Edited by: Abdul-Sattar Nizami, Government College University, Pakistan
Reviewed by: Muhammad Mostafa Kamal Bhuiya, Chittagong University of Engineering & Technology, Bangladesh; Md. Asraful Alam, Zhengzhou University, China; Md. Jahirul Islam, Central Queensland University, Australia
This article was submitted to Bioenergy and Biofuels, a section of the journal Frontiers in Energy Research
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
Biodiesel is one of the potential alternative energy sources that can be derived from renewable and low-grade origin through different processes. One of the processes is alcoholysis or transesterification in the presence of a suitable catalyst. The catalyst can be either homogeneous or heterogeneous. This article reviews various catalysts used for biodiesel production to date, presents the state of the art of types of catalysts, and compares their suitability and associated challenges in the transesterification process. Biodiesel production using homogeneous and heterogeneous catalysis has been studied extensively, and novel heterogeneous catalysts are being continuously investigated. Homogeneous catalysts are generally efficient in converting biodiesel with low free fatty acid (FFA) and water containing single-origin feedstock. Heterogeneous catalysts, on the other hand, provide superior activity, range of selectivity, good FFA, and water adaptability. The quantity and strengths of active acid or basic sites control these properties. Some of the heterogeneous catalysts such as zirconia and zeolite-based catalysts can be used as both basic and acidic catalyst by suitable alteration. Heterogeneous catalysts from waste and biocatalysts play an essential role in attaining a sustainable alternative to traditional homogeneous catalysts for biodiesel production. Recently, high catalytic efficiency at mild operating conditions has drawn attention to nanocatalysts. This review evaluates state of the art and perspectives for catalytic biodiesel production and assesses the critical operational variables that influence biodiesel production along with the technological solutions for sustainable implementation of the process.
香京julia种子在线播放
The exigency of energy, limited reserve, the rapidly rising price of petroleum oil, and the deleterious effect of greenhouse gases have dictated to steer our attention toward alternative sources of energy. The quest for eco-friendly technology is driving the research initiatives to find potential energy sources that are renewable, biodegradable non-toxic, and mostly carbon neutral (Arbab et al.,
Biodiesel is a renewable energy source that can replace fossil-based diesel and can reduce the drawbacks of diesel emission (Abedin et al.,
Homogeneous catalysts are generally efficient in converting biodiesel with low FFA and water containing single-origin feedstock (Silitonga et al.,
Catalytic transesterification review details.
“Modern heterogeneous catalysts for biodiesel production: A comprehensive review” | This work focused on different heterogeneous catalysts (acid, base, acid-base) and biocatalyst for biodiesel production | Chouhan and Sarma, |
“Inorganic heterogeneous catalysts for biodiesel production from vegetable oils” | This work reviews stable inorganic solid acid catalysts for biodiesel production from vegetable oils | Endalew et al., |
“Biodiesel production using enzymatic transesterification—Current state and perspectives” | This work discussed key operational variables that influence lipase activity and stability along with technological solutions for industrial implementation | Gog et al., |
“Recent developments on heterogeneous catalysts for biodiesel production by oil esterification and transesterification reactions: A review” | This article discusses the use of heterogeneous catalysts for esterification, transesterification and simultaneous esterification and transesterification | Borges and Díaz, |
“Heterogeneous catalysis for sustainable biodiesel production via esterification and transesterification” | This paper discusses the clean synthesis of biodiesel through heterogeneously catalyzed esterification and transesterification process | Lee et al., |
“Activity of solid acid catalysts for biodiesel production: A critical review” | This study reviews the activities and advantages of solid acid catalysts, their preparation method and prevailing reaction conditions affecting the catalytic activity | Sani et al., |
“State of the art of biodiesel production processes: a review of the heterogeneous catalyst” | This review focuses on various technologies used for biodiesel production, as well as the benefits and limitations of the different types of catalysts | Ruhul et al., |
“Heterogeneous basic catalysts for biodiesel production” | This review covers recent achievements in the field of basic heterogeneous catalysts for biodiesel production, focusing on the main systems being employed | De Lima et al., |
“Investigation of heterogeneous solid acid catalyst performance on low grade feedstocks for biodiesel production: A review” | This work investigates solid acid heterogeneous catalysts for biodiesel production | Mansir et al., |
“A review on latest developments and future prospects of heterogeneous catalyst in biodiesel production from non-edible oils” | This work focusses on heterogeneous catalysts with the highlight on the prospects of commercialization of those catalysts | Mardhiah et al., |
“State of the art and prospective of lipase-catalyzed transesterification reaction for biodiesel production” | The work reviews general and novel immobilizing materials, bioreactors for enzymatic transesterification, potential lipase resources, and process modeling for enzymatic transesterification | Amini et al., |
“Application of nanoparticles in biofuels: An overview” | This study explores nanoparticles in biofuel processes such as biodiesel, biohydrogen, biogas, and bioethanol production | Sekoai et al., |
“Biodiesel synthesis using natural solid catalyst derived from biomass waste—A review” | This paper assesses the latest breakthroughs involved in the use of catalysts derived from waste biomass | Chua et al., |
“Carbon-based catalysts for biodiesel production—A review” | This study focusses on sulfonated carbon-based acid solids originating from either carbohydrate or biomass precursors | Clohessy and Kwapinski, |
The conventional process for biodiesel production is transesterification or alcoholysis (typically methanolysis), by which the triglycerides are reacted with alcohols (typically methanol), in the presence of a catalyst, either homogeneous or heterogeneous, as a reaction promoter, to produce fatty acid alkyl esters [typically fatty acid methyl esters (FAME)] (Mahlia et al.,
Biodiesel production from feedstock:
Comparison of standards for diesel and biodiesel ASTM and EN standards (Fattah et al.,
Density @ 15°C | kg/m3 | 820–845 | 860–900 | ||
Kinematic Viscosity @ 40°C | mm2/s | 1.3–4.1 | 2–4.5 | 1.9–6.0 | 3.5–5.0 |
Cetane Number, Min. | – | 40 | 51 | 47 | 51 |
Distillation temperature | % vol. recovered | 90%: 282°C−338°C | 85%: 350°C max | – | – |
Ester content | 5% vol. max | 5% vol. max | – | 96.5% min | |
Ash content, Max. | % wt | 0.01 | 0.01 | – | – |
Sulfur Content, Max. | % mass | S500: 0.05% |
50 mg/kg |
S15 15 ppm |
10.0 mg/kg |
Flash Point | °C | 60–80 | Min. 55 | 100–170 | Min. 120 |
Cloud Point | °C | – | Report | Location & season dependent | Location & season dependent |
Cold Filter Plugging Point | °C | – | – | Location & season dependent | Location & season dependent |
Lubricity, Max. | μm | 520 | – | 460 | – |
Water and sediment, Max. | vol.% | 0.05 | 0.05 | ||
Water Content, Max. | mg/kg | – | 200 | - | 500 |
Acid Value, Max. | mgKOH/g | – | – | 0.5 | 0.50 |
Copper strip corrosion, Max | – | No. 3 | Class 1 | No. 3 | Class 1 |
Carbon residue on 10% |
wt. % | 0.15-0.35 | 0.3 | 0.05 | – |
Oxidation stability | – | – | 25 g/m3 max | Min. 3 h | Min 8 h |
Iodine Value, Max. | g I2/100 g | 120 |
The presence of catalyst increases the rate of the reaction, thereby increasing the yield of the product. Various catalysts are used in the transesterification process for biodiesel production. As discussed previously, the catalysts used for the transesterification reaction are intricate to the group. However, based on previous review articles, these can be divided into four major categories, namely, homogeneous catalysts, heterogeneous catalysts, biocatalysts, and nanocatalysts (Shan et al.,
Different catalysts used for biodiesel production.
Transesterification or alcoholysis can be catalyzed both homogeneously and heterogeneously. When catalyzed homogeneously, the reactions are faster typically and require lower loading than that of heterogeneously catalyzed ones. One major drawback of homogeneous catalysts is that the separation of these catalysts from the medium is intricate and often non-economical; as such, reuse of these is often impossible. Apart from that, several washing steps associated with the catalyst removal from the product results in the consumption of water, often deionized, and significant generation of wastewater (De Lima et al.,
Homogeneous catalysis involves a sequence of reactions that is catalyzed by a chemical that is in the same phase as the reaction system. The most preferred catalyst used for the production of biodiesel is the homogeneous catalyst, as they are simple to use and require less time to achieve a complete reaction. Both acidic and basic catalysts come under this category. Homogeneous catalysts are usually dissolved in a solvent that is in the same phase with all reactants.
Homogeneous base catalysts are an alkaline liquid such as alkali metal-based hydroxides, namely, sodium or potassium hydroxide; alkali metal-based oxides such as sodium and potassium methoxides; and carbonates. Base catalysts have high activity in transesterification (Endalew et al.,
The esterification process is catalyzed by Brønsted acids, preferably by sulfonic and sulfuric acids as well as hydrochloric acid (Schuchardt et al.,
Homogeneous catalysts used for biodiesel production from different sources.
Madhuca longifolia oil | H2SO4, KOH | Ester.: 1: 0.35 v/v/ 0.01 v/v/ 60°C/ 30 min |
Saravanan et al., |
Elaeagnus angustifolia L seed oil | Potassium methoxide | 9: 1 M |
Kamran et al., |
Rice bran oil | KOH | 10:1 M/ 0.005 v/v/ 50°C/ 2 h | Goga et al., |
Sunflower oil | KOH | 6:1 M/ 1 wt.%/ 60°C/ 3 h | Dueso et al., |
Castor oil | KOH | 5.4:1/ 0.73 wt.%/ 64°C/ 2.5 h | Aboelazayem et al., |
Millettia pinnata oil | H2SO4, CaO | Ester.: 12:1 M/ 1% v/v / 60 °C/ 3 h |
Ruhul et al., |
Jatropha curcas oil | H2SO4, NaOH | Ester.: 5:1 v/v/ 0.008 v/v/ 50 °C/ 2 h |
Dubey and Gupta, |
Rice bran oil | NaOH | 6:1 M/ 2 wt.%/ 60°C / 2 h | Wakil et al., |
Calophyllum inophyllum oil | H2SO4, sodium methoxide | Ester.: 30:1 M/ 10 wt.% / 75°C/ 2 h |
Jahirul et al., |
Aphanamixis polystachya oil | HCl, KOH | Ester.: 24:1 M/ 1% v/v/ 60°C/ 3 h |
Palash et al., |
Palm oil | KOH | 25% v/v/ 1 wt.%/ 60°C / 2 h | Fattah et al., |
Calophyllum inophyllum oil | H2SO4, KOH | Ester.: 12:1 M/ 1.5% v/v/ 60°C/ 3 h |
Fattah et al., |
Ceiba pentandra oil | H2SO4, NaOH | Ester.: 8:1 M/ 1% v/v/ 60°C/ 2 h |
Silitonga et al., |
Heterogeneous catalysts are in a phase or state different from those of the reactants. These are the type of catalysts that creates active sites with its reactants regularly during a reaction (Melero et al.,
A heterogeneous base catalyst aims to overcome constraints such as saponification that hinders the separation of glycerol from the methyl ester layer, associated with the usage of a homogeneous base catalyst. These catalysts also show superior catalytic activity under mild conditions (Calero et al.,
Metal-based oxides are the most commonly exploited as a heterogeneous catalyst for transesterification. The surface structure of a metal oxide is presented in
Surface structure of metal oxides (M represents the metal).
Among the metal-based catalysts, CaO has been the most studied catalyst material for biodiesel production, as it presents many advantages, namely, long catalyst life, relatively high basic strength, high activity, and low solubility in methanol and requires only moderate reaction conditions (Roschat et al.,
Du et al. (
Roschat et al. (
Mootabadi et al. (
Mixed metal-based oxides are predominantly used as base catalyst depending on the catalyst mixture. Their basicity can be tuned by altering their chemical composition and synthesis procedure (Teo et al.,
Titanium oxide (TiO2) and zinc oxide (ZnO) are among the transition metal oxides that are used as a heterogeneous base catalyst for biodiesel production (Yoo et al.,
Boron group-based compounds, especially alumina (Al2O3), are widely utilized for supporting different metal oxides, halides, nitrates, and alloys (Chouhan and Sarma,
“Hydrotalcites are a class of anionic and basic clays with a general formulas of
Waste derived from industrial processes and surrounding environment can aid in the development of a low-cost solid base catalyst. These catalysts can promote a sustainable and environment-friendly approach toward biodiesel production (Majhi and Ray,
Heterogeneous acid catalysts have a less corrosive and toxic effect and give rise to fewer environmental problems compared to homogeneous acid catalysts (Aransiola et al.,
Many researchers have used cation-exchange resin for biodiesel production at laboratory scale. Cation exchange resins are macroporous and contain numerous acidic sites to catalyze FFAs to biodiesel through heterogeneous esterification reactions and prevent saponification. Fu et al. (
Heteropoly acids (HPAs) and their salts as solid (heterogeneous) acid catalysts are also used frequently for the production of biodiesel (Hanif et al.,
Sulfonic acid group catalysts are characterized by sulfonated cross-linked polystyrene and are generally less corrosive and environmentally benign (Mansir et al.,
Sulfated metal oxides generally work as an acid heterogeneous catalyst in esterification reaction (Chen et al.,
As discussed previously, oil with high FFA content requires an acid catalyst to esterify the FFA content before transesterification can take place. For biodiesel production from these type of oils, a heterogeneous catalytic system with both acidic and basic sites is capable of esterification and transesterification with minimal soap formation is highly sought after (Semwal et al.,
Zirconium dioxide (ZrO2), also known as zirconia, is used as both acid and the base heterogeneous catalyst. The primary nature of this catalyst is acidic, as it has strong surface acidity (Lam et al.,
Zeolites occur naturally in the form of microporous crystalline aluminosilicates interlinked by oxygen atoms. The chemical composition, pore size structure, and ion exchange properties of zeolites are responsible for their versatile catalytic behavior (De Lima et al.,
Li et al. (
The pathway of biodiesel production through chemical catalysis is energy consuming and produces undesired by-products, namely, soaps and polymeric pigments, which hinder the separation of product from glycerol and di- and monoacylglycerols (Gog et al.,
Unlike the chemical catalysts, biocatalysts apply to a wide range of triglyceride sources, with FFA ranging from 0.5 to 80% (Aransiola et al.,
Crucial parameters affecting the biodiesel yield in enzymatic synthesis (Szczesna Antczak et al.,
Various biocatalysts used for biodiesel production from different sources.
Waste cooking oil | Pancreatic lipase | Methanol/3:1/1.5/60/4 h | 88% | Jayaraman et al., |
Residual fish oil | Novozym 435 lipase | Ethano/35.45:1/35/8 h | 82.91 wt.% | Marín-Suárez et al., |
Rice bran oil | Rice bran lipase | Methanol/6:1/N.A./40/12 day | 83.4 wt.% | Choi et al., |
Novozym 435 lipase | Methanol/11:1/6/47/68 h | 89% | Amini et al., |
|
Waste vegetable oil | Epobond |
Ethanol/3:1/3/37/1.5 h | 46.32% | Lopresto et al., |
Methanol/12:1/20/35/25 h | 92% | Arumugam and Ponnusami, |
||
Immobilised |
Ethanol/10:1/5.2mg/24 h | 78% | Abdulla and Ravindra, |
|
Castor oil | Lipozyme |
Methanol/3:1/15/45/24 h | 67.58 wt.% | Maleki et al., |
Corn oil | Lipozyme |
Ethanol/6:1/2.8/35/12 h | 69.2 wt.% | Mata et al., |
Methanol/5:1/25 IUAI−ROL/g/37/60 h (anion exchange resin) | 92% | Li et al., |
||
Methanol/5:1/7 IUMI−ROL/g/37/60 h (macroporous resin) | 94% | Li et al., |
||
Ethanol/4:1/5–8/40/24 h | 98% | Shah and Gupta, |
Recently, nanocatalysts have gained significant attention for biodiesel production owing to their high catalytic efficiency (Qiu et al.,
Various nanocatalysts used for biodiesel production from different sources.
NaAlO2/γ-Al2O3 | Palm oil | 20.79:1/64.72/10.89/3 | 1 | 97.65 | Zhang et al., |
6 | 93.29 | ||||
25%MoO3/B-ZSM-5 | Oleic acid | 20:1/160/3/6 | 1 | 98 | Mohebbi et al., |
6 | 93 | ||||
CaO/CuFe2O4 | Chicken fat | 15:1/70/3/4 h | 1 | 94.52 | Seffati et al., |
– | – | ||||
KOH/Fe3O4@Al2O3 | Canola oil | 12:1/65 /4/6 | 1 | 98.8 | Kazemifard et al., |
6 | 88.4 | ||||
MgO/MgFe2O4 | Sunflower oil | 12:1/110/4/4 | 1 | 91.2 | Alaei et al., |
6 | 82.4 | ||||
Cr/Ca/γ-Al2O3 | Cooking oil | 18:1/65/6/3 | 1 | 92.79 | Sulaiman et al., |
6 | 78.29 | ||||
MgO/MgAl2O4 (untreated and treated with plasma) | Sunflower oil | 12:1/110/3/3 | 1 | 95.7/96.5 | Rahmani Vahid et al., |
5 | 79.3/91.1 | ||||
γ-Al2O3/KI | Palm oil | 14:1/60/4/4 | 1 | 98 | Islam et al., |
11 | 79 | ||||
Ca/γ-Al2O3 | Corn oil | 12:1/65/6/5 | 1 | 87.89 | Moradi et al., |
5 | 34.64 | ||||
Cs/Al/Fe3O4 | Sunflower oil | 14:1/58/6/2 | 1 | 95 | Feyzi et al., |
4 | 88 |
Advantages and disadvantages of different types of catalysts.
Homogeneous base catalyst | Strong catalytic activity |
Possible formation of soap |
Sodium or potassium hydroxide; Sodium and potassium methoxides, and carbonates |
Homogeneous acid catalyst | Strong catalytic activity |
The reaction rate is slower compared to the base catalyst |
Sulfonic acid, sulfuric acid, hydrochloric acid |
Heterogeneous base catalyst | Ease of purification of the product |
High cost to synthesise catalyst |
Alkaline earth and alkali metal oxides, transition metal oxides, mixed metal oxides, hydrotalcite |
Heterogeneous acid catalyst | Ease of separation |
High cost to synthesise catalyst |
Cation exchanges reins, heteropoly acid derivatives, sulphated oxides, sulphonic acids |
Biocatalyst | Ease of separation |
High cost for catalyst synthesis |
Extracellular lipases (Mucor miehei, Rhizopus oryzae, Candida antarctica, Pseudomonas cepacia) and intracellular lipases (Filamentous fungi) |
Nanocatalyst | High activity and stability |
High cost for catalyst synthesis | Zn, Ca, Mg, Zr based nanocatalysts |
Homogeneous catalyst has been exhaustively studied, and challenges have been addressed in the literature. On the other hand, heterogeneous catalysts is a relatively new research area on which significant research is ongoing at present. Several challenges have been reported in the literature for these catalysts:
Short catalyst life, lower reaction rate, and instability have been reported as the main problems for heterogeneous catalysts. Solid base catalysts were reported to be sensitive to CO2, water, and FFA. These consume and deactivate the catalyst via saponification. Solid acid catalysts were reported to induce leaching and product contamination due to the ionic group being hydrolyzed by water. Lipase inhibition has been reported in the presence of methanol during enzymatic transesterification. In the case of nanocatalysts, at relatively mild operating conditions, it is necessary to increase the reaction time to achieve high performances. However, it is essential to apply severe operating conditions to achieve ordinary reaction times, thereby increasing the energy requirement.
The following aspects need to be addressed in future works:
Further investigation into waste-derived catalysts are necessary to develop new catalysts with improved catalytic performance. Development of highly active and selective heterogeneous catalysts that are economically feasible for use in the industrial scale. Exploring new catalyst supports with selective surface area and interconnected system of appropriate pore sizes. Exploring biomass or waste as the source of catalyst to reduce the associated cost and improve sustainability for commercially available solid catalysts. Improving preparation routes and treatment steps for hydrotalcite-based catalysts to transform their application from laboratory to industrial scale. Improving the sensitiveness to FFA and water and the morphology by keeping high basic strength of zeolite-based catalyst. Further investigation into industrial enzymatic biodiesel production for an ensuring viable future option. Energy-efficient and low-cost methods for effective recovery and reuse of nanocatalysts.
Laboratory-scale biodiesel production using heterogeneous catalysts have been reported at length in the literature. Among the catalysts, base homogeneous catalysts possess rapid reaction rate and high yield and require mild operating conditions. However, those are sensitive to FFA content of the oil that causes undesired by-products, namely, soaps and polymeric pigments, making the purification process difficult and impossible to reuse the catalysts. Homogeneous acid catalysts are suitable for those high FFA content oil. However, they suffer some drawbacks, including relatively slow reaction rate, corrosive nature, difficulty in catalyst separation from product, etc. Heterogeneous base catalysts overcome some of the disadvantages of homogeneous base catalysts, namely, ease of separation, simple catalyst recovery techniques, and reusability of catalyst from the product. Heterogeneous acid catalysts show very less sensitivity to high FFA and water content in the feedstock and can easily be recovered, recycled, and reused after the biodiesel production process. Due to current interest in “green” alternatives to chemical catalysts, biocatalysts, i.e., enzymes, have drawn attention. The catalysts work under relatively lower reaction temperature conditions compared to other catalysts and can catalyze low-grade oils with extremely high FFA content. The results obtained have proved that high productivity, involving yield and numbers of reuse, as well as low reaction time, can be achieved when using enzymes. The major limitation is the reaction rate, which is the slowest among all the catalysts. Furthermore, the synthesis of catalysts is more expensive than those of both homogeneous acid and base catalysts. High catalytic efficiency at mild operating conditions has drawn attention to nanocatalysts recently. The development of highly active and selective heterogeneous catalysts, along with their economic feasibility for use in the industrial scale, is a subject that needs to be addressed.
IR formulated the article, written heterogeneous base, and other sections, compiled the whole article. HO contributed heterogeneous acid catalyst section. TM oversaw the work and provided review. MM contributed the homogeneous catalyst section. AS contributed the biocatalyst section. SR contributed the nanocatalyst section. AA reviewed and improved the article. All authors contributed to the article and approved the submitted version.
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.