Edited by: Donata Medaglini, University of Siena, Italy
Reviewed by: Carole Henry, University of Chicago, United States; Ji Wang, Harvard Medical School, United States
†These authors have contributed equally to this work.
Specialty section: This article was submitted to Vaccines and Molecular Therapeutics, a section of the journal Frontiers in Immunology
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
Influenza virus infection is a significant cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide. The surface antigens of influenza virus change over time blunting both naturally acquired and vaccine induced adaptive immune protection. Viral antigenic drift is a major contributing factor to both the spread and disease burden of influenza. The aim of this study was to develop better infection models using clinically relevant, influenza strains to test vaccine induced protection. CB6F1 mice were infected with a range of influenza viruses and disease, inflammation, cell influx, and viral load were characterized after infection. Infection with circulating H1N1 and representative influenza B viruses induced a dose-dependent disease response; however, a recent seasonal H3N2 virus did not cause any disease in mice, even at high titers. Viral infection led to recoverable virus, detectable both by plaque assay and RNA quantification after infection, and increased upper airway inflammation on day 7 after infection comprised largely of CD8 T cells. Having established seasonal infection models, mice were immunized with seasonal inactivated vaccine and responses were compared to matched and mismatched challenge strains. While the H1N1 subtype strain recommended for vaccine use has remained constant in the seven seasons between 2010 and 2016, the circulating strain of H1N1 influenza (2009 pandemic subtype) has drifted both genetically and antigenically since 2009. To investigate the effect of this observed drift on vaccine induced protection, mice were immunized with antigens from A/California/7/2009 (H1N1) and challenged with H1N1 subtype viruses recovered from 2009, 2010, or 2015. Vaccination with A/California/7/2009 antigens protected against infection with either the 2009 or 2010 strains, but was less effective against the 2015 strain. This observed reduction in protection suggests that mouse models of influenza virus vaccination and infection can be used as an additional tool to predict vaccine efficacy against drift strains.
香京julia种子在线播放
Influenza infection is a significant cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide; the WHO estimates that there are 3–5 million severe influenza cases every year, causing 250,000–500,000 deaths globally (
Due to the changing nature of the circulating influenza virus strain, vaccine strain selection mismatches can and do occur (
Part of the decision process about which strains should be used for vaccines is hemagglutination inhibition (HI) using ferret sera, complemented with virus neutralization data. However, mice are widely used in the preclinical development and evaluation of potential vaccines and antiviral compounds and have the potential to inform decisions. In this paper, we develop models of influenza infection in CB6F1 mice and evaluate the effect of vaccination on disease outcome after infection with matched and mismatched strains of virus.
Mice were infected with escalating doses of viruses reflective of recent circulating influenza viral strains and or widely used laboratory strains. For H1N1, mice were infected with influenza A/England/195/2009 (
Seasonal influenza H1 and B but not seasonal H3 cause disease in mice. Mice were infected with increasing doses of different influenza viruses intranasally in 100 μl volumes. Weight loss was measured after infection with A/England/195/2009
Having observed that infection with some strains of influenza virus caused signs of disease, we wished to confirm that these viruses were able to replicate in mouse lungs and wanted to investigate the histological and immunological correlations of disease. Mice were challenged intranasally with representative H1N1 (Eng/195), Flu B (Flo/04), and H3N2 (A/X-31) strains and monitored over 7 days. A control group of mice were given sterile PBS intranasally. All influenza challenged mice lost significant amounts of weight compared to the control group (Figure
Characterization of pathogenic response to seasonal influenza infections. Mice were infected with H1N1, Flu B, or X31. Weight
Lung inflammation was investigated as a measure of disease pathology. There were no significant differences in lung inflammation at day 4 after challenge in either the upper and lower airways (data not shown). However, 7 days after challenge there was significantly more inflammation in both the upper (Figure
Having developed infectious challenge models, we wished to determine the efficacy of seasonal influenza vaccines in mice. Mice were intramuscularly immunized with purified surface antigens from A/California/7/2009, which was the (H1N1)pdm09 strain used in the trivalent vaccine from 2010 to 2016. The aim of the study was to find the lowest protective dose of vaccine, mice were given increasing doses from 0.02 to 1.5 µg A/California/7/2009 influenza hemagglutinin (as part of a mixture of viral surface antigens), for reference the human vaccine dose is 15 µg. The antibody response was proportional to the immunization dose, with most in the 1.5 µg immunized group (Figure
Immunization protects against homologous challenge. CB6F1 mice were immunized once with varying doses of H1N1 antigens. Antibody was measured prior to challenge
The biggest recent change in vaccine strains occurred with the emergence of the H1N1 pandemic strain in 2009. Because the strain recommendation preceded the emergence of the virus in 2009, the 2009–2010 vaccine did not contain the (H1N1)pdm09 like strain. However, from 2010 to 2016, the H1N1 subtype strain included in the virus was A/California/7/2009 (H1N1pdm09). By comparison, in the seven seasons since the emergence of the strain of H1N1 influenza (2009 pandemic strain) to the winter of 2017, the H3N2 component was changed four times (Table
Recommended vaccine strains (Northern Hemisphere) 2010–2017.
Season | H1N1 | H3N2 | B | Additional B strain for QIV |
---|---|---|---|---|
2009–2010 | A/Brisbane/59/2007 | A/Brisbane/10/2007 | B/Brisbane/60/2008 (Vic) | N/A |
2010–2011 | A/California/7/2009 | A/Perth/16/2009 | B/Brisbane/60/2008 (Vic) | N/A |
2011–2012 | A/California/7/2009 | A/Perth/16/2009 | B/Brisbane/60/2008 (Vic) | N/A |
2012–2013 | A/California/7/2009 | A/Victoria/361/2011 | B/Wisconsin/1/2010 (Yam) | B/Brisbane/60/2008 (Vic) |
2013–2014 | A/California/7/2009 | A/Victoria/361/2011 | B/Massachusetts/2/2012 (Yam) | B/Brisbane/60/2008 (Vic) |
2014–2015 | A/California/7/2009 | A/Texas/50/2012 | B/Massachusetts/2/2012 (Yam) | B/Brisbane/60/2008 (Vic) |
2015–2016 | A/California/7/2009 | A/Switzerland/9715293/2013 | B/Phuket/3073/2013 (Yam) | B/Brisbane/60/2008 (Vic) |
2016–2017 | A/California/7/2009 | A/Hong Kong/4801/2014 | B/Brisbane/60/2008 (Vic) | B/Phuket/3073/2013 (Yam) |
2017–2018 | A/Michigan/45/2015 | A/Hong Kong/4801/2014 | B/Brisbane/60/2008 (Vic) | B/Phuket/3073/2013 (Yam) |
We performed an integrated phylogenetic and antigenic cartography analysis (
Genetic and antigenic drift of H1N1pdm09 strains between 2009 and 2016. Integrated phylogenetic and antigenic cartography analysis of 61 viruses using Bayesian multidimensional scaling (
Since the H1 component of vaccine in use was unchanged from the initial wave of the pandemic, we wished to see whether the protection efficacy changed as the virus changed. Mice were immunized with 0.5 µg A/California/7/2009 antigens and then challenged either with a matched isolate from the initial wave of the pandemic in 2009 (A/England/195/2009), or drift isolates from 2010 (A/England/672/2010) or 2015 (A/England/336/2015). Immunized mice lost significantly less weight than control mice when infected with the 2009 (Figure
Antigenic drift in H1N1 strains is seen in mouse models. Mice were immunized with A/Cal/7/2009 (black squares) and challenged with A/England/195/2009
In the current study, we have successfully developed mouse models of seasonal H1N1 influenza infection to test vaccine efficacy. Infection with current seasonal H1N1, but not H3N2 virus, led to disease in mice. Immunization of mice with a vaccine homologous to the challenge strain, protected against infection with the same strain. However, immunization of mice with A/California/7/2009 was not protective against challenge with an H1N1 strain from 2015. This may recapitulate the situation in humans where key changes in the clade 6B H1N1 viruses, not detected by classical serological tests, reduced protection in individuals exposed to an earlier H1N1 strain (
Influenza virus infection in mice was characterized by a large percentage of the total body weight lost at the peak of disease, in some of the animals necessitating humane culling. There was not a noticeable change in appetite, so the most likely factor is increased effort in breathing driven by the very high levels of inflammation in the lungs. Previous studies have shown that blocking TNFα blocks reduces disease by reducing cell infiltration into the lower airways (
Mice are widely used for preclinical vaccine studies. In the current study, we demonstrate that a very low dose of protein is protective against viral infection; this was especially the case when mice were immunized twice in a prime boost regime, where a 0.02 µg dose which was not protective after a single immunization was protective when given twice. One question is why they can be protected with such small doses of protein. One consideration is the dose to size ratio; the average mouse used in these studies is 25 g, the average human 62 kg a 2,500-fold scale up. The human formulation of flu vaccine normally contains 15 µg of each hemagglutinin, so an equivalent dose for a mouse would be 6 ng, which we saw was protective in the prime boost studies. Whether body mass is the best comparison is not clear, another consideration could be muscle size, with the human muscle approximately 400 times larger. The other consideration is that the immune response amplifies signal, especially when it is boosted with the same antigen; so potentially the consideration is not about the amount of protein rather how the cells involved in the response get to the site of immunization.
Putting vaccine dosing aside, a question is whether mice are easier to protect against infection than humans. It should be noted that the viruses used in these studies were not mouse adapted strains. In our study, we were using between 104 and 106 viruses; however in human deliberate challenge studies, a similar dose is used and gives varying levels of disease (
Vaccination with a protein antigen may restrict the specificity of the response to the immunizing antigen. This may especially be the case when the vaccine strain is unchanged over several rounds of immunization as was the case with the H1 antigen. Our data show a clear antigenic and immunogenic drift of the (H1N1)pdm09 virus from 2009 to 2016. Critically, a lack of protection against infection from the vaccine strain was observable with a virus isolated from the season before the vaccine strain was changed. Based on this, we would suggest that modeling in the mouse could be used to contribute to decisions about the efficacy of vaccination against the currently circulating strains of influenza H1N1.
Seasonal influenza viruses (Table
Influenza strains used in study.
Type | Surface subtype | Strain |
---|---|---|
A | H1N1 | A/England/195/2009 |
A | H1N1 | A/California/07/2009 |
A | H1N1 | A/England/672/2010 |
A | H1N1 | A/England/336/2015 (Clade 6B.1) |
A | H1N1 | A/Puerto Rico/8/1934 |
A | H3N2 | A/England/691/2010 |
A | H3N2 | A/X-31 |
B | Yam | B/Florida/04/06 |
B | Vic | B/Brisbane |
6–10-week-old female CB6F1 mice were obtained from Harlan UK Ltd. (Horsham, UK) or from an internal breeding colony and kept in specific-pathogen-free conditions in accordance with the United Kingdom’s Home Office guidelines and all work was approved by the Animal Welfare and Ethical Review Board (AWERB) at Imperial College London. Studies followed the ARRIVE guidelines. Mice were immunized intramuscularly (i.m.) with purified surface antigens from influenza strain H1N1 A/California/7/2009 (GSK Vaccines, Siena, Italy) in 50 µl, either once (prime only) or twice (prime boost). For infections, mice were anesthetized using isoflurane and infected intranasally (i.n.) with 100 µl influenza virus or sterile PBS. Body surface temperature was taken from the xiphoid process using a hand-held infrared thermometer.
Mice were culled using 100 µl intraperitoneal pentobarbitone (20 mg dose, Pentoject, Animalcare Ltd., UK) and tissues collected as previously described (
Upper and lower regions of paraformaldehyde-fixed left lung lobes were processed and embedded in paraffin. Sections of 3 µm were stained with hematoxylin and eosin and the entire section was scanned at ×20 magnification so that the area with the greatest inflammation could be assigned the inflammation score. The degree of airway inflammation was assessed in a blinded manner using a modified system described previously (
Viral load
Plaque assays were performed using a modified protocol previously described (
Live cells were suspended in Fc block (Anti-CD16/32, BD) in PBS-1% BSA and stained with surface antibodies: CD3-FITC (BD, Oxford UK), CD4-APC (BD), CD8-APC Alexa75 (Invitrogen, Paisley, UK), and NK1.1 PerCP-Cy5.5 (BD, Oxford UK). Analysis was performed on an LSRFortessa flow cytometer (BD). FMO controls were used for surface stains.
Antibodies specific to influenza H1N1 were measured using a standardized ELISA (
A Bayesian multidimensional scaling (BMDS) model (
Calculations as described in figure legends were performed using Prism 6 (GraphPad Software Inc., La Jolla, CA, USA).
Work was performed in accordance with the United Kingdom’s Home Office guidelines and all work was approved by the Animal Welfare and Ethical Review Board (AWERB) at Imperial College London. Studies followed the ARRIVE guidelines.
HG, JM, and EK performed the experimental studies; PL and PK performed the data analysis of flu strain drift; JM provided HI data and analysis; JE, CT, RE, LP, and WB provided and grew influenza strains, JT designed the studies and wrote the paper.
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
The authors thank Stephen Reece for advice on manuscript. The authors have no commercial conflicts of interest in this study. Giuseppe Del Giudice (GSK Vaccines, Sienna) provided the influenza vaccine antigens. The research leading to these results has received support from the Innovative Medicines Initiative Joint Undertaking under grant agreement no. [115308] Biovacsafe, resources of which are composed of financial contribution from the European Union’s Seventh Framework Programme (FP7/2007-2013) and EFPIA members’ in kind contribution. This work was supported by the European Community’s European seventh Framework Program ADITEC (HEALTH-F4-2011-18 280873).
The Supplementary Material for this article can be found online at