Front. Genet. Frontiers in Genetics Front. Genet. 1664-8021 Frontiers Media S.A. 10.3389/fgene.2019.00269 Genetics Original Research Does Prenatal Stress Shape Postnatal Resilience? – An Epigenome-Wide Study on Violence and Mental Health in Humans Serpeloni Fernanda 1 2 Radtke Karl M. 1 3 Hecker Tobias 4 Sill Johanna 1 Vukojevic Vanja 5 Assis Simone G. de 2 Schauer Maggie 1 Elbert Thomas 1 Nätt Daniel 6 * 1Clinical Psychology and Neuropsychology, Department of Psychology, University of Konstanz, Konstanz, Germany 2Department of Studies in Violence and Health Jorge Careli, National School of Public Health of Rio de Janeiro – National Institute of Women, Children and Adolescents Health Fernandes Figueira, Oswaldo Cruz Foundation, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil 3Evolutionary Biology and Zoology, Department of Biology, University of Konstanz, Konstanz, Germany 4Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, Department of Psychology, Bielefeld University, Bielefeld, Germany 5Division of Molecular Neuroscience, Department of Psychology, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland 6Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Center for Social and Affective Neuroscience, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden

Edited by: Ryan Yuen, Hospital for Sick Children, Canada

Reviewed by: Hehuang Xie, Virginia Tech, United States; Connie J. Mulligan, University of Florida, United States

*Correspondence: Daniel Nätt, daniel.natt@liu.se

This article was submitted to Epigenomics and Epigenetics, a section of the journal Frontiers in Genetics

16 04 2019 2019 10 269 18 09 2018 12 03 2019 Copyright © 2019 Serpeloni, Radtke, Hecker, Sill, Vukojevic, Assis, Schauer, Elbert and Nätt. 2019 Serpeloni, Radtke, Hecker, Sill, Vukojevic, Assis, Schauer, Elbert and Nätt

This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

Stress during pregnancy widely associates with epigenetic changes and psychiatric problems during childhood. Animal studies, however, show that under specific postnatal conditions prenatal stress may have other, less detrimental consequences for the offspring. Here, we studied mental health and epigenome-wide DNA methylation in saliva following intimate partner violence (IPV) during pregnancy in São Gonçalo, a Brazilian city with high levels of violence. Not surprisingly, mothers exposed to pregnancy IPV expressed elevated depression, PTSD and anxiety symptoms. Children had similar psychiatric problems when they experienced maternal IPV after being born. More surprisingly, when maternal IPV occurred both during (prenatal) and after pregnancy these problems were absent. Following prenatal IPV, genomic sites in genes encoding the glucocorticoid receptor (NR3C1) and its repressor FKBP51 (FKBP5) were among the most differentially methylated and indicated an enhanced ability to terminate hormonal stress responses in prenatally stressed children. These children also showed more DNA methylation in heterochromatin-like regions, which previously has been associated with stress/disease resilience. A similar relationship was seen in prenatally stressed middle-eastern refugees of the same age as the São Gonçalo children but exposed to postnatal war-related violence. While our study is limited in location and sample size, it provides novel insights on how prenatal stress may epigenetically shape resilience in humans, possibly through interactions with the postnatal environment. This translates animal findings and emphasizes the importance to account for population differences when studying how early life gene–environment interactions affects mental health.

prenatal stress intimate partner violence NR3C1 FKBP5 psychiatric resilience DNA methylation retrotransposon heterochromatin 323977 European Research Council10.13039/501100000781 Hjärnfonden10.13039/501100003792 Svenska Sällskapet för Medicinsk Forskning10.13039/501100003748 Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior10.13039/501100002322

香京julia种子在线播放

    1. <form id=HxFbUHhlv><nobr id=HxFbUHhlv></nobr></form>
      <address id=HxFbUHhlv><nobr id=HxFbUHhlv><nobr id=HxFbUHhlv></nobr></nobr></address>

      Introduction

      Psychological stress during pregnancy, like maternal depression and intimate partner violence (IPV), has widely been associated with detrimental effects in the child (Monk et al., 2012). Effects on child mental health over-represent the literature, such as increased risk of psychiatric problems like attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, autism spectrum disorder, schizophrenia, major depression and anxiety related disorders (O’Connor et al., 2005; Lupien et al., 2009; Fine et al., 2014; Babenko et al., 2015; O’Donnell et al., 2017). However, not all individuals exposed to stress develop stress-related problems. Many appear to have psychiatric resilience, showing no or better outcomes despite severe stress exposures (Rutter, 1999; Russo et al., 2012).

      In animals, prenatal stress sometimes leads to general shifts toward what appears to be adaptations in the offspring to the stressful environments (Bateson et al., 2014). In these studies outcome is highly dependent on the postnatal environment, where for example prenatal stress in rodents leads to behavioral changes that are beneficial in predator rich environments but not otherwise (St-Cyr and McGowan, 2015). Analogies have been reported in several taxa including primates, but in humans they remain speculative in nature (Sheriff et al., 2009; Giesing et al., 2010; Nettle et al., 2013; Berghänel et al., 2016). The best human example can be seen in infants consistently exposed to maternal depression, both pre- and postnatally, which are protected against the negative mental effects seen in infants of mothers with depression either pre- or postnatally (but not during both periods) (Sandman et al., 2012). This indicates that an interaction between the pre- and postnatal environments may shape mental health also in humans. A reason why evidence is mostly lacking in humans could therefore be that prenatal stress studies rarely target postnatal exposures in environments with high levels of stress. Growing up in communities characterized by poverty, crime and violence predicts stress related disorders such as post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), depression and conduct problems (Elbert and Schauer, 2002; Fowler et al., 2009). Studying the consequences of prenatal stress in communities with high levels of violence could therefore yield unique insights into the interactions between the pre- and postnatal environments, insights that could be particularly important for understanding human mental disorders.

      Epigenetic mechanisms, such as DNA methylation, are important for reprogramming the genome following early life stress (Oberlander et al., 2008; Monk et al., 2012; Babenko et al., 2015; Serpeloni et al., 2016; Vangeel et al., 2017), and are believed to shape psychiatric resilience (Rutter et al., 2006). A well-known example is the epigenetic regulation of the glucocorticoid receptor (GR; gene: NR3C1) and its chaperone FK506 binding proteins 51 (FKBP51; gene: FKBP5). Both proteins have been studied extensively for their involvement in the hypothalamic–pituitary–adrenal (HPA) axis, a physiological pathway that mediates key elements of the stress response. GR uses the stress hormone cortisol as a ligand, and when activated represses the stress response, while FKBP51 exerts a short-loop feedback by inhibiting the nuclear translocation of GR (Zannas and Binder, 2014). Epigenetic dysregulation of NR3C1 and FKBP5 have repeatedly been observed in psychiatric disorders following early life stress (Binder et al., 2008; McGowan et al., 2009; Spijker and van Rossum, 2012; Klengel et al., 2013). The reprogramming of specific genes may, however, only represent pieces of the full epigenome-wide consequence of stress (Hunter et al., 2015). Cortisol exposure in young children is, for example, associated with genome-wide loss of DNA methylation in repetitive heterochromatin-like regions, which are genomic regions normally silenced by DNA methylation (Nätt et al., 2015). How stress-related genes and epigenome-wide mechanisms interact in shaping human mental health is poorly understood.

      Here, we aimed to investigate the psychiatric and epigenome-wide consequences of prenatal stress, in the form of IPV during pregnancy, in a human population exposed to high levels of violence. IPV affects one third of the women worldwide (Devries et al., 2013). In the present study, we targeted women and children in São Gonçalo, a city located in Rio de Janeiro state in Brazil. São Gonçalo’s population exceeds one million, with high proportion of low-income families and high levels of community/domestic violence (CDV) (Assis et al., 2009). In a previous study targeting the same population, we showed that the epigenome-wide consequences of IPV and CDV in this population can be detected in grandchildren of grandmothers exposed to violence (Serpeloni et al., 2017). Here, we focus on the more immediate epigenetic and psychiatric consequences of IPV, by obtaining epigenome-wide saliva DNA methylation and psychiatric profiles of children exposed to prenatal IPV. We hypothesized that exposure to prenatal IPV in the high violence communities of São Gonçalo will have different consequences than what has been reported in studies of less violent communities.

      Materials and Methods Participants

      São Gonçalo subjects, 122 grandmothers, 122 mothers, and 120 children were recruited via the “Family strategy program” of the city of São Gonçalo (Brazil) as described before (Serpeloni et al., 2017). Children (46% male) mean age were 13.1 (range = 8–18); mothers 37.9 (range = 25–51); grandmothers 64.0 (range 46–88) years. Sociodemographic variables of mothers and children can be found in Table 1.

      Selected psychiatric variables and social risk factors in the São Gonçalo subsamples.

      Mothers (n = 122) Children (n = 120)
      Pregnancy IPV a Prenatal IPV a Trauma b CDV c IPV+ (n = 21) IPV- (n = 99)





      ρ* p ρ* p ρ* p ρ* p Mean (SE) or % P-val; χ2 or ANOVA
      Sociodemographic
      Age (years)   0.003   n.s. –0.07   n.s.   0.20 <0.05   0.28 <0.01 13.38 (0.54) 13.66 (0.26)   n.s.
      Sex (female)   __   __   0.11   n.s.   0.04   n.s. –0.12   n.s.   0.62   0.52   n.s.
      Maternal age birth –0.11   n.s.   0.01   n.s. –0.16   n.s. –0.20 <0.05 24.06 (1.38) 24.97 (0.63)   n.s.
      Family income (USD) –0.11   n.s. –0.13   n.s. –0.23 <0.05 –0.13   n.s. 349.87 (51.51) 490.40 (33.26)   n.s.
      Family status (married) –0.07   n.s. –0.11   n.s. –0.09   n.s. –0.13   n.s.   0.61   0.7   n.s.
      Education (years) –0.21 <0.05 –0.10   n.s.   0.03   n.s.   0.15   n.s. 7.20 (0.61) 7.66 (0.26)   n.s.
      Maternal care (high) d   0.15   n.s.   0.15   n.s. –0.01   n.s. –0.12   n.s.   0.9   0.69   n.s.
      Maternal smoking (never) § –0.09   n.s. –0.03   n.s.   0.13   n.s.   0.08   n.s.   0.86   0.88   n.s.
      Maternal alcohol (never) §§   0.05   n.s. –0.03   n.s.   0.18 =0.05   0.18 <0.05   0.95   0.91   n.s.
      Stress
      Trauma b   0.33 <0.001   0.07   n.s. 1   __   0.6 <0.001 2.05 (0.32) 2.15 (0.21)   n.s.
      CDV c   0.22 <0.05   0.02   n.s.   0.6 <0.001 1   __ 12.90 (2.19) 12.16 (0.90)   n.s.
      Prenatal IPV a   0.06   n.s. # 1   __   0.07   n.s.   0.02   n.s.   __   __   __
      Pregnancy IPV (maternal) a 1   __ 1   __   0.07   n.s.   0.02   n.s.   __   __   __
      IPV lifetime (maternal) a   0.55 <0.001   0.56 <0.001   0.28 <0.01   0.26 <0.01   __   __   __
      Psychiatric
      PTSD severity e,f   0.22 <0.05   0.17   n.s.   0.42 <0.001   0.33 <0.001 6.71 (1.93) 6.13 (0.87)   n.s.
      Depression g   0.28 <0.01 –0.04   n.s.   0.34 <0.001   0.32 <0.001 1.55 (0.55) 1.77 0.32)   n.s.
      Conduct problemsh   __   __ –0.06   n.s.   0.18   n.s.   0.21 <0.05 3.25 (0.48) 3.41 (0.19)   n.s.
      Hyperactivity i   __   __   0.07   n.s.   0.01   n.s.   0.05   n.s. 4.60 (0.62) 4.35 (0.24)   n.s.
      Emotional problems j   __   __   0.22 <0.05   0.24 <0.01   0.25 <0.01 5.38 (0.53) 4.36 (0.27)   n.s.
      Peer problems k   __   __ –0.05   n.s.   0.02   n.s.   0.07   n.s. 1.86 (0.32) 2.04 (0.17)   n.s.
      Anxiety l   0.19 <0.05   __   __   __   __   __
      Not all interviewed mothers were mothers to the interviewed children, and vice versa. Of the reported numbers, 115 represent family dyads. Spearman rank correlation. Marital status represents the following categories: Single = 22, Married = 85, Divorced = 13, Widower = 2. § Categories of pregnancy smoking: Always = 5, Many times = 2, Few times = 4, Never = 111. §§ Categories of pregnancy alcohol use: Always = 3, Many times = 3, Few times = 11, Never = 105. # Pregnancy IPV exposure in grandmothers did not correlate with the mothers’ experiences of pregnancy IPV. – Not measured or not relevant for the affected group. Psychiatric instrument used: aComposite Abuse Scale (CAS) (Hegarty et al., 1999). bTrauma checklist (Neuner et al., 2004). cThings I Have Seen and Heard (TSHS) (Richters and Martinez, 1990). dParental Bonding Instrument (Parker et al., 1979). eAdults: Post-traumatic Stress Diagnostic Scale (Foa, 1995). fChildren: UCLA Post-traumatic Stress Disorder Reaction Index for DSM-IV (Steinberg et al., 2004). gPatient-Health-Questionnaire for teens (PHQ-9) (Richardson et al., 2010). hStrength and Difficult Questionnaire (SDQ), conduct problems scale, only children (Goodman et al., 1998). iSDQ hyperactivity scale, only children (Goodman et al., 1998). jSDQ emotional symptoms scale, only children (Goodman et al., 1998). kSDQ peer problems scale, only children (Goodman et al., 1998). lGeneralized anxiety disorder (GAD-7), only women (Spitzer et al., 2006).
      Pre- and Postnatal Stress

      All São Gonçalo participants were interviewed individually in their homes. Measures of interpersonal violence during pregnancy focused on the periods before, during, and after pregnancy, as described in Radtke et al. (2011). We used two instruments: the Composite Abuse Scale (CAS) (Hegarty et al., 1999, 2005) and the Things I Have Seen and Heard Scale (TSHS) (Richters and Martinez, 1990). CAS measures the degree of IPV through 30 items scaled from 0 (never) to 5 (daily) that together form four dimensions: severe combined abuse, physical abuse, emotional abuse and harassment. An IPV/CAS score >3 was used as cut-off for generating IPV+ and IPV- groups, which previously been shown to represent consistent IPV (Hegarty et al., 2005). Life time exposure scores used the weighted summarization method described in Radtke et al. (2011). TSHS (Richters and Martinez, 1990) contains 20–26 items that measure exposures to community and domestic violence (CDV). Items are presented in a 5-point format ranking from zero (never) to four (many times). Experience of IPV is not included in TSHS, with exception of witnessing parental interpersonal violence. Trauma exposure was measured through a checklist of 16 items (e.g., natural disasters, physical assault, sexual assault) adapted from Neuner et al. (2004). Maternal care was assessed using the Parental Bonding Instrument (Parker et al., 1979).

      Stress-Related Disorders

      Post-traumatic stress disorder symptoms in the children was measured using the University of California at Los Angeles Post-traumatic Stress Disorder Reaction Index for DSM-IV (Steinberg et al., 2004). For adults the Post-traumatic Stress Diagnostic Scale (PSSI) was used instead (Foa, 1995). Depression and anxiety were assessed using the Patient-Health-Questionnaire (PHQ-9) (Richardson et al., 2010) and the 7-item scale for generalized anxiety disorders (GAD-7) (Spitzer et al., 2006). Behavioral problems in children was measured using the Strength and Difficult Questionnaire (SDQ), (Goodman et al., 1998) which allocates behavioral attributes to five subscales: emotional symptoms, conduct problems, hyperactivity, peer problems, and prosocial behavior.

      Generating DNA Methylation Data

      For the São Gonçalo subjects, saliva samples (2 ml) were collected and DNA isolated using the Oragene-Discover (OGR-500) Collection Kit (DNA Genotek, Ottawa, ON, Canada). DNA was bisulfite-converted and analyzed using HumanMethylation450 BeadChips (Illumina, Inc.) at the Queen Mary University of London (United Kingdom) according to manufacturer’s protocols. Targeted bisulfite resequencing was used to technically validate 10 CpGs on the BeadChips in 33 randomly chosen individuals, using a service provided by Zymo Research Corporation (Irvine, CA, United States). This involved bisulfite conversion using EZ DNA Methylation-Lightning Kit (Zymo), followed by Illumina MiSeq sequencing. Results and primer sequences are found in Supplementary Table S2.

      Preprocessing and Quality Control of DNA Methylation Data

      A chart of the full bioinformatics analysis is available in Supplementary Figure S1. Preprocessing and statistical analysis was carried out in R 3.3.2 or SPSS (IBM, v.23). An R script is available in Supplementary Text S1, which automatically performs all preprocessing steps given the input files in Supplementary Data S1–S4. Instructions on how to use the script are contained within the script itself.

      The hg19 human reference genome was used in all analysis. Raw São Gonçalo bead array data (idat files) were imported and preprocessed in R using different functions available in minfi package as described in Aryee et al. (2014). Successful bisulfite conversion and hybridization were verified using minfi/qcReport. We used the recommendations by Chen et al. (2013) to filter probes known to cross-hybridize with multiple genomic locations (nprobes = 30,969), contain or neighboring common polymorphisms (nprobes = 162,255), or were annotated to the X/Y chromosomes (nprobes = 8,360). Probes with low detection signals (p > 0.01; nprobes = 5,526) in any of the samples were also excluded (Aryee et al., 2014). The final São Gonçalo dataset contained 272,636 high quality CpGs after filtering.

      Confirmation that individuals were assigned to unique families was done using the 65 SNP probes available on the beadchip. We also confirmed that all subjects’ sex, age, and sample type (saliva) matched the predicted epigenetic sex, age and sample type estimated by minfi (Aryee et al., 2014). In total, the São Gonçalo dataset contained 120 children (prenatal IPV+ = 21, IPV- = 99) and 122 adult women (prenatal IPV+ = 23, IPV- = 99), of which most were mothers to the children (pregnancy IPV+ = 18; IPV- = 104; full families = 115).

      Genome-Wide Differential DNA Methylation Analysis

      Filtered data were quantile normalized using default settings in minfi/preprocessQuantile. Logit-transformed beta values (M-values) were subjected to a robust linear regression model to identify significantly differentially methylated (DM) probes in association with prenatal IPV, adjusted for multiple testing (Benjamini–Hochberg method), using the Limma package (Ritchie et al., 2015). To minimize the effect of outliers due to the presence of rare SNPs in target CpG sites, we used the robust method in the lmFit function in limma (for more details, see Supplementary Figure S4). For the São Gonçalo children and women the model had prenatal IPV exposure (IPV+ versus IPV-) as main effect, and age, biological sex, prenatal CDV, and prenatal trauma scores (maternal exposures during pregnancy) as covariates. Again an IPV/CAS score >3 was used as cut-off for generating prenatal IPV+ and IPV- groups (Hegarty et al., 2005). An extended model with additional covariates is present in Supplementary Table S1. The covariates in the analysis of the contrast datasets may have differed (see section “Analysis of Contrast Datasets” below).

      To generate the genomic context graphs of NR3C1 and FKBP5 (Supplementary Figure S5), data were downloaded from UCSC genome browser (hg19). Histone and transcription factor binding data were taken from the default Integrated Regulation from ENCODE Track (Layered H3K4Me1, H3K4Me3, H3K27Ac, and Txn Factor ChIP) which contains data from multiple cell lines. For the Txn Factor ChIP, only the areas closest to candidate CpGs were considered, and due to the relative abundance of peaks at the NR3C1 CpG, only transcription factors with at least two peaks was retained for this gene (links to original graphs see Supplementary Figure S5). To generate heterochromatin/euchromatin coverage graphs (Figure 2D), ENCODE data for PBMC specific H3K9me3 and H3K4me3 ChIP-seq experiments were downloaded from the SYDH Histone Track in the USCS genome browser (GEO access: GSM788075 and GSM788084). To minimize differences in background noise between H3K9me3 and H3K4me3, the y-axes of these graphs were set by the average signal of the first and last bp of the 6,000 bp window (±3,000 bp relative CpG location). The same approach, but using genomic ranges downloaded from the ChromHMM Core 15 dataset (Ernst and Kellis, 2012) (Roadmap Epigenomic Project1), was used to visualize the overlap with defined chromatin states in cells present in saliva (for details, see Supplementary Figure S6). To partly control for polymorphism acting in trans we searched the mQTLdb database2 (accessed 07/15/2018) for previously identified methylation QTLs in the 31 differentially methylated CpGs reported in Table 2 (see footnote 2). The PLINK childhood (age 7) and adolescence (age 15–17) datasets (at any genomic distance) were used since these were corrected for sex, batch effects, cellular heterogeneity and genetic structure.

      Differentially methylated CpGs between São Gonçalo children exposed to prenatal IPV (n = 21) and controls (n = 99).

      Rank CpGprobe ID Log2fold change Average % methylation (SEM) Originalp-value FDR adjustedp-value Closestgene Psychiatricassociation c
      1 cg19014730   0.31 70.71 (0.38) 2.60E-07   0.05 FKBP5 Binder et al., 2008; Klengel et al., 2013
      2 cg04967982 a –0.35 35.79 (0.59) 4.39E-07   0.05 OTUD7A Egger et al., 2014; Uddin et al., 2018
      3 cg11608150 b –0.82 44.12 (1.61) 5.07E-07   0.05 VTRNA2-1
      4 cg12661272   0.16 79.10 (0.19) 1.12E-06   0.07 STK32C Dempster et al., 2014
      5 cg02638458 –0.23 26.32 (0.30) 1.27E-06   0.07 CNPY1
      6 cg05292788   0.35 86.46 (0.24) 1.52E-06   0.07 GABBR1 Fatemi et al., 2011; Vangeel et al., 2017
      7 cg24188111   0.20   6.69 (0.10) 1.91E-06   0.07 DHX29
      8 cg24137863   0.26 81.33 (0.25) 2.40E-06   0.07
      9 cg11147724   0.19 85.30 (0.17) 2.46E-06   0.07 PTPRN2 Jarick et al., 2012
      10 cg08857436   0.35 89.36 (0.21) 3.20E-06   0.08 CDK14
      11 cg08128826 –0.45 36.43 (0.62) 3.61E-06   0.08 LHX9 Yamazaki et al., 2015
      12 cg27478707   0.28 82.96 (0.26) 3.87E-06   0.08 HLA-DMB
      13 cg17403899 –0.22 72.21 (0.27) 4.45E-06   0.08 CNFN
      14 cg21721210 –0.29 20.02 (0.29) 4.79E-06   0.08 ACP7
      15 cg04914231 –0.37 27.19 (0.47) 5.16E-06   0.08 INO80E
      16 cg07305719 –0.27 82.76 (0.25) 5.31E-06   0.09 ZNF365 Ayyappan et al., 2009; Chaste et al., 2015
      17 cg04515200 b –0.70 25.35 (0.88) 5.57E-06   0.09 VTRNA2-1
      18 cg00058413   0.27 85.79 (0.26) 5.87E-06   0.09 DTWD2 Ellsworth et al., 2013; Pan et al., 2013
      19 cg10549227   0.24 85.34 (0.17) 6.29E-06   0.09 OXT Ferguson et al., 2000; Feldman et al., 2016
      20 cg20895092 –0.21 81.23 (0.24) 6.43E-06   0.09 SPDYC
      21 cg19365706   0.18 91.97 (0.09) 6.51E-06   0.09 EPHB4
      22 cg21552292   0.20 79.39 (0.25) 7.60E-06   0.09 TRIO
      23 cg10188592 –0.42   4.41 (0.11) 7.62E-06   0.09 HSPE1
      24 cg22043788 –0.30 90.71 (0.15) 7.81E-06   0.09 TBCD
      25 cg10616337 –0.25   8.30 (0.13) 7.84E-06   0.09 CRLS1
      26 cg08108641 –0.22 75.23 (0.29) 9.60E-06 <0.10 NTNG2
      27 cg03197792   0.18 85.34 (0.14) 1.05E-05 <0.10 HDLBP Felder et al., 2009
      28 cg08205099   0.20 83.80 (0.21) 1.07E-05 <0.10 DLGAP2 Marshall et al., 2008; Chertkow-Deutsher et al., 2010
      29 cg05291178   0.21 89.47 (0.38) 1.08E-05 <0.10 FANCD2OS
      30 cg13494826   0.20 66.89 (0.27) 1.13E-05 <0.10 PRRX2
      31 cg00772663   0.32 86.18 (0.27) 1.13E-05 <0.10 CTNNA2 Dempster et al., 2011; Elia et al., 2011
        …   …   …   …   …   …
      (39) (cg18068240) –0.32   5.44 (0.11) 1.18E-05   0.12 NR3C1 McGowan et al., 2009; Spijker and van Rossum, 2012
      Percent methylation was calculated from β-values, while fold changes and statistical analysis were calculated from M-values as recommended by Du et al. (2010). FDR indicates p-value after correcting for multiple testing using the Benjamini–Hochberg procedure. In total 272,636 CpGs were analyzed. a Possibly affected by transacting polymorphism according mQTLdp/PLINK (http://mqtldb.org/). b Likely affected by loss-of-methylation site polymorphism (see Supplementary Figure S4). c Previous psychiatric associations in the literature was limited to two references.
      Stress-Induced Methylome Switching and Retrotransposon Analysis

      The R script available in Supplementary Text S1 will perform a methylome switching analysis on normalized beta-values from the São Gonçalo samples (Supplementary Data S1), as well as downloaded data from the Grady Study (see section “Analysis of Contrast Datasets” below). Methylome switching was calculated by classifying each CpG into two categories: >50% or <50% methylation (hetero- and eu- chromatin-like, respectively) based on mean percent methylation of each CpG across subjects. We used K-means clustering analysis (K = 2), in the children and mothers, respectively, to validate the 50% cut-off. All classification was done within cohorts. As a result, the number of CpGs in each category differed slightly between datasets, since some CpGs may have been classified as heterochromatin-like in one cohort, but euchromatin-like in another. In downstream analysis, we further divided these two categories into those CpGs with or without a repeat region within ±50 bp, using the GenomicRanges package (Carlson et al., 2014) and repeat coordinates from RepeatMasker3. Average DNA methylation of each category were then calculated for the top 1% differentially methylated CpGs in respective dataset. We choose to rank the CpGs by Bayesian B-values instead of p-values, to circumvent any issue with p-value cut-off levels. The 1% threshold was chosen based on previous data (Nätt et al., 2015), as well as observations in Figure 2E. The progressive proportion graphs (Figure 2E) were constructed using information from RepeatMasker (repeat class; see footnote 3), and UCSC genome browser (CpG islands and exons). Since CpGs available on the Illumina HumanMethylation450 BeadChips are not a random subset, we choose to normalize the graphs so that all category lines originated from a 50% ratio at the level of all probes (100% top ranked). Bootstrap resampling to generate expected distributions given the CpG panels available on the beadchip was conducted using the boot package in R. Information in RepBase (Bao et al., 2015) was used to extract probes within ±50 bp of recently active L1 retrotransposons unique to the human linage.

      Cell Type and Genetic Ancestry

      To control for genetic structure and cell type heterogeneity bias between IPV+ and IPV- groups in São Gonçalo children, we extracted the minfi beta-values, imported them into GLINT 1.0.3 (Rahmani et al., 2017b) and attained the factor scores from the methods listed below. Analysis within GLINT used the default settings. For genetic ancestry analysis EPISTRUCTURE was used (Rahmani et al., 2017a), while ReFACTor was used for reference free cell type analysis (Rahmani et al., 2017b). Since, saliva contains white-blood cells (Theda et al., 2018) we used the Houseman (Houseman et al., 2012) blood reference available in GLINT, as well as a custom-made reference for panel-based cell type analysis. The custom reference was built using the Houseman method (Houseman et al., 2012), but was based on CpGs differentially methylated between saliva, buccal and a pool of the other tissues available in GEO dataset GSE48472. The reference panel can be found in Serpeloni et al. (2017), imported into GLINT and integrated into Houseman pipeline for saliva cell type analysis.

      Statistical Models

      For an overview of the statistical models used, see Supplementary Figure S1. Following the initial genome-wide analysis in R/limma, we applied general linear models (GLMs) in SPSS 23 for all group comparisons. Care was taken to assure that the data met GLM assumptions. For the São Gonçalo dataset, model design was the same as for genome-wide analysis, using the same IPV classification (main factor) and covariates (age, sex, prenatal trauma, and prenatal CDV). Models of the contrast datasets are presented below.

      Analysis of Contrast Datasets

      If not otherwise stated, sample handling, preprocessing and genome-wide analysis of the contrast datasets were performed the same way as for the São Gonçalo children and women datasets. For consistencies, we only analyzed CpGs that were in common with the São Gonçalo datasets.

      Refugee children presented in Figure 3 came from war refugees that migrated to Germany between 2010 and 2016 (n = 48; 60% females; 11–19 years old; 75% middle eastern; 83% Islamic). Bisulfite converted saliva DNA was hybridized to Infinium MethylationEPIC (Illumina, Inc.), and was therefore separately analyzed compared to the other contrast datasets. 239,442 CpGs were in common with the São Gonçalo datasets after filtering. To test differences between IPV+ (n = 15) and IPV- (n = 33) we used a similar statistical model as for the São Gonçalo children, with the same IPV threshold (CAS score > 3). As covariate, instead of prenatal CDV, we used prenatal scores of organized violence calculated using the Event Checklist for War, Detention, and Torture Experiences as described in Onyut et al. (2009). Results were not affected by cell-type heterogeneity and genetic ancestry as described above.

      Bisulfite converted DNA from the São Gonçalo women and the Grady datasets were hybridized to the HumanMethylation450 BeadChips (Illumina, Inc.) and was therefore analyzed together, only retaining CpGs that reached the detection signal threshold across all cohorts including the São Gonçalo children (nCpGs = 235,960). The São Gonçalo women (mothers) dataset was presented above, with the São Gonçalo children.

      The Grady dataset has been described in details previously (Zannas et al., 2015). Files were downloaded as Illumina HumanMethylation450 BeadChips raw signals from Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO, accession number: GSE72680). Only samples with sex, age (co-variates) and information on whether the participant had undergone psychiatric treatment (main factor) were retrained and imported into R. Quality control, filtering and normalization were performed as for the São Gonçalo dataset. The final dataset contained 367 individuals (70% females; 18–77 years old; 91% African American). Groups were generate according to psychiatric treatment of either depression, bipolar disorder, PTSD or anxiety disorder (nyes = 140, nno = 227). We did not observe group differences in cell-type heterogeneity and genetic ancestry as described above. The R script available in Supplementary Text S1 will automatically download, preprocess, and perform an epigenome-wide association and methylome switching analysis on the Grady data, using the input files in Supplementary Data S1–S4. Instructions are contained within the script.

      Ethics Statement

      Approvals were obtained in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki by the Ethical Committee of the University of Konstanz (Germany; permit UNIKON IRB st No. 4/2015) and the National Commission for Ethics in Research (Brazil; permit CAAE 16375413.1.0000.5240). We obtained written informed consent from adults/parents and written assent from children.

      Results Psychiatric Burden in Children Exposed to Prenatal IPV

      For an overview of all analysis, see Supplementary Figure S1. In the São Gonçalo samples, 19% of all mothers reported IPV during their pregnancy (n = 244; both maternal and grand-maternal generations included). As expected, IPV during pregnancy in the maternal generation (n = 122) was positively correlated with exposure to lifetime trauma, and community/domestic violence (CDV) other than IPV, as well as depression, PTSD and anxiety symptoms (Table 1). Children exposed to lifetime trauma, and CDV also showed the expected psychiatric problems, which validated the collection methods. Against previous findings in humans, however, children exposed to prenatal IPV did not present mental and behavioral problems (Table 1). Only a weak relationship with emotional symptoms (e.g., expressing more fears and worries) was present.

      As described by Hegarty et al. (2005), an IPV score of more than 3 in CAS reliably detects IPV exposure. We used this threshold to generate groups that had or had not been exposed to IPV. Only 22% of the mothers that experienced pregnancy IPV had been exposed to prenatal IPV themselves, confirming the low correlation between pregnancy and prenatal exposures reported in Table 1. Pregnancy IPV in the São Gonçalo mothers often coincided with IPV before and/or after pregnancy (Figure 1A). Several children, however, had mothers that experienced IPV exclusively after birth. These children had similar load of maternal IPV after birth, and their mothers experienced similar lifetime IPV exposure, as children that experienced maternal IPV prenatally (Figure 1B). Nevertheless, only children experiencing maternal IPV exclusively after birth expressed elevated levels of mental symptoms compared to controls (Figure 1C). This implies that prenatal IPV in the São Gonçalo children may have led to some sort of resilience against experiencing/witnessing maternal IPV.

      Missing psychiatric problems in São Gonçalo children following prenatal IPV. Most mothers experiencing pregnancy IPV were also exposed to IPV before conception or after giving birth (A). A substantial number of mothers experienced IPV only after birth. Despite similar maternal IPV exposures after birth in both prenatally and only postnatally exposed children, and even higher lifetime trauma exposures in mothers experiencing IPV during pregnancy (B), only children living in families with mothers exposed to IPV only postnatally expressed more depression and PTSD symptoms (C). Results in (B,C) originates from Bonferroni corrected post hoc tests, using general linear models with age, sex, pregnancy/prenatal trauma and CDV scores as covariates. Error bars indicates ±SEM. ∗∗∗p < 0.001, ∗∗p < 0.01, p < 0.05.

      Prenatal IPV Affects Genes Relevant for Stress and Psychiatric Disorder

      We next explored epigenetic biomarkers by measuring genome-wide saliva DNA methylation using Illumina HumanMethylation450 BeadChips (children = 120; women = 122; mother/children family pairs = 115). To validate the arrays, we technically replicated 10 CpGs covered by the BeadChip in 33 randomly chosen individuals (children = 18; women = 15) using targeted bisulfite resequencing, which showed strong inter-assay/subject reliability (subject mean r2 = 0.94; max = 0.96; min = 0.90; each subject had p < 0.001; Supplementary Table S2). Furthermore, we applied established practices to exclude CpGs with common polymorphisms and without reliable detection signals in all samples (see section “Materials and Methods”). Since the children samples contained both males and females, we also excluded the sex chromosomes, resulting in a final dataset of 272,636 CpGs.

      After correcting for multiple testing using the Benjamini–Hochberg procedure, 31 CpGs (Table 2 and Figure 2A) were differentially methylated between children exposed to prenatal IPV (IPV+, n = 21, mean age = 13.4 ± 0.5) and controls (IPV-, n = 99, mean age = 13.7 ± 0.3 SEM) using the Hegarty threshold described above (Hegarty et al., 2005) and a false discovery adjusted p-value < 0.1. To increase specificity toward IPV, the analysis was corrected for the covariates sex and age, as well as maternal exposures to pregnancy trauma and other types of CDV. Supplementary Table S1 shows a comparison between this model and an extended model including several more possible confounds like cell-type heterogeneity, genetic structure, family income and maternal smoking/alcohol use during pregnancy, which showed limited effects on the results. Direct between group comparisons of cell-type heterogeneity (Supplementary Figure S2), genetic ancestry (Supplementary Figure S2), reported age/epigenetic age (Supplementary Figure S3), and other possible confounds (Table 1) confirmed that these variables had limited effects on the results. We also applied a statistical strategy called robust statistics, to limit loss-of-methylation site polymorphism bias between the prenatal IPV+ and IPV- groups (for more information, see Supplementary Figure S4). To partly control for distant polymorphisms affecting DNA methylation, we searched the mQTLdb/PLINK database (see footnote 2) for previously identified methylation QTLs affecting these 31 CpGs. Only one of the 31 CpGs, cg04967982, had previously been associated with trans-acting polymorphism in juvenile/adolescence samples, suggesting limited effects of this type of genomic interaction.

      A methylome switch in the São Gonçalo children. (A) Manhattan plot showing the top 1% differentially methylated CpGs (Supplementary Data S1) in the São Gonçalo children exposed to prenatal IPV (IPV+) compared to controls (IPV–). Green dots show the significant CpGs from Table 2. (B) Differentially methylated CpGs in São Gonçalo children correlated across subjects. Asterisks here represent at least p < 0.05 significant Pearson correlations between target CpGs. (C) DNA methylation strongly correlated between São Gonçalo children and women. Small blue dots show average DNA methylation of each analyzed CpG in children and women, respectively (n = 272,636). A 50% cut-off in DNA methylation efficiently caught two distinct clusters verified with K-means cluster analysis (see main text). (D) The >50% DNA methylation cluster associated with the H3K9me3 heterochromatin marker, while the <50% cluster associated with the H3K4me3 euchromatin marker, as measured in previous ChIP-seq experiments of white blood cells. (E) Line graphs showing an accumulation of hypermethylated CpGs in heterochromatin-like regions of the top most differentially methylated CpGs between prenatal IPV+ and IPV– children (top graph). This was accompanied by a reduction of hypermethylated CpGs in euchromatin-like regions (lower graph). CpGs were categorized by being within ±50 bp of repetitive genomic features (SINE, LINE, LTR, DNA transposon, other repeats) or gene associated features (exons and/or CpG islands; no repeat within ±50 bp). (F) Comparing the observed number of hypermethylated CpGs in the top 1% differentially methylated CpGs with confidence intervals of the expected distributions generated by resampling 1% randomly from all analyzed CpGs (10,000 resamples), confirmed that the prenatal IPV+ children had more hypermethylated CpGs in heterochromatin-like regions, and less hypermethylated CpGs in euchromatin-like regions, compared to controls. (G) Averaging the top 1% CpGs into either heterochromatin-like CpGs with or without repeats (±50 bp), and euchromatin-like CpGs with or without repeats, showed that the effects were more pronounced in repetitive regions. (H) Prenatal IPV also led to more methylation in CpGs within ±50 bp of recently active retrotransposons. Error bars indicates ±SEM. Asterisks in (G,H) represent results from general linear models with age, sex, prenatal CDV, and prenatal trauma scores as covariates. ∗∗∗p < 0.001, ∗∗p < 0.01.

      Ranked 1 of 272,636 CpGs analyzed was a CpG in the gene body of FKBP5 (Table 2 and Supplementary Figure S4), which codes for FKBP51, the chaperone protein for GR which was presented in the text above. Also, a CpG in the promoter of the gene coding for GR, NR3C1, was top ranked (rank 39; Table 2). In both genes, the significant CpGs were in regions previously characterized by histone H3K27 acetylation and H3K4 mono/tri-methylation, which are histone marks commonly associated with active transcription (Supplementary Figure S5). While DNA methylation at the NR3C1 CpG supported an active promoter, by being poorly methylated, FKBP5 showed higher levels of DNA methylation, suggesting local silencing (Table 2). The FKBP5 CpG, however, showed substantial variation, and has a plausible binding site for the activator protein 1 (AP1) complex: a potent activator of gene transcription following dimerization of c-Fos and c-Jun (Supplementary Figure S5). A qualitative guess is therefore that the FKBP5 site is located within an enhancer region, but more evidence is needed.

      Many other differentially methylated CpGs were located in or close to genes previously associated with stress and psychiatric disorders, such as the genes for oxytocin (OXT) and DLG Associated Protein 2 (DLGAP2) that have commonly been associated with deficits in social behavior and autism spectrum disorder (Marshall et al., 2008; Feldman et al., 2016). Furthermore, a subunit for GABA receptor 1B (GABBR1), DTW Domain Containing 2 (DTWD2), and DISC1-Binding Zinc-Finger Protein (ZNF365), have been associated with multiple often comorbid disorders, including addiction, bipolar disorder, and schizophrenia (Ayyappan et al., 2009; Fatemi et al., 2011; Pan et al., 2013; Augier et al., 2018). Of interest for our study, polymorphism in DTWD2 has shown to interact with FKBP5 in trans (Ellsworth et al., 2013) and GABBR1 has been associated with DNA methylation changes in newborns following maternal anxiety during pregnancy (Vangeel et al., 2017). Furthermore, the high number of psychiatrically relevant genes may indicate co-regulation involving, for example, common transcription factors. This was consistent with high inter-subject correlations across many of the differentially methylated sites (Figure 2B).

      Since the maternal generation was also assessed for genome-wide DNA methylation, we cross-examined the children results in their mothers. No correlations within families (n = 115 mother/child pairs) were found for the 31 significant CpGs identified in the children, providing evidence against either genetic or intergenerational epigenetic inheritance. Changes in the children following prenatal IPV were therefore likely independent of the changes following the same exposures in their mothers.

      Stress Tolerance and Methylome Switching in São Gonçalo Children

      Similar changes in FKBP5 and NR3C1 DNA methylation reported by others (Binder et al., 2008; McGowan et al., 2009; Spijker and van Rossum, 2012; Klengel et al., 2013; Zannas and Binder, 2014) suggest that prenatal IPV exposed São Gonçalo children would have higher availability of GR, resulting in enhanced negative feedback of the HPA-axis, and therefore faster stress recovery than controls. While this may explain why these children seemed protected from the psychiatric consequences of prenatal IPV, only studying brain receptor function may fully addressed this hypothesis. Considering the challenges to study the São Gonçalo population this was out of our scope. Furthermore, while DNA methylation in NR3C1 and FKBP5 have been suggested to be indicators of mental burden, inconsistencies between studies have questioned their biomarker potential (Palma-Gudiel et al., 2015; Argentieri et al., 2017). Therefore, we sought to explore epigenetic indicators of stress tolerance that are not dependent on single CpGs, but instead averages information across genomes. Analyzing our data this way, would make our observation more robust against technical noise and decrease the risk of making false discoveries due to multiple testing.

      Exposures to stress, aging and disease have been shown to associate with genome-wide losses of DNA methylation in heterochromatin-like genomic regions rich in DNA methylation (Jones et al., 2015; Nätt et al., 2015; Nätt and Thorsell, 2016). More DNA methylation in heterochromatin-like regions would therefore indicate stress/disease resilience and deaccelerated aging. Based on this, we simply categorized all analyzed CpGs into hyper (>50%) or hypo- (<50%) methylated (Figure 2C). The seemingly arbitrary 50% cut-off overlapped to >98.7% with two clusters, independently replicated in the São Gonçalo children and women, and unbiasedly generated using K-means clustering analysis (K = 2). Clusters were also inversely associated with the heterochromatin marker H3K9me3, and euchromatin marker H3K4me3, as previously measured in mono nuclear leucocytes (Figure 2D). Inversed chromatin states of these clusters were also confirmed in relevant cell types using ChromHMM data downloaded from the Roadmap Epigenomics Project, which reports chromatin states based on machine learning of five different chromatin markers (Supplementary Figure S6).

      Exploring the hetero- and eu-chromatin-like clusters revealed a never described phenomena following prenatal stress in humans. In heterochromatin-like regions, the number of hypermethylated CpGs in prenatal IPV exposed children compared to controls progressively increased the closer to the top most differentially methylated CpGs that was targeted (top graph Figure 2E). The gain in DNA methylation of heterochromatin-like regions was accompanied by a rebound in euchromatin-like regions (bottom graph Figure 2E). This resulted in what appeared to be a methylome switch, where prenatal IPV exposure led to more methylation in heterochromatin-like and less methylation in euchromatin-like regions of the top regions affected by prenatal IPV. The switch affected many types of genomic regions but was most pronounced in several classes of transposons and other repetitive genomic elements (Figure 2E). Poorly methylated exons and CpG islands depleted of repetitive regions appeared slightly protected against the switch, at least in euchromatin-like regions.

      Given the explorative findings in Figure 2E, we looked more closely at the 1% top differentially methylated CpGs between IPV+ and IPV- children (Supplementary Data S1). The proportion of hypermethylated regions in IPV+ children was far greater than what was expected by confidence intervals generated using 10,000 bootstrap resamples of the original 272,636 analyzed CpGs post filtering (top graph Figure 2F). While not as pronounced, the opposite relationship was observed in the eu-chromatin like regions (bottom graph Figure 2F). This confirms statistically the overrepresentation observed in Figure 2E, and that the switch was not biased by the CpG panel chosen for the Illumina HumanMethylation450 BeadChip.

      A methylome switch was also present when averaging the DNA methylation levels over heterochromatin-like repetitive and non-repetitive, as well as euchromatin-like repetitive and non-repetitive regions (Figure 2G). Again, the most pronounced effect was found in repetitive regions.

      Stress and age-related loss of DNA methylation in repetitive heterochromatin-like regions may partly involve a mechanism that reactivates intact retrotransposons (Wood and Helfand, 2013; Gorbunova et al., 2014; Nätt and Thorsell, 2016). These virus-like elements are often found in repetitive genomic regions and are normally silenced by DNA methylation. It is believed that when this epigenetic control mechanism is compromised, these elements may reactivate, spread to other genomic locations, leading to disruption of genome integrity, and increased nuclear instability (Nätt and Thorsell, 2016). Since the strongest effect by prenatal IPV was found within repetitive heterochromatin-like regions (Figure 2E–G), we therefore limited our analysis to only involve known recently active L1 retrotransposons specific to the human linage. As expected, prenatal IPV exposed São Gonçalo children showed more DNA methylation in these regions, suggesting that these children may have stronger protection against nuclear instability caused by reactivation of retrotransposons compared to the controls (Figure 2H).

      Children Exposed to Both Prenatal IPV and Postnatal Violence Share a Unique Relationship

      To put the findings in the São Gonçalo children into a wider context, we compared the results with three other datasets relevant for prenatal IPV and psychiatric burden.

      Firstly, we tried to validate the main analysis in saliva samples from an independent juvenile cohort of war immigrants with primarily Middle Eastern origin (IPV+ = 15, mean age = 14.7 ± 0.6; IPV- = 33, mean age = 15.4 ± 0.4 SEM). This cohort had also experienced high levels of violence both in the maternal and juvenile generations (Figure 3A). While the refugee children did not present as pronounced resilience in their psychiatric profiles following prenatal IPV as their São Gonçalo counterparts (Figure 3B), the data still showed a similar methylome switch with the strongest effect observed in repetitive heterochromatin-like regions, thus replicating the Brazilian results despite the limited sample size (Figure 3C).

      A methylome switch in prenatally stressed war-exposed refugees. Graphs show results from an independent study in refugees primarily born in countries of the Middle East which migrated to Germany between 2010 and 2016. (A) Refugee mothers and children had higher life-time exposure to violence than reference groups born in Germany. Community violence scores used for the São Gonçalo samples was not available here. Instead graphs indicate organized violence scored using the Event Checklist for War, Detention, and Torture Experiences, as described in Onyut et al. (2009). (B) Using the same methods for scoring symptoms of PTSD and depression as were used for the São Gonçalo samples, refugee children that experienced prenatal IPV (IPV+) did not show more symptoms of PTSD and depression compared to controls (IPV–). (C) Just like the São Gonçalo children, refugee children that experienced prenatal IPV had more DNA methylation in heterochromatin-like repetitive regions than controls, accompanied with what appeared to be a rebound in euchromatin-like repetitive regions. Analysis was done on CpGs in common post filter between refugees and São Gonçalo cohorts (n = 239,442). General linear models were used with age, sex and prenatal exposure to trauma and organized violence as covariates. ∗∗∗p < 0.001, ∗∗p < 0.01, p < 0.05.

      Secondly, we used the material collected for the São Gonçalo maternal generation, and investigated prenatal IPV in adult São Gonçalo women, where the grand-maternal generation was exposed to IPV during pregnancy (IPV+ = 23, mean age = 37.5 ± 1.3; IPV- = 99, mean age = 38.3 ± 0.6 SEM). Surprisingly, women in this population showed the opposite methylome switch (Figure 4A) compared to the São Gonçalo children (Figure 4B) following prenatal IPV. These inversed relationships were, however, only present when the analysis was done on the 1% top differentially methylated CpGs identified within each cohort. Thus, São Gonçalo children did not express a methylome switch on the CpGs affected by prenatal stress in adult women, and vice versa. This result indicates that prenatal IPV may have unique epigenome-wide consequences across lifespan.

      Comparison of the methylome switches in São Gonçalo children and women. Graphs show the methylome switch analyses of the top 1% differentially methylated CpGs affected by prenatal IPV in (A) saliva of São Gonçalo children, where the maternal generation was exposed to pregnancy IPV, and (B) in saliva of São Gonçalo women, where the grand-maternal generation was exposed to pregnancy IPV. Analyses were done using CpGs in common across all datasets (n = 235,960). General linear models were used with age, sex and prenatal exposure to trauma and community violence as covariates. ∗∗∗p < 0.001, ∗∗p < 0.01.

      Thirdly, to explore how a methylome switch may appear in subjects with confirmed psychiatric burden we acquired a freely available subset of the Grady dataset (Zannas et al., 2015). This dataset contains 367 individuals, primarily of African-American origin, with white blood cell DNA methylation profiles and information on whether the participants have undergone treatment for psychiatric disorders or not (for more information, see Supplementary Figure S7). We motivated a comparison between blood and saliva with a high density of white blood cells previously observed in saliva (Theda et al., 2018), something that was confirmed in our samples (Supplementary Figure S2). We hypothesized that if a methylome switch truly is a suggestive biomarker for stress exposure and psychiatric vulnerability, patients with a documented history of psychiatric disorders (nyes = 140, nno = 227) should show the opposite relationship compared to the São Gonçalo children. As hypothesized, psychiatric burden in the Grady cohort showed a similar methylome switch as the São Gonçalo women (Supplementary Figure S7), which was the inverted relationship compared to the São Gonçalo children (Figure 2G, 4B), and the refugee replication cohort (Figure 3C). For regenerating the complete Grady/São Gonçalo comparison, we provide an automated R script in Supplementary Text S1.

      Importantly, as indicated by the women/children comparison in Figure 4, the methylome switch observed across the different cohorts were induced at independent genomic sites, where each cohort generated highly unique top 1% subsets with very few overlaps across cohorts (Supplementary Figure S8). In fact, none of the differentially methylated CpGs following prenatal IPV in the São Gonçalo children (Table 1) where among the top 1% differentially methylated CpGs in the other cohorts. This confirms what others have indicated, that single CpGs are relatively poor biomarkers for stress and psychiatric burden (Palma-Gudiel et al., 2015; Argentieri et al., 2017).

      Discussion

      We provide both psychiatric and molecular evidence that prenatal stress in humans may have different consequences on mental health depending on the postnatal environment. Children living in the high violence communities of São Gonçalo seemed more resilient to the epigenome-wide and psychiatric consequences of prenatal IPV reported repeatedly by others (Lupien et al., 2009; Fine et al., 2014; Babenko et al., 2015). We found similar effects in an independent sample of children exposed to war violence. Furthermore, consistent with prenatal IPV exposed São Gonçalo children showing more resilience, these children presented the opposite relationships in their epigenetic profiles compared to United States patients with documented history of psychiatric disorders. Together these effects involved hundreds of subjects and thousands of methylation sites, where a clear impact was found in two well established stress response genes, FKBP5 and NR3C1.

      The FKBP5 and NR3C1 findings are consistent with a reprogramming of the HPA-axis, resulting in an enhanced negative feedback and a faster stress recovery in prenatal IPV exposed São Gonçalo children (Zannas and Binder, 2014). This interpretation should be made with caution, firstly since HPA axis feedback is primarily mediated at the levels of the pituitary, hypothalamus and hippocampus, and secondly since these candidate CpGs are poorly characterized in terms of mechanism. Support for this interpretation is, however, found in our study of peripheral cells populations. Specifically, São Gonçalo children whose mothers were exposed to IPV during pregnancy had more DNA methylation in retrotransposons and heterochromatin-like regions, profiles that previously have been associated with slower aging and lower risk of disease (Wood and Helfand, 2013; Gorbunova et al., 2014; Jones et al., 2015; Nätt and Thorsell, 2016). Chronic cortisol exposures in children (Nätt et al., 2015) and endogenous hypercortisolism (Glad et al., 2017), also associates with similar changes in DNA methylation, which links our findings more directly with stress physiology. It must be noticed, however, that while most studies have reported a relatively linear relationship between stress exposure and age acceleration, one recent finding shows that war-veterans with PTSD can show epigenetic age-deceleration (Verhoeven et al., 2018). Thus, under some circumstances, what appears to be resilience on a molecular level may be associated with a psychiatric disorder on the macro level, which may indicate a non-linear relationship.

      If interactions between the prenatal and postnatal environments are important for shaping mental resilience, this may explain the absence of stress-related mental illness in other prenatal stress studies targeting juvenile populations exposed to violence (Roth et al., 2014) or other types of postnatal stress (Sandman et al., 2012). It must, however, be emphasized that although we believe we have one of the first and largest epigenome-wide studies targeting cohorts with consistently high exposures to prenatal IPV, defined as a Hegarty IPV score >3 (Hegarty et al., 2005), each individual cohort represented only a limited amount of prenatal IPV exposed cases. As such, our study should be considered a pilot study for a much larger study involving thousands of subjects, differing on their exposures to prenatal and postnatal violence. Given the available evidence and without acknowledging possible molecular mechanism, we propose three models that should be further investigated in such future research.

      Programmed epigenetic resilience suggests that the effects of prenatal IPV always turn from being advantageous in childhood to becoming disadvantageous in adulthood. This would explain the inversed relationships seen between São Gonçalo women and São Gonçalo children living in the same environments, but will have a hard time explaining the differences with previous research (Lupien et al., 2009; Fine et al., 2014; Babenko et al., 2015).

      Temporal environmental resilience suggests that the São Gonçalo communities have changed dramatically during the last decades, thus the environmental factors that shape present day youth were not present when the adult women were in the same age.

      The third model we call, Dynamic environmental resilience. Here, the present-day São Gonçalo communities must be viewed as a composite of juvenile and adult subcultures, which clearly separates the generations and provide opposite environmental feedbacks to the epigenome. According to previous research (Fine et al., 2014; Babenko et al., 2015), prenatal stress associates with more emotionally impulsive behavior and less response to social cues (including suffering of others), which likely are advantageous traits in juvenile subcultures influenced by gang mentality. Our results indicate that prenatal stress may epigenetically affect emotional behavior (Table 1) and genes controlling social behavior, such as the oxytocin gene (Table 2). Social and emotional problems may, however, be disadvantageous in more societally accepted adult and juvenile subcultures (e.g., work environments), characterized by needs for adhering to social norms, following through with tasks and reacting emotionally to the plight of others. Thus, in this model prenatal stress originally induces the same early life phenotypes across populations (e.g., deficits in social and emotional behavior), which later may be shaped into problems by feedbacks from the postnatal environment (e.g., bullying and social exclusion). While we think this model holds promises for a novel syntheses in molecular psychology, it is in desperate need of further support.

      We did not observe any difference in exposures to maternal behavior between prenatal IPV exposed children and controls (Table 1). While our genetic structure analysis (EPISTRUCTURE) partly controls for genetic paternal effects, the effect of the father is a possible confound that also needs to be better addressed in future studies. That the paternal contribution would explain the suggestive effects on psychiatric resilience in the São Gonçalo children is, however, a controversial idea that conflicts with the consensus within child/adolescence psychiatry. This would imply that the fathers, which often are the perpetrators in IPV, may have (epi)genetic benefits in relation to fathers of controls.

      We are aware that our results may be viewed as evidence for the Predictive Adaptive Hypothesis (PAR) (Bateson et al., 2014), suggesting that the prenatal environment, experienced by the mother, prepares/adapts the fetus for postnatal life. While we acknowledge this possibility, we recommend caution here. Firstly, our data were collected in humans and therefore are correlational in nature. Secondly, we have no evidence that our observations are adaptive over a life cycle. Thirdly, due to the complexity of human social behavior, subcultures that promote behavioral phenotypes generated by suboptimal brain development (maladaptive traits) are likely to occur. As outlined by the Dynamic environmental resilience model, the violent juvenile subcultures that we studied here may represent such a niche.

      CpGs previously associated with stress and psychiatric disorders, including CpGs in NR3C1 and FKBP5, replicates poorly across studies (Palma-Gudiel et al., 2015; Argentieri et al., 2017) and have so far failed to translate into reliable clinical tests. Our result confirms this. We have here presented a novel marker that appears to associate with mental burden, namely the stress-induced methylome switch. Fully developed this marker may provide a more robust alternative to candidate CpGs. Like the epigenetic clock (Horvath, 2013), the methylome switch relies on broad epigenome signatures, making it less affected by populational structure and measurement artifacts, such as fluctuations in cell-type heterogeneity. Used properly this marker allow for epigenome studies in relation to more stochastic models of stress and aging, such as the allostatic load (McEwen and Stellar, 1993) and epigenetic drift (Jones et al., 2015) concepts. In such models, it is expected that broad genomic mechanisms, such as a loss of genome integrity, can disassociate the impact of stress at single CpGs (Nätt and Thorsell, 2016). While our methylome switch marker is robust for this kind of stochasticity, it instead suffers from a small effect size. A successful biomarker, however, should primarily rely on the power to detect a true difference. Whether it shows a 0.5% or 50% effect size does not matter given that precision is high. The precision of the methylome switch is high since it summarizes hundreds of measurements at individual CpGs. Future studies must therefore aim to evaluate and refine our suggestive biomarker, rather than dismiss it for being biologically irrelevant due to a low effect size.

      Conclusion

      We provide human evidence that children exposed to prenatal stress may experience resilience driven by epigenome-wide interactions. This plausibly translates animal findings and suggests that prenatal psychiatric risk factors may have different, and maybe even opposite, consequences in different world populations. Our findings therefore call for more research on personalizing psychiatric practices according to social and community backgrounds. By studying the gene–environment interactions in some of these world populations, we have also discovered a novel phenomenon that may be refined into a biomarker for mental burden, namely the stress-induced methylome switch. We hope that this discovery may lead to innovative molecular diagnostic tools in psychiatry, with profound impact on our understanding and treatment of mental disorders.

      Author Contributions

      TE, DN, FS, MS, and SA: conceptualization. FS, JS, and KR: investigation/sample collection. TE, DN, and SA: supervision. DN, FS, and KR: formal analysis. TE, DN, FS, and TH: methodology. JS and VV: validation. TE, DN, and FS: funding acquisition and writing – original draft preparation. TE, DN, SA, and VV: resources. All authors reviewed and/or edited the manuscript.

      Conflict of Interest Statement

      The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

      Funding. This work was supported by grants from the European Research Council (ERC) advanced grant (323977 to TE), CAPES/DAAD (to FS), Swedish Brain Foundation (to DN), and Swedish Society for Medical Research (to DN).

      We specially thank Prof. Markus Heilig and Assoc. Prof. Annika Thorsell (Linköping University, Sweden), Prof. Elizabeth Wieling (University of Minnesota, United States), Dr. Joviana Avanci (Claves ENSP/FIOCRUZ, Brazil), Dr. Susanne Schaal and Jeanine Narrog (University of Konstanz, Germany) for support and comments. We are grateful to the participating families, NGO Mulheres em Movimento, the Estratégia de Saúde da Família, and the supportive health agents in São Gonçalo.

      Supplementary Material

      The Supplementary Material for this article can be found online at: /articles/10.3389/fgene.2019.00269/full#supplementary-material

      Datasheet 1.pdf contains Supplementary Figures and Supplementary Tables.

      Datasheet 2.zip contains the script and data for reproducing some of the analysis of this paper, this includes: Supplementary Text S1 which contains the R script that will reproduce our analysis using Supplementary Data S1–S4; Supplementary Text S2 explains the column names in Supplementary Data S1; Supplementary Data S1 is the result table with beta-values for the top 1 % most differentially methylated CpGs between IPV+ and IPV- São Gonçalo children and women; Supplementary Data S2 contains the factors and co-variates for São Gonçalo children and women; Supplementary Data S3 contains the factors and co-variates for the Grady data downloaded from Gene Expression Omnibus; Supplementary Data S4 contains a list of excluded CpGs/probes as described in the Materials and Methods. For possible updates to the R script in Supplementary Text S1 check https://github.com/Danis102 or contact the corresponding author.

      References Argentieri M. A. Nagarajan S. Seddighzadeh B. Baccarelli A. A. Shields A. E. (2017). Epigenetic pathways in human disease: the impact of DNA methylation on stress-related pathogenesis and current challenges in biomarker development. EBioMedicine 18(Suppl. C), 327350. 10.1016/j.ebiom.2017.03.044 28434943 Aryee M. J. Jaffe A. E. Corrada-Bravo H. Ladd-Acosta C. Feinberg A. P. Hansen K. D. (2014). Minfi: a flexible and comprehensive Bioconductor package for the analysis of Infinium DNA methylation microarrays. Bioinformatics 30 13631369. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btu049 24478339 Assis S. G. D. Avanci J. Q. Pesce R. P. Ximenes L. F. (2009). The situation of Brazilian children and adolescents with regard to mental health and violence. Ciência Saúde Coletiva 14 349361. 10.1590/S1413-81232009000200002 19197408 Augier E. Barbier E. Dulman R. S. Licheri V. Augier G. Domi E. (2018). A molecular mechanism for choosing alcohol over an alternative reward. Science 360 13211326. 10.1126/science.aao1157 29930131 Ayyappan A. Kazuhiko N. Kazuo Y. Yoshimi I. Tomoko T. Nori T. (2009). Association studies and gene expression analyses of the DISC1-interacting molecules, pericentrin 2 (PCNT2) and DISC1-binding zinc finger protein (DBZ), with schizophrenia and with bipolar disorder. Am. J. Med. Genet. B 150B, 967976. 10.1002/ajmg.b.30926 19191256 Babenko O. Kovalchuk I. Metz G. A. S. (2015). Stress-induced perinatal and transgenerational epigenetic programming of brain development and mental health. Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev. 48 7091. 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2014.11.013 25464029 Bao W. Kojima K. K. Kohany O. (2015). Repbase Update, a database of repetitive elements in eukaryotic genomes. Mobile DNA 6:11. 10.1186/s13100-015-0041-9 26045719 Bateson P. Gluckman P. Hanson M. (2014). The biology of developmental plasticity and the Predictive Adaptive Response hypothesis. J. Physiol. 592(Pt 11), 23572368. 10.1113/jphysiol.2014.271460 24882817 Berghänel A. Heistermann M. Schülke O. Ostner J. (2016). Prenatal stress effects in a wild, long-lived primate: predictive adaptive responses in an unpredictable environment. Proc. R. Soc. B Biol. Sci. 283 10.1098/rspb.2016.1304 27655764 Binder E. B. Bradley R. G. Liu W. Epstein M. P. Deveau T. C. Mercer K. B. (2008). Association of FKBP5 polymorphisms and childhood abuse with risk of posttraumatic stress disorder symptoms in adults. JAMA 299 12911305. 10.1001/jama.299.11.1291 18349090 Carlson M. Aboyoun P. Pages H. (2014). An Introduction to Genomic Ranges Classes. Available at: https://bioconductor.statistik.tu-dortmund.de/packages/3.2/bioc/vignettes/GenomicRanges/inst/doc/GenomicRangesIntroduction.pdf Chaste P. Klei L. Sanders S. J. Hus V. Murtha M. T. Lowe J. K. (2015). A genome-wide association study of autism using the simons simplex collection: Does reducing phenotypic heterogeneity in autism increase genetic homogeneity? Biol. Psychiatry 77 775784. 10.1016/j.biopsych.2014.09.017 25534755 Chen Y.-A. Lemire M. Choufani S. Butcher D. Grafodatskaya D. Zanke B. (2013). Discovery of cross-reactive probes and polymorphic CpGs in the Illumina Infinium HumanMethylation450 microarray. Epigenetics 8 203209. 10.4161/epi.23470 23314698 Chertkow-Deutsher Y. Cohen H. Klein E. Ben-Shachar D. (2010). DNA methylation in vulnerability to post-traumatic stress in rats: evidence for the role of the post-synaptic density protein Dlgap2. Int. J. Neuropsychopharmacol. 13 347359. 10.1017/S146114570999071X 19793403 Dempster E. L. Pidsley R. Schalkwyk L. C. Owens S. Georgiades A. Kane F. (2011). Disease-associated epigenetic changes in monozygotic twins discordant for schizophrenia and bipolar disorder. Hum. Mol. Genet. 20 47864796. 10.1093/hmg/ddr416 21908516 Dempster E. L. Wong C. C. Y. Lester K. J. Burrage J. Gregory A. M. Mill J. (2014). Genome-wide methylomic analysis of monozygotic twins discordant for adolescent depression. Biol. Psychiatry 76 977983. 10.1016/j.biopsych.2014.04.013 24929637 Devries K. M. Mak J. Y. T. García-Moreno C. Petzold M. Child J. C. Falder G. (2013). The global prevalence of intimate partner violence against women. Science 340 15271528. 10.1126/science.1240937 23788730 Du P. Zhang X. Huang C.-C. Jafari N. Kibbe W. A. Hou L. (2010). Comparison of Beta-value and M-value methods for quantifying methylation levels by microarray analysis. BMC Bioinformatics 11:587. 10.1186/1471-2105-11-587 21118553 Egger G. Roetzer K. M. Noor A. Lionel A. C. Mahmood H. Schwarzbraun T. (2014). Identification of risk genes for autism spectrum disorder through copy number variation analysis in Austrian families. Neurogenetics 15 117127. 10.1007/s10048-014-0394-0 24643514 Elbert T. Schauer M. (2002). Psychological rauma: burnt into memory. Nature 419:883. 10.1038/419883a 12410289 Elia J. Glessner J. T. Wang K. Takahashi N. Shtir C. J. Hadley D. (2011). Genome-wide copy number variation study associates metabotropic glutamate receptor gene networks with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder. Nat. Genet. 44 7884. 10.1038/ng.1013 22138692 Ellsworth K. A. Moon I. Eckloff B. W. Fridley B. L. Jenkins G. D. Batzler A. (2013). FKBP5 genetic variation: association with selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor treatment outcomes in major depressive disorder. Pharmacogenet. Genomics 23 156166. 10.1097/FPC.0b013e32835dc133 23324805 Ernst J. Kellis M. (2012). ChromHMM: automating chromatin-state discovery and characterization. Nat. Methods 9 215216. 10.1038/nmeth.1906 22373907 Fatemi S. H. Folsom T. D. Thuras P. D. (2011). Deficits in GABA(B) receptor system in schizophrenia and mood disorders: a postmortem study. Schizophr. Res. 128 3743. 10.1016/j.schres.2010.12.025 21303731 Felder B. Radlwimmer B. Benner A. Mincheva A. Tödt G. Beyer K. S. (2009). FARP2, HDLBP and PASK are downregulated in a patient with autism and 2q37. 3 deletion syndrome. Am. J. Med.Genet. A 149 952959. 10.1002/ajmg.a.32779 19365831 Feldman R. Monakhov M. Pratt M. Ebstein R. P. (2016). Oxytocin pathway genes: evolutionary ancient system impacting on human affiliation. Soc. Psychopathol. Biol. Psychiatry 79 174184. 10.1016/j.biopsych.2015.08.008 26392129 Ferguson J. N. Young L. J. Hearn E. F. Matzuk M. M. Insel T. R. Winslow J. T. (2000). Social amnesia in mice lacking the oxytocin gene. Nat. Genet. 25:284. 10.1038/77040 10888874 Fine R. Zhang J. Stevens H. E. (2014). Prenatal stress and inhibitory neuron systems: implications for neuropsychiatric disorders. Mol. Psychiatry 19 641651. 10.1038/mp.2014.35 24751963 Foa E. B. (1995). Posttraumatic Stress Diagnostic Scale Manual. Minneapolis, MN: National Computer Systems. Fowler P. J. Tompsett C. J. Braciszewski J. M. Jacques-Tiura A. J. Baltes B. B. (2009). Community violence: a meta-analysis on the effect of exposure and mental health outcomes of children and adolescents. Dev. Psychopathol. 21 227259. 10.1017/S0954579409000145 19144232 Giesing E. R. Suski C. D. Warner R. E. Bell A. M. (2010). Female sticklebacks transfer information via eggs: effects of maternal experience with predators on offspring. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci. 278 17531759. 10.1098/rspb.2010.1819 21068041 Glad C. A. M. Andersson-Assarsson J. C. Berglund P. Bergthorsdottir R. Ragnarsson O. Johannsson G. (2017). Reduced DNA methylation and psychopathology following endogenous hypercortisolism – a genome-wide study. Sci. Rep. 7:44445. 10.1038/srep44445 28300138 Goodman R. Meltzer H. Bailey V. (1998). The strengths and difficulties questionnaire: a pilot study on the validity of the self-report version. Eur. Child Adolesc. Psychiatry 7 125130. 10.1007/s007870050057 Gorbunova V. Boeke J. D. Helfand S. L. Sedivy J. M. (2014). Sleeping dogs of the genome: retrotransposable elements may be agents of somatic diversity, disease and aging. Science 346 11871188. 10.1126/science.aaa3177 25477445 Hegarty K. Bush R. Sheehan M. (2005). The composite abuse scale: further development and assessment of reliability and validity of a multidimensional partner abuse measure in clinical settings. Violence Vict. 20 529547. 10.1891/0886-6708.2005.20.5.529 16248489 Hegarty K. Sheehan M. Schonfeld C. (1999). A multidimensional definition of partner abuse: development and preliminary validation of the composite abuse scale. J. Fam. Violence 14 399415. 10.1023/A:1022834215681 Horvath S. (2013). DNA methylation age of human tissues and cell types. Genome Biol. 14:3156. 10.1186/gb-2013-14-10-r115 24138928 Houseman E. A. Accomando W. P. Koestler D. C. Christensen B. C. Marsit C. J. Nelson H. H. (2012). DNA methylation arrays as surrogate measures of cell mixture distribution. BMC Bioinformatics 13:86. 10.1186/1471-2105-13-86 22568884 Hunter R. G. Gagnidze K. McEwen B. S. Pfaff D. W. (2015). Stress and the dynamic genome: steroids, epigenetics, and the transposome. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 112 68286833. 10.1073/pnas.1411260111 25385609 Jarick I. Volckmar A. L. Pütter C. Pechlivanis S. Nguyen T. T. Dauvermann M. R. (2012). Genome-wide analysis of rare copy number variations reveals PARK2 as a candidate gene for attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder. Mol. Psychiatry 19:115. 10.1038/mp.2012.161 23164820 Jones M. J. Goodman S. J. Kobor M. S. (2015). DNA methylation and healthy human aging. Aging Cell 14 924932. 10.1111/acel.12349 25913071 Klengel T. Mehta D. Anacker C. Rex-Haffner M. Pruessner J. C. Pariante C. M. (2013). Allele-specific FKBP5 DNA demethylation mediates gene-childhood trauma interactions. Nat. Neurosci. 16 3341. 10.1038/nn.3275 23201972 Lupien S. J. McEwen B. S. Gunnar M. R. Heim C. (2009). Effects of stress throughout the lifespan on the brain, behaviour and cognition. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 10 434445. 10.1038/nrn2639 19401723 Marshall C. R. Noor A. Vincent J. B. Lionel A. C. Feuk L. Skaug J. (2008). Structural variation of chromosomes in autism spectrum disorder. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 82 477488. 10.1016/j.ajhg.2007.12.009 18252227 McEwen B. S. Stellar E. (1993). Stress and the individual: mechanisms leading to disease. Arch. Intern. Med. 153 20932101. 10.1001/archinte.1993.00410180039004 McGowan P. Sasaki A. D’Alessio A. C. Dymov S. Labonte B. Szyf M. (2009). Epigenetic regulation of the glucocorticoid receptor in human brain associates with childhood abuse. Nat. Neurosci. 12 342348. 10.1038/nn.2270 19234457 Monk C. Spicer J. Champagne F. A. (2012). Linking prenatal maternal adversity to developmental outcomes in infants: the role of epigenetic pathways. Dev. Psychopathol. 24 13611376. 10.1017/S0954579412000764 23062303 Nätt D. Johansson I. Faresjö T. Ludvigsson J. Thorsell A. (2015). High cortisol in 5-year-old children causes loss of DNA methylation in SINE retrotransposons: a possible role for ZNF263 in stress-related diseases. Clin. Epigenet. 7 113. 10.1186/s13148-015-0123-z 26339299 Nätt D. Thorsell A. (2016). Stress-induced transposon reactivation: a mediator or an estimator of allostatic load? Environ. Epigenet. 2:dvw015. 10.1093/eep/dvw015 29492295 Nettle D. Frankenhuis W. E. Rickard I. J. (2013). The evolution of predictive adaptive responses in human life history. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci. 280:20131343. 10.1098/rspb.2013.1343 23843395 Neuner F. Schauer M. Karunakara U. Klaschik C. Robert C. Elbert T. (2004). Psychological trauma and evidence for enhanced vulnerability for posttraumatic stress disorder through previous trauma among West Nile refugees. BMC Psychiatry 4:34. 10.1186/1471-244x-4-34 15504233 Oberlander T. F. Weinberg J. Papsdorf M. Grunau R. Misri S. Devlin A. M. (2008). Prenatal exposure to maternal depression, neonatal methylation of human glucocorticoid receptor gene (NR3C1) and infant cortisol stress responses. Epigenetics 3 97106. 10.4161/epi.3.2.6034 18536531 O’Connor T. G. Ben-Shlomo Y. Heron J. Golding J. Adams D. Glover V. (2005). Prenatal anxiety predicts individual differences in cortisol in pre-adolescent children. Biol. Psychiatry 58 211217. 10.1016/j.biopsych.2005.03.032 16084841 O’Donnell K. J. Michael J. Meaney. (2017). Fetal origins of mental health: the developmental origins of health and disease hypothesis. Am. J. Psychiatry 174 319328. 10.1176/appi.ajp.2016.16020138 27838934 Onyut L. P. Neuner F. Ertl V. Schauer E. Odenwald M. Elbert T. (2009). Trauma, poverty and mental health among Somali and Rwandese refugees living in an African refugee settlement – an epidemiological study. Confl. Health 3:6. 10.1186/1752-1505-3-6 19470171 Palma-Gudiel H. Córdova-Palomera A. Leza J. C. Fañanás L. (2015). Glucocorticoid receptor gene (NR3C1) methylation processes as mediators of early adversity in stress-related disorders causality: a critical review. Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev. 55 520535. 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2015.05.016 26073068 Pan Y. Luo X. Liu X. Wu L.-Y. Zhang Q. Wang L. (2013). Genome-wide association studies of maximum number of drinks. J. Psychiatr. Res. 47 17171724. 10.1016/j.jpsychires.2013.07.013 23953852 Parker G. Tupling H. Brown L. (1979). A parental bonding instrument. Br. J. Med. Psychol. 52 110. 10.1111/j.2044-8341.1979.tb02487.x Radtke K. M. Ruf M. Gunter H. M. Dohrmann K. Schauer M. Meyer A. (2011). Transgenerational impact of intimate partner violence on methylation in the promoter of the glucocorticoid receptor. Transl. Psychiatry 1:e21. 10.1038/tp.2011.21 22832523 Rahmani E. Shenhav L. Schweiger R. Yousefi P. Huen K. Eskenazi B. (2017a). Genome-wide methylation data mirror ancestry information. Epigenet. Chromatin 10:1. 10.1186/s13072-016-0108-y 28149326 Rahmani E. Yedidim R. Shenhav L. Schweiger R. Weissbrod O. Zaitlen N. (2017b). GLINT: a user-friendly toolset for the analysis of high-throughput DNA-methylation array data. Bioinformatics 1:3. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btx059 28177067 Richardson L. P. McCauley E. Grossman D. C. McCarty C. A. Richards J. Russo J. E. (2010). Evaluation of the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 Item for detecting major depression among adolescents. Pediatrics 126 11171123. 10.1542/peds.2010-0852 21041282 Richters J. E. Martinez P. (1990). Things I Have Seen and Heard: A Structured Interview for Assessing Young Children’s Violence Exposure. Rockville, MD: National Institute of Mental Health. Ritchie M. E. Phipson B. Wu D. Hu Y. Law C. W. Shi W. (2015). limma powers differential expression analyses for RNA-sequencing and microarray studies. Nucleic Acids Res. 43:e47. 10.1093/nar/gkv007 25605792 Roth M. Neuner F. Elbert T. (2014). Transgenerational consequences of PTSD: risk factors for the mental health of children whose mothers have been exposed to the Rwandan genocide. Int. J. Ment. Health Syst. 8:12. 10.1186/1752-4458-8-12 24690436 Russo S. J. Murrough J. W. Han M.-H. Charney D. S. Nestler E. J. (2012). Neurobiology of resilience. Nat. Neurosci. 15:1475. 10.1038/nn.3234 23064380 Rutter M. (1999). Resilience concepts and findings: implications for family therapy. J. Fam. Ther. 21 119144. 10.1111/1467-6427.00108 Rutter M. Moffitt T. E. Caspi A. (2006). Gene–environment interplay and psychopathology: multiple varieties but real effects. J. Child Psychol. Psychiatry 47 226261. 10.1111/j.1469-7610.2005.01557.x 16492258 Sandman C. A. Davis E. P. Glynn L. M. (2012). Prescient human fetuses thrive. Psychol. Sci. 23 93100. 10.1177/0956797611422073 22173740 Serpeloni F. Radtke K. de Assis S. G. Henning F. Natt D. Elbert T. (2017). Grandmaternal stress during pregnancy and DNA methylation of the third generation: an epigenome-wide association study. Transl. Psychiatry 7:e1202. 10.1038/tp.2017.153 28809857 Serpeloni F. Radtke K. M. Hecker T. Elbert T. (2016). “Epigenetic biomarkers of prenatal maternal stress,” in Epigenetics and Neuroendocrinology : Clinical Focus on Psychiatry Vol. 2 eds Spengler D. Binder E. (Cham: Springer International Publishing), 177196. 10.1007/978-3-319-29901-3_8 Sheriff M. J. Krebs C. J. Boonstra R. (2009). The sensitive hare: sublethal effects of predator stress on reproduction in snowshoe hares. J. Anim. Ecol. 78 12491258. 10.1111/j.1365-2656.2009.01552.x 19426257 Spijker A. T. van Rossum E. F. C. (2012). Glucocorticoid sensitivity in mood disorders. Neuroendocrinology 95 179186. 10.1159/000329846 22076031 Spitzer R. L. Kroenke K. Williams J. W. Löwe B. (2006). A brief measure for assessing generalized anxiety disorder: the gad-7. Arch. Internal Med. 166 10921097. 10.1001/archinte.166.10.1092 16717171 St-Cyr S. McGowan P. O. (2015). Programming of stress-related behavior and epigenetic neural gene regulation in mice offspring through maternal exposure to predator odor. Front. Behav. Neurosci. 9:145. 10.3389/fnbeh.2015.00145 26082698 Steinberg A. M. Brymer M. J. Decker K. B. Pynoos R. S. (2004). The University of California at Los Angeles post-traumatic stress disorder reaction index. Curr. Psychiatry Rep. 6 96100. 10.1007/s11920-004-0048-2 Theda C. Hwang S. H. Czajko A. Loke Y. J. Leong P. Craig J. M. (2018). Quantitation of the cellular content of saliva and buccal swab samples. Sci. Rep. 8:6944. 10.1038/s41598-018-25311-0 29720614 Uddin M. Unda B. K. Kwan V. Holzapfel N. T. White S. H. Chalil L. (2018). OTUD7A regulates neurodevelopmental phenotypes in the 15q13.3 microdeletion syndrome. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 102 278295. 10.1016/j.ajhg.2018.01.006 29395074 Vangeel E. B. Pishva E. Hompes T. van den Hove D. Lambrechts D. Allegaert K. (2017). Newborn genome-wide DNA methylation in association with pregnancy anxiety reveals a potential role for GABBR1. Clin. Epigenet. 9:107. 10.1186/s13148-017-0408-5 29026448 Verhoeven J. E. Yang R. Wolkowitz O. M. Bersani F. S. Lindqvist D. Mellon S. H. (2018). Epigenetic age in male combat-exposed war veterans: associations with posttraumatic stress disorder status. Mol. Neuropsychiatry 4 9099. 10.1159/000491431 30397597 Wood J. G. Helfand S. L. (2013). Chromatin structure and transposable elements in organismal aging. Front. Genet. 4:274. 10.3389/fgene.2013.00274 24363663 Yamazaki F. Møller M. Fu C. Clokie S. J. Zykovich A. Coon S. L. (2015). The Lhx9 homeobox gene controls pineal gland development and prevents postnatal hydrocephalus. Brain Struct. Funct. 220 14971509. 10.1007/s00429-014-0740-x 24647753 Zannas A. Binder E. (2014). Gene–environment interactions at the FKBP5 locus: sensitive periods, mechanisms and pleiotropism. Genes Brain Behav. 13 2537. 10.1111/gbb.12104 24219237 Zannas A. S. Arloth J. Carrillo-Roa T. Iurato S. Röh S. Ressler K. J. (2015). Lifetime stress accelerates epigenetic aging in an urban, African American cohort: relevance of glucocorticoid signaling. Genome Biol. 16:266. 10.1186/s13059-015-0828-5 26673150

      https://egg2.wustl.edu/roadmap/web_portal/chr_state_learning.html

      http://www.mqtldb.org/

      http://www.repeatmasker.org

      ‘Oh, my dear Thomas, you haven’t heard the terrible news then?’ she said. ‘I thought you would be sure to have seen it placarded somewhere. Alice went straight to her room, and I haven’t seen her since, though I repeatedly knocked at the door, which she has locked on the inside, and I’m sure it’s most unnatural of her not to let her own mother comfort her. It all happened in a moment: I have always said those great motor-cars shouldn’t be allowed to career about the streets, especially when they are all paved with cobbles as they are at Easton Haven, which are{331} so slippery when it’s wet. He slipped, and it went over him in a moment.’ My thanks were few and awkward, for there still hung to the missive a basting thread, and it was as warm as a nestling bird. I bent low--everybody was emotional in those days--kissed the fragrant thing, thrust it into my bosom, and blushed worse than Camille. "What, the Corner House victim? Is that really a fact?" "My dear child, I don't look upon it in that light at all. The child gave our picturesque friend a certain distinction--'My husband is dead, and this is my only child,' and all that sort of thing. It pays in society." leave them on the steps of a foundling asylum in order to insure [See larger version] Interoffice guff says you're planning definite moves on your own, J. O., and against some opposition. Is the Colonel so poor or so grasping—or what? Albert could not speak, for he felt as if his brains and teeth were rattling about inside his head. The rest of[Pg 188] the family hunched together by the door, the boys gaping idiotically, the girls in tears. "Now you're married." The host was called in, and unlocked a drawer in which they were deposited. The galleyman, with visible reluctance, arrayed himself in the garments, and he was observed to shudder more than once during the investiture of the dead man's apparel. HoME香京julia种子在线播放 ENTER NUMBET 0016www.guituapp.com.cn
      www.hutnlg.com.cn
      edjruu.com.cn
      lxdsfzc.com.cn
      www.gqlbj.net.cn
      www.egggang.com.cn
      qdever.org.cn
      ntyhhg.com.cn
      www.vningnan.com.cn
      www.vivebest.com.cn
      处女被大鸡巴操 强奸乱伦小说图片 俄罗斯美女爱爱图 调教强奸学生 亚洲女的穴 夜来香图片大全 美女性强奸电影 手机版色中阁 男性人体艺术素描图 16p成人 欧美性爱360 电影区 亚洲电影 欧美电影 经典三级 偷拍自拍 动漫电影 乱伦电影 变态另类 全部电 类似狠狠鲁的网站 黑吊操白逼图片 韩国黄片种子下载 操逼逼逼逼逼 人妻 小说 p 偷拍10幼女自慰 极品淫水很多 黄色做i爱 日本女人人体电影快播看 大福国小 我爱肏屄美女 mmcrwcom 欧美多人性交图片 肥臀乱伦老头舔阴帝 d09a4343000019c5 西欧人体艺术b xxoo激情短片 未成年人的 插泰国人夭图片 第770弾み1 24p 日本美女性 交动态 eee色播 yantasythunder 操无毛少女屄 亚洲图片你懂的女人 鸡巴插姨娘 特级黄 色大片播 左耳影音先锋 冢本友希全集 日本人体艺术绿色 我爱被舔逼 内射 幼 美阴图 喷水妹子高潮迭起 和后妈 操逼 美女吞鸡巴 鸭个自慰 中国女裸名单 操逼肥臀出水换妻 色站裸体义术 中国行上的漏毛美女叫什么 亚洲妹性交图 欧美美女人裸体人艺照 成人色妹妹直播 WWW_JXCT_COM r日本女人性淫乱 大胆人艺体艺图片 女同接吻av 碰碰哥免费自拍打炮 艳舞写真duppid1 88电影街拍视频 日本自拍做爱qvod 实拍美女性爱组图 少女高清av 浙江真实乱伦迅雷 台湾luanlunxiaoshuo 洛克王国宠物排行榜 皇瑟电影yy频道大全 红孩儿连连看 阴毛摄影 大胆美女写真人体艺术摄影 和风骚三个媳妇在家做爱 性爱办公室高清 18p2p木耳 大波撸影音 大鸡巴插嫩穴小说 一剧不超两个黑人 阿姨诱惑我快播 幼香阁千叶县小学生 少女妇女被狗强奸 曰人体妹妹 十二岁性感幼女 超级乱伦qvod 97爱蜜桃ccc336 日本淫妇阴液 av海量资源999 凤凰影视成仁 辰溪四中艳照门照片 先锋模特裸体展示影片 成人片免费看 自拍百度云 肥白老妇女 女爱人体图片 妈妈一女穴 星野美夏 日本少女dachidu 妹子私处人体图片 yinmindahuitang 舔无毛逼影片快播 田莹疑的裸体照片 三级电影影音先锋02222 妻子被外国老头操 观月雏乃泥鳅 韩国成人偷拍自拍图片 强奸5一9岁幼女小说 汤姆影院av图片 妹妹人艺体图 美女大驱 和女友做爱图片自拍p 绫川まどか在线先锋 那么嫩的逼很少见了 小女孩做爱 处女好逼连连看图图 性感美女在家做爱 近距离抽插骚逼逼 黑屌肏金毛屄 日韩av美少女 看喝尿尿小姐日逼色色色网图片 欧美肛交新视频 美女吃逼逼 av30线上免费 伊人在线三级经典 新视觉影院t6090影院 最新淫色电影网址 天龙影院远古手机版 搞老太影院 插进美女的大屁股里 私人影院加盟费用 www258dd 求一部电影里面有一个二猛哥 深肛交 日本萌妹子人体艺术写真图片 插入屄眼 美女的木奶 中文字幕黄色网址影视先锋 九号女神裸 和骚人妻偷情 和潘晓婷做爱 国模大尺度蜜桃 欧美大逼50p 西西人体成人 李宗瑞继母做爱原图物处理 nianhuawang 男鸡巴的视屏 � 97免费色伦电影 好色网成人 大姨子先锋 淫荡巨乳美女教师妈妈 性nuexiaoshuo WWW36YYYCOM 长春继续给力进屋就操小女儿套干破内射对白淫荡 农夫激情社区 日韩无码bt 欧美美女手掰嫩穴图片 日本援交偷拍自拍 入侵者日本在线播放 亚洲白虎偷拍自拍 常州高见泽日屄 寂寞少妇自卫视频 人体露逼图片 多毛外国老太 变态乱轮手机在线 淫荡妈妈和儿子操逼 伦理片大奶少女 看片神器最新登入地址sqvheqi345com账号群 麻美学姐无头 圣诞老人射小妞和强奸小妞动话片 亚洲AV女老师 先锋影音欧美成人资源 33344iucoom zV天堂电影网 宾馆美女打炮视频 色五月丁香五月magnet 嫂子淫乱小说 张歆艺的老公 吃奶男人视频在线播放 欧美色图男女乱伦 avtt2014ccvom 性插色欲香影院 青青草撸死你青青草 99热久久第一时间 激情套图卡通动漫 幼女裸聊做爱口交 日本女人被强奸乱伦 草榴社区快播 2kkk正在播放兽骑 啊不要人家小穴都湿了 www猎奇影视 A片www245vvcomwwwchnrwhmhzcn 搜索宜春院av wwwsee78co 逼奶鸡巴插 好吊日AV在线视频19gancom 熟女伦乱图片小说 日本免费av无码片在线开苞 鲁大妈撸到爆 裸聊官网 德国熟女xxx 新不夜城论坛首页手机 女虐男网址 男女做爱视频华为网盘 激情午夜天亚洲色图 内裤哥mangent 吉沢明歩制服丝袜WWWHHH710COM 屌逼在线试看 人体艺体阿娇艳照 推荐一个可以免费看片的网站如果被QQ拦截请复制链接在其它浏览器打开xxxyyy5comintr2a2cb551573a2b2e 欧美360精品粉红鲍鱼 教师调教第一页 聚美屋精品图 中韩淫乱群交 俄罗斯撸撸片 把鸡巴插进小姨子的阴道 干干AV成人网 aolasoohpnbcn www84ytom 高清大量潮喷www27dyycom 宝贝开心成人 freefronvideos人母 嫩穴成人网gggg29com 逼着舅妈给我口交肛交彩漫画 欧美色色aV88wwwgangguanscom 老太太操逼自拍视频 777亚洲手机在线播放 有没有夫妻3p小说 色列漫画淫女 午间色站导航 欧美成人处女色大图 童颜巨乳亚洲综合 桃色性欲草 色眯眯射逼 无码中文字幕塞外青楼这是一个 狂日美女老师人妻 爱碰网官网 亚洲图片雅蠛蝶 快播35怎么搜片 2000XXXX电影 新谷露性家庭影院 深深候dvd播放 幼齿用英语怎么说 不雅伦理无需播放器 国外淫荡图片 国外网站幼幼嫩网址 成年人就去色色视频快播 我鲁日日鲁老老老我爱 caoshaonvbi 人体艺术avav 性感性色导航 韩国黄色哥来嫖网站 成人网站美逼 淫荡熟妇自拍 欧美色惰图片 北京空姐透明照 狼堡免费av视频 www776eom 亚洲无码av欧美天堂网男人天堂 欧美激情爆操 a片kk266co 色尼姑成人极速在线视频 国语家庭系列 蒋雯雯 越南伦理 色CC伦理影院手机版 99jbbcom 大鸡巴舅妈 国产偷拍自拍淫荡对话视频 少妇春梦射精 开心激动网 自拍偷牌成人 色桃隐 撸狗网性交视频 淫荡的三位老师 伦理电影wwwqiuxia6commqiuxia6com 怡春院分站 丝袜超短裙露脸迅雷下载 色制服电影院 97超碰好吊色男人 yy6080理论在线宅男日韩福利大全 大嫂丝袜 500人群交手机在线 5sav 偷拍熟女吧 口述我和妹妹的欲望 50p电脑版 wwwavtttcon 3p3com 伦理无码片在线看 欧美成人电影图片岛国性爱伦理电影 先锋影音AV成人欧美 我爱好色 淫电影网 WWW19MMCOM 玛丽罗斯3d同人动画h在线看 动漫女孩裸体 超级丝袜美腿乱伦 1919gogo欣赏 大色逼淫色 www就是撸 激情文学网好骚 A级黄片免费 xedd5com 国内的b是黑的 快播美国成年人片黄 av高跟丝袜视频 上原保奈美巨乳女教师在线观看 校园春色都市激情fefegancom 偷窥自拍XXOO 搜索看马操美女 人本女优视频 日日吧淫淫 人妻巨乳影院 美国女子性爱学校 大肥屁股重口味 啪啪啪啊啊啊不要 操碰 japanfreevideoshome国产 亚州淫荡老熟女人体 伦奸毛片免费在线看 天天影视se 樱桃做爱视频 亚卅av在线视频 x奸小说下载 亚洲色图图片在线 217av天堂网 东方在线撸撸-百度 幼幼丝袜集 灰姑娘的姐姐 青青草在线视频观看对华 86papa路con 亚洲1AV 综合图片2区亚洲 美国美女大逼电影 010插插av成人网站 www色comwww821kxwcom 播乐子成人网免费视频在线观看 大炮撸在线影院 ,www4KkKcom 野花鲁最近30部 wwwCC213wapwww2233ww2download 三客优最新地址 母亲让儿子爽的无码视频 全国黄色片子 欧美色图美国十次 超碰在线直播 性感妖娆操 亚洲肉感熟女色图 a片A毛片管看视频 8vaa褋芯屑 333kk 川岛和津实视频 在线母子乱伦对白 妹妹肥逼五月 亚洲美女自拍 老婆在我面前小说 韩国空姐堪比情趣内衣 干小姐综合 淫妻色五月 添骚穴 WM62COM 23456影视播放器 成人午夜剧场 尼姑福利网 AV区亚洲AV欧美AV512qucomwwwc5508com 经典欧美骚妇 震动棒露出 日韩丝袜美臀巨乳在线 av无限吧看 就去干少妇 色艺无间正面是哪集 校园春色我和老师做爱 漫画夜色 天海丽白色吊带 黄色淫荡性虐小说 午夜高清播放器 文20岁女性荫道口图片 热国产热无码热有码 2015小明发布看看算你色 百度云播影视 美女肏屄屄乱轮小说 家族舔阴AV影片 邪恶在线av有码 父女之交 关于处女破处的三级片 极品护士91在线 欧美虐待女人视频的网站 享受老太太的丝袜 aaazhibuo 8dfvodcom成人 真实自拍足交 群交男女猛插逼 妓女爱爱动态 lin35com是什么网站 abp159 亚洲色图偷拍自拍乱伦熟女抠逼自慰 朝国三级篇 淫三国幻想 免费的av小电影网站 日本阿v视频免费按摩师 av750c0m 黄色片操一下 巨乳少女车震在线观看 操逼 免费 囗述情感一乱伦岳母和女婿 WWW_FAMITSU_COM 偷拍中国少妇在公车被操视频 花也真衣论理电影 大鸡鸡插p洞 新片欧美十八岁美少 进击的巨人神thunderftp 西方美女15p 深圳哪里易找到老女人玩视频 在线成人有声小说 365rrr 女尿图片 我和淫荡的小姨做爱 � 做爱技术体照 淫妇性爱 大学生私拍b 第四射狠狠射小说 色中色成人av社区 和小姨子乱伦肛交 wwwppp62com 俄罗斯巨乳人体艺术 骚逼阿娇 汤芳人体图片大胆 大胆人体艺术bb私处 性感大胸骚货 哪个网站幼女的片多 日本美女本子把 色 五月天 婷婷 快播 美女 美穴艺术 色百合电影导航 大鸡巴用力 孙悟空操美少女战士 狠狠撸美女手掰穴图片 古代女子与兽类交 沙耶香套图 激情成人网区 暴风影音av播放 动漫女孩怎么插第3个 mmmpp44 黑木麻衣无码ed2k 淫荡学姐少妇 乱伦操少女屄 高中性爱故事 骚妹妹爱爱图网 韩国模特剪长发 大鸡巴把我逼日了 中国张柏芝做爱片中国张柏芝做爱片中国张柏芝做爱片中国张柏芝做爱片中国张柏芝做爱片 大胆女人下体艺术图片 789sss 影音先锋在线国内情侣野外性事自拍普通话对白 群撸图库 闪现君打阿乐 ady 小说 插入表妹嫩穴小说 推荐成人资源 网络播放器 成人台 149大胆人体艺术 大屌图片 骚美女成人av 春暖花开春色性吧 女亭婷五月 我上了同桌的姐姐 恋夜秀场主播自慰视频 yzppp 屄茎 操屄女图 美女鲍鱼大特写 淫乱的日本人妻山口玲子 偷拍射精图 性感美女人体艺木图片 种马小说完本 免费电影院 骑士福利导航导航网站 骚老婆足交 国产性爱一级电影 欧美免费成人花花性都 欧美大肥妞性爱视频 家庭乱伦网站快播 偷拍自拍国产毛片 金发美女也用大吊来开包 缔D杏那 yentiyishu人体艺术ytys WWWUUKKMCOM 女人露奶 � 苍井空露逼 老荡妇高跟丝袜足交 偷偷和女友的朋友做爱迅雷 做爱七十二尺 朱丹人体合成 麻腾由纪妃 帅哥撸播种子图 鸡巴插逼动态图片 羙国十次啦中文 WWW137AVCOM 神斗片欧美版华语 有气质女人人休艺术 由美老师放屁电影 欧美女人肉肏图片 白虎种子快播 国产自拍90后女孩 美女在床上疯狂嫩b 饭岛爱最后之作 幼幼强奸摸奶 色97成人动漫 两性性爱打鸡巴插逼 新视觉影院4080青苹果影院 嗯好爽插死我了 阴口艺术照 李宗瑞电影qvod38 爆操舅母 亚洲色图七七影院 被大鸡巴操菊花 怡红院肿么了 成人极品影院删除 欧美性爱大图色图强奸乱 欧美女子与狗随便性交 苍井空的bt种子无码 熟女乱伦长篇小说 大色虫 兽交幼女影音先锋播放 44aad be0ca93900121f9b 先锋天耗ばさ无码 欧毛毛女三级黄色片图 干女人黑木耳照 日本美女少妇嫩逼人体艺术 sesechangchang 色屄屄网 久久撸app下载 色图色噜 美女鸡巴大奶 好吊日在线视频在线观看 透明丝袜脚偷拍自拍 中山怡红院菜单 wcwwwcom下载 骑嫂子 亚洲大色妣 成人故事365ahnet 丝袜家庭教mp4 幼交肛交 妹妹撸撸大妈 日本毛爽 caoprom超碰在email 关于中国古代偷窥的黄片 第一会所老熟女下载 wwwhuangsecome 狼人干综合新地址HD播放 变态儿子强奸乱伦图 强奸电影名字 2wwwer37com 日本毛片基地一亚洲AVmzddcxcn 暗黑圣经仙桃影院 37tpcocn 持月真由xfplay 好吊日在线视频三级网 我爱背入李丽珍 电影师傅床戏在线观看 96插妹妹sexsex88com 豪放家庭在线播放 桃花宝典极夜著豆瓜网 安卓系统播放神器 美美网丝袜诱惑 人人干全免费视频xulawyercn av无插件一本道 全国色五月 操逼电影小说网 good在线wwwyuyuelvcom www18avmmd 撸波波影视无插件 伊人幼女成人电影 会看射的图片 小明插看看 全裸美女扒开粉嫩b 国人自拍性交网站 萝莉白丝足交本子 七草ちとせ巨乳视频 摇摇晃晃的成人电影 兰桂坊成社人区小说www68kqcom 舔阴论坛 久撸客一撸客色国内外成人激情在线 明星门 欧美大胆嫩肉穴爽大片 www牛逼插 性吧星云 少妇性奴的屁眼 人体艺术大胆mscbaidu1imgcn 最新久久色色成人版 l女同在线 小泽玛利亚高潮图片搜索 女性裸b图 肛交bt种子 最热门有声小说 人间添春色 春色猜谜字 樱井莉亚钢管舞视频 小泽玛利亚直美6p 能用的h网 还能看的h网 bl动漫h网 开心五月激 东京热401 男色女色第四色酒色网 怎么下载黄色小说 黄色小说小栽 和谐图城 乐乐影院 色哥导航 特色导航 依依社区 爱窝窝在线 色狼谷成人 91porn 包要你射电影 色色3A丝袜 丝袜妹妹淫网 爱色导航(荐) 好男人激情影院 坏哥哥 第七色 色久久 人格分裂 急先锋 撸撸射中文网 第一会所综合社区 91影院老师机 东方成人激情 怼莪影院吹潮 老鸭窝伊人无码不卡无码一本道 av女柳晶电影 91天生爱风流作品 深爱激情小说私房婷婷网 擼奶av 567pao 里番3d一家人野外 上原在线电影 水岛津实透明丝袜 1314酒色 网旧网俺也去 0855影院 在线无码私人影院 搜索 国产自拍 神马dy888午夜伦理达达兔 农民工黄晓婷 日韩裸体黑丝御姐 屈臣氏的燕窝面膜怎么样つぼみ晶エリーの早漏チ○ポ强化合宿 老熟女人性视频 影音先锋 三上悠亚ol 妹妹影院福利片 hhhhhhhhsxo 午夜天堂热的国产 强奸剧场 全裸香蕉视频无码 亚欧伦理视频 秋霞为什么给封了 日本在线视频空天使 日韩成人aⅴ在线 日本日屌日屄导航视频 在线福利视频 日本推油无码av magnet 在线免费视频 樱井梨吮东 日本一本道在线无码DVD 日本性感诱惑美女做爱阴道流水视频 日本一级av 汤姆avtom在线视频 台湾佬中文娱乐线20 阿v播播下载 橙色影院 奴隶少女护士cg视频 汤姆在线影院无码 偷拍宾馆 业面紧急生级访问 色和尚有线 厕所偷拍一族 av女l 公交色狼优酷视频 裸体视频AV 人与兽肉肉网 董美香ol 花井美纱链接 magnet 西瓜影音 亚洲 自拍 日韩女优欧美激情偷拍自拍 亚洲成年人免费视频 荷兰免费成人电影 深喉呕吐XXⅩX 操石榴在线视频 天天色成人免费视频 314hu四虎 涩久免费视频在线观看 成人电影迅雷下载 能看见整个奶子的香蕉影院 水菜丽百度影音 gwaz079百度云 噜死你们资源站 主播走光视频合集迅雷下载 thumbzilla jappen 精品Av 古川伊织star598在线 假面女皇vip在线视频播放 国产自拍迷情校园 啪啪啪公寓漫画 日本阿AV 黄色手机电影 欧美在线Av影院 华裔电击女神91在线 亚洲欧美专区 1日本1000部免费视频 开放90后 波多野结衣 东方 影院av 页面升级紧急访问每天正常更新 4438Xchengeren 老炮色 a k福利电影 色欲影视色天天视频 高老庄aV 259LUXU-683 magnet 手机在线电影 国产区 欧美激情人人操网 国产 偷拍 直播 日韩 国内外激情在线视频网给 站长统计一本道人妻 光棍影院被封 紫竹铃取汁 ftp 狂插空姐嫩 xfplay 丈夫面前 穿靴子伪街 XXOO视频在线免费 大香蕉道久在线播放 电棒漏电嗨过头 充气娃能看下毛和洞吗 夫妻牲交 福利云点墦 yukun瑟妃 疯狂交换女友 国产自拍26页 腐女资源 百度云 日本DVD高清无码视频 偷拍,自拍AV伦理电影 A片小视频福利站。 大奶肥婆自拍偷拍图片 交配伊甸园 超碰在线视频自拍偷拍国产 小热巴91大神 rctd 045 类似于A片 超美大奶大学生美女直播被男友操 男友问 你的衣服怎么脱掉的 亚洲女与黑人群交视频一 在线黄涩 木内美保步兵番号 鸡巴插入欧美美女的b舒服 激情在线国产自拍日韩欧美 国语福利小视频在线观看 作爱小视颍 潮喷合集丝袜无码mp4 做爱的无码高清视频 牛牛精品 伊aⅤ在线观看 savk12 哥哥搞在线播放 在线电一本道影 一级谍片 250pp亚洲情艺中心,88 欧美一本道九色在线一 wwwseavbacom色av吧 cos美女在线 欧美17,18ⅹⅹⅹ视频 自拍嫩逼 小电影在线观看网站 筱田优 贼 水电工 5358x视频 日本69式视频有码 b雪福利导航 韩国女主播19tvclub在线 操逼清晰视频 丝袜美女国产视频网址导航 水菜丽颜射房间 台湾妹中文娱乐网 风吟岛视频 口交 伦理 日本熟妇色五十路免费视频 A级片互舔 川村真矢Av在线观看 亚洲日韩av 色和尚国产自拍 sea8 mp4 aV天堂2018手机在线 免费版国产偷拍a在线播放 狠狠 婷婷 丁香 小视频福利在线观看平台 思妍白衣小仙女被邻居强上 萝莉自拍有水 4484新视觉 永久发布页 977成人影视在线观看 小清新影院在线观 小鸟酱后丝后入百度云 旋风魅影四级 香蕉影院小黄片免费看 性爱直播磁力链接 小骚逼第一色影院 性交流的视频 小雪小视频bd 小视频TV禁看视频 迷奸AV在线看 nba直播 任你在干线 汤姆影院在线视频国产 624u在线播放 成人 一级a做爰片就在线看狐狸视频 小香蕉AV视频 www182、com 腿模简小育 学生做爱视频 秘密搜查官 快播 成人福利网午夜 一级黄色夫妻录像片 直接看的gav久久播放器 国产自拍400首页 sm老爹影院 谁知道隔壁老王网址在线 综合网 123西瓜影音 米奇丁香 人人澡人人漠大学生 色久悠 夜色视频你今天寂寞了吗? 菲菲影视城美国 被抄的影院 变态另类 欧美 成人 国产偷拍自拍在线小说 不用下载安装就能看的吃男人鸡巴视频 插屄视频 大贯杏里播放 wwwhhh50 233若菜奈央 伦理片天海翼秘密搜查官 大香蕉在线万色屋视频 那种漫画小说你懂的 祥仔电影合集一区 那里可以看澳门皇冠酒店a片 色自啪 亚洲aV电影天堂 谷露影院ar toupaizaixian sexbj。com 毕业生 zaixian mianfei 朝桐光视频 成人短视频在线直接观看 陈美霖 沈阳音乐学院 导航女 www26yjjcom 1大尺度视频 开平虐女视频 菅野雪松协和影视在线视频 华人play在线视频bbb 鸡吧操屄视频 多啪啪免费视频 悠草影院 金兰策划网 (969) 橘佑金短视频 国内一极刺激自拍片 日本制服番号大全magnet 成人动漫母系 电脑怎么清理内存 黄色福利1000 dy88午夜 偷拍中学生洗澡磁力链接 花椒相机福利美女视频 站长推荐磁力下载 mp4 三洞轮流插视频 玉兔miki热舞视频 夜生活小视频 爆乳人妖小视频 国内网红主播自拍福利迅雷下载 不用app的裸裸体美女操逼视频 变态SM影片在线观看 草溜影院元气吧 - 百度 - 百度 波推全套视频 国产双飞集合ftp 日本在线AV网 笔国毛片 神马影院女主播是我的邻居 影音资源 激情乱伦电影 799pao 亚洲第一色第一影院 av视频大香蕉 老梁故事汇希斯莱杰 水中人体磁力链接 下载 大香蕉黄片免费看 济南谭崔 避开屏蔽的岛a片 草破福利 要看大鸡巴操小骚逼的人的视频 黑丝少妇影音先锋 欧美巨乳熟女磁力链接 美国黄网站色大全 伦蕉在线久播 极品女厕沟 激情五月bd韩国电影 混血美女自摸和男友激情啪啪自拍诱人呻吟福利视频 人人摸人人妻做人人看 44kknn 娸娸原网 伊人欧美 恋夜影院视频列表安卓青青 57k影院 如果电话亭 avi 插爆骚女精品自拍 青青草在线免费视频1769TV 令人惹火的邻家美眉 影音先锋 真人妹子被捅动态图 男人女人做完爱视频15 表姐合租两人共处一室晚上她竟爬上了我的床 性爱教学视频 北条麻妃bd在线播放版 国产老师和师生 magnet wwwcctv1024 女神自慰 ftp 女同性恋做激情视频 欧美大胆露阴视频 欧美无码影视 好女色在线观看 后入肥臀18p 百度影视屏福利 厕所超碰视频 强奸mp magnet 欧美妹aⅴ免费线上看 2016年妞干网视频 5手机在线福利 超在线最视频 800av:cOm magnet 欧美性爱免播放器在线播放 91大款肥汤的性感美乳90后邻家美眉趴着窗台后入啪啪 秋霞日本毛片网站 cheng ren 在线视频 上原亚衣肛门无码解禁影音先锋 美脚家庭教师在线播放 尤酷伦理片 熟女性生活视频在线观看 欧美av在线播放喷潮 194avav 凤凰AV成人 - 百度 kbb9999 AV片AV在线AV无码 爱爱视频高清免费观看 黄色男女操b视频 观看 18AV清纯视频在线播放平台 成人性爱视频久久操 女性真人生殖系统双性人视频 下身插入b射精视频 明星潜规测视频 mp4 免賛a片直播绪 国内 自己 偷拍 在线 国内真实偷拍 手机在线 国产主播户外勾在线 三桥杏奈高清无码迅雷下载 2五福电影院凸凹频频 男主拿鱼打女主,高宝宝 色哥午夜影院 川村まや痴汉 草溜影院费全过程免费 淫小弟影院在线视频 laohantuiche 啪啪啪喷潮XXOO视频 青娱乐成人国产 蓝沢润 一本道 亚洲青涩中文欧美 神马影院线理论 米娅卡莉法的av 在线福利65535 欧美粉色在线 欧美性受群交视频1在线播放 极品喷奶熟妇在线播放 变态另类无码福利影院92 天津小姐被偷拍 磁力下载 台湾三级电髟全部 丝袜美腿偷拍自拍 偷拍女生性行为图 妻子的乱伦 白虎少妇 肏婶骚屄 外国大妈会阴照片 美少女操屄图片 妹妹自慰11p 操老熟女的b 361美女人体 360电影院樱桃 爱色妹妹亚洲色图 性交卖淫姿势高清图片一级 欧美一黑对二白 大色网无毛一线天 射小妹网站 寂寞穴 西西人体模特苍井空 操的大白逼吧 骚穴让我操 拉好友干女朋友3p