste for Heterogeneous Photo Fenton-Like Treatment of Cosmetic Effluent. J. Environ. Chem. Eng. 8 (5), 104148. doi: 10.1016/j.jece.2020.104148 De Lasa H. Serrano B. Salaices M. (2005). “Chapter 2: Novel Photocatalytic Reactors for Water and Air Treatment,” in Photocatalytic Reaction Engineering (Boston, MA: Springer), 1747. doi: 10.1007/0-387-27591-6_2 De los Santos-Villarreal G. Elizalde L. E. (2013). “Polymer Spectroscopy and Compositional Analysis,” in In Handbook of Polymer Synthesis, Characterization, and Processing. Eds. Saldívar-Guerra E. Vivaldo-Lima E. (Hoboken, NJ, USA: John Wiley & Sons, Inc), 335354. doi: 10.1002/9781118480793.ch16 Denny F. Scott J. Pareek V. Ding Peng G. Amal R. (2009). CFD Modelling for a TiO2-Coated Glass-Bead Photoreactor Irradiated by Optical Fibers: Photocatalytic Degradation of Oxalic Acid. Chem. Eng. Sci. 64 (8), 16951706. doi: 10.1016/j.ces.2008.12.021 Dey T.K. Uddin M.E. Jamal M. (2021). Detection and Removal of Microplastics in Wastewater: Evolution and Impact. Environ. Sci. pollut. Res. 28 (14), 1692516947. doi: 10.1007/s11356-021-12943-5 Dillert R. Cassano A. E. Goslich R. Bahnemann D. (1999). Large Scale Studies in Solar Catalytic Wastewater Treatment. Catalys. Today 54, 267282. doi: 10.1016/S0920-5861(99)00188-1 Domínguez-Jaimes L. P. Cedillo-González E. I. Luévano-Hipólito E. Acuña-Bedoya J. D. Hernández-López J. M. (2021). Degradation of Primary Nanoplastics by Photocatalysis Using Different Anodized TiO2 Structures. J. Hazard. Mater. 413, 125452. doi: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2021.125452 Eduardo da Hora Machado A. Padovani Xavier T. Rodrigues de Souza D. Antonio de Miranda J. Thomas Fleury Mendonça Duarte E. Ruggiero R. . (2004). Solar Photo-Fenton Treatment of Chip Board Production Waste Water. Solar. Energy 77 (5), 583589. doi: 10.1016/j.solener.2004.03.024 Eriksen M. Lebreton L.C.M. Carson H.S. Thiel M. Moore C.J. Borerro J.C. . (2014). Plastic Pollution in the World’s Oceans: More Than 5 Trillion Plastic Pieces Weighing Over 250,000 Tons Afloat at Sea. PLoS One 9 (12), e111913. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0111913 Evode N. Qamar S.A. Bilal M. Barceló D. Iqbal H.M.N. (2021). Plastic Waste and Its Management Strategies for Environmental Sustainability. Case Stud. Chem. Environ. Eng. 4, 100142. doi: 10.1016/j.cscee.2021.100142 Fagan R. McCormack D. E. Dionysiou D. D. Pillai S. C. A. (2016). Review of Solar and Visible Light Active TiO2 Photocatalysis for Treating Bacteria, Cyanotoxins and Contaminants of Emerging Concern. Mater. Sci. Semiconduct. Process. 42 (1), 214. doi: 10.1016/j.mssp.2015.07.052 Falconer J. L. Magrini-Bair K. A. (1998). Photocatalytic and Thermal Catalytic Oxidation of Acetaldehyde on Pt/Tio2. J. Catalys. 179 (1), 171178. doi: 10.1006/jcat.1998.2215 Fallmann H. Krutzler T. Bauer R. Malato S. Blanco J. (1999). Applicability of the Photo-Fenton Method for Treating Water Containing Pesticides. Catalys. Today 54 (2-3), 309319. doi: 10.1016/s0920-5861(99)00192-3 Fendrich M. Quaranta A. Orlandi M. Bettonte M. Miotello A. (2018). Solar Concentration for Wastewaters Remediation: A Review of Materials and Technologies. Appl. Sci. 9 (1), 118. doi: 10.3390/app9010118 Fenton H.J.H. (1894). LXXIII.—Oxidation of Tartaric Acid in Presence of Iron. J. Chem. Soc. 65, 899910. doi: 10.1039/ct8946500899 Fernández P. Blanco J. Sichel C. Malato S. (2005). Water Disinfection by Solar Photocatalysis Using Compound Parabolic Collectors. Catalys. Today 101 (3-4), 345352. doi: 10.1016/j.cattod.2005.03.062 Filho H. J. I. Siqueira A. F. Alcântara M. A. K. Aguiar L. G. Da Rós P. C. M. Napoleão D.A.d. S. . (2021). Solar Photo-Fenton Oxidation of Mature Landfill Leachate: Empirical Model and Chemical Inferences. Environ. Technol. 7 (1), 015519. doi: 10.1080/09593330.2021.1909656 Frias J.P.G.L. Nash R. (2019). Microplastics: Finding a Consensus on the Definition. Mar. pollut. Bull. 138, 145147. doi: 10.1016/j.marpolbul.2018.11.022 Galloway J. A. Montminy M. D. Macosko C. W. (2002). Image Analysis for Interfacial Area and Cocontinuity Detection in Polymer Blends. Polymer 43 (17), 47154722. doi: 10.1016/S0032-3861(02)00282-3 Gamaralalage D. Sawai O. Nunoura T. (2019). Degradation Behavior of Palm Oil Mill Effluent in Fenton Oxidation. J. Hazard. Mater. 364, 791799. doi: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2018.07.023 Ganguly P. Panneri S. Hareesh U. S. Breen A. Pillai S.C. (2019). “Chapter 23 - Recent Advances in Photocatalytic Detoxification of Water. In Micro and Nano Technologies,” in Nanoscale Materials in Water Purification Elsevier. Eds. Thomas S. Pasquini D. Leu S.-Y. Gopakumar D. A. (Elsevier), 653688. doi: 10.1016/B978-0-12-813926-4.00029-X Gaya U. I. Abdullah A. H. (2008). Heterogeneous Photocatalytic Degradation of Organic Contaminants Over Titanium Dioxide: A Review of Fundamentals, Progress and Problems. J. Photochem. Photobiol. C.: Photochem. Rev. 9 (1), 112. doi: 10.1016/j.jphotochemrev.2007.12.003 Gernjak W. Maldonado M. I. Malato S. Cáceres J. Krutzler T. Glaser A. . (2004). Pilot-Plant Treatment of Olive Mill Wastewater (OMW) by Solar TiO2 Photocatalysis and Solar Photo-Fenton. Solar. Energy 77 (5), 567572. doi: 10.1016/j.solener.2004.03.030 Geyer R. Jambeck J.R. Law K.L. (2017). Production, Use, and Fate of All Plastics Ever Made. Sci. Adv. 3 (7), e1700782. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.1700782 Ghafoori S. Mehrvar M. Chan P. K. (2014). Photoreactor Scale-Up for Degradation of Aqueous Poly(Vinyl Alcohol) Using UV/H2O2 Process. Chem. Eng. J. 245, 133142. doi: 10.1016/j.cej.2014.01.055 Gill P. Moghadam T. T. Ranjbar B. (2010). Differential Scanning Calorimetry Techniques: Applications in Biology and Nanoscience. J. Biomolecul. Technique. 21 (4), 167193. Giroto J. A. Teixeira A. C. S. C. Nascimento C. A. O. Guardani R. (2010). Degradation of Poly(Ethylene Glycol) in Aqueous Solution by Photo-Fenton and H 2 O 2 /UV Processes. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 49 (7), 32003206. doi: 10.1021/ie9015792 Goswami D. Y. (1997). A Review of Engineering Developments of Aqueous Phase Solar Photocatalytic Detoxification and Disinfection Processes. J. Solar. Energy Eng. 119 (2), 101107. doi: 10.1115/1.2887886 Goswami D. Y. Vijayaraghavan S. Lu S. Tamm G. (2004). New and Emerging Developments in Solar Energy. Solar. Energy 76 (1-3), 3343. doi: 10.1016/s0038-092x(03)00103-8 Gregory J. (1998). Turbidity and Beyond. Filtrat. Separat. 35 (1), 6367. doi: 10.1016/S0015-1882(97)83117-5 Guillard C. Lachheb H. Houas A. Ksibi M. Elaloui E. Herrmann J.-M. (2003). Influence of Chemical Structure of Dyes, of pH and of Inorganic Salts on Their Photocatalytic Degradation by TiO2 Comparison of the Efficiency of Powder and Supported Tio2. J. Photochem. Photobiol. A.: Chem. 158 (1), 2736. doi: 10.1016/s1010-6030(03)00016-9 Gulkaya İ Surucu G. A. Dilek F. B. (2006). Importance of H2O2/Fe2+ Ratio in Fenton's Treatment of a Carpet Dyeing Wastewater. J. Hazard. Mater. 136 (3), 763769. doi: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2006.01.006 Gulshan F. Yanagida S. Kameshima Y. Isobe T. Nakajima A. Okada K. (2010). Various Factors Affecting Photodecomposition of Methylene Blue by Iron-Oxides in an Oxalate Solution. Water Res. 44 (9), 287622884. doi: 10.1016/j.watres.2010.01.040 Gulyas H. Jain H. B. Susanto A. L. Malekpur M. Harasiuk K. Krawczyk I. . (2005). Solar Photocatalytic Oxidation of Pretreated Wastewaters: Laboratory Scale Generation Of Design Data for Technical-Scale Double-Skin Sheet Reactors. Envi. Technol. 26 (5), 501514. doi: 10.1080/09593332608618540 Gutierrez-Mata A. G. Velazquez-Martínez S. Álvarez-Gallegos A. Ahmadi M. Hernández-Pérez JoséA. Ghanbari F. . (2017). Recent Overview of Solar Photocatalysis and Solar Photo-Fenton Processes for Wastewater Treatment. Int. J. Photoener. 8528063, 127. doi: 10.1155/2017/8528063 Habib I.Y. Burhan J. Jaladi F. Lim C.M. Usman A. Kumara N. T. R. N. . (2020). Effect of Cr Doping in CeO2 Nanostructures on Photocatalysis and H2O2 Assisted Methylene Blue Dye Degradation. Catalys. Today 375, 506-513. doi: 10.1016/j.cattod.2020.04.008. ISSN 0920-5861. Hakkarainen M. Karlsson S. (2006). “Gas Chromatography in Analysis of Polymers and Rubbers,” in Encyclopedia of Analytical Chemistry. Ed. Meyers R. A. (Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd), a2010. doi: 10.1002/9780470027318.a2010 Hale R.C. Seeley M.E. La Guardia M.J. Mai L. Zeng E.Y.A. (2020). Global Perspective on Microplastics. J. Geophys. Res.: Ocean. 125 (1), e2018JC014719. doi: 10.1029/2018JC014719 Hamd W.S. Dutta J. (2020). “Chapter 11 - Heterogeneous Photo-Fenton Reaction and its Enhancement Upon Addition of Chelating Agents,” in Nanomaterials for the Detection and Removal of Wastewater Pollutants, A Volume in Micro and Nano Technologies. Eds. Bonelli B. Freyria F. S. Rossetti I. Sethi R. (Amsterdam Oxford Cambridge, MA: Elsevier), 303330. ISBN 9780128184899. doi: 10.1016/B978-0-12-818489-9.00011-6 Hanaor D. A. H. Sorrell C. C. (2014). Sand Supported Mixed-Phase TiO2 Photocatalysts for Water Decontamination Applications: Sand Supported Mixed-Phase TiO2 Photocatalysts. Adv. Eng. Mater. 16 (2), 248254. doi: 10.1002/adem.201300259 Hartmann N.B. Hüffer T. Thompson R.C. Hassellöv M. Verschoor A. Daugaard A.E. . (2019). Are We Speaking the Same Language? Recommendations for a Definition and Categorization Framework for Plastic Debris. Environ. Sci. Technol. 53 (3), 10391047. doi: 10.1021/acs.est.8b05297 He D. Luo Y. Lu S. Liu M. Song Y. Lei L. (2018). Microplastics in Soils: Analytical Methods, Pollution Characteristics and Ecological Risks. TrAC. Trends Anal. Chem. 109, 163172. doi: 10.1016/j.trac.2018.10.006 Herrmann J.-M. (1999). Heterogeneous Photocatalysis: Fundamentals and Applications to the Removal of Various Types of Aqueous Pollutants. Catalys. Today 53 (1), 115129. doi: 10.1016/s0920-5861(99)00107-8 Herrmann J.-M. Guillard C. (2000). Photocatalytic Degradation of Pesticides in Agricultural Used Waters. Compt. Rendus. l’Académie. Des. Sci. - Ser. IIC. – Chem. 3 (6), 417422. doi: 10.1016/S1387-1609(00)01137-3 He J. Yang X. Men B. Wang D. (2015). Interfacial Mechanisms of Heterogeneous Fenton Reactions Catalyzed by Iron-Based Materials: A Review. J. Environ. Sci. 39, 97109. doi: 10.1016/j.jes.2015.12.003 He J. Yang X. Men B. Yu L. Wang D. (2015). EDTA Enhanced Heterogeneous Fenton Oxidation of Dimethyl Phthalate Catalyzed by Fe3O4: Kinetics and Interface Mechanism. J. Mol. Catalys. A.: Chem. 408, 179188. doi: 10.1016/j.molcata.2015.07.030 Hodson M.E. Duffus-Hodson C.A. Clark A. Prendergast-Miller M.T. Thorpe K.L. (2017). Plastic Bag Derived-Microplastics as a Vector for Metal Exposure in Terrestrial Invertebrates. Environ. Sci. Technol. 51 (8), 47144721. doi: 10.1021/acs.est.7b00635 Hoffmann M.R. Martin S.T. Choi W. (1995). Environmental Applications of Semiconductor Photocatalysis. Chem. Rev. 95 (1), 6996. doi: 10.1021/cr00033a004 Huang W. Brigante M. Wu F. Hanna K. Mailhot G. (2013). Effect of Ethylenediamine-N,N′-Disuccinic Acid on Fenton and Photo-Fenton Processes Using Goethite as an Iron Source: Optimization of Parameters for Bisphenol A Degradation. Environ. Sci. pollut. Res. 20 (1), 3950. doi: 10.1007/s11356-012-1042-6 Huang H.-H. Lu M.-C. Chen J.-N. (2001). Catalytic Decomposition of Hydrogen Peroxide and 2-Chlorophenol With Iron Oxides. Water Res. 35 (9), 22912299. doi: 10.1016/s0043-1354(00)00496-6 Izunobi J. U. Higginbotham C. L. (2011). Polymer Molecular Weight Analysis by 1H NMR Spectroscopy. J. Chem. Educ. 88 (8), 10981104. doi: 10.1021/ed100461v Jamali A. Vanraes R. Hanselaer P. Van Gerven T. (2013). A Batch LED Reactor for the Photocatalytic Degradation of Phenol. Chem. Eng. Process.: Process. 71, 4350. doi: 10.1016/j.cep.2013.03.010 Jiang R. Lu G. Yan Z. Liu J. Wu D. Wang Y. (2021). Microplastic Degradation by Hydroxy-Rich Bismuth Oxychloride. J. Hazard. Mater. 405, 124247. doi: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2020.124247 Kamble S. P. Sawant S. B. Pangarkar V. G. (2004). Novel Solar-Based Photocatalytic Reactor for Degradation of Refractory Pollutants. AIChE. J. 50 (7), 16471650. doi: 10.1002/aic.10125 Kaur R. Kaur H. (2021). Solar Driven Photocatalysis - an Efficient Method for Removal of Pesticides From Water and Wastewater. Biointerfac. Res. Appl. Chem. 11 (12), 90719084. doi: 10.33263/BRIAC112.90719084 Kim J. R. Kan E. (2015). Heterogeneous Photo-Fenton Oxidation of Methylene Blue Using CdS-Carbon Nanotube/TiO2 Under Visible Light. J. Ind. Eng. Chem. 21, 644652. doi: 10.1016/j.jiec.2014.03.032 Kim S. Sin A. Nam H. Park Y. Lee H. Han C. (2022). Advanced Oxidation Processes for Microplastics Degradation: A Recent Trend. Chem. Eng. J. Adv. 9, 100213. doi: 10.1016/j.ceja.2021.100213 Knoblauch D. Mederake L. Stein U. (2018). Developing Countries in the Lead—What Drives the Diffusion of Plastic Bag Policies? Sustainability 10 (6), 1994. doi: 10.3390/su10061994 Konstas K. Konstantinou A. (2019). Photocatalytic Treatment of Pharmaceuticals in Real Hospital Wastewaters for Effluent Quality Amelioration. Water 11 (10), 2165. doi: 10.3390/w11102165 Kositzi M. Poulios I. Malato S. Caceres J. Campos A. (2004). Solar Photocatalytic Treatment of Synthetic Municipal Wastewater. Water Res. 38 (5), 11471154. doi: 10.1016/j.watres.2003.11.024 Kumar J. Bansal A. (2013). Photocatalytic Degradation in Annular Reactor: Modelization and Optimization Using Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) and Response Surface Methodology (RSM). J. Environ. Chem. Eng. 1 (3), 398405. doi: 10.1016/j.jece.2013.06.002 Kumar A. P. Depan D. Singh Tomer N. Singh R. P. (2009). Nanoscale Particles for Polymer Degradation and Stabilization—Trends and Future Perspectives. Prog. Polym. Sci. 34 (6), 479515. doi: 10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2009.01.002 Kwan W. P. Voelker B. M. (2003). Rates of Hydroxyl Radical Generation and Organic Compound Oxidation in Mineral-Catalyzed Fenton-Like Systems. Environ. Sci. Technol. 37 (6), 11501158. doi: 10.1021/es020874g Lasee S. Mauricio J. Thompson W.A. Karnjanapiboonwong A. Kasumba J. Subbiah S. . (2017). Microplastics in a Freshwater Environment Receiving Treated Wastewater Effluent: Microplastics in Urban Surface Water. Integrat. Environ. Assess. Manage. 13 (3), 528532. doi: 10.1002/ieam.1915 Law K.L. Thompson R.C. (2014). Microplastics in the Seas. Science 345 (6193), 144145. doi: 10.1126/science.1254065 Lebreton L. Andrady A. (2019). Future Scenarios of Global Plastic Waste Generation and Disposal. Palgrave. Commun. 5 (1), 6. doi: 10.1057/s41599-018-0212-7 Lee J.-M. Busquets R. Choi I.-C. Lee S.-H. Kim J.-K. Campos L. C. (2020). Photocatalytic Degradation of Polyamide 66; Evaluating the Feasibility of Photocatalysis as a Microfibre-Targeting Technology. Water 12, 3551. doi: 10.3390/w12123551 Lee H.-J. Lee H. Lee C. (2014). Degradation of Diclofenac and Carbamazepine by the Copper(II)-Catalyzed Dark and Photo-Assisted Fenton-Like Systems. Chem. Eng. J. 245, 258264. doi: 10.1016/j.cej.2014.02.037 Liang W. Luo Y. Song S. Dong X. Yu X. (2013). High Photocatalytic Degradation Activity of Polyethylene Containing Polyacrylamide Grafted Tio2. Polym. Degrad. Stab. 98 (9), 17541761. doi: 10.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2013.05.027 Liao Q. Sun J. Gao L. (2009). Degradation of Phenol by Heterogeneous Fenton Reaction Using Multi-Walled Carbon Nanotube Supported Fe2O3 Catalysts. Colloid. Surf. A.: Physicochem. Eng. Aspect. 345 (1-3), 95100. doi: 10.1016/j.colsurfa.2009.04.037 Lin S.-S. Gurol M. D. (1998). Catalytic Decomposition of Hydrogen Peroxide on Iron Oxide: Kinetics, Mechanism, and Implications. Environ. Sci. Technol. 32 (10), 14171423. doi: 10.1021/es970648k Li Puma G. (2005). Dimensionless Analysis of Photocatalytic Reactors Using Suspended Solid Photocatalysts. Inst. Chem. Engi. 83 (7), 820826. doi: 10.1205/cherd.04336 Liu R. Chiu H. M. Shiau C.-S. Yeh R. Y.-L. Hung Y.-T. (2007). Degradation and Sludge Production of Textile Dyes by Fenton and Photo-Fenton Processes. Dyes. Pigment. 73 (1), 16. doi: 10.1016/j.dyepig.2005.10.002 Liu Y. Jin W. Zhao Y. Zhang G. Zhang W. (2017). Enhanced Catalytic Degradation of Methylene Blue by α-Fe2O3/graphene Oxide via Heterogeneous Photo-Fenton Reactions. Appl. Catalys. B.: Environ. 206, 642652. doi: 10.1016/j.apcatb.2017.01.075 Liu P. Qian L. Wang H. Zhan X. Lu K. Gu C. . (2019). New Insights Into Aging Behavior of Microplastics Accelerated by Advanced Oxidation Processes. Environ. Sci. Technol. 53 (7), 35793588. doi: 10.1021/acs.est.9b00493 Liu W. Zhang J. Liu H. Guo X. Zhang X. Yao X. . (2021). Review of the Removal of Microplastics in Global Wastewater Treatment Plants: Characteristics and Mechanisms. Environ. Int. 146, 106277. doi: 10.1016/j.envint.2020.106277 Li S. Xu S. He L. Xu F. Wang Y. Zhang L. (2020). Photocatalytic Degradation of Polyethylene Plastic With Polypyrrole/TiO2 Nanocomposite as Photocatalyst. Polymer-Plast. Technol. Eng. 49 (4), 400406. doi: 10.1080/03602550903532166 Llorente-García B. E. Hernández-López J. M. Zaldívar-Cadena A. A. Siligardi C. Cedillo-González E. I. (2020). First Insights Into Photocatalytic Degradation of HDPE and LDPE Microplastics by a Mesoporous N–TiO2 Coating: Effect of Size and Shape of Microplastics. Coatings. 10 (7), 658. doi: 10.3390/coatings10070658 Lum P.T. Foo K.Y. Zakaria N.A. Palaniandy P. (2019). Ash Based Nanocomposites for Photocatalytic Degradation of Textile Dye Pollutants: A Review. Mater. Chem. Phys. 241, 122405. doi: 10.1016/j.matchemphys.2019.122405 Luna A. J. Chiavone-Filho O. Machulek A. de Moraes J. E. F. Nascimento C. A. O. (2012). Photo-Fenton Oxidation of Phenol and Organochlorides (2,4-DCP and 2,4-D) in Aqueous Alkaline Medium With High Chloride Concentration. J. Environ. Manage. 111, 1017. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2012.06.014 Luo H. Xiang Y. Li Y. Zhao Y. Pan X. (2021). Photocatalytic Aging Process of Nano-TiO2 Coated Polypropylene Microplastics: Combining Atomic Force Microscopy and Infrared Spectroscopy (AFM-IR) for Nanoscale Chemical Characterization. J. Hazard. Mater. 404, 124159. doi: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2020.124159 Machado A. E. H. De Miranda J. A. De Freitas R. F. Duarte E. T. F. M. Ferreira L. F. Albuquerque Y. D. T. . (2003). Destruction of the Organic Matter Present in Effluent From a Cellulose and Paper Industry Using Photocatalysis. J. Photochem. Photobiol. A.: Chem. 155 (1-3), 231241. doi: 10.1016/s1010-6030(02)00393-3 Malato S. Blanco J. Alarcón D. C. Maldonado M. I. Fernández-Ibáñez P. Gernjak W. (2007). Photocatalytic Decontamination and Disinfection of Water With Solar Collectors. Catalys. Today 122 (1-2), 137149. doi: 10.1016/j.cattod.2007.01.034 Malato S. Blanco J. Richter C. Curcó D. Gimenez J. (1997). Low-Concentrating CPC Collectors for Photocatalytic Water Detoxification: Comparison With a Medium Concentrating Solar Collector. Water Sci. Technol. 35 (4), 157164. doi: 10.1016/s0273-1223(97)00021-8 Malato S. Blanco J. Vidal A. Fernández P. Cáceres J. Trincado P. . (2002). New Large Solar Photocatalytic Plant: Set-Up and Preliminary Results. Chemosphere 47 (3), 235240. doi: 10.1016/s0045-6535(01)00220-x Martínez N. S. S. Fernández J. F. Segura X. F. Ferrer A. S. (2003). Pre-Oxidation of an Extremely Polluted Industrial Wastewater by the Fenton’s Reagent. J. Hazard. Mater. 101 (3), 315322. doi: 10.1016/s0304-3894(03)00207-3 Martínez-Huitle C. A. Rodrigo M. A. Sirés I. Scialdone O. (2015). Single and Coupled Electrochemical Processes and Reactors for the Abatement of Organic Water Pollutants: A Critical Review. Chem. Rev. 115 (24), 1336213407. doi: 10.1021/acs.chemrev.5b00361 Martínez S. Morales-Mejía J. C. Hernández P. P. Santiago L. Almanza R. (2014). Solar Photocatalytic Oxidation of Triclosan With TiO2 Immobilized on Volcanic Porous Stones on a CPC Pilot Scale Reactor. Energy Proc. 57, 30143020. doi: 10.1016/j.egypro.2014.10.337 Ma B. Xue W. Hu C. Liu H. Qu J. Li L. (2019). Characteristics of Microplastic Removal via Coagulation and Ultrafiltration During Drinking Water Treatment. Chem. Eng. J. 359, 159167. doi: 10.1016/j.cej.2018.11.155 McLoughlin O. A. Kehoe S. C. McGuigan K. G. Duffy E. F. Al Touati F. Gernjak W. . (2004a). Solar Disinfection of Contaminated Water: A Comparison of Three Small-Scale Reactors. Solar. Energy 77 (5), 657664. doi: 10.1016/j.solener.2004.07.004 McLoughlin O. A. Kehoe S. C. McGuigan K. G. Duffy E. F. Al Touati F. Gernjak W. . (2004b). Solar Disinfection of Contaminated Water: A Comparison of Three Small-Scale Reactors. Solar. Energy 77 (5), 657664. doi: 10.1016/j.solener.2004.07.004 Medeiros P. M. (2018). “Gas Chromatography–Mass Spectrometry (GC–MS),” in Encyclopedia of Geochemistry. Ed. White W. M. (Cham: Springer International Publishing), 530535. Encyclopedia of Earth Sciences Series. doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-39312-4_159 Meeker R. E. United States Patent Office (1963). Stabilization of Hydrogen Peroxide (US). (Patent number: US3208825A). Mehos M. Turchi C. Pacheco J. Boegel A. J. Merrill T. Stanley R. (1992). Pilot-Scale Study of the Solar Detoxification of VOC-Contaminated Groundwater (United States: U.S. Department of Energy Office of Scientific and Technical Information). Available at: https://www.osti.gov/biblio/7102976-pilot-scale-study-solar-detoxification-voc-contaminated-groundwater. Menard K. P. Menard N. R. (2020). Dynamic Mechanical Analysis. 3rd ed (Boca Raton: CRC Press). doi: 10.1201/9780429190308 Miao F. Liu Y. Gao M. Yu X. Xiao P. Wang M. . (2020). Degradation of Polyvinyl Chloride Microplastics via an Electro-Fenton-Like System With a TiO2/graphite Cathode. J. Hazard. Mater. 399, 123023. doi: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2020.123023 Minero C. Pelizzetti E. Malato S. Blanco J. (1993). Large Solar Plant Photocatalytic Water Decontamination: Degradation of Pentachlorophenol. Chemosphere 26 (12), 02119. doi: 10.1016/0045-6535(93)90337-5 Miranda-García N. Suárez S. Sánchez B. Coronado J. M. Malato S. Maldonado M. I. (2001). Photocatalytic Degradation of Emerging Contaminants in Municipal Wastewater Treatment Plant Effluents Using Immobilized TiO2 in a Solar Pilot Plant. Appl. Catalys. B.: Environ. 103 (3-4), 294301. doi: 10.1016/j.apcatb.2011.01.030 Mishra M. Chun D.-M. (2015). α-Fe2O3 as a Photocatalytic Material: A Review. Appl. Catalys. A. 498, 126141. doi: 10.1016/j.apcata.2015.03.023 Moghaddami M. Raisee M. (2012). Performance and Energy Consumption Analysis of UV-H2O2 Photoreactors Using Computational Fluid Dynamics. Int. J. Environ. Sci. Dev. 3 (4), 387392. doi: 10.7763/IJESD.2012.V3.253 Mohamed A.S. AbuKhadra M.R. Abdallah E.A. El-Sherbeeny A.M. Mahmoud R.K. (2020). The Photocatalytic Performance of Silica Fume Based Co3O4/MCM-41 Green Nanocomposite for Instantaneous Degradation of Omethoate Pesticide Under Visible Light. J. Photochem. Photobiol. A. 392, 112434. doi: 10.1016/j.jphotochem.2020.112434 Mohamed A. Yousef S. Nasser W. S. Osman T. A. Knebel A. Valadez Sánchez E. P. . (2020). Rapid Photocatalytic Degradation of Phenol From Water Using Composite Nanofibers Under UV. Environ. Sci. Eur. 32, 160. doi: 10.1186/s12302-020-00436-0 Mokhbi Y. Korichi M. Akchiche Z. (2019). Combined Photocatalytic and Fenton Oxidation for Oily Wastewater Treatment. Appl. Water Sci. 9 (2), 3544. doi: 10.1007/s13201-019-0916-x Molina C. B. Sanz-Santos E. Boukhemkhem A. Bedia J. Belver C. Rodriguez J. (2020). Removal of Emerging Pollutants in Aqueous Phase by Heterogeneous Fenton and Photo-Fenton With Fe2O3- TiO2-Clay Heterostructures. Environ. Sci. pollut. Res. 27, 3843438445. doi: 10.1007/s11356-020-09236-8 Moreira J. Serrano B. Ortiz A. De Lasa H. (2010). Evaluation of Photon Absorption in an Aqueous TiO2 Slurry Reactor Using Monte Carlo Simulations and Macroscopic Balance. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 49 (21), 1052410534. doi: 10.1021/ie100374f Motaung T. E. Luyt A. S. Bondioli F. Messori M. Saladino M. L. Spinella A. . (2012). PMMA–Titania Nanocomposites: Properties and Thermal Degradation Behaviour. Polym. Degrad. Stab. 97 (8), 13251333. doi: 10.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2012.05.022 Mozia S. Brożek P. Przepiórski J. Tryba B. Morawski A. W. (2012). Immobilized TiO2 for Phenol Degradation in a Pilot-Scale Photocatalytic Reactor. J. Nanomater. 2012, 110. doi: 10.1155/2012/949764 Mumford A.C. Barringer J.L. Benzel W.M. Reilly P.A. Young L.Y. (2012). Microbial Transformations of Arsenic: Mobilization From Glauconitic Sediments to Water. Water Res. 46 (9), 28592868. doi: 10.1016/j.watres.2012.02.044 Murphy F. Ewins C. Carbonnier F. Quinn B. (2016). Wastewater Treatment Works (WwTW) as a Source of Microplastics in the Aquatic Environment. Environ. Sci. Technol. 50 (11), 58005808. doi: 10.1021/acs.est.5b05416 Nabi I. Bacha A.-U.-R Ahmad F. Zhang L. (2021). Application of Titanium Dioxide for the Photocatalytic Degradation of Macro- and Micro-Plastics: A Review. J. Environ. Chem. Eng. 9 (5), 105964. doi: 10.1016/j.jece.2021.105964 Nabi I. Bacha A.-U.-R Li K. Cheng H. Wang T. Liu Y. . (2020). Complete Photocatalytic Mineralization of Microplastic on TiO2 Nanoparticle Film. iScience. 23 (7), 101326. doi: 10.1016/j.isci.2020.101326 Nadeem N. Zahid M. Tabasum A. Mansha A. Jilani A. Bhatti I. A. . (2020). Degradation of Reactive Dye Using Heterogeneous Photo-Fenton Catalysts: ZnFe2O4 and GO-ZnFe2O4 Composite. Mater. Res. Exp. 7 (1), 015519. doi: 10.1088/2053-1591/ab66ee Nakano K. Obuchi E. Takagi S. Yamamoto R. Tanizaki T. Taketomi M. . (2004). Photocatalytic Treatment of Water Containing Dinitrophenol and City Water Over Tio2/Sio2. Separat. Purifi. Technol. 34 (1-3), 6772. doi: 10.1016/s1383-5866(03)00176-x Navntoft C. Araujo P. Litter M. I. Apella M. C. Fernández D. Puchulu M. E. . (2007). Field Tests of the Solar Water Detoxification SOLWATER Reactor in Los Pereyra, Tucumán, Argentina. J. Solar. Energy Eng. 129 (1), 127134. doi: 10.1115/1.2391318 Oller I. Gernjak W. Maldonado M. I. Pérez-Estrada L. A. Sánchez-Pérez J. A. Malato S. (2006). Solar Photocatalytic Degradation of Some Hazardous Water-Soluble Pesticides at Pilot-Plant Scale. J. Hazard. Mater. 138 (3), 507517. doi: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2006.05.075 Ollis D. F. Turchi C. (1990). Heterogeneous Photocatalysis for Water Purification: Contaminant Mineralization Kinetics and Elementary Reactor Analysis. Envi. Prog. 9 (4), 229234. doi: 10.1002/ep.670090417 Oyama T. Aoshima A. Horikoshi S. Hidaka S. Zhao J. Serpone N. (2004). Solar Photocatalysis, Photodegradation of a Commercial Detergent in Aqueous TiO2 Dispersions Under Sunlight Irradiation. Solar. Energy 77 (5), 525532. doi: 10.1016/j.solener.2004.04.020 Padervand M. Lichtfouse E. Robert D. Wang C. (2020). Removal of Microplastics From the Environment. A Review. Environ. Chem. Lett. 18 (3), 807828. doi: 10.1007/s10311-020-00983-1 Parra S. Malato S. Blanco J. Péringer P. Pulgari C. (2001). Concentrating Versus Non-Concentrating Reactors for Solar Photocatalytic Degradation of P-Nitrotoluene-O-Sulfonic Acid. Water Sci. Technol. 44 (5), 219227. doi: 10.2166/wst.2001.0290 Pawar R. C. Lee C. S. (2015). “Heterogeneous Photocatalysts Based on Organic/Inorganic Semiconductor,” in Heterogeneous Nanocomposite-Photocatalysis for Water Purification (Elsevier: Elsevier), 4396. doi: 10.1016/B978-0-323-39310-2.00003-5 Peill N. J. Hoffmann M. R. (1997). Solar-Powered Photocatalytic Fiber-Optic Cable Reactor for Waste Stream Remediation. J. Solar. Energy Eng. 119 (3), 229236. doi: 10.1115/1.2888024 Perez E. R. Knapp J. A. Horn C. K. Stillman S. L. Evans J. E. Arfsten D. P. (2016). Comparison of LC–MS-MS and GC–MS Analysis of Benzodiazepine Compounds Included in the Drug Demand Reduction Urinalysis Program. J. Anal. Toxicol. 40 (3), 201207. doi: 10.1093/jat/bkv140 Porta R. (2021). Anthropocene, the Plastic Age and Future Perspectives. FEBS Open Bio 11 (4), 948953. doi: 10.1002/2211-5463.13122 Potakis N. Frontistis Z. Antonopoulou M. Konstantinou I. Mantzavinos D. (2017). Oxidation of Bisphenol A in Water by Heat-Activated Persulfate. J. Environ. Manage. 195 (2), 125132. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2016.05.045 Pozzo R. L. Giombi J. L. Baltanás M. A. Cassano A. E. (2000). The Performance in a Fluidized Bed Reactor of Photocatalysts Immobilized Onto Inert Supports. Catalys. Today 62 (2-3), 175187. doi: 10.1016/s0920-5861(00)00419-3 Prairie M. R. Pacheco J. Evans L. R. (1991). Solar Detoxification of Water Containing Chlorinated Solvents and Heavy Metals via TiO2 Photocatalysis (United States). Available at: https://www.osti.gov/biblio/5858147-solar-detoxification-water-containing-chlorinated-solvents-heavy-metals-via-tio-sub-photocatalysis. Prieto O. Fermoso J. Nuñez Y. Del Valle J. L. Irusta R. (2005). Decolouration of Textile Dyes in Wastewaters by Photocatalysis With Tio2. Solar. Energy 79 (4), 376383. doi: 10.1016/j.solener.2005.02.023 Qiu Q. Peng J. Yu X. Chen F. Wang J. Dong F. (2015). Occurrence of Microplastics in the Coastal Marine Environment: First Observation on Sediment of China. Mar. pollut. Bull. 98 (1–2), 274280. doi: 10.1016/j.marpolbul.2015.07.028 Rabek Jan F. (2012). Polymer Photodegradation: Mechanisms and Experimental Methods (Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands). Rajamanickam D. Shanthi M. (2016). Photocatalytic Degradation of an Organic Pollutant by Zinc Oxide – Solar Process. Arab. J. Chem. 9, S1858S1868. doi: 10.1016/j.arabjc.2012.05.006 Raji M. Mirbagheri S. A. Ye F. Dutta J. (2021). Nano Zero-Valent Iron on Activated Carbon Cloth Support as Fenton-Like Catalyst for Efficient Color and COD Removal From Melanoidin Wastewater. Chemosphere 263, 127945. doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2020.127945 Rao N. N. Chaturvedi V. Li Puma G. (2012). Novel Pebble Bed Photocatalytic Reactor for Solar Treatment of Textile Wastewater. Chem. Eng. J. 184, 9097. doi: 10.1016/j.cej.2012.01.004 Remucal C. K. Sedlak D. L. (2011). “The Role of Iron Coordination in the Production of Reactive Oxidants From Ferrous Iron Oxidation by Oxygen and Hydrogen Peroxide,” in In ACS Symposium Series, vol. 1071 . Eds. Tratnyek P. G. Grundl T. J. Haderlein S. B. (Washington, DC: American Chemical Society), 177197. doi: 10.1021/bk-2011-1071.ch009 Revel M. Châtel A. Mouneyrac C. (2018). Micro(Nano)Plastics: A Threat to Human Health? Curr. Opin. Environ. Sci. Health 1, 1723. doi: 10.1016/j.coesh.2017.10.003 Rist S. Carney Almroth B. Hartmann N.B. Karlsson T.M.A. (2018). Critical Perspective on Early Communications Concerning Human Health Aspects of Microplastics. Sci. Total. Environ. 626, 720726. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.01.092 Rivas F. J. Beltrán F. J. Gimeno O. Alvarez P. (2003). Treatment of Brines by Combined Fenton’s Reagent–Aerobic Biodegradation: II. Process Modelling. J. Hazardous Mat. 96, 2-3, 259276. doi: 10.1016/s0304-3894(02)00216-9 Rivas F. J. Beltrán F. J. Gimeno O. Frades J. (2001). Treatment of Olive Oil Mill Wastewater by Fenton's Reagent. J. Agric. Food Chem. 49 (4), 18731880. doi: 10.1021/jf001223b Rossetti G. H. Albizzati E. D. Alfano O. M. (2004). Modeling of a Flat-Plate Solar Reactor. Degradation of Formic Acid by the Photo-Fenton Reaction. Solar. Energy 77 (5), 461470. doi: 10.1016/j.solener.2004.04.019 RuÃz-Delgado A. Roccamante M. A. Malato S. Agüera A. Oller I. (2020). Olive Mill Wastewater Reuse to Enable Solar Photo-Fenton-Like Processes for the Elimination of Priority Substances in Municipal Wastewater Treatment Plant Effluents. Environ. Sci. pollut. Res. 27, 3814838154. doi: 10.1007/s11356-020-09721-0 Sacco O. Vaiano V. Sannino D. (2020). Main Parameters Influencing the Design of Photocatalytic Reactors for Wastewater Treatment: A Mini Review. J. Chem. Technol. Biotechnol. 95 (10), 26082618. doi: 10.1002/jctb.6488 Sagawe G. Lehnard A. Lübber M. Bahnemann D. (2001). The Insulated Solar Fenton Hybrid Process: Fundamental Investigations. HCA. 84 (12), 37423759. doi: 10.1002/1522-2675(20011219)84:12<3742::aid-hlca3742>3.0.co;2-q Saggioro E. M. Oliveira A. S. Buss D. F. Magalhães D. de P. Pavesi T. Jimenéz M. . (2015). Photo-Decolorization and Ecotoxicological Effects of Solar Compound Parabolic Collector Pilot Plant and Artificial Light Photocatalysis of Indigo Carmine Dye. Dyes. Pigment. 113, 571580. doi: 10.1016/j.dyepig.2014.09.029 Salgado P. Frontela J. L. Vidal G. (2020). Optimization of Fenton Technology for Recalcitrant Compounds and Bacteria Inactivation. Catalysts 10 (12), 1483. doi: 10.3390/catal10121483 Samet Y. Ayadi M. Abdelhedi R. (2009). Degradation of 4-Chloroguaiacol by Dark Fenton and Solar Photo-Fenton Advanced Oxidation Processes. Water Environ. Res. 81 (12), 23892397. doi: 10.2175/106143009x425997 Sanchez W. Bender C. Porcher J.-M. (2014). Wild Gudgeons (Gobio Gobio) From French Rivers Are Contaminated by Microplastics: Preliminary Study and First Evidence. Environ. Res. 128, 98100. doi: 10.1016/j.envres.2013.11.004 Sangami S. Manu B. (2017). Optimization of Fenton’s Oxidation of Herbicide Dicamba in Water Using Response Surface Methodology. Appl. Water Sci. 7, 42694280. doi: 10.1007/s13201-017-0559-8 Santos-Juanes L. Sánchez J. L. G. López J. L. C. Oller I. Malato S. Sánchez Pérez J. A. (2011). Dissolved Oxygen Concentration: A Key Parameter in Monitoring the Photo-Fenton Process. Appl. Catalys. B.: Environ. 104 (3–4), 316323. doi: 10.1016/j.apcatb.2011.03.013 Saravanan A. Kumar P.S. Vo D.-V. N. Yaashikaa P.R. Karishma S. Jeevanantham S. . (2020). Photocatalysis for Removal of Environmental Pollutants and Fuel Production: A Review. Environ. Chem. Lett 19(1), 441-463. doi: 10.1007/s10311-020-01077-8. IF 5.922. Sarria V. Péringer P. Cáceres J. Blanco J. Malato S. Pulgarin C. (2004). Solar Degradation of 5-Amino-6-Methyl-2-Benzimidazolone by TiO2 and Iron(III) Catalyst With H2O2 and O2 as Electron Acceptors. Energy 29 (5-6), 853860. doi: 10.1016/s0360-5442(03)00190-7 Sarwan B. Acharya A. D. Kaur S. Pare B. (2020). Visible Light Photocatalytic Deterioration of Polystyrene Plastic Using Supported BiOCl Nanoflower and Nanodisk. Eur. Polym. J. 134, 109793. doi: 10.1016/j.eurpolymj.2020.109793 Sattler C. De Oliveira L. Tzschirner M. Machado A. E. H. (2004). Solar Photocatalytic Water Detoxification of Paper Mill Effluents. Energy 29 (5-6), 835843. doi: 10.1016/s0360-5442(03)00189-0 Satuf M. L. Brandi R. J. Cassano A. E. Alfano O. M. (2007). Scaling-Up of Slurry Reactors for the Photocatalytic Degradation of 4-Chlorophenol. Catalys. Today 129 (1–2), 110117. doi: 10.1016/j.cattod.2007.06.056 Sekar R. DiChristina T. J. (2017). Degradation of the Recalcitrant Oil Spill Components Anthracene and Pyrene by a Microbially Driven Fenton Reaction. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 364 (21), fnx203 . doi: 10.1093/femsle/fnx203 Serrano B. De Lasa H. (1997). Photocatalytic Degradation of Water Organic Pollutants. Kinetic Modeling and Energy Efficiency. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 36 (11), 47054711. doi. 10.1021/ie970104r Shang J. Chai M. Zhu Y. (2003). Photocatalytic Degradation of Polystyrene Plastic Under Fluorescent Light. Environ. Sci. Technol. 37 (19), 44944499. doi: 10.1021/es0209464 Silva T. F. C. V. Soares P. A. Manenti D. R. Fonseca A. Saraiva I. Boaventura R. A. R. . (2017). An Innovative Multistage Treatment System for Sanitary Landfill Leachate Depuration: Studies at Pilot-Scale. Sci. Total. Environ. 576, 99117. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.10.058 Singa P. K. Isa M. H. Lim J.-W. Ho Y.-C. Krishnan S. (2021). Photo-Fenton Process for Removal of Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons From Hazardous Waste Landfill Leachate. Int. J. Environ. Sci. Technol. 18 (11), 35153526. doi: 10.1007/s13762-020-03010-6 Singh B. Sharma N. (2008). Mechanistic Implications of Plastic Degradation. Polym. Degrad. Stab. 93 (3), 561584. doi: 10.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2007.11.008 Sivagami K. Anand D. Divyapriya G. Nambi I. (2019). Treatment of Petroleum Oil Spill Sludge Using the Combined Ultrasound and Fenton Oxidation Process. Ultrasonic. Sonochem. 51, 340349. doi: 10.1016/j.ultsonch.2018.09.007 Sol D. Laca A. Laca A. Díaz M. (2021). Microplastics in Wastewater and Drinking Water Treatment Plants: Occurrence and Removal of Microfibres. Appl. Sci. 11 (21), 10109. doi: 10.3390/app112110109 Song W. Cheng M. Ma J. Ma W. Chen C. Zhao J. (2006). Decomposition of Hydrogen Peroxide Driven by Photochemical Cycling of Iron Species in Clay. Environ. Sci. Technol. 40 (15), 47824787. doi: 10.1021/es060624q Sun J. Dai X. Wang Q. van Loosdrecht M.C.M. Ni B.-J. (2019). Microplastics in Wastewater Treatment Plants: Detection, Occurrence and Removal. Water Res. 152, 2137. doi: 10.1016/j.watres.2018.12.050 Talvitie J. Mikola A. Koistinen A. Setälä O. (2017). Solutions to Microplastic Pollution – Removal of Microplastics From Wastewater Effluent With Advanced Wastewater Treatment Technologies. Water Res. 123, 401407. doi: 10.1016/j.watres.2017.07.005 Tang W. Z. Huang C. P. (1996). 2,4-Dichlorophenol Oxidation Kinetics by Fenton's Reagent. Environ. Technol. 17 (12), 13711378. doi: 10.1080/09593330.1996.9618465 Tanveer M. Tezcanli Guyer G. (2013). Solar Assisted Photo Degradation of Wastewater by Compound Parabolic Collectors: Review of Design and Operational Parameters. Renewable Sustain. Energy Rev. 24, 534543. doi: 10.1016/j.rser.2013.03.053 Tapia J. B. Haines J. Yapor J. P. Reynolds M. M. (2019). Identification of the Degradation Products of a Crosslinked Polyester Using LC-Ms. Polym. Degrad. Stab. 168, 108948. doi: 10.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2019.108948 Tejera J. Hermosilla D. Gascó A. Miranda R. Alonso V. Negro C. . (2021). Treatment of Mature Landfill Leachate by Electrocoagulation Followed by Fenton or UVA-LED Photo-Fenton Processes. J. Tai. Insti. Chem. Engi. 119, 3344. doi: 10.1016/j.jtice.2021.02.018 Thompson R.C. Olsen Y. Mitchell R.P. Davis A. Rowland S.J. John A.W.G. . (2004). Lost at Sea: Where Is All the Plastic? Science 304 (5672), 838838. doi: 10.1126/science.1094559 Tian L. Chen Q. Jiang W. Wang L. Xie H. Kalogerakis N. . (2019). A Carbon-14 Radiotracer-Based Study on the Phototransformation of Polystyrene Nanoplastics in Water Versus in Air. Environ. Sci.: Nano. 6 (9), 29072917. doi: 10.1039/C9EN00662A Tian Z. Perers B. Furbo S. Fan J. (2017). Annual Measured and Simulated Thermal Performance Analysis of a Hybrid Solar District Heating Plant With Flat Plate Collectors and Parabolic Trough Collectors in Series. Appl. Energy 205, 417427. doi: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2017.07.139 Tofa T. S. (2018). Degradation of Microplastic Residuals in Water by Visible Light Photocatalysis. Thesis, Number: 18493, Series: TRITA-ABE-MBT (Sweden: KTH, Sustainable development, Environmental science and Engineering). Available at: http://www.diva-portal.org/smash/get/diva2:1266570/FULLTEXT01.pdf. Tofa T. S. Kunjali K. L. Paul S. Kunjali K. L. Dutta J. (2019). Visible Light Photocatalytic Degradation of Microplastic Residues With Zinc Oxide Nanorods. Environ. Chem. Lett. 17, 13411346. doi: 10.1007/s10311-019-00859-z Tofa T. S. Ye F. Kunjali K. L. Dutta J. (2019). Enhanced Visible Light Photodegradation of Microplastic Fragments With Plasmonic Platinum/Zinc Oxide Nanorod Photocatalysts. Catalysts. 9 (10), 819. doi: 10.3390/catal9100819 Tong H. Ouyang S. Bi Y. Umezawa N. Oshikiri M. Ye J. (2012). Nano-Photocatalytic Materials: Possibilities and Challenges. Adv. Mater. 24 (2), 229251. doi: 10.1002/adma.201102752 Uheida A. Mejía H. G. Abdel-Rehim M. Hamd W. Dutta J. (2020). Visible Light Photocatalytic Degradation of Polypropylene Microplastics in a Continuous Water Flow System. J. Hazard. Mater. 406, 124299. doi: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2020.124299 Ul haq I. Ahmad W. Ahmad I. Yaseen M. (2020). Photocatalytic Oxidative Degradation of Hydrocarbon Pollutants in Refinery Wastewater Using TiO2 as Catalyst. Water Environ. Res. 92 (12), 20862094. doi: 10.1002/wer.1370 Vaiano V. Sacco O. Pisano D. Sannino D. Ciambelli P. (2015a). From the Design to the Development of a Continuous Fixed Bed Photoreactor for Photocatalytic Degradation of Organic Pollutants in Wastewater. Chem. Eng. Sci. 137, 152160. doi: 10.1016/j.ces.2015.06.023 Vaiano V. Sacco O. Pisano D. Sannino D. Ciambelli P. (2015b). From the Design to the Development of a Continuous Fixed Bed Photoreactor for Photocatalytic Degradation of Organic Pollutants in Wastewater. Chem. Eng. Sci. 137, 152160. doi: 10.1016/j.ces.2015.06.023 Vaiano V. Sacco O. Sannino D. (2019). Electric Energy Saving in Photocatalytic Removal of Crystal Violet Dye Through the Simultaneous Use of Long-Persistent Blue Phosphors, Nitrogen-Doped TiO2 and UV-Light Emitting Diodes. J. Clean. Product. 210, 10151021. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.11.017 Van Well M. Dillert R. H. G. Bahnemann D. W. Benz V. W. Mueller M. A. A. (1997). Novel Nonconcentrating Reactor for Solar Water Detoxification. J. Solar. Energy Eng. 119, 114119. doi: 10.1115/1.2887888 Vargas V. Núñez O. (2010). Photocatalytic Degradation of Oil Industry Hydrocarbons Models at Laboratory and at Pilot-Plant Scale. Solar. Energy 84 (2), 345351. doi: 10.1016/j.solener.2009.12.005 Venkataramana C. Botsa S. M. Shyamala P. Muralikrishna R. (2021). Photocatalytic Degradation of Polyethylene Plastics by NiAl2O4 Spinels-Synthesis and Characterization. Chemosphere 265, 129021. doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2020.129021 Vione D. Minella M. Maurino V. Minero C. (2014). Indirect Photochemistry in Sunlit Surface Waters: Photoinduced Production of Reactive Transient Species. Chem. - A. Eur. J. 20 (34), 1059010606. doi: 10.1002/chem.2014004 Vital-Grappin A. D. Ariza-Tarazona M. C. Luna-Hernández V. M. Villarreal-Chiu J. F. Hernández-López J. M. Siligardi C. . (2021). The Role of the Reactive Species Involved in the Photocatalytic Degradation of HDPE Microplastics Using C,N- TiO2 Powders. Polymers 13 (7), 999. doi: 10.3390/polym13070999 Walling C. (1975). Fenton’s Reagent Revisited. Acc. Chem. Res. 84, 125131. doi: 10.1021/ar50088a003 Wang S. (2008). A Comparative Study of Fenton and Fenton-Like Reaction Kinetics in Decolourisation of Wastewater. Dyes. Pigment. 76 (3), 714720. doi: 10.1016/j.dyepig.2007.01.012 Wang W. Ndungu A.W. Li Z. Wang J. (2017). Microplastics Pollution in Inland Freshwaters of China: A Case Study in Urban Surface Waters of Wuhan, China. Sci. Total. Environ. 575, 13691374. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.09.213 Wang H. Wang H.-L. Jiang W.-F. Li Z.-Q. (2009). Photocatalytic Degradation of 2,4-Dinitrophenol (DNP) by Multi-Walled Carbon Nanotubes (MWCNTs)/ TiO2 Composite in Aqueous Solution Under Solar Irradiation. Water Res. 43 (1), 204210. doi: 10.1016/j.watres.2008.10.003 Wright S.L. Thompson R.C. Galloway T.S. (2013). The Physical Impacts of Microplastics on Marine Organisms: A Review. Environ. pollut. 178, 483492. doi: 10.1016/j.envpol.2013.02.031 Xu C. Anusuyadevi P. R. Aymonier C. Luque R. Marre S. (2019). Nanostructured Materials for Photocatalysis. Chem. Soc. Rev. 48 (14), 38683902. doi: 10.1039/C9CS00102F Xue W. Peng Z. Huang D. Zeng G. Wan J. Xu R. . (2018). Nanoremediation of Cadmium Contaminated River Sediments: Microbial Response and Organic Carbon Changes. J. Hazard. Mater. 359, 290299. doi: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2018.07.062 Xu Q. Huang Q.-S. Luo T.-Y. Wu R.-L. Wei W. Ni B.-J. (2021). Coagulation Removal and Photocatalytic Degradation of Microplastics in Urban Waters. Chem. Eng. J. 416, 129123. doi: 10.1016/j.cej.2021.129123 Yadav R. Amoli V. Singh J. Tripathi M.K. Bhanja P. Bhaumik A. . (2018). Plasmonic Gold Deposited on Mesoporous TixSi1–xO2 With Isolated Silica in Lattice: An Excellent Photocatalyst for Photocatalytic Conversion of CO2 Into Methanol Under Visible Light Irradiation. J. CO2 Utiliz. 27, 1121. doi: 10.1016/j.jcou.2018.06.016 Yousif E. Haddad R. (2013). Photodegradation and Photostabilization of Polymers, Especially Polystyrene: Review. SpringerPlus 2 (1), 398. doi: 10.1186/2193-1801-2-398 Zapata A. Malato S. Sánchez-Pérez J. A. Oller I. Maldonado M. I. (2010). Scale-Up Strategy for a Combined Solar Photo-Fenton/biological System for Remediation of Pesticide-Contaminated Water. Catalys. Today 151 (1-2), 100106. doi: 10.1016/j.cattod.2010.01.034 Zayani G. Bousselmi L. Mhenni F. Ghrabi A. (2009). Solar Photocatalytic Degradation of Commercial Textile Azo Dyes: Performance of Pilot Plant Scale Thin Film Fixed-Bed Reactor. Desalination 246 (1-3), 344352. doi: 10.1016/j.desal.2008.03.059 Zhang M.-h. Dong H. Zhao L. Wang D.-X. Meng D. (2019). A Review on Fenton Process for Organic Wastewater Treatment Based on Optimization Perspective. Sci. Total. Environ. 670, 110121. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.03.180 Zhang Y. Sivakumar M. Yang S. Enever K. Ramezanianpour M. (2018). Application of Solar Energy in Water Treatment Processes: A Review. Desalination 428, 116145. doi: 10.1016/j.desal.2017.11.020 Zhang J. Tian B. Wang L. Xing M. Lei J. (2018). Photocatalysis: Fundamentals, Materials and Applications (Singapor: Springer Verlag). ISBN: 9789811321122,9811321124. Zhao X. u Li Z. Chen Y. Shi L. Zhu Y. (2007). Solid-Phase Photocatalytic Degradation of Polyethylene Plastic Under UV and Solar Light Irradiation. J. Mol. Catalys. A.: Chem. 268 (1–2), 101106. doi: 10.1016/j.molcata.2006.12.012 Zhao H. Zhang Q. (2021). Performance of Electro-Fenton Process Coupling With Microbial Fuel Cell for Simultaneous Removal of Herbicide Mesotrione. Bioresourc. Technol. 319, 124244. doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2020.124244 Zhou Y. Liu X. Wang J. (2019). Characterization of Microplastics and the Association of Heavy Metals With Microplastics in Suburban Soil of Central China. Sci. Total. Environ. 694, 133798. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.133798 Zhou Q. Zhang H. Zhou Y. Li Y. Xue Y. Fu C. . (2016). Separation of Microplastics From a Coastal Soil and Their Surface Microscopic Features. Chin. Sci. Bull. 61 (14), 16041611. doi: 10.1360/N972015-01098 Ziajahromi S. Neale P.A. Rintoul L. Leusch F.D.L. (2017). Wastewater Treatment Plants as a Pathway for Microplastics: Development of a New Approach to Sample Wastewater-Based Microplastics. Water Res. 112, 9399. doi: 10.1016/j.watres.2017.01.042 Zulfiqar M. Sufian S. Rabat N. E. Mansor N. (2021). Development of Photo-Fenton Oxidation as Green Strategy for Phenol Degradation Enhancement via DMF-Controlled TiO2 Nanotubes Under Various Oxidizing Agents. J. Environ. Chem. Eng. 9 (1), 104933. doi: 10.1016/j.jece.2020.104933
      ‘Oh, my dear Thomas, you haven’t heard the terrible news then?’ she said. ‘I thought you would be sure to have seen it placarded somewhere. Alice went straight to her room, and I haven’t seen her since, though I repeatedly knocked at the door, which she has locked on the inside, and I’m sure it’s most unnatural of her not to let her own mother comfort her. It all happened in a moment: I have always said those great motor-cars shouldn’t be allowed to career about the streets, especially when they are all paved with cobbles as they are at Easton Haven, which are{331} so slippery when it’s wet. He slipped, and it went over him in a moment.’ My thanks were few and awkward, for there still hung to the missive a basting thread, and it was as warm as a nestling bird. I bent low--everybody was emotional in those days--kissed the fragrant thing, thrust it into my bosom, and blushed worse than Camille. "What, the Corner House victim? Is that really a fact?" "My dear child, I don't look upon it in that light at all. The child gave our picturesque friend a certain distinction--'My husband is dead, and this is my only child,' and all that sort of thing. It pays in society." leave them on the steps of a foundling asylum in order to insure [See larger version] Interoffice guff says you're planning definite moves on your own, J. O., and against some opposition. Is the Colonel so poor or so grasping—or what? Albert could not speak, for he felt as if his brains and teeth were rattling about inside his head. The rest of[Pg 188] the family hunched together by the door, the boys gaping idiotically, the girls in tears. "Now you're married." The host was called in, and unlocked a drawer in which they were deposited. The galleyman, with visible reluctance, arrayed himself in the garments, and he was observed to shudder more than once during the investiture of the dead man's apparel. HoME香京julia种子在线播放 ENTER NUMBET 0016www.flchain.com.cn
      www.jjajyhsw.org.cn
      www.hmchain.com.cn
      lcgydyj.com.cn
      rtchain.com.cn
      qdtqnc.com.cn
      thhrq.com.cn
      www.okfchjk.net.cn
      www.srtonf.com.cn
      www.x-nv.com.cn
      处女被大鸡巴操 强奸乱伦小说图片 俄罗斯美女爱爱图 调教强奸学生 亚洲女的穴 夜来香图片大全 美女性强奸电影 手机版色中阁 男性人体艺术素描图 16p成人 欧美性爱360 电影区 亚洲电影 欧美电影 经典三级 偷拍自拍 动漫电影 乱伦电影 变态另类 全部电 类似狠狠鲁的网站 黑吊操白逼图片 韩国黄片种子下载 操逼逼逼逼逼 人妻 小说 p 偷拍10幼女自慰 极品淫水很多 黄色做i爱 日本女人人体电影快播看 大福国小 我爱肏屄美女 mmcrwcom 欧美多人性交图片 肥臀乱伦老头舔阴帝 d09a4343000019c5 西欧人体艺术b xxoo激情短片 未成年人的 插泰国人夭图片 第770弾み1 24p 日本美女性 交动态 eee色播 yantasythunder 操无毛少女屄 亚洲图片你懂的女人 鸡巴插姨娘 特级黄 色大片播 左耳影音先锋 冢本友希全集 日本人体艺术绿色 我爱被舔逼 内射 幼 美阴图 喷水妹子高潮迭起 和后妈 操逼 美女吞鸡巴 鸭个自慰 中国女裸名单 操逼肥臀出水换妻 色站裸体义术 中国行上的漏毛美女叫什么 亚洲妹性交图 欧美美女人裸体人艺照 成人色妹妹直播 WWW_JXCT_COM r日本女人性淫乱 大胆人艺体艺图片 女同接吻av 碰碰哥免费自拍打炮 艳舞写真duppid1 88电影街拍视频 日本自拍做爱qvod 实拍美女性爱组图 少女高清av 浙江真实乱伦迅雷 台湾luanlunxiaoshuo 洛克王国宠物排行榜 皇瑟电影yy频道大全 红孩儿连连看 阴毛摄影 大胆美女写真人体艺术摄影 和风骚三个媳妇在家做爱 性爱办公室高清 18p2p木耳 大波撸影音 大鸡巴插嫩穴小说 一剧不超两个黑人 阿姨诱惑我快播 幼香阁千叶县小学生 少女妇女被狗强奸 曰人体妹妹 十二岁性感幼女 超级乱伦qvod 97爱蜜桃ccc336 日本淫妇阴液 av海量资源999 凤凰影视成仁 辰溪四中艳照门照片 先锋模特裸体展示影片 成人片免费看 自拍百度云 肥白老妇女 女爱人体图片 妈妈一女穴 星野美夏 日本少女dachidu 妹子私处人体图片 yinmindahuitang 舔无毛逼影片快播 田莹疑的裸体照片 三级电影影音先锋02222 妻子被外国老头操 观月雏乃泥鳅 韩国成人偷拍自拍图片 强奸5一9岁幼女小说 汤姆影院av图片 妹妹人艺体图 美女大驱 和女友做爱图片自拍p 绫川まどか在线先锋 那么嫩的逼很少见了 小女孩做爱 处女好逼连连看图图 性感美女在家做爱 近距离抽插骚逼逼 黑屌肏金毛屄 日韩av美少女 看喝尿尿小姐日逼色色色网图片 欧美肛交新视频 美女吃逼逼 av30线上免费 伊人在线三级经典 新视觉影院t6090影院 最新淫色电影网址 天龙影院远古手机版 搞老太影院 插进美女的大屁股里 私人影院加盟费用 www258dd 求一部电影里面有一个二猛哥 深肛交 日本萌妹子人体艺术写真图片 插入屄眼 美女的木奶 中文字幕黄色网址影视先锋 九号女神裸 和骚人妻偷情 和潘晓婷做爱 国模大尺度蜜桃 欧美大逼50p 西西人体成人 李宗瑞继母做爱原图物处理 nianhuawang 男鸡巴的视屏 � 97免费色伦电影 好色网成人 大姨子先锋 淫荡巨乳美女教师妈妈 性nuexiaoshuo WWW36YYYCOM 长春继续给力进屋就操小女儿套干破内射对白淫荡 农夫激情社区 日韩无码bt 欧美美女手掰嫩穴图片 日本援交偷拍自拍 入侵者日本在线播放 亚洲白虎偷拍自拍 常州高见泽日屄 寂寞少妇自卫视频 人体露逼图片 多毛外国老太 变态乱轮手机在线 淫荡妈妈和儿子操逼 伦理片大奶少女 看片神器最新登入地址sqvheqi345com账号群 麻美学姐无头 圣诞老人射小妞和强奸小妞动话片 亚洲AV女老师 先锋影音欧美成人资源 33344iucoom zV天堂电影网 宾馆美女打炮视频 色五月丁香五月magnet 嫂子淫乱小说 张歆艺的老公 吃奶男人视频在线播放 欧美色图男女乱伦 avtt2014ccvom 性插色欲香影院 青青草撸死你青青草 99热久久第一时间 激情套图卡通动漫 幼女裸聊做爱口交 日本女人被强奸乱伦 草榴社区快播 2kkk正在播放兽骑 啊不要人家小穴都湿了 www猎奇影视 A片www245vvcomwwwchnrwhmhzcn 搜索宜春院av wwwsee78co 逼奶鸡巴插 好吊日AV在线视频19gancom 熟女伦乱图片小说 日本免费av无码片在线开苞 鲁大妈撸到爆 裸聊官网 德国熟女xxx 新不夜城论坛首页手机 女虐男网址 男女做爱视频华为网盘 激情午夜天亚洲色图 内裤哥mangent 吉沢明歩制服丝袜WWWHHH710COM 屌逼在线试看 人体艺体阿娇艳照 推荐一个可以免费看片的网站如果被QQ拦截请复制链接在其它浏览器打开xxxyyy5comintr2a2cb551573a2b2e 欧美360精品粉红鲍鱼 教师调教第一页 聚美屋精品图 中韩淫乱群交 俄罗斯撸撸片 把鸡巴插进小姨子的阴道 干干AV成人网 aolasoohpnbcn www84ytom 高清大量潮喷www27dyycom 宝贝开心成人 freefronvideos人母 嫩穴成人网gggg29com 逼着舅妈给我口交肛交彩漫画 欧美色色aV88wwwgangguanscom 老太太操逼自拍视频 777亚洲手机在线播放 有没有夫妻3p小说 色列漫画淫女 午间色站导航 欧美成人处女色大图 童颜巨乳亚洲综合 桃色性欲草 色眯眯射逼 无码中文字幕塞外青楼这是一个 狂日美女老师人妻 爱碰网官网 亚洲图片雅蠛蝶 快播35怎么搜片 2000XXXX电影 新谷露性家庭影院 深深候dvd播放 幼齿用英语怎么说 不雅伦理无需播放器 国外淫荡图片 国外网站幼幼嫩网址 成年人就去色色视频快播 我鲁日日鲁老老老我爱 caoshaonvbi 人体艺术avav 性感性色导航 韩国黄色哥来嫖网站 成人网站美逼 淫荡熟妇自拍 欧美色惰图片 北京空姐透明照 狼堡免费av视频 www776eom 亚洲无码av欧美天堂网男人天堂 欧美激情爆操 a片kk266co 色尼姑成人极速在线视频 国语家庭系列 蒋雯雯 越南伦理 色CC伦理影院手机版 99jbbcom 大鸡巴舅妈 国产偷拍自拍淫荡对话视频 少妇春梦射精 开心激动网 自拍偷牌成人 色桃隐 撸狗网性交视频 淫荡的三位老师 伦理电影wwwqiuxia6commqiuxia6com 怡春院分站 丝袜超短裙露脸迅雷下载 色制服电影院 97超碰好吊色男人 yy6080理论在线宅男日韩福利大全 大嫂丝袜 500人群交手机在线 5sav 偷拍熟女吧 口述我和妹妹的欲望 50p电脑版 wwwavtttcon 3p3com 伦理无码片在线看 欧美成人电影图片岛国性爱伦理电影 先锋影音AV成人欧美 我爱好色 淫电影网 WWW19MMCOM 玛丽罗斯3d同人动画h在线看 动漫女孩裸体 超级丝袜美腿乱伦 1919gogo欣赏 大色逼淫色 www就是撸 激情文学网好骚 A级黄片免费 xedd5com 国内的b是黑的 快播美国成年人片黄 av高跟丝袜视频 上原保奈美巨乳女教师在线观看 校园春色都市激情fefegancom 偷窥自拍XXOO 搜索看马操美女 人本女优视频 日日吧淫淫 人妻巨乳影院 美国女子性爱学校 大肥屁股重口味 啪啪啪啊啊啊不要 操碰 japanfreevideoshome国产 亚州淫荡老熟女人体 伦奸毛片免费在线看 天天影视se 樱桃做爱视频 亚卅av在线视频 x奸小说下载 亚洲色图图片在线 217av天堂网 东方在线撸撸-百度 幼幼丝袜集 灰姑娘的姐姐 青青草在线视频观看对华 86papa路con 亚洲1AV 综合图片2区亚洲 美国美女大逼电影 010插插av成人网站 www色comwww821kxwcom 播乐子成人网免费视频在线观看 大炮撸在线影院 ,www4KkKcom 野花鲁最近30部 wwwCC213wapwww2233ww2download 三客优最新地址 母亲让儿子爽的无码视频 全国黄色片子 欧美色图美国十次 超碰在线直播 性感妖娆操 亚洲肉感熟女色图 a片A毛片管看视频 8vaa褋芯屑 333kk 川岛和津实视频 在线母子乱伦对白 妹妹肥逼五月 亚洲美女自拍 老婆在我面前小说 韩国空姐堪比情趣内衣 干小姐综合 淫妻色五月 添骚穴 WM62COM 23456影视播放器 成人午夜剧场 尼姑福利网 AV区亚洲AV欧美AV512qucomwwwc5508com 经典欧美骚妇 震动棒露出 日韩丝袜美臀巨乳在线 av无限吧看 就去干少妇 色艺无间正面是哪集 校园春色我和老师做爱 漫画夜色 天海丽白色吊带 黄色淫荡性虐小说 午夜高清播放器 文20岁女性荫道口图片 热国产热无码热有码 2015小明发布看看算你色 百度云播影视 美女肏屄屄乱轮小说 家族舔阴AV影片 邪恶在线av有码 父女之交 关于处女破处的三级片 极品护士91在线 欧美虐待女人视频的网站 享受老太太的丝袜 aaazhibuo 8dfvodcom成人 真实自拍足交 群交男女猛插逼 妓女爱爱动态 lin35com是什么网站 abp159 亚洲色图偷拍自拍乱伦熟女抠逼自慰 朝国三级篇 淫三国幻想 免费的av小电影网站 日本阿v视频免费按摩师 av750c0m 黄色片操一下 巨乳少女车震在线观看 操逼 免费 囗述情感一乱伦岳母和女婿 WWW_FAMITSU_COM 偷拍中国少妇在公车被操视频 花也真衣论理电影 大鸡鸡插p洞 新片欧美十八岁美少 进击的巨人神thunderftp 西方美女15p 深圳哪里易找到老女人玩视频 在线成人有声小说 365rrr 女尿图片 我和淫荡的小姨做爱 � 做爱技术体照 淫妇性爱 大学生私拍b 第四射狠狠射小说 色中色成人av社区 和小姨子乱伦肛交 wwwppp62com 俄罗斯巨乳人体艺术 骚逼阿娇 汤芳人体图片大胆 大胆人体艺术bb私处 性感大胸骚货 哪个网站幼女的片多 日本美女本子把 色 五月天 婷婷 快播 美女 美穴艺术 色百合电影导航 大鸡巴用力 孙悟空操美少女战士 狠狠撸美女手掰穴图片 古代女子与兽类交 沙耶香套图 激情成人网区 暴风影音av播放 动漫女孩怎么插第3个 mmmpp44 黑木麻衣无码ed2k 淫荡学姐少妇 乱伦操少女屄 高中性爱故事 骚妹妹爱爱图网 韩国模特剪长发 大鸡巴把我逼日了 中国张柏芝做爱片中国张柏芝做爱片中国张柏芝做爱片中国张柏芝做爱片中国张柏芝做爱片 大胆女人下体艺术图片 789sss 影音先锋在线国内情侣野外性事自拍普通话对白 群撸图库 闪现君打阿乐 ady 小说 插入表妹嫩穴小说 推荐成人资源 网络播放器 成人台 149大胆人体艺术 大屌图片 骚美女成人av 春暖花开春色性吧 女亭婷五月 我上了同桌的姐姐 恋夜秀场主播自慰视频 yzppp 屄茎 操屄女图 美女鲍鱼大特写 淫乱的日本人妻山口玲子 偷拍射精图 性感美女人体艺木图片 种马小说完本 免费电影院 骑士福利导航导航网站 骚老婆足交 国产性爱一级电影 欧美免费成人花花性都 欧美大肥妞性爱视频 家庭乱伦网站快播 偷拍自拍国产毛片 金发美女也用大吊来开包 缔D杏那 yentiyishu人体艺术ytys WWWUUKKMCOM 女人露奶 � 苍井空露逼 老荡妇高跟丝袜足交 偷偷和女友的朋友做爱迅雷 做爱七十二尺 朱丹人体合成 麻腾由纪妃 帅哥撸播种子图 鸡巴插逼动态图片 羙国十次啦中文 WWW137AVCOM 神斗片欧美版华语 有气质女人人休艺术 由美老师放屁电影 欧美女人肉肏图片 白虎种子快播 国产自拍90后女孩 美女在床上疯狂嫩b 饭岛爱最后之作 幼幼强奸摸奶 色97成人动漫 两性性爱打鸡巴插逼 新视觉影院4080青苹果影院 嗯好爽插死我了 阴口艺术照 李宗瑞电影qvod38 爆操舅母 亚洲色图七七影院 被大鸡巴操菊花 怡红院肿么了 成人极品影院删除 欧美性爱大图色图强奸乱 欧美女子与狗随便性交 苍井空的bt种子无码 熟女乱伦长篇小说 大色虫 兽交幼女影音先锋播放 44aad be0ca93900121f9b 先锋天耗ばさ无码 欧毛毛女三级黄色片图 干女人黑木耳照 日本美女少妇嫩逼人体艺术 sesechangchang 色屄屄网 久久撸app下载 色图色噜 美女鸡巴大奶 好吊日在线视频在线观看 透明丝袜脚偷拍自拍 中山怡红院菜单 wcwwwcom下载 骑嫂子 亚洲大色妣 成人故事365ahnet 丝袜家庭教mp4 幼交肛交 妹妹撸撸大妈 日本毛爽 caoprom超碰在email 关于中国古代偷窥的黄片 第一会所老熟女下载 wwwhuangsecome 狼人干综合新地址HD播放 变态儿子强奸乱伦图 强奸电影名字 2wwwer37com 日本毛片基地一亚洲AVmzddcxcn 暗黑圣经仙桃影院 37tpcocn 持月真由xfplay 好吊日在线视频三级网 我爱背入李丽珍 电影师傅床戏在线观看 96插妹妹sexsex88com 豪放家庭在线播放 桃花宝典极夜著豆瓜网 安卓系统播放神器 美美网丝袜诱惑 人人干全免费视频xulawyercn av无插件一本道 全国色五月 操逼电影小说网 good在线wwwyuyuelvcom www18avmmd 撸波波影视无插件 伊人幼女成人电影 会看射的图片 小明插看看 全裸美女扒开粉嫩b 国人自拍性交网站 萝莉白丝足交本子 七草ちとせ巨乳视频 摇摇晃晃的成人电影 兰桂坊成社人区小说www68kqcom 舔阴论坛 久撸客一撸客色国内外成人激情在线 明星门 欧美大胆嫩肉穴爽大片 www牛逼插 性吧星云 少妇性奴的屁眼 人体艺术大胆mscbaidu1imgcn 最新久久色色成人版 l女同在线 小泽玛利亚高潮图片搜索 女性裸b图 肛交bt种子 最热门有声小说 人间添春色 春色猜谜字 樱井莉亚钢管舞视频 小泽玛利亚直美6p 能用的h网 还能看的h网 bl动漫h网 开心五月激 东京热401 男色女色第四色酒色网 怎么下载黄色小说 黄色小说小栽 和谐图城 乐乐影院 色哥导航 特色导航 依依社区 爱窝窝在线 色狼谷成人 91porn 包要你射电影 色色3A丝袜 丝袜妹妹淫网 爱色导航(荐) 好男人激情影院 坏哥哥 第七色 色久久 人格分裂 急先锋 撸撸射中文网 第一会所综合社区 91影院老师机 东方成人激情 怼莪影院吹潮 老鸭窝伊人无码不卡无码一本道 av女柳晶电影 91天生爱风流作品 深爱激情小说私房婷婷网 擼奶av 567pao 里番3d一家人野外 上原在线电影 水岛津实透明丝袜 1314酒色 网旧网俺也去 0855影院 在线无码私人影院 搜索 国产自拍 神马dy888午夜伦理达达兔 农民工黄晓婷 日韩裸体黑丝御姐 屈臣氏的燕窝面膜怎么样つぼみ晶エリーの早漏チ○ポ强化合宿 老熟女人性视频 影音先锋 三上悠亚ol 妹妹影院福利片 hhhhhhhhsxo 午夜天堂热的国产 强奸剧场 全裸香蕉视频无码 亚欧伦理视频 秋霞为什么给封了 日本在线视频空天使 日韩成人aⅴ在线 日本日屌日屄导航视频 在线福利视频 日本推油无码av magnet 在线免费视频 樱井梨吮东 日本一本道在线无码DVD 日本性感诱惑美女做爱阴道流水视频 日本一级av 汤姆avtom在线视频 台湾佬中文娱乐线20 阿v播播下载 橙色影院 奴隶少女护士cg视频 汤姆在线影院无码 偷拍宾馆 业面紧急生级访问 色和尚有线 厕所偷拍一族 av女l 公交色狼优酷视频 裸体视频AV 人与兽肉肉网 董美香ol 花井美纱链接 magnet 西瓜影音 亚洲 自拍 日韩女优欧美激情偷拍自拍 亚洲成年人免费视频 荷兰免费成人电影 深喉呕吐XXⅩX 操石榴在线视频 天天色成人免费视频 314hu四虎 涩久免费视频在线观看 成人电影迅雷下载 能看见整个奶子的香蕉影院 水菜丽百度影音 gwaz079百度云 噜死你们资源站 主播走光视频合集迅雷下载 thumbzilla jappen 精品Av 古川伊织star598在线 假面女皇vip在线视频播放 国产自拍迷情校园 啪啪啪公寓漫画 日本阿AV 黄色手机电影 欧美在线Av影院 华裔电击女神91在线 亚洲欧美专区 1日本1000部免费视频 开放90后 波多野结衣 东方 影院av 页面升级紧急访问每天正常更新 4438Xchengeren 老炮色 a k福利电影 色欲影视色天天视频 高老庄aV 259LUXU-683 magnet 手机在线电影 国产区 欧美激情人人操网 国产 偷拍 直播 日韩 国内外激情在线视频网给 站长统计一本道人妻 光棍影院被封 紫竹铃取汁 ftp 狂插空姐嫩 xfplay 丈夫面前 穿靴子伪街 XXOO视频在线免费 大香蕉道久在线播放 电棒漏电嗨过头 充气娃能看下毛和洞吗 夫妻牲交 福利云点墦 yukun瑟妃 疯狂交换女友 国产自拍26页 腐女资源 百度云 日本DVD高清无码视频 偷拍,自拍AV伦理电影 A片小视频福利站。 大奶肥婆自拍偷拍图片 交配伊甸园 超碰在线视频自拍偷拍国产 小热巴91大神 rctd 045 类似于A片 超美大奶大学生美女直播被男友操 男友问 你的衣服怎么脱掉的 亚洲女与黑人群交视频一 在线黄涩 木内美保步兵番号 鸡巴插入欧美美女的b舒服 激情在线国产自拍日韩欧美 国语福利小视频在线观看 作爱小视颍 潮喷合集丝袜无码mp4 做爱的无码高清视频 牛牛精品 伊aⅤ在线观看 savk12 哥哥搞在线播放 在线电一本道影 一级谍片 250pp亚洲情艺中心,88 欧美一本道九色在线一 wwwseavbacom色av吧 cos美女在线 欧美17,18ⅹⅹⅹ视频 自拍嫩逼 小电影在线观看网站 筱田优 贼 水电工 5358x视频 日本69式视频有码 b雪福利导航 韩国女主播19tvclub在线 操逼清晰视频 丝袜美女国产视频网址导航 水菜丽颜射房间 台湾妹中文娱乐网 风吟岛视频 口交 伦理 日本熟妇色五十路免费视频 A级片互舔 川村真矢Av在线观看 亚洲日韩av 色和尚国产自拍 sea8 mp4 aV天堂2018手机在线 免费版国产偷拍a在线播放 狠狠 婷婷 丁香 小视频福利在线观看平台 思妍白衣小仙女被邻居强上 萝莉自拍有水 4484新视觉 永久发布页 977成人影视在线观看 小清新影院在线观 小鸟酱后丝后入百度云 旋风魅影四级 香蕉影院小黄片免费看 性爱直播磁力链接 小骚逼第一色影院 性交流的视频 小雪小视频bd 小视频TV禁看视频 迷奸AV在线看 nba直播 任你在干线 汤姆影院在线视频国产 624u在线播放 成人 一级a做爰片就在线看狐狸视频 小香蕉AV视频 www182、com 腿模简小育 学生做爱视频 秘密搜查官 快播 成人福利网午夜 一级黄色夫妻录像片 直接看的gav久久播放器 国产自拍400首页 sm老爹影院 谁知道隔壁老王网址在线 综合网 123西瓜影音 米奇丁香 人人澡人人漠大学生 色久悠 夜色视频你今天寂寞了吗? 菲菲影视城美国 被抄的影院 变态另类 欧美 成人 国产偷拍自拍在线小说 不用下载安装就能看的吃男人鸡巴视频 插屄视频 大贯杏里播放 wwwhhh50 233若菜奈央 伦理片天海翼秘密搜查官 大香蕉在线万色屋视频 那种漫画小说你懂的 祥仔电影合集一区 那里可以看澳门皇冠酒店a片 色自啪 亚洲aV电影天堂 谷露影院ar toupaizaixian sexbj。com 毕业生 zaixian mianfei 朝桐光视频 成人短视频在线直接观看 陈美霖 沈阳音乐学院 导航女 www26yjjcom 1大尺度视频 开平虐女视频 菅野雪松协和影视在线视频 华人play在线视频bbb 鸡吧操屄视频 多啪啪免费视频 悠草影院 金兰策划网 (969) 橘佑金短视频 国内一极刺激自拍片 日本制服番号大全magnet 成人动漫母系 电脑怎么清理内存 黄色福利1000 dy88午夜 偷拍中学生洗澡磁力链接 花椒相机福利美女视频 站长推荐磁力下载 mp4 三洞轮流插视频 玉兔miki热舞视频 夜生活小视频 爆乳人妖小视频 国内网红主播自拍福利迅雷下载 不用app的裸裸体美女操逼视频 变态SM影片在线观看 草溜影院元气吧 - 百度 - 百度 波推全套视频 国产双飞集合ftp 日本在线AV网 笔国毛片 神马影院女主播是我的邻居 影音资源 激情乱伦电影 799pao 亚洲第一色第一影院 av视频大香蕉 老梁故事汇希斯莱杰 水中人体磁力链接 下载 大香蕉黄片免费看 济南谭崔 避开屏蔽的岛a片 草破福利 要看大鸡巴操小骚逼的人的视频 黑丝少妇影音先锋 欧美巨乳熟女磁力链接 美国黄网站色大全 伦蕉在线久播 极品女厕沟 激情五月bd韩国电影 混血美女自摸和男友激情啪啪自拍诱人呻吟福利视频 人人摸人人妻做人人看 44kknn 娸娸原网 伊人欧美 恋夜影院视频列表安卓青青 57k影院 如果电话亭 avi 插爆骚女精品自拍 青青草在线免费视频1769TV 令人惹火的邻家美眉 影音先锋 真人妹子被捅动态图 男人女人做完爱视频15 表姐合租两人共处一室晚上她竟爬上了我的床 性爱教学视频 北条麻妃bd在线播放版 国产老师和师生 magnet wwwcctv1024 女神自慰 ftp 女同性恋做激情视频 欧美大胆露阴视频 欧美无码影视 好女色在线观看 后入肥臀18p 百度影视屏福利 厕所超碰视频 强奸mp magnet 欧美妹aⅴ免费线上看 2016年妞干网视频 5手机在线福利 超在线最视频 800av:cOm magnet 欧美性爱免播放器在线播放 91大款肥汤的性感美乳90后邻家美眉趴着窗台后入啪啪 秋霞日本毛片网站 cheng ren 在线视频 上原亚衣肛门无码解禁影音先锋 美脚家庭教师在线播放 尤酷伦理片 熟女性生活视频在线观看 欧美av在线播放喷潮 194avav 凤凰AV成人 - 百度 kbb9999 AV片AV在线AV无码 爱爱视频高清免费观看 黄色男女操b视频 观看 18AV清纯视频在线播放平台 成人性爱视频久久操 女性真人生殖系统双性人视频 下身插入b射精视频 明星潜规测视频 mp4 免賛a片直播绪 国内 自己 偷拍 在线 国内真实偷拍 手机在线 国产主播户外勾在线 三桥杏奈高清无码迅雷下载 2五福电影院凸凹频频 男主拿鱼打女主,高宝宝 色哥午夜影院 川村まや痴汉 草溜影院费全过程免费 淫小弟影院在线视频 laohantuiche 啪啪啪喷潮XXOO视频 青娱乐成人国产 蓝沢润 一本道 亚洲青涩中文欧美 神马影院线理论 米娅卡莉法的av 在线福利65535 欧美粉色在线 欧美性受群交视频1在线播放 极品喷奶熟妇在线播放 变态另类无码福利影院92 天津小姐被偷拍 磁力下载 台湾三级电髟全部 丝袜美腿偷拍自拍 偷拍女生性行为图 妻子的乱伦 白虎少妇 肏婶骚屄 外国大妈会阴照片 美少女操屄图片 妹妹自慰11p 操老熟女的b 361美女人体 360电影院樱桃 爱色妹妹亚洲色图 性交卖淫姿势高清图片一级 欧美一黑对二白 大色网无毛一线天 射小妹网站 寂寞穴 西西人体模特苍井空 操的大白逼吧 骚穴让我操 拉好友干女朋友3p