Front. Energy Res. Frontiers in Energy Research Front. Energy Res. 2296-598X Frontiers Media S.A. 10.3389/fenrg.2020.00101 Energy Research Review State of the Art of Catalysts for Biodiesel Production Rizwanul Fattah I. M. 1 * Ong H. C. 1 Mahlia T. M. I. 1 Mofijur M. 1 Silitonga A. S. 2 Rahman S. M. Ashrafur 3 Ahmad Arslan 4 1Faculty of Engineering and IT, School of Information, Systems and Modelling, University of Technology, Sydney, NSW, Australia 2Department of Mechanical Engineering, Politeknik Negeri Medan, Medan, Indonesia 3Biofuel Engine Research Facility, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, QLD, Australia 4Department of Mechanical Engineering, COMSATS University Islamabad, Sahiwal, Pakistan

Edited by: Abdul-Sattar Nizami, Government College University, Pakistan

Reviewed by: Muhammad Mostafa Kamal Bhuiya, Chittagong University of Engineering & Technology, Bangladesh; Md. Asraful Alam, Zhengzhou University, China; Md. Jahirul Islam, Central Queensland University, Australia

*Correspondence: I. M. Rizwanul Fattah islammdrizwanul.fattah@uts.edu.au; rizwanul.buet@gmail.com

This article was submitted to Bioenergy and Biofuels, a section of the journal Frontiers in Energy Research

19 06 2020 2020 8 101 27 03 2020 07 05 2020 Copyright © 2020 Rizwanul Fattah, Ong, Mahlia, Mofijur, Silitonga, Rahman and Ahmad. 2020 Rizwanul Fattah, Ong, Mahlia, Mofijur, Silitonga, Rahman and Ahmad

This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

Biodiesel is one of the potential alternative energy sources that can be derived from renewable and low-grade origin through different processes. One of the processes is alcoholysis or transesterification in the presence of a suitable catalyst. The catalyst can be either homogeneous or heterogeneous. This article reviews various catalysts used for biodiesel production to date, presents the state of the art of types of catalysts, and compares their suitability and associated challenges in the transesterification process. Biodiesel production using homogeneous and heterogeneous catalysis has been studied extensively, and novel heterogeneous catalysts are being continuously investigated. Homogeneous catalysts are generally efficient in converting biodiesel with low free fatty acid (FFA) and water containing single-origin feedstock. Heterogeneous catalysts, on the other hand, provide superior activity, range of selectivity, good FFA, and water adaptability. The quantity and strengths of active acid or basic sites control these properties. Some of the heterogeneous catalysts such as zirconia and zeolite-based catalysts can be used as both basic and acidic catalyst by suitable alteration. Heterogeneous catalysts from waste and biocatalysts play an essential role in attaining a sustainable alternative to traditional homogeneous catalysts for biodiesel production. Recently, high catalytic efficiency at mild operating conditions has drawn attention to nanocatalysts. This review evaluates state of the art and perspectives for catalytic biodiesel production and assesses the critical operational variables that influence biodiesel production along with the technological solutions for sustainable implementation of the process.

biodiesel transesterification homogeneous catalyst heterogeneous catalyst biocatalyst nanocatalyst University of Technology Sydney10.13039/501100001775

香京julia种子在线播放

    1. <form id=HxFbUHhlv><nobr id=HxFbUHhlv></nobr></form>
      <address id=HxFbUHhlv><nobr id=HxFbUHhlv><nobr id=HxFbUHhlv></nobr></nobr></address>

      Introduction

      The exigency of energy, limited reserve, the rapidly rising price of petroleum oil, and the deleterious effect of greenhouse gases have dictated to steer our attention toward alternative sources of energy. The quest for eco-friendly technology is driving the research initiatives to find potential energy sources that are renewable, biodegradable non-toxic, and mostly carbon neutral (Arbab et al., 2015). Historically, fossil fuels have played a vital role in global energy demand (Jayed et al., 2009). The diesel engine, named after its inventor Rudolf Diesel, was patented in 1892 and catered this energy demand substantially ever since. Being the powerhouse of heavy-duty and commercial transport vehicles has been the most important use of diesel engines, and the importance is increasing consistently. The diesel engine is the most efficient type of internal combustion engine, offering excellent fuel economy and low carbon dioxide (CO2) emission (Fattah et al., 2018). While diesel engines are arguably superior to any other power-producing device for the transportation sector in terms of efficiency, torque, and overall drivability, they suffer from inferior performance in terms of emissions (Silitonga et al., 2013a).

      Biodiesel is a renewable energy source that can replace fossil-based diesel and can reduce the drawbacks of diesel emission (Abedin et al., 2014). Diesel is obtained by fractional distillation from crude petroleum oil that typically contains a mixture of pure hydrocarbon molecules (no oxygen molecule) that range in size from 8 to 21 carbon atoms. Biodiesel, on the other hand, consists of long-chain hydrocarbons with an ester functional group (–COOR). Thus, it is defined as mono-alkyl esters of long-chain fatty acids derived from various feedstocks, namely, plant oils, animal fats, or other lipids, also known as triacylglycerides (TAGs), or more simply, triglycerides (Hoekman and Robbins, 2012). Biodiesel is produced using the transesterification or alcoholysis process, which is usually facilitated by acids, bases, enzymes, and other type and form of catalysts (Ong et al., 2014). The catalysts can be either in a homogeneous or in a heterogeneous phase as of the reactants. If the catalyst remains in the same phase (usually liquid) to the reactants during alcoholysis, then that is the homogeneous catalyst. If the catalyst is in a different phase (usually non-liquid) to the reactants, then that is the heterogeneous catalyst (Ruhul et al., 2015). The appropriate catalyst selection depends on several factors, namely, the amount of free fatty acids (FFAs) in the oil, the water content, etc.

      Homogeneous catalysts are generally efficient in converting biodiesel with low FFA and water containing single-origin feedstock (Silitonga et al., 2013a). Oils with higher FFA content lead to the formation of soap, consequently affecting the activity of the catalyst (Fattah et al., 2014a). Besides, the catalyst is partially miscible in biodiesel and miscible in glycerol, which results in problems of product separation from the reactant mixture (Tan et al., 2019). Heterogeneous catalysts, on the other hand, provides high activity, selectivity, and water adaptability due to the presence of a large number of active acid or basic sites. Various reviews have been published before on the topic of catalysts, especially on heterogeneous catalysts. Table 1 presented below summarizes some of the critical review articles in the last decade, along with their brief introductions. The novelty aspect of this article is to review the works of many researchers on the development of various homogeneous and heterogeneous catalysts used for biodiesel production to date. This article presents different types of catalysts and compares their suitability and associated challenges in the transesterification process with an emphasis on the catalytic activity, selectivity, catalyst loading, and reusability.

      Catalytic transesterification review details.

      Title of the work Content References
      “Modern heterogeneous catalysts for biodiesel production: A comprehensive review” This work focused on different heterogeneous catalysts (acid, base, acid-base) and biocatalyst for biodiesel production Chouhan and Sarma, 2011
      “Inorganic heterogeneous catalysts for biodiesel production from vegetable oils” This work reviews stable inorganic solid acid catalysts for biodiesel production from vegetable oils Endalew et al., 2011
      “Biodiesel production using enzymatic transesterification—Current state and perspectives” This work discussed key operational variables that influence lipase activity and stability along with technological solutions for industrial implementation Gog et al., 2012
      “Recent developments on heterogeneous catalysts for biodiesel production by oil esterification and transesterification reactions: A review” This article discusses the use of heterogeneous catalysts for esterification, transesterification and simultaneous esterification and transesterification Borges and Díaz, 2012
      “Heterogeneous catalysis for sustainable biodiesel production via esterification and transesterification” This paper discusses the clean synthesis of biodiesel through heterogeneously catalyzed esterification and transesterification process Lee et al., 2014
      “Activity of solid acid catalysts for biodiesel production: A critical review” This study reviews the activities and advantages of solid acid catalysts, their preparation method and prevailing reaction conditions affecting the catalytic activity Sani et al., 2014
      “State of the art of biodiesel production processes: a review of the heterogeneous catalyst” This review focuses on various technologies used for biodiesel production, as well as the benefits and limitations of the different types of catalysts Ruhul et al., 2015
      “Heterogeneous basic catalysts for biodiesel production” This review covers recent achievements in the field of basic heterogeneous catalysts for biodiesel production, focusing on the main systems being employed De Lima et al., 2016
      “Investigation of heterogeneous solid acid catalyst performance on low grade feedstocks for biodiesel production: A review” This work investigates solid acid heterogeneous catalysts for biodiesel production Mansir et al., 2017
      “A review on latest developments and future prospects of heterogeneous catalyst in biodiesel production from non-edible oils” This work focusses on heterogeneous catalysts with the highlight on the prospects of commercialization of those catalysts Mardhiah et al., 2017
      “State of the art and prospective of lipase-catalyzed transesterification reaction for biodiesel production” The work reviews general and novel immobilizing materials, bioreactors for enzymatic transesterification, potential lipase resources, and process modeling for enzymatic transesterification Amini et al., 2017a
      “Application of nanoparticles in biofuels: An overview” This study explores nanoparticles in biofuel processes such as biodiesel, biohydrogen, biogas, and bioethanol production Sekoai et al., 2019
      “Biodiesel synthesis using natural solid catalyst derived from biomass waste—A review” This paper assesses the latest breakthroughs involved in the use of catalysts derived from waste biomass Chua et al., 2020
      “Carbon-based catalysts for biodiesel production—A review” This study focusses on sulfonated carbon-based acid solids originating from either carbohydrate or biomass precursors Clohessy and Kwapinski, 2020
      Biodiesel Production Using Alcoholysis

      The conventional process for biodiesel production is transesterification or alcoholysis (typically methanolysis), by which the triglycerides are reacted with alcohols (typically methanol), in the presence of a catalyst, either homogeneous or heterogeneous, as a reaction promoter, to produce fatty acid alkyl esters [typically fatty acid methyl esters (FAME)] (Mahlia et al., 2020). Transesterification consists of several consecutive, reversible, and catalyzed reactions where the triglycerides are converted to diglycerides, monoglyceride, and finally glycerin (also known as glycerol) stepwise (Ong et al., 2019). Generally, biodiesel is produced using a single-step transesterification reaction catalyzed by alkali catalysts. However, depending on FFA and water content, a two-step reaction might be required where acid catalyzed alcoholysis, also known as esterification, precedes the transesterification process (Ashraful et al., 2014). The schematic diagram for one- and two-step biodiesel production is shown in Figure 1. The property standard of petroleum diesel and biodiesel, according to the American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM) and European Standard (EN) are shown in Table 2.

      Biodiesel production from feedstock: (A) two-step process; (B) one-step process (Fattah et al., 2014d; Mofijur et al., 2014).

      Comparison of standards for diesel and biodiesel ASTM and EN standards (Fattah et al., 2013; Knothe and Razon, 2017).

      Property Units Diesel Biodiesel (B100)
      ASTM D975 EN 590 ASTM D6751 EN 14214
      Density @ 15°C kg/m3 820–845 860–900
      Kinematic Viscosity @ 40°C mm2/s 1.3–4.1 2–4.5 1.9–6.0 3.5–5.0
      Cetane Number, Min. 40 51 47 51
      Distillation temperature % vol. recovered 90%: 282°C−338°C 85%: 350°C max
      Ester content 5% vol. max 5% vol. max 96.5% min
      Ash content, Max. % wt 0.01 0.01
      Sulfur Content, Max. % mass S500: 0.05% S5000: 0.50% 50 mg/kg 10 mg/kg S15 15 ppm S500 0.05% 10.0 mg/kg
      Flash Point °C 60–80 Min. 55 100–170 Min. 120
      Cloud Point °C Report Location & season dependent Location & season dependent
      Cold Filter Plugging Point °C Location & season dependent Location & season dependent
      Lubricity, Max. μm 520 460
      Water and sediment, Max. vol.% 0.05 0.05
      Water Content, Max. mg/kg 200 - 500
      Acid Value, Max. mgKOH/g 0.5 0.50
      Copper strip corrosion, Max No. 3 Class 1 No. 3 Class 1
      Carbon residue on 10% distillation residue, Max. wt. % 0.15-0.35 0.3 0.05
      Oxidation stability 25 g/m3 max Min. 3 h Min 8 h
      Iodine Value, Max. g I2/100 g 120
      Different Catalysts for Biodiesel Production

      The presence of catalyst increases the rate of the reaction, thereby increasing the yield of the product. Various catalysts are used in the transesterification process for biodiesel production. As discussed previously, the catalysts used for the transesterification reaction are intricate to the group. However, based on previous review articles, these can be divided into four major categories, namely, homogeneous catalysts, heterogeneous catalysts, biocatalysts, and nanocatalysts (Shan et al., 2018; Akubude et al., 2019), which can be further classified into different subgroups. The classification is shown in Figure 2.

      Different catalysts used for biodiesel production.

      Transesterification or alcoholysis can be catalyzed both homogeneously and heterogeneously. When catalyzed homogeneously, the reactions are faster typically and require lower loading than that of heterogeneously catalyzed ones. One major drawback of homogeneous catalysts is that the separation of these catalysts from the medium is intricate and often non-economical; as such, reuse of these is often impossible. Apart from that, several washing steps associated with the catalyst removal from the product results in the consumption of water, often deionized, and significant generation of wastewater (De Lima et al., 2016). On the other hand, heterogeneous catalysts are in a different phase than the reaction system, which allows for the removal of catalyst at various stages. These can be reused subsequently without intensive washing steps. Besides, high-purity glycerine can be obtained compared to that of homogeneous catalysis due to considerably fewer dissolved ions, allowing for further use in industrial processes. For the advantages mentioned above, transesterification using heterogeneous catalysts has received increased attention over the past decade (Lam et al., 2010; Ling et al., 2019). However, partial leaching of the active sites, destruction of the catalyst microstructure, and organic deposition from the reaction mixture pose a problem for the applicability of these catalysts (Zhang et al., 2020). Therefore, the synthesis of active reusable heterogeneous catalysts is a great challenge in biodiesel production.

      Homogeneous Catalysts

      Homogeneous catalysis involves a sequence of reactions that is catalyzed by a chemical that is in the same phase as the reaction system. The most preferred catalyst used for the production of biodiesel is the homogeneous catalyst, as they are simple to use and require less time to achieve a complete reaction. Both acidic and basic catalysts come under this category. Homogeneous catalysts are usually dissolved in a solvent that is in the same phase with all reactants.

      Base Catalyst

      Homogeneous base catalysts are an alkaline liquid such as alkali metal-based hydroxides, namely, sodium or potassium hydroxide; alkali metal-based oxides such as sodium and potassium methoxides; and carbonates. Base catalysts have high activity in transesterification (Endalew et al., 2011). Metallic hydroxides are frequently used as catalysts due to lower prices but generally possess lower activity than alkoxides. It was reported that the rate of base catalyzed reaction is 4,000 times faster than that of the acid-catalyzed one (De Lima et al., 2016). A known drawback is that the oil containing significant amounts of FFA cannot be converted into biodiesels completely but remains as soap in vast quantities (Helwani et al., 2009). Up to ~5% FFAs, the reaction can still be catalyzed with an alkali catalyst, but an additional amount of catalyst is required to compensate for the catalyst lost to soap (Gerpen, 2005). Most studies recommend that the FFA content should be <2 wt.% for biodiesel production using the homogeneous catalyst.

      Acid Catalyst

      The esterification process is catalyzed by Brønsted acids, preferably by sulfonic and sulfuric acids as well as hydrochloric acid (Schuchardt et al., 1998). These catalysts produce very high yields in alkyl esters. However, the reactions are slower compared to alkali catalyzed reactions, making the process economically confronting due to the increased energy requirements (Silitonga et al., 2020). Homogeneous acid catalysis is insensitive to FFA content and can catalyze both esterification and transesterification reactions. Despite these added advantages, homogeneous acid catalysis presents the same separation issues as homogeneous base catalysis. Some investigations using homogeneous catalysts to produce biodiesel from different biodiesel feedstocks are shown in Table 3.

      Homogeneous catalysts used for biodiesel production from different sources.

      Feedstock Catalyst Reaction parameters References
      Oil: alcohol ratio/ Catalyst amount/ Temperature/ Reaction time
      Madhuca longifolia oil H2SO4, KOH Ester.: 1: 0.35 v/v/ 0.01 v/v/ 60°C/ 30 min Trans.: 1:4 v/v/ 7 g/L/ 60°C/ 30 min Saravanan et al., 2020
      Elaeagnus angustifolia L seed oil Potassium methoxide 9: 1 M*/ 1 wt.%/ 60 °C/ 1 h Kamran et al., 2020
      Rice bran oil KOH 10:1 M/ 0.005 v/v/ 50°C/ 2 h Goga et al., 2019
      Sunflower oil KOH 6:1 M/ 1 wt.%/ 60°C/ 3 h Dueso et al., 2018
      Castor oil KOH 5.4:1/ 0.73 wt.%/ 64°C/ 2.5 h Aboelazayem et al., 2018
      Millettia pinnata oil H2SO4, CaO Ester.: 12:1 M/ 1% v/v / 60 °C/ 3 h Trans.: 6:1 M/ 1 wt.%/ 60°C/ 2 h Ruhul et al., 2017
      Jatropha curcas oil H2SO4, NaOH Ester.: 5:1 v/v/ 0.008 v/v/ 50 °C/ 2 h Trans.: 5:1 v/v/ 8 g/L/ 50°C/ 2 h Dubey and Gupta, 2017
      Rice bran oil NaOH 6:1 M/ 2 wt.%/ 60°C / 2 h Wakil et al., 2016
      Calophyllum inophyllum oil H2SO4, sodium methoxide Ester.: 30:1 M/ 10 wt.% / 75°C/ 2 h Trans.: 7.5:1 M/ 1 wt.%/ 55°C/ 1.5 h Jahirul et al., 2015
      Aphanamixis polystachya oil HCl, KOH Ester.: 24:1 M/ 1% v/v/ 60°C/ 3 h Trans.: 6:1 M/ 1 wt.%/ 60°C/ 2 h Palash et al., 2015
      Palm oil KOH 25% v/v/ 1 wt.%/ 60°C / 2 h Fattah et al., 2014b
      Calophyllum inophyllum oil H2SO4, KOH Ester.: 12:1 M/ 1.5% v/v/ 60°C/ 3 h Trans.: 6:1 M/ 1 wt.%/ 60°C/ 2 h Fattah et al., 2014c
      Ceiba pentandra oil H2SO4, NaOH Ester.: 8:1 M/ 1% v/v/ 60°C/ 2 h Trans.: 8:1 M/ 1 wt.%/ 50°C/ 1 h Silitonga et al., 2013b

      M, Molar ratio.

      Heterogeneous Catalysts

      Heterogeneous catalysts are in a phase or state different from those of the reactants. These are the type of catalysts that creates active sites with its reactants regularly during a reaction (Melero et al., 2009). Heterogeneously catalyzed methanolysis reaction is very complex because it occurs in a three-phase system consisting of a solid (heterogeneous catalyst) and two immiscible liquid phases (oil and methanol). Some side reactions such as saponification of glycerides and methyl esters and neutralization of FFAs by catalyst also occur concurrently with methanolysis. The main disadvantages of this catalysis include elevated temperatures and higher oil/alcohol ratios than that of the homogeneous catalysis. Other advantages include ease in separation and purification, as well as superior reusability of the catalyst, etc. Heterogeneous catalysts can be divided into acid and base catalysts. These catalysts can be classified as Brønsted or Lewis catalysts (Di Serio et al., 2008). However, in many cases, both types of sites could be present; as such, some of the catalysts can be used as a catalyst to both kind of reactions.

      Base Catalyst

      A heterogeneous base catalyst aims to overcome constraints such as saponification that hinders the separation of glycerol from the methyl ester layer, associated with the usage of a homogeneous base catalyst. These catalysts also show superior catalytic activity under mild conditions (Calero et al., 2014). These catalysts have many other advantages, namely, non-corrosiveness, environmental friendliness, and less problems in disposal. In addition, they are easily separated from the reaction environment and can be designed to give higher activity, selectivity and longer catalyst lifetime (Liu et al., 2008b). Many metal-based oxides, including alkali metal, alkaline earth metal, and transition metal oxides have been used as catalyst for the transesterification process of oils. The structure of metal oxides consists of positive metal ions (cations) that possess Lewis acid characteristics and negative oxygen ions (anions) that possess Brønsted base characteristics (Di Serio et al., 2008; Zabeti et al., 2009). Sometimes, two or more types of metal oxides are combined to be used as catalysts. Other types of catalysts that predominantly work as base heterogeneous catalysts are boron group-based and waste-based catalysts (Semwal et al., 2011).

      Alkaline earth and alkali metal-based catalyst

      Metal-based oxides are the most commonly exploited as a heterogeneous catalyst for transesterification. The surface structure of a metal oxide is presented in Figure 3. Zhang et al. (1988) demonstrated the basic properties of alkaline earth metal oxides using temperature-programmed desorption (TPD) of adsorbed carbon dioxide analysis. They showed that the amount of basic sites per unit weight approximately corresponds to that of the surface area and follows the sequence: CaO > MgO > SrO > BaO. The oxides of stronger basic sites promote the reaction more effectively.

      Surface structure of metal oxides (M represents the metal).

      Among the metal-based catalysts, CaO has been the most studied catalyst material for biodiesel production, as it presents many advantages, namely, long catalyst life, relatively high basic strength, high activity, and low solubility in methanol and requires only moderate reaction conditions (Roschat et al., 2016; Latchubugata et al., 2018). Arun et al. (2017) studied the biodiesel production from Terminalia belerica and Garcinia gummi-gutta using calcinated CaO as a heterogeneous catalyst. The calcination process was done in a muffle furnace at 605°C for 5 h, which was preceded by drying in an oven at 125°C for 12 h. The transesterification was carried out at 60°C, 9:1 M methanol/oil ratio, and 2% w/v catalyst for 3 h. Properties of biodiesel produced from these feedstocks were within the range suggested by the American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM) standard establishing a successful production. Roschat et al. (2016) carried out the transesterification of palm olein oil (FFAs of 0.29 mg KOH/g) using hydrated lime-derived calcium oxide (CaO) as a catalyst. The catalyst was prepared by drying overnight in an oven at 100°C, crushed and sieved, and then calcined in a furnace at different temperatures (700, 800, and 900°C) in the air for 3 h. A biodiesel yield of 97.20% was achieved for 800°C calcined sample. This catalyst could be reused for at least five times without significant yield deterioration (more than 90%).

      Du et al. (2019) synthesized three novel carbon-based MgO solid bases using sol–gel and calcination method for biodiesel production from castor oil. These catalysts were identified as MgO-PVA-800, MgO-UREA-800, and MgO-GLY-800, where 800 indicates the calcination temperature, and PVA, UREA, and GLY stands for polyvinyl acetate, urea, and ethylene glycol, respectively. The transesterification was carried out at 12:1 M ethanol/oil ratio, 6 wt.% catalyst concentration at 75°C. The highest conversion rate of 96.5% was obtained with MgO-UREA-800 after 50 min under these conditions. The biodiesel yield for MgO-PVA-800 and MgO-GLY-800 was 93.6 and 91.8%, respectively, for the same reaction time. Manríquez-Ramírez et al. (2013) studied the catalyst activity of impregnated MgO with KOH, NaOH, and cerium nitrate. The basic strength of the samples followed the order: MgO–KOH > MgO–NaOH > MgO–CeO2 as determined by Fourier-transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR). The reaction was carried out at 60°C with oil/methanol ratio of 4:1, and the biodiesel yields after 1 h of reaction were 44, 56, 78, and <99% for MgO and MgO–CeO2, MgO–NaOH, and MgO–KOH, respectively. It has been reported that MgO has low activity in transesterification of vegetable oils to biodiesel (Liu et al., 2007).

      Roschat et al. (2018) studied the biodiesel production process of palm oil using strontium oxide (SrO) via the ethanolysis reaction. The optimum reaction condition for this work was determined experimentally as 80°C reaction temperature, ethanol/oil ratio of 12:1 M, catalyst loading amount of 5 wt.%, and reaction time of 3 h. This resulted in a yield of 98.2% fatty acid ethyl ester. The catalyst can be reused for five times with more than 90% yield. Liu et al. (2007) studied the transesterification of soybean oil to biodiesel using SrO as a solid base catalyst. They proposed the mechanism of the catalytic reaction of SrO, which creates basic intermediate compounds, thereby making it a solid base catalyzed reaction. The results showed that biodiesel yield was <95% at temperatures below 70°C within 30 min. The reusability of SrO was high and could maintain sustained activity even after 10 cycles.

      Mootabadi et al. (2010) carried out ultrasonic-assisted transesterification of palm oil using different alkaline earth metal oxides such as CaO, SrO, BaO, etc. as catalysts. They varied the reaction parameters, namely, reaction time of 10–60 min, alcohol/oil ratio of 3:1–15:1 M, catalyst loading of 0.5–3%, and ultrasonic amplitudes of 25–100%. Their results opposed the previously reported activity ranking of the catalysts as CaO < SrO < BaO. At optimum test conditions, 95% yield was reached in 1 h. When non-optimized conditions were used, the yield of 77.3, 95.2, and 95.2% was reported for CaO, SrO, and BaO catalysts, respectively, for 1 h reaction time. Dai et al. (2018) prepared lithium-based catalyst, lithium–iron oxide (LiFe5O8-LiFeO2) by homogeneously mixing Fe2O3 in an aqueous solution of Li2CO3 and then heating this in a muffle furnace at different calcination temperatures and cooling to room temperature afterwards. The catalysts were then used to produce biodiesel from soybean oil where reactions were carried out at 65°C for 2 h utilizing methanol/oil ratio 36:1 M and 8 wt.% catalyst loading. The maximum conversion of 96.5% was achieved when the catalyst calcination temperature of 800°C was used. Moreover, the catalyst can be reused for at least five runs, maintaining the biodiesel yields close to 94%.

      Mixed metal-based catalyst

      Mixed metal-based oxides are predominantly used as base catalyst depending on the catalyst mixture. Their basicity can be tuned by altering their chemical composition and synthesis procedure (Teo et al., 2017). The type of synthesis method, activation temperature, and structure have a strong influence in the final basicity of the mixed oxides (Mckenzie et al., 1992; Tichit et al., 1995). They were sometimes used as a mixed acid–base catalyst by some researchers. Salinas et al. (2018) studied the catalytic activity of 1–5 wt.% La2O3 in ZrO2 mixed metal oxides produced using sol–gel method and calcined at 600°C in biodiesel production from canola oil through methanolysis reaction. The sol–gel method allows for improving catalytic activity by modifying acid–base properties. It was found that La2O3 doped in ZrO2 forms a monoclinic-ZrO2 structure and enhances its basicity, which plays a key role in catalysis, and 3 wt.% La2O3 was the optimum percentage for the transesterification of canola oil. Limmanee et al. (2013) studied the catalytic activity of nanocrystallite CaMgZn mixed oxides as heterogeneous catalyst prepared using coprecipitation method using Na2CO3 as a precipitant in the synthesis of palm kernel oil biodiesel via methanolysis. They reported a maximum yield of 97.5 wt.% over the CaMgZn mixed oxide, prepared with the Ca/Mg/Zn ratio of 3:1:1 under the Na2CO3 concentration of 0.75 mol/L and the CaMg(CO3)2 and CaZn(CO3)2 metal ions ratio of 1.0 when the reaction conditions were methanol/oil ratio of 20:1 M, 6 wt.% catalyst and 60°C. Santiago-Torres et al. (2014) studied Na2ZrO3 as a basic catalyst for the transesterification of soybean oil. They reported a maximum biodiesel conversion efficiency of 98.3% at 3% of catalyst in 3 h of reaction time at 65°C reaction temperature. Lee et al. (2015) synthesized bifunctional acid–base catalyst comprising of mixed metal oxides of Ca and La (CaO–La2O3) at various Ca/La atomic ratios via coprecipitation. This integration enhanced the catalytic activity due to the dispersion of CaO on the composite surface, thereby increasing the surface acidic and basic sites compared to individual oxides. They reported the highest biodiesel yield of 98.76% under conditions of 160°C, 3 h, 25:1 M methanol/oil ratio, and 3 wt.% catalyst.

      Transition metal-based catalyst

      Titanium oxide (TiO2) and zinc oxide (ZnO) are among the transition metal oxides that are used as a heterogeneous base catalyst for biodiesel production (Yoo et al., 2010). Kaur et al. (2018) synthesized tungsten (W) supported TiO2/SiO2 catalyst using the sol–gel method to study transesterification of waste cottonseed oil to produce biodiesel. The complete transesterification reaction was achieved in 4 h with 1:30 M oil/methanol ratio, 5 wt.% catalyst at 65°C. They also reported good reusability with the catalyst being active in four catalytic runs without significant reduction in activity. Madhuvilakku and Piraman (2013) studied the catalytic activity of mixed oxides of Ti and Zn (TiO2-ZnO) and ZnO by employing these in palm oil transesterification process. Biodiesel yield of 92% was attained with 200 mg catalyst loading of TiO2-ZnO, 6:1 M methanol/oil ratio, and 60°C reaction temperature in 5 h. They also reported a better yield compared to ZnO catalyst (83%).

      Boron group-based catalyst

      Boron group-based compounds, especially alumina (Al2O3), are widely utilized for supporting different metal oxides, halides, nitrates, and alloys (Chouhan and Sarma, 2011). Kesserwan et al. (2020) reported on novel hybrid CaO/Al2O3 aerogel to catalyze the methanolysis of waste cooking oil. The catalyst was prepared by the rapid epoxide-initiated sol–gel process followed by calcination at 700°C under supercritical carbon dioxide conditions. They reported that, at optimized reaction condition of 11:1 M methanol/oil ratio, 1 wt.% of 3:1 CaO/Al2O3 calcined aerogel, 65°C reaction temperature, and 4 h reaction time results in a maximum biodiesel yield of 89.9%. Benjapornkulaphong et al. (2009) studied various Al2O3-supported alkali and alkali earth metal nitrates, namely, LiNO3/Al2O3, NaNO3/Al2O3, Ca(NO3)2/Al2O3, KNO3/Al2O3, and Mg(NO3)2/Al2O3 produced by impregnation method followed by calcination at 450–850°C. They employed these to catalyze the methanolysis of palm kernel oil and coconut oil. They found that calcination temperature affects the yield significantly with Ca(NO3)2/Al2O3 and LiNO3/Al2O3 yielding <90% biodiesel when calcined at 450°C, and higher calcination temperature dropped the biodiesel yield. They recommended a catalyst amount of 10 wt.% and 15–20 wt.% of Ca(NO3)2/Al2O3 catalyst for transesterification of palm kernel oil and coconut oil, respectively, when methanol/oil ratio of 65:1 M, temperature of 60°C, and reaction time of 3 h were used.

      Hydrotalcite-based catalyst

      “Hydrotalcites are a class of anionic and basic clays with a general formulas of M1-x2+Mx3+ (OH2)x+(Ax/n)n−. yH2O where M2+ and M3+ are divalent and trivalent metals, respectively, An−(CO3-, SO42-, Cl, NO3-) is an n-valent anion, and x usually has a value between 0.25 and 0.33” (Helwani et al., 2009; Endalew et al., 2011). Hydrotalcites are predominantly used as heterogeneous base catalyst. The advantages of these catalysts are their tunable high basic strength obtained by changing the ratio of Mg/Al and the inherent better catalyst morphology compared to alkaline earth metal oxides. However, nonhomogeneity and sensitiveness to FFA and water are the major disadvantages for this type of catalysts. Navajas et al. (2018) studied the catalytic activity of Mg–Al hydrotalcite with Mg/Al ratios of 1.5–5 M, synthesized by coprecipitation, in transesterification of sunflower oil. They reported an optimum conversion of 96% under methanol/oil ratio of 48:1 M, 1 atm, 60°C, 2 wt.% of the catalyst after 24 h. They attributed the activity of catalyst to the presence of Brønsted-type basic sites at the edges of the crystal. Nowicki et al. (2016) studied the catalytic performance of Zr-doped Mg–Al hydrotalcite with varying Zr/Mg molar ratios in transesterification of refined rapeseed oil. They found that tetravalent cation of Zr (Zr4+) was effective in significantly increasing the catalytic activity of the catalyst. They reported the optimum oil conversion of 99.9% for hydrotalcite with the ratio of Zr/Mg/Al = 0.45:2.55:1 M and the reaction condition of 373–393 K temperature, 4.8−5.0 atm pressure, and 6 h reaction time. Trakarnpruk and Porntangjitlikit (2008) studied the catalytic activity of K-loaded calcined Mg–Al hydrotalcite (Mg/AL = 4) in transesterification of palm oil with methanol. They found that the catalyst acts as a basic catalyst. They also reported an 86.6% methyl ester yield at reaction parameters of 30:1 M methanol/oil ratio, 100°C, and 7 wt.% catalyst for 6 h. Zeng et al. (2009) reported that immobilization of Saccharomyces cerevisiae lipase (a biocatalyst) on Mg–Al hydrotalcite (Mg/Al molar ratio, 4.0) by physical adsorption markedly improved performance of the enzyme. The transesterification of refined rape oil was carried out with immobilized lipase (1.5 wt.%) and under atmospheric pressure at 45°C with 96% ester conversion in 4.5 h. The biocatalyst maintained high activity with 81.3% ester conversion after 10 reuse cycles.

      Waste-based catalyst

      Waste derived from industrial processes and surrounding environment can aid in the development of a low-cost solid base catalyst. These catalysts can promote a sustainable and environment-friendly approach toward biodiesel production (Majhi and Ray, 2016; Pandit and Fulekar, 2017). Calcium-enriched waste products, namely, shells of mussel, egg, cockle, snail, and oyster; fish scales; animal bones; and ash derived from plant species, etc. are easily available at low cost (Marwaha et al., 2018). Calcium obtained from these waste materials could be converted to CaO, which is the most versatile heterogeneous base catalyst, as discussed previously. Yaşar (2019) studied the catalytic activity of waste-eggshell-based CaO and compared it to the pure CaO. Transesterification of rapeseed oil was carried out at 9:1 M methanol/oil ratio, 4 wt.% catalyst, and 60°C reaction temperature for 1 h. The maximum yield for these conditions was 96.81 and 95.12% for CaO and waste-eggshell-based CaO, respectively. Sirisomboonchai et al. (2015) studied the catalytic activity of calcined scallop shell in the transesterification of waste cooking oil using methanol. A yield of 86% was observed in the presence of small amount of water with 5 wt.% catalyst loading, 6:1 M methanol/oil ratio, and 65°C reaction temperature for 2 h. The same catalyst was used for four cycles with 20% reduction of FAME yield owing to the formation of Ca-glyceroxide on its surface. Hu et al. (2011) studied the catalyst derived from waste freshwater mussel shell in transesterification of Chinese tallow oil. The catalyst was synthesized using the calcination–impregnation–activation method. The mussel shell was first calcined at 900°C followed by impregnation in deionized water and activated by calcination at 600°C for 3 h. Over 90% yields was obtainable with 12:1 M methanol/oil ratio, 5 wt.% catalyst, and reaction temperature of 70°C in 1.5 h. The catalyst also exhibited excellent reusability with only 10–15% decrease in yield after 12 runs.

      Acid Catalysts

      Heterogeneous acid catalysts have a less corrosive and toxic effect and give rise to fewer environmental problems compared to homogeneous acid catalysts (Aransiola et al., 2014). These catalysts contain a variety of acidic sites with different strengths of Brønsted or Lewis acidity. While these catalysts provide encouraging results under moderate reaction conditions, they react very slowly compared to solid base catalysts. In addition, high catalyst loading, high temperature, and long reaction time are required to employ this type of catalysts (Mansir et al., 2017).

      Cation-exchange resins

      Many researchers have used cation-exchange resin for biodiesel production at laboratory scale. Cation exchange resins are macroporous and contain numerous acidic sites to catalyze FFAs to biodiesel through heterogeneous esterification reactions and prevent saponification. Fu et al. (2015) studied the catalyst activity of sulfonated polystyrene-divinyl benzene (ST-DVB-SO3H) macroporous resin in the esterification of high FFA (acid value, 64.9 mg KOH/g) oil. Maximum FFA conversion of 97.8% was achieved when the reaction was carried out under the following conditions: 10 wt.% catalyst loading, methanol/oil ratio of 15:1 M, and 100°C for 3 h. Feng et al. (2011) studied continuous esterification of waste fried oil with an acid value of 36.0 mg KOH/g in a fixed bed reactor using commercial cation-exchange resin (NKC-9). They reported a 98% conversion rate during 500 h run under 2.8:1 methanol/oleic acid mass ratio, 44.0 cm catalyst bed height, 0.62 ml/min feed flowrate, and 65°C reaction temperature.

      Heteropoly acid derivatives

      Heteropoly acids (HPAs) and their salts as solid (heterogeneous) acid catalysts are also used frequently for the production of biodiesel (Hanif et al., 2017; Alcañiz-Monge et al., 2018). HPAs having a Keggin structure are preferably used because they have high thermal stability and can be synthesized easily compared to other types of HPAs. However, Keggin-type HPA has a low specific surface area, which can be overcome using appropriate supportive material. HPAs supported on the carriers are used in biodiesel production because of their structural mobility and superacidity. Kurhade and Dalai (2018) studied 12-tungstophosphoric acid (TPA) (H3PW12O40.nH2O) impregnated on the γ-Al2O3 catalyst for the biodiesel production. An optimized conversion of 94.9 ± 2.3% can be achieved with 10 wt.% of the catalyst loading, 17.5:1 M methanol/oil ratio, 200°C, and 4 MPa in 10 h. A conversion of 90.3 ± 4.3% was achieved after the second run. Siddiquee et al. (2011) studied the catalytic activity of mesoporous ordered silica, SBA-15 impregnated with the HPA in the production of biodiesel from the lipid of wastewater sludge. The experiment was carried out in a microreactor setup under varying operating conditions. A biodiesel yield of 30.14 wt.% was obtained with 15% HPA at a temperature of 135°C and a pressure of 135 psi in 3 h reaction time.

      Sulfonic acid-based catalysts

      Sulfonic acid group catalysts are characterized by sulfonated cross-linked polystyrene and are generally less corrosive and environmentally benign (Mansir et al., 2017). These type of catalysts have enhanced activity due to the attraction of fatty acids and tails of alcohol by the polymer support. In addition, the strong sulfonic acid group attached to the polymer chains increases the acidity of the sites (Vaccari, 1999). The typical examples of these catalysts are nonporous Nafion resins and porous Amberlysts. Liu et al. (2008a) studied the synthesis of mesoporous solid acid catalysts based on sulfonic acid functionalized ordered mesoporous carbons (OMC-SO3H) to use as a heterogeneous acid catalyst for esterification of oleic acid with ethanol. The esterification was performed under an N2 atmosphere in a closed flask at 80°C. The results showed that this catalyst is highly efficient due to its high acid density and hydrophobic surface property. Andrijanto et al. (2012) studied sulfonic acid catalysts supported on hypercrosslinked polystyrene (D5082) for the esterification of oleic acid with methanol. The results showed that D5082 had high catalytic activity despite showing low concentrations of acid sites and acid site strengths, which they attributed to the high accessibility of acid sites throughout the catalyst particles.

      Sulfated oxide-based catalyst

      Sulfated metal oxides generally work as an acid heterogeneous catalyst in esterification reaction (Chen et al., 2007; Shi et al., 2016). Kaur and Ali (2015) studied the efficacy and reusability of Ce/ZrO2-TiO2/SO42-, a catalyst in the esterification of oleic acid with methanol or ethanol. The catalyst activity of this catalyst is a function of its Brønsted acidic sites, which depends on the cerium concentration. A 2 wt.% cerium in the catalyst, when calcined at 600°C, showed the highest catalytic activity. With 5 wt.% catalyst, 6:1 M methanol/oil ratio at 65°C and 1 h reaction time achieved <98% conversion for the esterification of vegetable oil. They also reported no significant loss in the catalyst activity until the fifth cycle. Ropero-Vega et al. (2010) studied the catalytic activity of titania sulfated with ammonium sulfate [TiO2/SO42--(NH4)2SO4] as well as sulfuric acid (TiO2/SO42--H2SO4). They found that sulfated samples showed strong acidity as determined using Hammet indicators. The FTIR analysis of TiO2/SO42--(NH4)2SO4 and TiO2/SO42--H2SO4 showed the presence of both Lewis and Brønsted acid sites and only Lewis-type sites, respectively. Further analysis showed very high activity for the esterification of fatty acids with ethanol in a mixture of oleic acid (79%). Up to 82.2% conversion of oleic acid was achieved after 3 h of reaction at 80°C.

      Acid/Base Catalyst

      As discussed previously, oil with high FFA content requires an acid catalyst to esterify the FFA content before transesterification can take place. For biodiesel production from these type of oils, a heterogeneous catalytic system with both acidic and basic sites is capable of esterification and transesterification with minimal soap formation is highly sought after (Semwal et al., 2011). This type of catalysts possesses “Lewis acid” sites, which take part in the esterification reaction of the carboxylic acid with methanol as well as conjugated basic sites that influence the transesterification of triglyceride with methanol. Depending on the type of reactant and reaction parameters, this type of catalysts can work as an acid catalyst, base catalyst, or bifunctional one.

      Zirconia and its derivatives

      Zirconium dioxide (ZrO2), also known as zirconia, is used as both acid and the base heterogeneous catalyst. The primary nature of this catalyst is acidic, as it has strong surface acidity (Lam et al., 2010). Other derivatives of zirconia include sulfated ZrO2 (Shi et al., 2016), metal oxides with ZrO2 (Guldhe et al., 2017), metal-supported zirconia (Wan Omar and Amin, 2011), zirconia supported metal oxides (Kim et al., 2012), etc. Ibrahim et al. (2019) studied the catalytic activity of ZrO2 loaded into different supports, namely, Al2O3, Fe2O3, TiO2, and SiO2 using hybrid sol–gel autocombustion method. Highest conversion of biodiesel of 48.6% was achieved using alcohol/acid ratio of 120:1 M, 0.1 mass% catalyst, and 120°C reaction temperature for 3 h when ZrO2/SiO2 was used. In addition, the catalyst could be reused five times without significant loss of catalytic activity. Guldhe et al. (2017) studied tungstated zirconia (WO3/ZrO2) as a heterogeneous acid catalyst for the synthesis of biodiesel for S. obliquus lipids. FTIR characterization of catalyst showed the presence of both Brønsted and Lewis acid sites. Optimized biodiesel conversion of 94.58% was achieved at 100°C temperature, 12:1 M methanol/oil ratio, and 15 wt.% of catalyst amount in 3 h. Sun et al. (2010) studied ZrO2 supported La2O3 as a catalyst for the transesterification reaction of sunflower oil with methanol to produce biodiesel. The catalyst was prepared by an incipient wetness impregnation method, followed by drying at 110°C overnight and calcination at 600°C for 4 h in air. They reported that biodiesel conversion was possible due to the basic nature of the catalyst, which was determined using TPD of adsorbed CO2 and 21 wt.% La2O3 loaded on ZrO2 showed the highest basicity. The optimized test conditions were 30:1 M methanol/oil ratio, 200°C reaction temperature, and 5 h of reaction time that resulted in 84.9% biodiesel yield for each case.

      Zeolite-based catalyst

      Zeolites occur naturally in the form of microporous crystalline aluminosilicates interlinked by oxygen atoms. The chemical composition, pore size structure, and ion exchange properties of zeolites are responsible for their versatile catalytic behavior (De Lima et al., 2016). Zeolite framework structure contains molecular pores and channels of equal sizes, which can absorb molecules that fit into these and exclude the larger ones. This property of zeolite helps to exchange ions that in turn produce negative ion within the structure of the catalyst, thereby emerging as a base catalyst (Hattori, 1995; Mansir et al., 2017). The base strength of the alkali ion-exchanged zeolite increases with increasing electropositivity of the exchange cation. Both synthetic and natural zeolites are being pursued as promising catalysts. Zeolites have unique properties as catalysts, namely, shape selectivity, ability to maintain electro-neutrality through cation–polar molecules reversible interactions, etc. The weak basic strength and small catalytic pore diameter are the main problems reported for basic zeolite catalysts (Endalew et al., 2011). These can also be used as an acid heterogeneous catalyst.

      Li et al. (2019) studied alkaline Li/NaY zeolite catalysts with different molar ratios of Li2CO3 to NaY zeolite in the transesterification of castor oil with ethanol. The ideal catalyst was synthesized from fly ash using coprecipitation method with ratio of Li2CO3 to NaY zeolite of 1:1 M calcined at 750°C for 4 h. The fatty acid ethyl ester yield of 98.6% was obtained for the reaction conditions of ethanol/oil ratio of 18:1 M, 3 wt.% catalyst, and reaction temperature of 75°C for 2 h. Du et al. (2018) studied the catalytic activity of NaY zeolite-supported La2O3 catalysts in the production of castor oil biodiesel. They produced the optimized catalyst, S-La2O3/NaY-800, by physically mixing the zeolite NaY, sodium carboxymethyl cellulose (CMC), lanthanum oxide and kaolin (mass ratio of NaY/kaolin/La2O3/CMC = 70:20:10:2.5). A surfactant (4 wt.%) was added to this mixture and then calcined at 800°C. Under the optimized reaction conditions: ratio of ethanol to oil of 15:1 M, 10 wt.% catalyst, and reaction temperature of 70°C for 50 min; 84.6% fatty acid ethyl ester was obtained. Doyle et al. (2016) studied the acidic catalytic activity of zeolite Y with Si/Al ratio of 3.1, in the esterification of oleic acid. The optimum oleic acid conversion using the zeolite catalyst was 85% with 6:1 M ethanol/oleic acid ratio, 5 wt.% catalyst loading, and 70°C for 1 h reaction time.

      Biocatalysts

      The pathway of biodiesel production through chemical catalysis is energy consuming and produces undesired by-products, namely, soaps and polymeric pigments, which hinder the separation of product from glycerol and di- and monoacylglycerols (Gog et al., 2012). Using biocatalysts, these impediments can be eliminated. Biocatalysts, also known as enzymes, are acquired from living organisms that promote chemical reactions without affecting themselves chemically (Amini et al., 2017a,b). Two types of enzymatic biocatalyst are usually used in biodiesel production, namely, extracellular lipases and intracellular lipases. Extracellular lipases are the enzymes that have been recovered from the microorganism broth and then purified. Intracellular lipase, on the other hand, remains either in the cell-producing walls or inside the cell. The major producer microorganisms for extracellular lipases are Rhizopus oryzae, Mucor miehei, Candida antarctica, and Pseudomonas cepacia. The commercial immobilized lipases that has been studied thoroughly are Novozym 435, Lipozyme TL IM, Lipozyme RM IM, and Lipase PS-C (Gog et al., 2012). The drawback of using extracellular enzymes as catalyst is the complexity of separation and purification procedures and its associated cost. This can be lowered using microbial cells as whole-cell biocatalysts with acceptable biodiesel yield. Filamentous fungi have been discerned as whole-cell biocatalysts. However, lipase used in whole-cell form cannot be reused at the end of the reaction.

      Unlike the chemical catalysts, biocatalysts apply to a wide range of triglyceride sources, with FFA ranging from 0.5 to 80% (Aransiola et al., 2014). Other advantages of enzymatic biodiesel production include easy product removal, moderate process temperature (35–45°C), zero by-product, and reusability of catalysts (Christopher et al., 2014; Mardhiah et al., 2017). The key parameters affecting the biodiesel yield for enzymatic synthesis are presented in Figure 4. As seen in the figure, various factors such as choice of lipase, choice of substrate, substrate concentration, pH of the microenvironment, temperature, spacing between the enzyme molecules and the substrate, etc. affect the biodiesel yield for enzyme-catalyzed transesterification. Some investigations using enzyme-catalyzed transesterification of different biodiesel feedstocks are presented in Table 4. As seen from the table, the efficiency of biocatalyzed transesterification process is dependent on enzyme source and operational conditions.

      Crucial parameters affecting the biodiesel yield in enzymatic synthesis (Szczesna Antczak et al., 2009).

      Various biocatalysts used for biodiesel production from different sources.

      Feedstock Catalyst Reaction parameters Yield (%/wt.%) References
      Alcohol/Oil to alcohol ratio/Catalyst amount (wt.%)/Temperature (°C)/Reaction time
      Waste cooking oil Pancreatic lipase Methanol/3:1/1.5/60/4 h 88% Jayaraman et al., 2020
      Residual fish oil Novozym 435 lipase Ethano/35.45:1/35/8 h 82.91 wt.% Marín-Suárez et al., 2019
      Rice bran oil Rice bran lipase Methanol/6:1/N.A./40/12 day 83.4 wt.% Choi et al., 2018
      Ocimum basilicum seed oil Novozym 435 lipase Methanol/11:1/6/47/68 h 89% Amini et al., 2017b
      Waste vegetable oil Epobond Pseudomonas cepacia Ethanol/3:1/3/37/1.5 h 46.32% Lopresto et al., 2015
      Calophyllum inophyllum Rhizopus oryzae lipase Methanol/12:1/20/35/25 h 92% Arumugam and Ponnusami, 2014
      Jatropha curcas Immobilised Burkholderia cepacia Ethanol/10:1/5.2mg/24 h 78% Abdulla and Ravindra, 2013
      Castor oil Lipozyme Thermomyces lanuginosa IM. Methanol/3:1/15/45/24 h 67.58 wt.% Maleki et al., 2013
      Corn oil Lipozyme Thermomyces lanuginosa IM. Ethanol/6:1/2.8/35/12 h 69.2 wt.% Mata et al., 2012
      Pistacia chinensis bge seed oil Rhizopus oryzae lipase Methanol/5:1/25 IUAI−ROL/g/37/60 h (anion exchange resin) 92% Li et al., 2012
      Pistacia chinensis bge seed oil Rhizopus oryzae lipase Methanol/5:1/7 IUMI−ROL/g/37/60 h (macroporous resin) 94% Li et al., 2012
      Jatropha curcas Pseudomonas cepacia Ethanol/4:1/5–8/40/24 h 98% Shah and Gupta, 2007
      Nanocatalysts

      Recently, nanocatalysts have gained significant attention for biodiesel production owing to their high catalytic efficiency (Qiu et al., 2011). These catalysts have a high surface area that results in increased activity compared to conventional catalysts. In addition, these catalysts possess high stability, superior resistance to saponification, efficient surface/volume ratio, and high reusability (Rahmani Vahid et al., 2017). Nanocatalysts can be synthesized using various methods. Some of the methods include self-propagating high-temperature synthesis, microwave combustion, conventional hydrothermal, microwave hydrothermal, microwave solvothermal, sol–gel technique, coprecipitation, impregnation, gas condensation, chemical vapor deposition, electrochemical deposition, vacuum deposition and evaporation, etc. (Quirino et al., 2016; Ambat et al., 2018). Characterization of these catalysts is critical before it can be used for biodiesel production. Different methods have been used to achieve this so far. The most commonly used method for characterization of composition and crystallinity of these catalysts is X-ray diffraction (XRD). The morphology of prepared nanocatalysts and their precursors are determined using scanning electron microscopy (SEM). To analyze the particle diameter and morphology of the catalysts, transmission electron microscopy (TEM) is used. Other characterization methods include Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) spectroscopy that is used for determining assimilation of phases, Barrett–Joyner–Hlenda (BJH) and Brunauer–Emmett–Teller (BET) methods for specific surface area calculation, and thermogravimetric analysis (TGA) for examining the decomposition nature of catalyst samples, etc. (Nayebzadeh et al., 2017; Baskar et al., 2018). Some of the latest works on nanocatalysts for the transesterification reaction are summarized in Table 5. As seen from the table, nanocatalyst can achieve high FAME yield with very mild reaction conditions and short reaction times. The reusability of these catalysts is also excellent, as these retain good activity even after 11 cycles depending on the catalyst.

      Various nanocatalysts used for biodiesel production from different sources.

      Catalyst Feedstock Reaction parameters No of cycle FAME yield/Conversion (%) References
      Methanol to oil molar ratio/Temperature (°C)/Catalyst (wt.%)/Time (h)
      NaAlO2/γ-Al2O3 Palm oil 20.79:1/64.72/10.89/3 1 97.65 Zhang et al., 2020
      6 93.29
      25%MoO3/B-ZSM-5 Oleic acid 20:1/160/3/6 1 98 Mohebbi et al., 2020
      6 93
      CaO/CuFe2O4 Chicken fat 15:1/70/3/4 h 1 94.52 Seffati et al., 2019
      KOH/Fe3O4@Al2O3 Canola oil 12:1/65 /4/6 1 98.8 Kazemifard et al., 2018
      6 88.4
      MgO/MgFe2O4 Sunflower oil 12:1/110/4/4 1 91.2 Alaei et al., 2018
      6 82.4
      Cr/Ca/γ-Al2O3 Cooking oil 18:1/65/6/3 1 92.79 Sulaiman et al., 2017
      6 78.29
      MgO/MgAl2O4 (untreated and treated with plasma) Sunflower oil 12:1/110/3/3 1 95.7/96.5 Rahmani Vahid et al., 2017
      5 79.3/91.1
      γ-Al2O3/KI Palm oil 14:1/60/4/4 1 98 Islam et al., 2015
      11 79
      Ca/γ-Al2O3 Corn oil 12:1/65/6/5 1 87.89 Moradi et al., 2015
      5 34.64
      Cs/Al/Fe3O4 Sunflower oil 14:1/58/6/2 1 95 Feyzi et al., 2013
      4 88
      Perspectives, Challenges, and Further Work

      Table 6 summarizes the advantages and disadvantages of different types of catalyst based on the above discussion.

      Advantages and disadvantages of different types of catalysts.

      Catalyst type Advantages Disadvantages Examples
      Homogeneous base catalyst Strong catalytic activity Inexpensive and widely available No corrosive Ideal for TGAs with low FFA Possible formation of soap Not suitable for feedstock with high FFA No reusability Requires extensive washing Sodium or potassium hydroxide; Sodium and potassium methoxides, and carbonates
      Homogeneous acid catalyst Strong catalytic activity Suitable for feedstock with high FFA Do not form soap The reaction rate is slower compared to the base catalyst Separation and reuse unusual Corrosion problem Sulfonic acid, sulfuric acid, hydrochloric acid
      Heterogeneous base catalyst Ease of purification of the product Effluent generation minimized Catalyst can be reused High cost to synthesise catalyst Leaching of active sites may occur Alkaline earth and alkali metal oxides, transition metal oxides, mixed metal oxides, hydrotalcite
      Heterogeneous acid catalyst Ease of separation Catalyst can be reused High cost to synthesise catalyst Higher alcohol-to-oil molar ratios High catalyst concentrations Longer reaction time May undergo deactivation Cation exchanges reins, heteropoly acid derivatives, sulphated oxides, sulphonic acids
      Biocatalyst Ease of separation Mild reaction condition Produces high purity product Insensitive to FFA and water content in the oil Preferred method for low-grade oil High cost for catalyst synthesis Sensitive to methanol, causing deactivation of the enzyme Very slow reaction rate Extracellular lipases (Mucor miehei, Rhizopus oryzae, Candida antarctica, Pseudomonas cepacia) and intracellular lipases (Filamentous fungi)
      Nanocatalyst High activity and stability High reusability Mild reaction condition High cost for catalyst synthesis Zn, Ca, Mg, Zr based nanocatalysts

      Homogeneous catalyst has been exhaustively studied, and challenges have been addressed in the literature. On the other hand, heterogeneous catalysts is a relatively new research area on which significant research is ongoing at present. Several challenges have been reported in the literature for these catalysts:

      Short catalyst life, lower reaction rate, and instability have been reported as the main problems for heterogeneous catalysts.

      Solid base catalysts were reported to be sensitive to CO2, water, and FFA. These consume and deactivate the catalyst via saponification.

      Solid acid catalysts were reported to induce leaching and product contamination due to the ionic group being hydrolyzed by water.

      Lipase inhibition has been reported in the presence of methanol during enzymatic transesterification.

      In the case of nanocatalysts, at relatively mild operating conditions, it is necessary to increase the reaction time to achieve high performances. However, it is essential to apply severe operating conditions to achieve ordinary reaction times, thereby increasing the energy requirement.

      The following aspects need to be addressed in future works:

      Further investigation into waste-derived catalysts are necessary to develop new catalysts with improved catalytic performance.

      Development of highly active and selective heterogeneous catalysts that are economically feasible for use in the industrial scale.

      Exploring new catalyst supports with selective surface area and interconnected system of appropriate pore sizes.

      Exploring biomass or waste as the source of catalyst to reduce the associated cost and improve sustainability for commercially available solid catalysts.

      Improving preparation routes and treatment steps for hydrotalcite-based catalysts to transform their application from laboratory to industrial scale.

      Improving the sensitiveness to FFA and water and the morphology by keeping high basic strength of zeolite-based catalyst.

      Further investigation into industrial enzymatic biodiesel production for an ensuring viable future option.

      Energy-efficient and low-cost methods for effective recovery and reuse of nanocatalysts.

      Conclusion

      Laboratory-scale biodiesel production using heterogeneous catalysts have been reported at length in the literature. Among the catalysts, base homogeneous catalysts possess rapid reaction rate and high yield and require mild operating conditions. However, those are sensitive to FFA content of the oil that causes undesired by-products, namely, soaps and polymeric pigments, making the purification process difficult and impossible to reuse the catalysts. Homogeneous acid catalysts are suitable for those high FFA content oil. However, they suffer some drawbacks, including relatively slow reaction rate, corrosive nature, difficulty in catalyst separation from product, etc. Heterogeneous base catalysts overcome some of the disadvantages of homogeneous base catalysts, namely, ease of separation, simple catalyst recovery techniques, and reusability of catalyst from the product. Heterogeneous acid catalysts show very less sensitivity to high FFA and water content in the feedstock and can easily be recovered, recycled, and reused after the biodiesel production process. Due to current interest in “green” alternatives to chemical catalysts, biocatalysts, i.e., enzymes, have drawn attention. The catalysts work under relatively lower reaction temperature conditions compared to other catalysts and can catalyze low-grade oils with extremely high FFA content. The results obtained have proved that high productivity, involving yield and numbers of reuse, as well as low reaction time, can be achieved when using enzymes. The major limitation is the reaction rate, which is the slowest among all the catalysts. Furthermore, the synthesis of catalysts is more expensive than those of both homogeneous acid and base catalysts. High catalytic efficiency at mild operating conditions has drawn attention to nanocatalysts recently. The development of highly active and selective heterogeneous catalysts, along with their economic feasibility for use in the industrial scale, is a subject that needs to be addressed.

      Author Contributions

      IR formulated the article, written heterogeneous base, and other sections, compiled the whole article. HO contributed heterogeneous acid catalyst section. TM oversaw the work and provided review. MM contributed the homogeneous catalyst section. AS contributed the biocatalyst section. SR contributed the nanocatalyst section. AA reviewed and improved the article. All authors contributed to the article and approved the submitted version.

      Conflict of Interest

      The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

      References Abdulla R. Ravindra P. (2013). Immobilized Burkholderia cepacia lipase for biodiesel production from crude Jatropha curcas L. oil. Biomass Bioenergy 56, 813. 10.1016/j.biombioe.2013.04.010 Abedin M. J. Masjuki H. H. Kalam M. A. Sanjid A. Rahman S. M. A. Rizwanul Fattah I. M. (2014). Performance, emissions, and heat losses of palm and jatropha biodiesel blends in a diesel engine. Ind. Crops Prod. 59, 96104. 10.1016/j.indcrop.2014.05.001 Aboelazayem O. El-Gendy N. S. Abdel-Rehim A. A. Ashour F. Sadek M. A. (2018). Biodiesel production from castor oil in Egypt: process optimisation, kinetic study, diesel engine performance and exhaust emissions analysis. Energy 157, 843852. 10.1016/j.energy.2018.05.202 Akubude V. C. Nwaigwe K. N. Dintwa E. (2019). Production of biodiesel from microalgae via nanocatalyzed transesterification process: a review. Mater. Sci. Energy Tech. 2, 216225. 10.1016/j.mset.2018.12.006 Alaei S. Haghighi M. Toghiani J. Rahmani Vahid B. (2018). Magnetic and reusable MgO/MgFe2O4 nanocatalyst for biodiesel production from sunflower oil: Influence of fuel ratio in combustion synthesis on catalytic properties and performance. Ind. Crops Prod. 117, 322332. 10.1016/j.indcrop.2018.03.015 Alcañiz-Monge J. Bakkali B. E. Trautwein G. Reinoso S. (2018). Zirconia-supported tungstophosphoric heteropolyacid as heterogeneous acid catalyst for biodiesel production. Appl. Cataly. B Environ. 224, 194203. 10.1016/j.apcatb.2017.10.066 Ambat I. Srivastava V. Sillanpää M. (2018). Recent advancement in biodiesel production methodologies using various feedstock: a review. Renew. Sust. Energy Rev. 90, 356369. 10.1016/j.rser.2018.03.069 Amini Z. Ilham Z. Ong H. C. Mazaheri H. Chen W.-H. (2017a). State of the art and prospective of lipase-catalyzed transesterification reaction for biodiesel production. Energy Convers. Manage. 141, 339353. 10.1016/j.enconman.2016.09.049 Amini Z. Ong H. C. Harrison M. D. Kusumo F. Mazaheri H. Ilham Z. (2017b). Biodiesel production by lipase-catalyzed transesterification of Ocimum basilicum L. (sweet basil) seed oil. Energy Convers. Manage. 132, 8290. 10.1016/j.enconman.2016.11.017 Andrijanto E. Dawson E. A. Brown D. R. (2012). Hypercrosslinked polystyrene sulphonic acid catalysts for the esterification of free fatty acids in biodiesel synthesis. Appl. Cataly. B Environ. 115–116, 261268. 10.1016/j.apcatb.2011.12.040 Aransiola E. F. Ojumu T. V. Oyekola O. O. Madzimbamuto T. F. Ikhu-Omoregbe D. I. O. (2014). A review of current technology for biodiesel production: State of the art. Biomass Bioenerg. 61, 276297. 10.1016/j.biombioe.2013.11.014 Arbab M. I. Varman M. Masjuki H. H. Kalam M. A. Imtenan S. Sajjad H. . (2015). Evaluation of combustion, performance, and emissions of optimum palm–coconut blend in turbocharged and non-turbocharged conditions of a diesel engine. Energ. Convers. Manage. 90, 111120. 10.1016/j.enconman.2014.11.017 Arumugam A. Ponnusami V. (2014). Biodiesel production from Calophyllum inophyllum oil using lipase producing Rhizopus oryzae cells immobilized within reticulated foams. Renew. Energ. 64, 276282. 10.1016/j.renene.2013.11.016 Arun S. B. Suresh R. Yatish K. V. Omkaresh B. R. Channa Keshava Naik N. (2017). Use of CaO and Na3PO4 catalysts in the synthesis of biodiesel and investigation of fuel properties. Mater. Today Proc. 4, 1111111117. 10.1016/j.matpr.2017.08.074 Ashraful A. M. Masjuki H. H. Kalam M. A. Rizwanul Fattah I. M. Imtenan S. Shahir S. A. . (2014). Production and comparison of fuel properties, engine performance, and emission characteristics of biodiesel from various non-edible vegetable oils: a review. Energy Convers. Manage. 80, 202228. 10.1016/j.enconman.2014.01.037 Baskar G. Aberna Ebenezer Selvakumari I. Aiswarya R. (2018). Biodiesel production from castor oil using heterogeneous Ni doped ZnO nanocatalyst. Bioresour. Technol. 250, 793798. 10.1016/j.biortech.2017.12.01029245130 Benjapornkulaphong S. Ngamcharussrivichai C. Bunyakiat K. (2009). Al2O3-supported alkali and alkali earth metal oxides for transesterification of palm kernel oil and coconut oil. Chem. Eng. J. 145, 468474. 10.1016/j.cej.2008.04.036 Borges M. E. Díaz L. (2012). Recent developments on heterogeneous catalysts for biodiesel production by oil esterification and transesterification reactions: a review. Renew. Sust. Energ. Rev. 16, 28392849. 10.1016/j.rser.2012.01.071 Calero J. Luna D. Sancho E. D. Luna C. Bautista F. M. Romero A. A. . (2014). Development of a new biodiesel that integrates glycerol, by using CaO as heterogeneous catalyst, in the partial methanolysis of sunflower oil. Fuel 122, 94102. 10.1016/j.fuel.2014.01.033 Chen X.-R. Ju Y.-H. Mou C.-Y. (2007). Direct synthesis of mesoporous sulfated silica-zirconia catalysts with high catalytic activity for biodiesel via esterification. J. Phys. Chem. C 111, 1873118737. 10.1021/jp0749221 Choi N. No D. S. Kim H. Kim B. H. Kwak J. Lee J.-S. . (2018). In situ lipase-catalyzed transesterification in rice bran for synthesis of fatty acid methyl ester. Ind. Crops Prod. 120, 140146. 10.1016/j.indcrop.2018.04.049 Chouhan A. P. S. Sarma A. K. (2011). Modern heterogeneous catalysts for biodiesel production: A comprehensive review. Renew. Sust. Energ. Rev. 15, 43784399. 10.1016/j.rser.2011.07.112 Christopher L. P. Hemanathan K. Zambare V. P. (2014). Enzymatic biodiesel: challenges and opportunities. Appl. Energy 119, 497520. 10.1016/j.apenergy.2014.01.017 Chua S. Y. Periasamy L. A. P. Goh C. M. H. Tan Y. H. Mubarak N. M. . (2020). Biodiesel synthesis using natural solid catalyst derived from biomass waste — a review. J. Industr. Eng. Chem. 81, 4160. 10.1016/j.jiec.2019.09.022 Clohessy J. Kwapinski W. (2020). Carbon-based catalysts for biodiesel production—a review. Appl. Sci. 10:918. 10.3390/app10030918 Dai Y.-M. Wang Y.-F. Chen C.-C. (2018). Synthesis and characterization of magnetic LiFe5O8-LiFeO2 as a solid basic catalyst for biodiesel production. Catal. Commun. 106, 2024. 10.1016/j.catcom.2017.12.002 De Lima A. L. Ronconi C. M. Mota C. J. A. (2016). Heterogeneous basic catalysts for biodiesel production. Catal. Sci. Technol. 6, 28772891. 10.1039/C5CY01989C Di Serio M. Tesser R. Pengmei L. Santacesaria E. (2008). Heterogeneous catalysts for biodiesel production. Energy Fuels 22, 207217. 10.1021/ef700250g Doyle A. M. Albayati T. M. Abbas A. S. Alismaeel Z. T. (2016). Biodiesel production by esterification of oleic acid over zeolite Y prepared from kaolin. Renew. Energy 97, 1923. 10.1016/j.renene.2016.05.067 Du L. Ding S. Li Z. Lv E. Lu J. Ding J. (2018). Transesterification of castor oil to biodiesel using NaY zeolite-supported La2O3 catalysts. Energy Convers. Manag. 173, 728734. 10.1016/j.enconman.2018.07.053 Du L. Li Z. Ding S. Chen C. Qu S. Yi W. . (2019). Synthesis and characterization of carbon-based MgO catalysts for biodiesel production from castor oil. Fuel 258:116122. 10.1016/j.fuel.2019.116122 Dubey P. Gupta R. (2017). Effects of dual bio-fuel (Jatropha biodiesel and turpentine oil) on a single cylinder naturally aspirated diesel engine without EGR. Appl. Therm. Eng. 115, 11371147. 10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2016.12.125 Dueso C. Muñoz M. Moreno F. Arroyo J. Gil-Lalaguna N. Bautista A. . (2018). Performance and emissions of a diesel engine using sunflower biodiesel with a renewable antioxidant additive from bio-oil. Fuel 234, 276285. 10.1016/j.fuel.2018.07.013 Endalew A. K. Kiros Y. Zanzi R. (2011). Inorganic heterogeneous catalysts for biodiesel production from vegetable oils. Biomass Bioenergy 35, 37873809. 10.1016/j.biombioe.2011.06.011 Fattah I. M. R. Kalam M. A. Masjuki H. H. Wakil M. A. (2014a). Biodiesel production, characterization, engine performance, and emission characteristics of Malaysian Alexandrian laurel oil. RSC Advanc. 4, 1778717796. 10.1039/C3RA47954D Fattah I. M. R. Masjuki H. H. Kalam M. A. Mofijur M. Abedin M. J. (2014b). Effect of antioxidant on the performance and emission characteristics of a diesel engine fueled with palm biodiesel blends. Energy Convers. Manag. 79, 265272. 10.1016/j.enconman.2013.12.024 Fattah I. M. R. Masjuki H. H. Kalam M. A. Wakil M. A. Ashraful A. M. Shahir S. A. (2014c). Experimental investigation of performance and regulated emissions of a diesel engine with Calophyllum inophyllum biodiesel blends accompanied by oxidation inhibitors. Energy Convers. Manag. 83, 232240. 10.1016/j.enconman.2014.03.069 Fattah I. M. R. Masjuki H. H. Kalam M. A. Wakil M. A. Rashedul H. K. Abedin M. J. (2014d). Performance and emission characteristics of a CI engine fueled with Cocos nucifera and Jatropha curcas B20 blends accompanying antioxidants. Ind. Crops Prod. 57, 132140. 10.1016/j.indcrop.2014.03.022 Fattah I. M. R. Masjuki H. H. Liaquat A. M. Ramli R. Kalam M. A. Riazuddin V. N. (2013). Impact of various biodiesel fuels obtained from edible and non-edible oils on engine exhaust gas and noise emissions. Renew. Sust. Energ. Rev. 18, 552567. 10.1016/j.rser.2012.10.036 Fattah I. M. R. Ming C. Chan Q. N. Wehrfritz A. Pham P. X. Yang W. . (2018). Spray and combustion investigation of post injections under low-temperature combustion conditions with biodiesel. Energy Fuels 32, 87278742. 10.1021/acs.energyfuels.8b00284 Feng Y. Zhang A. Li J. He B. (2011). A continuous process for biodiesel production in a fixed bed reactor packed with cation-exchange resin as heterogeneous catalyst. Bioresour. Technol. 102, 36073609. 10.1016/j.biortech.2010.10.11521078550 Feyzi M. Hassankhani A. Rafiee H. R. (2013). Preparation and characterization of Cs/Al/Fe3O4 nanocatalysts for biodiesel production. Energ. Convers. Manage. 71, 6268. 10.1016/j.enconman.2013.03.022 Fu J. Chen L. Lv P. Yang L. Yuan Z. (2015). Free fatty acids esterification for biodiesel production using self-synthesized macroporous cation exchange resin as solid acid catalyst. Fuel 154, 18. 10.1016/j.fuel.2015.03.048 Gerpen J. V. (2005). Biodiesel processing and production. Fuel Process. Technol. 86, 10971107. 10.1016/j.fuproc.2004.11.005 Gog A. Roman M. Toşa M. Paizs C. Irimie F. D. (2012). Biodiesel production using enzymatic transesterification – Current state and perspectives. Renew. Energ. 39, 1016. 10.1016/j.renene.2011.08.007 Goga G. Chauhan B. S. Mahla S. K. Cho H. M. (2019). Performance and emission characteristics of diesel engine fueled with rice bran biodiesel and n-butanol. Energy Rep. 5, 7883. 10.1016/j.egyr.2018.12.002 Guldhe A. Singh P. Ansari F. A. Singh B. Bux F. (2017). Biodiesel synthesis from microalgal lipids using tungstated zirconia as a heterogeneous acid catalyst and its comparison with homogeneous acid and enzyme catalysts. Fuel 187, 180188. 10.1016/j.fuel.2016.09.053 Hanif M. A. Nisar S. Rashid U. (2017). Supported solid and heteropoly acid catalysts for production of biodiesel. Catal. Rev. 59, 165188. 10.1080/01614940.2017.1321452 Hattori H. (1995). Heterogeneous basic catalysis. Chem. Rev. 95, 537558. 10.1021/cr00035a005 Helwani Z. Othman M. R. Aziz N. Kim J. Fernando W. J. N. (2009). Solid heterogeneous catalysts for transesterification of triglycerides with methanol: a review. Appl. Catal. A Gen. 363, 110. 10.1016/j.apcata.2009.05.021 Hoekman S. K. Robbins C. (2012). Review of the effects of biodiesel on NOx emissions. Fuel Process. Technol. 96, 237249. 10.1016/j.fuproc.2011.12.036 Hu S. Wang Y. Han H. (2011). Utilization of waste freshwater mussel shell as an economic catalyst for biodiesel production. Biomass Bioenergy 35, 36273635. 10.1016/j.biombioe.2011.05.009 Ibrahim M. M. Mahmoud H. R. El-Molla S. A. (2019). Influence of support on physicochemical properties of ZrO2 based solid acid heterogeneous catalysts for biodiesel production. Catal. Commun. 122, 1015. 10.1016/j.catcom.2019.01.008 Islam A. Taufiq-Yap Y. H. Ravindra P. Teo S. H. Sivasangar S. Chan E.-S. (2015). Biodiesel synthesis over millimetric γ-Al2O3/KI catalyst. Energy 89, 965973. 10.1016/j.energy.2015.06.036 Jahirul M. I. Brown R. J. Senadeera W. Ashwath N. Rasul M. G. Rahman M. M. . (2015). Physio-chemical assessment of beauty leaf (Calophyllum inophyllum) as second-generation biodiesel feedstock. Energy Rep. 1, 204215. 10.1016/j.egyr.2015.10.003 Jayaraman J. Alagu K. Appavu P. Joy N. Jayaram P. Mariadoss A. (2020). Enzymatic production of biodiesel using lipase catalyst and testing of an unmodified compression ignition engine using its blends with diesel. Renew. Energy 145, 399407. 10.1016/j.renene.2019.06.061 Jayed M. H. Masjuki H. H. Saidur R. Kalam M. A. Jahirul M. I. (2009). Environmental aspects and challenges of oilseed produced biodiesel in Southeast Asia. Renew. Sust. Energ. Rev. 13, 24522462. 10.1016/j.rser.2009.06.023 Kamran E. Mashhadi H. Mohammadi A. Ghobadian B. (2020). Biodiesel production from Elaeagnus angustifolia.L seed as a novel waste feedstock using potassium hydroxide catalyst. Biocatal. Agric. Biotechnol. 25:101578. 10.1016/j.bcab.2020.101578 Kaur M. Malhotra R. Ali A. (2018). Tungsten supported Ti/SiO2 nanoflowers as reusable heterogeneous catalyst for biodiesel production. Renew. Energy 116, 109119. 10.1016/j.renene.2017.09.065 Kaur N. Ali A. (2015). Preparation and application of Ce/ZrO2-TiO2/SO42- as solid catalyst for the esterification of fatty acids. Renew. Energy 81, 421431. 10.1016/j.renene.2015.03.051 Kazemifard S. Nayebzadeh H. Saghatoleslami N. Safakish E. (2018). Assessment the activity of magnetic KOH/Fe3O4@Al2O3 core–shell nanocatalyst in transesterification reaction: effect of Fe/Al ratio on structural and performance. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 25, 3281132821. 10.1007/s11356-018-3249-730251043 Kesserwan F. Ahmad M. N. Khalil M. El-Rassy H. (2020). Hybrid CaO/Al2O3 aerogel as heterogeneous catalyst for biodiesel production. Chem. Eng. J. 385:123834. 10.1016/j.cej.2019.123834 Kim M. Dimaggio C. Salley S. O. Simon Ng K. Y. (2012). A new generation of zirconia supported metal oxide catalysts for converting low grade renewable feedstocks to biodiesel. Bioresour. Technol. 118, 3742. 10.1016/j.biortech.2012.04.03522695144 Knothe G. Razon L. F. (2017). Biodiesel fuels. Prog. Energ. Combust. 58, 3659. 10.1016/j.pecs.2016.08.001 Kurhade A. Dalai A. K. (2018). Physiochemical characterization and support interaction of alumina-supported heteropolyacid catalyst for biodiesel production. Asia-Pac. J. Chem. Eng. 13:e2249. 10.1002/apj.2249 Lam M. K. Lee K. T. Mohamed A. R. (2010). Homogeneous, heterogeneous and enzymatic catalysis for transesterification of high free fatty acid oil (waste cooking oil) to biodiesel: a review. Biotechnol. Advanc. 28, 500518. 10.1016/j.biotechadv.2010.03.00220362044 Latchubugata C. S. Kondapaneni R. V. Patluri K. K. Virendra U. Vedantam S. (2018). Kinetics and optimization studies using response surface methodology in biodiesel production using heterogeneous catalyst. Chem. Eng. Res. Des. 135, 129139. 10.1016/j.cherd.2018.05.022 Lee A. F. Bennett J. A. Manayil J. C. Wilson K. (2014). Heterogeneous catalysis for sustainable biodiesel production via esterification and transesterification. Chem. Soc. Rev. 43, 78877916. 10.1039/C4CS00189C24957179 Lee H. V. Juan J. C. Taufiq-Yap Y. H. (2015). Preparation and application of binary acid–base CaO–La2O3 catalyst for biodiesel production. Renew. Energy 74, 124132. 10.1016/j.renene.2014.07.017 Li X. He X.-Y. Li Z.-L. Wang Y.-D. Wang C.-Y. Shi H. . (2012). Enzymatic production of biodiesel from Pistacia chinensis bge seed oil using immobilized lipase. Fuel 92, 8993. 10.1016/j.fuel.2011.06.048 Li Z. Ding S. Chen C. Qu S. Du L. Lu J. . (2019). Recyclable Li/NaY zeolite as a heterogeneous alkaline catalyst for biodiesel production: Process optimization and kinetics study. Energy Convers. Manag. 192, 335345. 10.1016/j.enconman.2019.04.053 Limmanee S. Naree T. Bunyakiat K. Ngamcharussrivichai C. (2013). Mixed oxides of Ca, Mg and Zn as heterogeneous base catalysts for the synthesis of palm kernel oil methyl esters. Chem. Eng. J. 225, 616624. 10.1016/j.cej.2013.03.093 Ling J. S. J. Tan Y. H. Mubarak N. M. Kansedo J. Saptoro A. Nolasco-Hipolito C. (2019). A review of heterogeneous calcium oxide based catalyst from waste for biodiesel synthesis. SN Appl. Sci. 1:810. 10.1007/s42452-019-0843-3 Liu R. Wang X. Zhao X. Feng P. (2008a). Sulfonated ordered mesoporous carbon for catalytic preparation of biodiesel. Carbon 46, 16641669. 10.1016/j.carbon.2008.07.016 Liu X. He H. Wang Y. Zhu S. (2007). Transesterification of soybean oil to biodiesel using SrO as a solid base catalyst. Catal. Commun. 8, 11071111. 10.1016/j.catcom.2006.10.02619603797 Liu X. He H. Wang Y. Zhu S. Piao X. (2008b). Transesterification of soybean oil to biodiesel using CaO as a solid base catalyst. Fuel 87, 216221. 10.1016/j.fuel.2007.04.01319603797 Lopresto C. G. Naccarato S. Albo L. De Paola M. G. Chakraborty S. Curcio S. . (2015). Enzymatic transesterification of waste vegetable oil to produce biodiesel. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Safe. 121, 229235. 10.1016/j.ecoenv.2015.03.02825838070 Madhuvilakku R. Piraman S. (2013). Biodiesel synthesis by TiO2-ZnO mixed oxide nanocatalyst catalyzed palm oil transesterification process. Bioresour. Technol. 150, 5559. 10.1016/j.biortech.2013.09.08724148858 Mahlia T. M. I. Syazmi Z. A. H. S. Mofijur M. Abas A. E. P. Bilad M. R. . (2020). Patent landscape review on biodiesel production: technology updates. Renew. Sust. Energ. Rev. 118:109526. 10.1016/j.rser.2019.109526 Majhi S. Ray S. (2016). A study on production of biodiesel using a novel solid oxide catalyst derived from waste. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 23, 92519259. 10.1007/s11356-015-4824-926154033 Maleki E. Aroua M. K. Sulaiman N. M. N. (2013). Castor oil — a more suitable feedstock for enzymatic production of methyl esters. Fuel Process. Technol. 112, 129132. 10.1016/j.fuproc.2013.03.003 Manríquez-Ramírez M. Gómez R. Hernández-Cortez J. G. Zúñiga-Moreno A. Reza-San Germán C. M. . (2013). Advances in the transesterification of triglycerides to biodiesel using MgO–NaOH, MgO–KOH and MgO–CeO2 as solid basic catalysts. Catal. Today 212, 2330. 10.1016/j.cattod.2012.11.005 Mansir N. Taufiq-Yap Y. H. Rashid U. Lokman I. M. (2017). Investigation of heterogeneous solid acid catalyst performance on low grade feedstocks for biodiesel production: a review. Energy Convers. Manag. 141, 171182. 10.1016/j.enconman.2016.07.037 Mardhiah H. H. Ong H. C. Masjuki H. H. Lim S. Lee H. V. (2017). A review on latest developments and future prospects of heterogeneous catalyst in biodiesel production from non-edible oils. Renew. Sust. Energ. Rev. 67, 12251236. 10.1016/j.rser.2016.09.036 Marín-Suárez M. Méndez-Mateos D. Guadix A. Guadix E. M. (2019). Reuse of immobilized lipases in the transesterification of waste fish oil for the production of biodiesel. Renew. Energ. 140, 18. 10.1016/j.renene.2019.03.035 Marwaha A. Rosha P. Mohapatra S. K. Mahla S. K. Dhir A. (2018). Waste materials as potential catalysts for biodiesel production: current state and future scope. Fuel Process. Technol. 181, 175186. 10.1016/j.fuproc.2018.09.011 Mata T. M. Sousa I. R. B. G. Vieira S. S. Caetano N. S. (2012). Biodiesel production from corn oil via enzymatic catalysis with ethanol. Energy Fuels 26, 30343041. 10.1021/ef300319f Mckenzie A. L. Fishel C. T. Davis R. J. (1992). Investigation of the surface structure and basic properties of calcined hydrotalcites. J. Catal. 138, 547561. 10.1016/0021-9517(92)90306-3 Melero J. A. Iglesias J. Morales G. (2009). Heterogeneous acid catalysts for biodiesel production: current status and future challenges. Green Chem. 11, 12851308. 10.1039/b902086a Mofijur M. Masjuki H. H. Kalam M. A. Atabani A. E. Rizwanul Fattah I. M. Mobarak H. M. (2014). Comparative evaluation of performance and emission characteristics of Moringa oleifera and Palm oil based biodiesel in a diesel engine. Ind. Crops Prod. 53, 7884. 10.1016/j.indcrop.2013.12.011 Mohebbi S. Rostamizadeh M. Kahforoushan D. (2020). Effect of molybdenum promoter on performance of high silica MoO3/B-ZSM-5 nanocatalyst in biodiesel production. Fuel 266:117063. 10.1016/j.fuel.2020.117063 Mootabadi H. Salamatinia B. Bhatia S. Abdullah A. Z. (2010). Ultrasonic-assisted biodiesel production process from palm oil using alkaline earth metal oxides as the heterogeneous catalysts. Fuel 89, 18181825. 10.1016/j.fuel.2009.12.023 Moradi G. Mohadesi M. Rezaei R. Moradi R. (2015). Biodiesel production using CaO/γ-Al2O3 catalyst synthesized by sol-gel method. Canad. J. Chem. Eng. 93, 15311538. 10.1002/cjce.22258 Navajas A. Campo I. Moral A. Echave J. Sanz O. Montes M. . (2018). Outstanding performance of rehydrated Mg-Al hydrotalcites as heterogeneous methanolysis catalysts for the synthesis of biodiesel. Fuel 211, 173181. 10.1016/j.fuel.2017.09.061 Nayebzadeh H. Saghatoleslami N. Haghighi M. Tabasizadeh M. (2017). Influence of fuel type on microwave-enhanced fabrication of KOH/Ca12Al14O33 nanocatalyst for biodiesel production via microwave heating. J. Taiwan Inst. Chem. Eng. 75, 148155. 10.1016/j.jtice.2017.03.018 Nowicki J. Lach J. Organek M. Sabura E. (2016). Transesterification of rapeseed oil to biodiesel over Zr-dopped MgAl hydrotalcites. Appl. Catal. A Genrl. 524, 1724. 10.1016/j.apcata.2016.05.015 Ong H. C. Masjuki H. H. Mahlia T. M. I. Silitonga A. S. Chong W. T. Yusaf T. (2014). Engine performance and emissions using Jatropha curcas, Ceiba pentandra and Calophyllum inophyllum biodiesel in a CI diesel engine. Energy 69, 427445. 10.1016/j.energy.2014.03.035 Ong H. C. Milano J. Silitonga A. S. Hassan M. H. Shamsuddin A. H. Wang C.-T. . (2019). Biodiesel production from Calophyllum inophyllum-Ceiba pentandra oil mixture: Optimization and characterization. J. Clean. Prod. 219, 183198. 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.02.048 Palash S. M. Masjuki H. H. Kalam M. A. Atabani A. E. Rizwanul Fattah I. M. Sanjid A. (2015). Biodiesel production, characterization, diesel engine performance, and emission characteristics of methyl esters from Aphanamixis polystachya oil of Bangladesh. Energy Convers. Manag. 91, 149157. 10.1016/j.enconman.2014.12.009 Pandit P. R. Fulekar M. H. (2017). Egg shell waste as heterogeneous nanocatalyst for biodiesel production: optimized by response surface methodology. J. Environ. Manage. 198, 319329. 10.1016/j.jenvman.2017.04.10028494420 Qiu F. Li Y. Yang D. Li X. Sun P. (2011). Heterogeneous solid base nanocatalyst: Preparation, characterization and application in biodiesel production. Bioresour. Technol. 102, 41504156. 10.1016/j.biortech.2010.12.07121227682 Quirino M. R. Oliveira M. J. C. Keyson D. Lucena G. L. Oliveira J. B. L. Gama L. (2016). Synthesis of zinc aluminate with high surface area by microwave hydrothermal method applied in the transesterification of soybean oil (biodiesel). Mater. Res. Bull. 74, 124128. 10.1016/j.materresbull.2015.10.027 Rahmani Vahid B. Haghighi M. Alaei S. Toghiani J. (2017). Reusability enhancement of combustion synthesized MgO/MgAl2O4 nanocatalyst in biodiesel production by glow discharge plasma treatment. Energy Convers. Manag. 143, 2332. 10.1016/j.enconman.2017.03.075 Ropero-Vega J. L. Aldana-Pérez A. Gómez R. Niño-Gómez M. E. (2010). Sulfated titania [TiO2/SO42-]: a very active solid acid catalyst for the esterification of free fatty acids with ethanol. Appl. Catal. A-Gen. 379, 2429. 10.1016/j.apcata.2010.02.020 Roschat W. Phewphong S. Khunchalee J. Moonsin P. (2018). Biodiesel production by ethanolysis of palm oil using SrO as a basic heterogeneous catalyst. Mater. Today Proc. 5, 1391613921. 10.1016/j.matpr.2018.02.040 Roschat W. Siritanon T. Yoosuk B. Promarak V. (2016). Biodiesel production from palm oil using hydrated lime-derived CaO as a low-cost basic heterogeneous catalyst. Energy Convers. Manag. 108, 459467. 10.1016/j.enconman.2015.11.036 Ruhul A. M. Kalam M. A. Masjuki H. H. Fattah I. M. R. Reham S. S. Rashed M. M. (2015). State of the art of biodiesel production processes: a review of the heterogeneous catalyst. RSC Advanc. 5, 101023101044. 10.1039/C5RA09862A Ruhul A. M. Kalam M. A. Masjuki H. H. Shahir S. A. Alabdulkarem A. Teoh Y. H. . (2017). Evaluating combustion, performance and emission characteristics of Millettia pinnata and Croton megalocarpus biodiesel blends in a diesel engine. Energy 141, 23622376. 10.1016/j.energy.2017.11.096 Salinas D. Sepúlveda C. Escalona N. Gfierro J. L. Pecchi G. (2018). Sol–gel La2O3-ZrO2 mixed oxide catalysts for biodiesel production. J. Energ. Chem. 27, 565572. 10.1016/j.jechem.2017.11.003 Sani Y. M. Daud W. M. A. W. Abdul Aziz A. R. (2014). Activity of solid acid catalysts for biodiesel production: a critical review. Appl. Catal. A Gen. 470, 140161. 10.1016/j.apcata.2013.10.052 Santiago-Torres N. Romero-Ibarra I. C. Pfeiffer H. (2014). Sodium zirconate (Na2ZrO3) as a catalyst in a soybean oil transesterification reaction for biodiesel production. Fuel Process. Technol. 120, 3439. 10.1016/j.fuproc.2013.11.018 Saravanan A. Murugan M. Sreenivasa Reddy M. Parida S. (2020). Performance and emission characteristics of variable compression ratio CI engine fueled with dual biodiesel blends of Rapeseed and Mahua. Fuel 263:116751. 10.1016/j.fuel.2019.116751 Schuchardt U. Sercheli R. Vargas R. M. (1998). Transesterification of vegetable oils: a review. J. Braz. Chem. Soc. 9, 199210. 10.1590/S0103-50531998000300002 Seffati K. Honarvar B. Esmaeili H. Esfandiari N. (2019). Enhanced biodiesel production from chicken fat using CaO/CuFe2O4 nanocatalyst and its combination with diesel to improve fuel properties. Fuel 235, 12381244. 10.1016/j.fuel.2018.08.118 Sekoai P. T. Ouma C. N. M. Du Preez S. P. Modisha P. Engelbrecht N. Bessarabov D. G. . (2019). Application of nanoparticles in biofuels: an overview. Fuel 237, 380397. 10.1016/j.fuel.2018.10.030 Semwal S. Arora A. K. Badoni R. P. Tuli D. K. (2011). Biodiesel production using heterogeneous catalysts. Bioresour. Technol. 102, 21512161. 10.1016/j.biortech.2010.10.08021106371 Shah S. Gupta M. N. (2007). Lipase catalyzed preparation of biodiesel from Jatropha oil in a solvent free system. Process Biochemi. 42, 409414. 10.1016/j.procbio.2006.09.024 Shan R. Lu L. Shi Y. Yuan H. Shi J. (2018). Catalysts from renewable resources for biodiesel production. Energ. Convers. Manage. 178, 277289. 10.1016/j.enconman.2018.10.032 Shi G. Yu F. Wang Y. Pan D. Wang H. Li R. (2016). A novel one-pot synthesis of tetragonal sulfated zirconia catalyst with high activity for biodiesel production from the transesterification of soybean oil. Renew. Energy 92, 2229. 10.1016/j.renene.2016.01.094 Siddiquee M. N. Kazemian H. Rohani S. (2011). Biodiesel production from the lipid of wastewater sludge using an acidic heterogeneous catalyst. Chem. Eng. Technol. 34, 19831988. 10.1002/ceat.201100119 Silitonga A. S. Masjuki H. H. Mahlia T. M. I. Ong H. C. Chong W. T. Boosroh M. H. (2013a). Overview properties of biodiesel diesel blends from edible and non-edible feedstock. Renew. Sust. Energ. Rev. 22, 346360. 10.1016/j.rser.2013.01.055 Silitonga A. S. Ong H. C. Mahlia T. M. I. Masjuki H. H. Chong W. T. (2013b). Characterization and production of Ceiba pentandra biodiesel and its blends. Fuel 108, 855858. 10.1016/j.fuel.2013.02.014 Silitonga A. S. Shamsuddin A. H. Mahlia T. M. I. Milano J. Kusumo F. Siswantoro J. . (2020). Biodiesel synthesis from Ceiba pentandra oil by microwave irradiation-assisted transesterification: ELM modeling and optimization. Renew. Energy 146, 12781291. 10.1016/j.renene.2019.07.065 Sirisomboonchai S. Abuduwayiti M. Guan G. Samart C. Abliz S. Hao X. . (2015). Biodiesel production from waste cooking oil using calcined scallop shell as catalyst. Energy Convers. Manage. 95, 242247. 10.1016/j.enconman.2015.02.044 Sulaiman N. F. Wan Abu Bakar W. A. Ali R. (2017). Response surface methodology for the optimum production of biodiesel over Cr/Ca/γ-Al2O3 catalyst: Catalytic performance and physicochemical studies. Renew. Energy 113, 697705. 10.1016/j.renene.2017.06.007 Sun H. Ding Y. Duan J. Zhang Q. Wang Z. Lou H. . (2010). Transesterification of sunflower oil to biodiesel on ZrO2 supported La2O3 catalyst. Bioresour. Technol. 101, 953958. 10.1016/j.biortech.2009.08.08919766483 Szczesna Antczak M. Kubiak A. Antczak T. Bielecki S. (2009). Enzymatic biodiesel synthesis – Key factors affecting efficiency of the process. Renew. Energ. 34, 11851194. 10.1016/j.renene.2008.11.013 Tan Y. H. Abdullah M. O. Kansedo J. Mubarak N. M. Chan Y. S. Nolasco-Hipolito C. (2019). Biodiesel production from used cooking oil using green solid catalyst derived from calcined fusion waste chicken and fish bones. Renew. Energ. 139, 696706. 10.1016/j.renene.2019.02.110 Teo S. H. Rashid U. Thomas Choong S. Y. Taufiq-Yap Y. H. (2017). Heterogeneous calcium-based bimetallic oxide catalyzed transesterification of Elaeis guineensis derived triglycerides for biodiesel production. Energy Convers. Manage. 141, 2027. 10.1016/j.enconman.2016.03.042 Tichit D. Lhouty M. H. Guida A. Chiche B. H. Figueras F. Auroux A. . (1995). Textural properties and catalytic activity of hydrotalcites. J. Catal. 151, 5059. 10.1006/jcat.1995.1007 Trakarnpruk W. Porntangjitlikit S. (2008). Palm oil biodiesel synthesized with potassium loaded calcined hydrotalcite and effect of biodiesel blend on elastomer properties. Renew. Energ. 33, 15581563. 10.1016/j.renene.2007.08.003 Vaccari A. (1999). Clays and catalysis: a promising future. Appl. Clay Sci. 14, 161198. 10.1016/S0169-1317(98)00058-1 Wakil M. A. Kalam M. A. Masjuki H. H. Rizwanul Fattah I. M. (2016). Rice bran: a prospective resource for biodiesel production in Bangladesh. Int. J. Green Energy 13, 497504. 10.1080/15435075.2014.966374 Wan Omar W. N. N. Amin N. A. S. (2011). Biodiesel production from waste cooking oil over alkaline modified zirconia catalyst. Fuel Process. Technol. 92, 23972405. 10.1016/j.fuproc.2011.08.009 Yaşar F. (2019). Biodiesel production via waste eggshell as a low-cost heterogeneous catalyst: Its effects on some critical fuel properties and comparison with CaO. Fuel 255:115828. 10.1016/j.fuel.2019.115828 Yoo S. J. Lee H.-S. Veriansyah B. Kim J. Kim J.-D. Lee Y.-W. (2010). Synthesis of biodiesel from rapeseed oil using supercritical methanol with metal oxide catalysts. Bioresour. Technol. 101, 86868689. 10.1016/j.biortech.2010.06.07320620052 Zabeti M. Wan Daud W. M. A. Aroua M. K. (2009). Activity of solid catalysts for biodiesel production: a review. Fuel Process. Technol. 90, 770777. 10.1016/j.fuproc.2009.03.010 Zeng H.-Y. Liao K.-B. Deng X. Jiang H. Zhang F. (2009). Characterization of the lipase immobilized on Mg–Al hydrotalcite for biodiesel. Process Biochem. 44, 791798. 10.1016/j.procbio.2009.04.005 Zhang G. Hattori H. Tanabe K. (1988). Aldol addition of acetone, catalyzed by solid base catalysts: magnesium oxide, calcium oxide, strontium oxide, barium oxide, lanthanum (III) oxide and zirconium oxide. Appl. Catal. 36, 189197. 10.1016/S0166-9834(00)80114-1 Zhang Y. Niu S. Lu C. Gong Z. Hu X. (2020). Catalytic performance of NaAlO2/γ-Al2O3 as heterogeneous nanocatalyst for biodiesel production: optimization using response surface methodology. Energy Convers. Manage. 203:112263. 10.1016/j.enconman.2019.112263

      Funding. This research was funded by research development fund of School of Information, Systems and Modeling, University of Technology Sydney, Australia.

      ‘Oh, my dear Thomas, you haven’t heard the terrible news then?’ she said. ‘I thought you would be sure to have seen it placarded somewhere. Alice went straight to her room, and I haven’t seen her since, though I repeatedly knocked at the door, which she has locked on the inside, and I’m sure it’s most unnatural of her not to let her own mother comfort her. It all happened in a moment: I have always said those great motor-cars shouldn’t be allowed to career about the streets, especially when they are all paved with cobbles as they are at Easton Haven, which are{331} so slippery when it’s wet. He slipped, and it went over him in a moment.’ My thanks were few and awkward, for there still hung to the missive a basting thread, and it was as warm as a nestling bird. I bent low--everybody was emotional in those days--kissed the fragrant thing, thrust it into my bosom, and blushed worse than Camille. "What, the Corner House victim? Is that really a fact?" "My dear child, I don't look upon it in that light at all. The child gave our picturesque friend a certain distinction--'My husband is dead, and this is my only child,' and all that sort of thing. It pays in society." leave them on the steps of a foundling asylum in order to insure [See larger version] Interoffice guff says you're planning definite moves on your own, J. O., and against some opposition. Is the Colonel so poor or so grasping—or what? Albert could not speak, for he felt as if his brains and teeth were rattling about inside his head. The rest of[Pg 188] the family hunched together by the door, the boys gaping idiotically, the girls in tears. "Now you're married." The host was called in, and unlocked a drawer in which they were deposited. The galleyman, with visible reluctance, arrayed himself in the garments, and he was observed to shudder more than once during the investiture of the dead man's apparel. HoME香京julia种子在线播放 ENTER NUMBET 0016www.hyllyh.com.cn
      fecbgm.com.cn
      www.qynye.com.cn
      www.titpo.com.cn
      www.tsjzzs.com.cn
      www.newjia.com.cn
      www.qrynje.com.cn
      rycgc.org.cn
      www.qyzenw.com.cn
      whjy365.com.cn
      处女被大鸡巴操 强奸乱伦小说图片 俄罗斯美女爱爱图 调教强奸学生 亚洲女的穴 夜来香图片大全 美女性强奸电影 手机版色中阁 男性人体艺术素描图 16p成人 欧美性爱360 电影区 亚洲电影 欧美电影 经典三级 偷拍自拍 动漫电影 乱伦电影 变态另类 全部电 类似狠狠鲁的网站 黑吊操白逼图片 韩国黄片种子下载 操逼逼逼逼逼 人妻 小说 p 偷拍10幼女自慰 极品淫水很多 黄色做i爱 日本女人人体电影快播看 大福国小 我爱肏屄美女 mmcrwcom 欧美多人性交图片 肥臀乱伦老头舔阴帝 d09a4343000019c5 西欧人体艺术b xxoo激情短片 未成年人的 插泰国人夭图片 第770弾み1 24p 日本美女性 交动态 eee色播 yantasythunder 操无毛少女屄 亚洲图片你懂的女人 鸡巴插姨娘 特级黄 色大片播 左耳影音先锋 冢本友希全集 日本人体艺术绿色 我爱被舔逼 内射 幼 美阴图 喷水妹子高潮迭起 和后妈 操逼 美女吞鸡巴 鸭个自慰 中国女裸名单 操逼肥臀出水换妻 色站裸体义术 中国行上的漏毛美女叫什么 亚洲妹性交图 欧美美女人裸体人艺照 成人色妹妹直播 WWW_JXCT_COM r日本女人性淫乱 大胆人艺体艺图片 女同接吻av 碰碰哥免费自拍打炮 艳舞写真duppid1 88电影街拍视频 日本自拍做爱qvod 实拍美女性爱组图 少女高清av 浙江真实乱伦迅雷 台湾luanlunxiaoshuo 洛克王国宠物排行榜 皇瑟电影yy频道大全 红孩儿连连看 阴毛摄影 大胆美女写真人体艺术摄影 和风骚三个媳妇在家做爱 性爱办公室高清 18p2p木耳 大波撸影音 大鸡巴插嫩穴小说 一剧不超两个黑人 阿姨诱惑我快播 幼香阁千叶县小学生 少女妇女被狗强奸 曰人体妹妹 十二岁性感幼女 超级乱伦qvod 97爱蜜桃ccc336 日本淫妇阴液 av海量资源999 凤凰影视成仁 辰溪四中艳照门照片 先锋模特裸体展示影片 成人片免费看 自拍百度云 肥白老妇女 女爱人体图片 妈妈一女穴 星野美夏 日本少女dachidu 妹子私处人体图片 yinmindahuitang 舔无毛逼影片快播 田莹疑的裸体照片 三级电影影音先锋02222 妻子被外国老头操 观月雏乃泥鳅 韩国成人偷拍自拍图片 强奸5一9岁幼女小说 汤姆影院av图片 妹妹人艺体图 美女大驱 和女友做爱图片自拍p 绫川まどか在线先锋 那么嫩的逼很少见了 小女孩做爱 处女好逼连连看图图 性感美女在家做爱 近距离抽插骚逼逼 黑屌肏金毛屄 日韩av美少女 看喝尿尿小姐日逼色色色网图片 欧美肛交新视频 美女吃逼逼 av30线上免费 伊人在线三级经典 新视觉影院t6090影院 最新淫色电影网址 天龙影院远古手机版 搞老太影院 插进美女的大屁股里 私人影院加盟费用 www258dd 求一部电影里面有一个二猛哥 深肛交 日本萌妹子人体艺术写真图片 插入屄眼 美女的木奶 中文字幕黄色网址影视先锋 九号女神裸 和骚人妻偷情 和潘晓婷做爱 国模大尺度蜜桃 欧美大逼50p 西西人体成人 李宗瑞继母做爱原图物处理 nianhuawang 男鸡巴的视屏 � 97免费色伦电影 好色网成人 大姨子先锋 淫荡巨乳美女教师妈妈 性nuexiaoshuo WWW36YYYCOM 长春继续给力进屋就操小女儿套干破内射对白淫荡 农夫激情社区 日韩无码bt 欧美美女手掰嫩穴图片 日本援交偷拍自拍 入侵者日本在线播放 亚洲白虎偷拍自拍 常州高见泽日屄 寂寞少妇自卫视频 人体露逼图片 多毛外国老太 变态乱轮手机在线 淫荡妈妈和儿子操逼 伦理片大奶少女 看片神器最新登入地址sqvheqi345com账号群 麻美学姐无头 圣诞老人射小妞和强奸小妞动话片 亚洲AV女老师 先锋影音欧美成人资源 33344iucoom zV天堂电影网 宾馆美女打炮视频 色五月丁香五月magnet 嫂子淫乱小说 张歆艺的老公 吃奶男人视频在线播放 欧美色图男女乱伦 avtt2014ccvom 性插色欲香影院 青青草撸死你青青草 99热久久第一时间 激情套图卡通动漫 幼女裸聊做爱口交 日本女人被强奸乱伦 草榴社区快播 2kkk正在播放兽骑 啊不要人家小穴都湿了 www猎奇影视 A片www245vvcomwwwchnrwhmhzcn 搜索宜春院av wwwsee78co 逼奶鸡巴插 好吊日AV在线视频19gancom 熟女伦乱图片小说 日本免费av无码片在线开苞 鲁大妈撸到爆 裸聊官网 德国熟女xxx 新不夜城论坛首页手机 女虐男网址 男女做爱视频华为网盘 激情午夜天亚洲色图 内裤哥mangent 吉沢明歩制服丝袜WWWHHH710COM 屌逼在线试看 人体艺体阿娇艳照 推荐一个可以免费看片的网站如果被QQ拦截请复制链接在其它浏览器打开xxxyyy5comintr2a2cb551573a2b2e 欧美360精品粉红鲍鱼 教师调教第一页 聚美屋精品图 中韩淫乱群交 俄罗斯撸撸片 把鸡巴插进小姨子的阴道 干干AV成人网 aolasoohpnbcn www84ytom 高清大量潮喷www27dyycom 宝贝开心成人 freefronvideos人母 嫩穴成人网gggg29com 逼着舅妈给我口交肛交彩漫画 欧美色色aV88wwwgangguanscom 老太太操逼自拍视频 777亚洲手机在线播放 有没有夫妻3p小说 色列漫画淫女 午间色站导航 欧美成人处女色大图 童颜巨乳亚洲综合 桃色性欲草 色眯眯射逼 无码中文字幕塞外青楼这是一个 狂日美女老师人妻 爱碰网官网 亚洲图片雅蠛蝶 快播35怎么搜片 2000XXXX电影 新谷露性家庭影院 深深候dvd播放 幼齿用英语怎么说 不雅伦理无需播放器 国外淫荡图片 国外网站幼幼嫩网址 成年人就去色色视频快播 我鲁日日鲁老老老我爱 caoshaonvbi 人体艺术avav 性感性色导航 韩国黄色哥来嫖网站 成人网站美逼 淫荡熟妇自拍 欧美色惰图片 北京空姐透明照 狼堡免费av视频 www776eom 亚洲无码av欧美天堂网男人天堂 欧美激情爆操 a片kk266co 色尼姑成人极速在线视频 国语家庭系列 蒋雯雯 越南伦理 色CC伦理影院手机版 99jbbcom 大鸡巴舅妈 国产偷拍自拍淫荡对话视频 少妇春梦射精 开心激动网 自拍偷牌成人 色桃隐 撸狗网性交视频 淫荡的三位老师 伦理电影wwwqiuxia6commqiuxia6com 怡春院分站 丝袜超短裙露脸迅雷下载 色制服电影院 97超碰好吊色男人 yy6080理论在线宅男日韩福利大全 大嫂丝袜 500人群交手机在线 5sav 偷拍熟女吧 口述我和妹妹的欲望 50p电脑版 wwwavtttcon 3p3com 伦理无码片在线看 欧美成人电影图片岛国性爱伦理电影 先锋影音AV成人欧美 我爱好色 淫电影网 WWW19MMCOM 玛丽罗斯3d同人动画h在线看 动漫女孩裸体 超级丝袜美腿乱伦 1919gogo欣赏 大色逼淫色 www就是撸 激情文学网好骚 A级黄片免费 xedd5com 国内的b是黑的 快播美国成年人片黄 av高跟丝袜视频 上原保奈美巨乳女教师在线观看 校园春色都市激情fefegancom 偷窥自拍XXOO 搜索看马操美女 人本女优视频 日日吧淫淫 人妻巨乳影院 美国女子性爱学校 大肥屁股重口味 啪啪啪啊啊啊不要 操碰 japanfreevideoshome国产 亚州淫荡老熟女人体 伦奸毛片免费在线看 天天影视se 樱桃做爱视频 亚卅av在线视频 x奸小说下载 亚洲色图图片在线 217av天堂网 东方在线撸撸-百度 幼幼丝袜集 灰姑娘的姐姐 青青草在线视频观看对华 86papa路con 亚洲1AV 综合图片2区亚洲 美国美女大逼电影 010插插av成人网站 www色comwww821kxwcom 播乐子成人网免费视频在线观看 大炮撸在线影院 ,www4KkKcom 野花鲁最近30部 wwwCC213wapwww2233ww2download 三客优最新地址 母亲让儿子爽的无码视频 全国黄色片子 欧美色图美国十次 超碰在线直播 性感妖娆操 亚洲肉感熟女色图 a片A毛片管看视频 8vaa褋芯屑 333kk 川岛和津实视频 在线母子乱伦对白 妹妹肥逼五月 亚洲美女自拍 老婆在我面前小说 韩国空姐堪比情趣内衣 干小姐综合 淫妻色五月 添骚穴 WM62COM 23456影视播放器 成人午夜剧场 尼姑福利网 AV区亚洲AV欧美AV512qucomwwwc5508com 经典欧美骚妇 震动棒露出 日韩丝袜美臀巨乳在线 av无限吧看 就去干少妇 色艺无间正面是哪集 校园春色我和老师做爱 漫画夜色 天海丽白色吊带 黄色淫荡性虐小说 午夜高清播放器 文20岁女性荫道口图片 热国产热无码热有码 2015小明发布看看算你色 百度云播影视 美女肏屄屄乱轮小说 家族舔阴AV影片 邪恶在线av有码 父女之交 关于处女破处的三级片 极品护士91在线 欧美虐待女人视频的网站 享受老太太的丝袜 aaazhibuo 8dfvodcom成人 真实自拍足交 群交男女猛插逼 妓女爱爱动态 lin35com是什么网站 abp159 亚洲色图偷拍自拍乱伦熟女抠逼自慰 朝国三级篇 淫三国幻想 免费的av小电影网站 日本阿v视频免费按摩师 av750c0m 黄色片操一下 巨乳少女车震在线观看 操逼 免费 囗述情感一乱伦岳母和女婿 WWW_FAMITSU_COM 偷拍中国少妇在公车被操视频 花也真衣论理电影 大鸡鸡插p洞 新片欧美十八岁美少 进击的巨人神thunderftp 西方美女15p 深圳哪里易找到老女人玩视频 在线成人有声小说 365rrr 女尿图片 我和淫荡的小姨做爱 � 做爱技术体照 淫妇性爱 大学生私拍b 第四射狠狠射小说 色中色成人av社区 和小姨子乱伦肛交 wwwppp62com 俄罗斯巨乳人体艺术 骚逼阿娇 汤芳人体图片大胆 大胆人体艺术bb私处 性感大胸骚货 哪个网站幼女的片多 日本美女本子把 色 五月天 婷婷 快播 美女 美穴艺术 色百合电影导航 大鸡巴用力 孙悟空操美少女战士 狠狠撸美女手掰穴图片 古代女子与兽类交 沙耶香套图 激情成人网区 暴风影音av播放 动漫女孩怎么插第3个 mmmpp44 黑木麻衣无码ed2k 淫荡学姐少妇 乱伦操少女屄 高中性爱故事 骚妹妹爱爱图网 韩国模特剪长发 大鸡巴把我逼日了 中国张柏芝做爱片中国张柏芝做爱片中国张柏芝做爱片中国张柏芝做爱片中国张柏芝做爱片 大胆女人下体艺术图片 789sss 影音先锋在线国内情侣野外性事自拍普通话对白 群撸图库 闪现君打阿乐 ady 小说 插入表妹嫩穴小说 推荐成人资源 网络播放器 成人台 149大胆人体艺术 大屌图片 骚美女成人av 春暖花开春色性吧 女亭婷五月 我上了同桌的姐姐 恋夜秀场主播自慰视频 yzppp 屄茎 操屄女图 美女鲍鱼大特写 淫乱的日本人妻山口玲子 偷拍射精图 性感美女人体艺木图片 种马小说完本 免费电影院 骑士福利导航导航网站 骚老婆足交 国产性爱一级电影 欧美免费成人花花性都 欧美大肥妞性爱视频 家庭乱伦网站快播 偷拍自拍国产毛片 金发美女也用大吊来开包 缔D杏那 yentiyishu人体艺术ytys WWWUUKKMCOM 女人露奶 � 苍井空露逼 老荡妇高跟丝袜足交 偷偷和女友的朋友做爱迅雷 做爱七十二尺 朱丹人体合成 麻腾由纪妃 帅哥撸播种子图 鸡巴插逼动态图片 羙国十次啦中文 WWW137AVCOM 神斗片欧美版华语 有气质女人人休艺术 由美老师放屁电影 欧美女人肉肏图片 白虎种子快播 国产自拍90后女孩 美女在床上疯狂嫩b 饭岛爱最后之作 幼幼强奸摸奶 色97成人动漫 两性性爱打鸡巴插逼 新视觉影院4080青苹果影院 嗯好爽插死我了 阴口艺术照 李宗瑞电影qvod38 爆操舅母 亚洲色图七七影院 被大鸡巴操菊花 怡红院肿么了 成人极品影院删除 欧美性爱大图色图强奸乱 欧美女子与狗随便性交 苍井空的bt种子无码 熟女乱伦长篇小说 大色虫 兽交幼女影音先锋播放 44aad be0ca93900121f9b 先锋天耗ばさ无码 欧毛毛女三级黄色片图 干女人黑木耳照 日本美女少妇嫩逼人体艺术 sesechangchang 色屄屄网 久久撸app下载 色图色噜 美女鸡巴大奶 好吊日在线视频在线观看 透明丝袜脚偷拍自拍 中山怡红院菜单 wcwwwcom下载 骑嫂子 亚洲大色妣 成人故事365ahnet 丝袜家庭教mp4 幼交肛交 妹妹撸撸大妈 日本毛爽 caoprom超碰在email 关于中国古代偷窥的黄片 第一会所老熟女下载 wwwhuangsecome 狼人干综合新地址HD播放 变态儿子强奸乱伦图 强奸电影名字 2wwwer37com 日本毛片基地一亚洲AVmzddcxcn 暗黑圣经仙桃影院 37tpcocn 持月真由xfplay 好吊日在线视频三级网 我爱背入李丽珍 电影师傅床戏在线观看 96插妹妹sexsex88com 豪放家庭在线播放 桃花宝典极夜著豆瓜网 安卓系统播放神器 美美网丝袜诱惑 人人干全免费视频xulawyercn av无插件一本道 全国色五月 操逼电影小说网 good在线wwwyuyuelvcom www18avmmd 撸波波影视无插件 伊人幼女成人电影 会看射的图片 小明插看看 全裸美女扒开粉嫩b 国人自拍性交网站 萝莉白丝足交本子 七草ちとせ巨乳视频 摇摇晃晃的成人电影 兰桂坊成社人区小说www68kqcom 舔阴论坛 久撸客一撸客色国内外成人激情在线 明星门 欧美大胆嫩肉穴爽大片 www牛逼插 性吧星云 少妇性奴的屁眼 人体艺术大胆mscbaidu1imgcn 最新久久色色成人版 l女同在线 小泽玛利亚高潮图片搜索 女性裸b图 肛交bt种子 最热门有声小说 人间添春色 春色猜谜字 樱井莉亚钢管舞视频 小泽玛利亚直美6p 能用的h网 还能看的h网 bl动漫h网 开心五月激 东京热401 男色女色第四色酒色网 怎么下载黄色小说 黄色小说小栽 和谐图城 乐乐影院 色哥导航 特色导航 依依社区 爱窝窝在线 色狼谷成人 91porn 包要你射电影 色色3A丝袜 丝袜妹妹淫网 爱色导航(荐) 好男人激情影院 坏哥哥 第七色 色久久 人格分裂 急先锋 撸撸射中文网 第一会所综合社区 91影院老师机 东方成人激情 怼莪影院吹潮 老鸭窝伊人无码不卡无码一本道 av女柳晶电影 91天生爱风流作品 深爱激情小说私房婷婷网 擼奶av 567pao 里番3d一家人野外 上原在线电影 水岛津实透明丝袜 1314酒色 网旧网俺也去 0855影院 在线无码私人影院 搜索 国产自拍 神马dy888午夜伦理达达兔 农民工黄晓婷 日韩裸体黑丝御姐 屈臣氏的燕窝面膜怎么样つぼみ晶エリーの早漏チ○ポ强化合宿 老熟女人性视频 影音先锋 三上悠亚ol 妹妹影院福利片 hhhhhhhhsxo 午夜天堂热的国产 强奸剧场 全裸香蕉视频无码 亚欧伦理视频 秋霞为什么给封了 日本在线视频空天使 日韩成人aⅴ在线 日本日屌日屄导航视频 在线福利视频 日本推油无码av magnet 在线免费视频 樱井梨吮东 日本一本道在线无码DVD 日本性感诱惑美女做爱阴道流水视频 日本一级av 汤姆avtom在线视频 台湾佬中文娱乐线20 阿v播播下载 橙色影院 奴隶少女护士cg视频 汤姆在线影院无码 偷拍宾馆 业面紧急生级访问 色和尚有线 厕所偷拍一族 av女l 公交色狼优酷视频 裸体视频AV 人与兽肉肉网 董美香ol 花井美纱链接 magnet 西瓜影音 亚洲 自拍 日韩女优欧美激情偷拍自拍 亚洲成年人免费视频 荷兰免费成人电影 深喉呕吐XXⅩX 操石榴在线视频 天天色成人免费视频 314hu四虎 涩久免费视频在线观看 成人电影迅雷下载 能看见整个奶子的香蕉影院 水菜丽百度影音 gwaz079百度云 噜死你们资源站 主播走光视频合集迅雷下载 thumbzilla jappen 精品Av 古川伊织star598在线 假面女皇vip在线视频播放 国产自拍迷情校园 啪啪啪公寓漫画 日本阿AV 黄色手机电影 欧美在线Av影院 华裔电击女神91在线 亚洲欧美专区 1日本1000部免费视频 开放90后 波多野结衣 东方 影院av 页面升级紧急访问每天正常更新 4438Xchengeren 老炮色 a k福利电影 色欲影视色天天视频 高老庄aV 259LUXU-683 magnet 手机在线电影 国产区 欧美激情人人操网 国产 偷拍 直播 日韩 国内外激情在线视频网给 站长统计一本道人妻 光棍影院被封 紫竹铃取汁 ftp 狂插空姐嫩 xfplay 丈夫面前 穿靴子伪街 XXOO视频在线免费 大香蕉道久在线播放 电棒漏电嗨过头 充气娃能看下毛和洞吗 夫妻牲交 福利云点墦 yukun瑟妃 疯狂交换女友 国产自拍26页 腐女资源 百度云 日本DVD高清无码视频 偷拍,自拍AV伦理电影 A片小视频福利站。 大奶肥婆自拍偷拍图片 交配伊甸园 超碰在线视频自拍偷拍国产 小热巴91大神 rctd 045 类似于A片 超美大奶大学生美女直播被男友操 男友问 你的衣服怎么脱掉的 亚洲女与黑人群交视频一 在线黄涩 木内美保步兵番号 鸡巴插入欧美美女的b舒服 激情在线国产自拍日韩欧美 国语福利小视频在线观看 作爱小视颍 潮喷合集丝袜无码mp4 做爱的无码高清视频 牛牛精品 伊aⅤ在线观看 savk12 哥哥搞在线播放 在线电一本道影 一级谍片 250pp亚洲情艺中心,88 欧美一本道九色在线一 wwwseavbacom色av吧 cos美女在线 欧美17,18ⅹⅹⅹ视频 自拍嫩逼 小电影在线观看网站 筱田优 贼 水电工 5358x视频 日本69式视频有码 b雪福利导航 韩国女主播19tvclub在线 操逼清晰视频 丝袜美女国产视频网址导航 水菜丽颜射房间 台湾妹中文娱乐网 风吟岛视频 口交 伦理 日本熟妇色五十路免费视频 A级片互舔 川村真矢Av在线观看 亚洲日韩av 色和尚国产自拍 sea8 mp4 aV天堂2018手机在线 免费版国产偷拍a在线播放 狠狠 婷婷 丁香 小视频福利在线观看平台 思妍白衣小仙女被邻居强上 萝莉自拍有水 4484新视觉 永久发布页 977成人影视在线观看 小清新影院在线观 小鸟酱后丝后入百度云 旋风魅影四级 香蕉影院小黄片免费看 性爱直播磁力链接 小骚逼第一色影院 性交流的视频 小雪小视频bd 小视频TV禁看视频 迷奸AV在线看 nba直播 任你在干线 汤姆影院在线视频国产 624u在线播放 成人 一级a做爰片就在线看狐狸视频 小香蕉AV视频 www182、com 腿模简小育 学生做爱视频 秘密搜查官 快播 成人福利网午夜 一级黄色夫妻录像片 直接看的gav久久播放器 国产自拍400首页 sm老爹影院 谁知道隔壁老王网址在线 综合网 123西瓜影音 米奇丁香 人人澡人人漠大学生 色久悠 夜色视频你今天寂寞了吗? 菲菲影视城美国 被抄的影院 变态另类 欧美 成人 国产偷拍自拍在线小说 不用下载安装就能看的吃男人鸡巴视频 插屄视频 大贯杏里播放 wwwhhh50 233若菜奈央 伦理片天海翼秘密搜查官 大香蕉在线万色屋视频 那种漫画小说你懂的 祥仔电影合集一区 那里可以看澳门皇冠酒店a片 色自啪 亚洲aV电影天堂 谷露影院ar toupaizaixian sexbj。com 毕业生 zaixian mianfei 朝桐光视频 成人短视频在线直接观看 陈美霖 沈阳音乐学院 导航女 www26yjjcom 1大尺度视频 开平虐女视频 菅野雪松协和影视在线视频 华人play在线视频bbb 鸡吧操屄视频 多啪啪免费视频 悠草影院 金兰策划网 (969) 橘佑金短视频 国内一极刺激自拍片 日本制服番号大全magnet 成人动漫母系 电脑怎么清理内存 黄色福利1000 dy88午夜 偷拍中学生洗澡磁力链接 花椒相机福利美女视频 站长推荐磁力下载 mp4 三洞轮流插视频 玉兔miki热舞视频 夜生活小视频 爆乳人妖小视频 国内网红主播自拍福利迅雷下载 不用app的裸裸体美女操逼视频 变态SM影片在线观看 草溜影院元气吧 - 百度 - 百度 波推全套视频 国产双飞集合ftp 日本在线AV网 笔国毛片 神马影院女主播是我的邻居 影音资源 激情乱伦电影 799pao 亚洲第一色第一影院 av视频大香蕉 老梁故事汇希斯莱杰 水中人体磁力链接 下载 大香蕉黄片免费看 济南谭崔 避开屏蔽的岛a片 草破福利 要看大鸡巴操小骚逼的人的视频 黑丝少妇影音先锋 欧美巨乳熟女磁力链接 美国黄网站色大全 伦蕉在线久播 极品女厕沟 激情五月bd韩国电影 混血美女自摸和男友激情啪啪自拍诱人呻吟福利视频 人人摸人人妻做人人看 44kknn 娸娸原网 伊人欧美 恋夜影院视频列表安卓青青 57k影院 如果电话亭 avi 插爆骚女精品自拍 青青草在线免费视频1769TV 令人惹火的邻家美眉 影音先锋 真人妹子被捅动态图 男人女人做完爱视频15 表姐合租两人共处一室晚上她竟爬上了我的床 性爱教学视频 北条麻妃bd在线播放版 国产老师和师生 magnet wwwcctv1024 女神自慰 ftp 女同性恋做激情视频 欧美大胆露阴视频 欧美无码影视 好女色在线观看 后入肥臀18p 百度影视屏福利 厕所超碰视频 强奸mp magnet 欧美妹aⅴ免费线上看 2016年妞干网视频 5手机在线福利 超在线最视频 800av:cOm magnet 欧美性爱免播放器在线播放 91大款肥汤的性感美乳90后邻家美眉趴着窗台后入啪啪 秋霞日本毛片网站 cheng ren 在线视频 上原亚衣肛门无码解禁影音先锋 美脚家庭教师在线播放 尤酷伦理片 熟女性生活视频在线观看 欧美av在线播放喷潮 194avav 凤凰AV成人 - 百度 kbb9999 AV片AV在线AV无码 爱爱视频高清免费观看 黄色男女操b视频 观看 18AV清纯视频在线播放平台 成人性爱视频久久操 女性真人生殖系统双性人视频 下身插入b射精视频 明星潜规测视频 mp4 免賛a片直播绪 国内 自己 偷拍 在线 国内真实偷拍 手机在线 国产主播户外勾在线 三桥杏奈高清无码迅雷下载 2五福电影院凸凹频频 男主拿鱼打女主,高宝宝 色哥午夜影院 川村まや痴汉 草溜影院费全过程免费 淫小弟影院在线视频 laohantuiche 啪啪啪喷潮XXOO视频 青娱乐成人国产 蓝沢润 一本道 亚洲青涩中文欧美 神马影院线理论 米娅卡莉法的av 在线福利65535 欧美粉色在线 欧美性受群交视频1在线播放 极品喷奶熟妇在线播放 变态另类无码福利影院92 天津小姐被偷拍 磁力下载 台湾三级电髟全部 丝袜美腿偷拍自拍 偷拍女生性行为图 妻子的乱伦 白虎少妇 肏婶骚屄 外国大妈会阴照片 美少女操屄图片 妹妹自慰11p 操老熟女的b 361美女人体 360电影院樱桃 爱色妹妹亚洲色图 性交卖淫姿势高清图片一级 欧美一黑对二白 大色网无毛一线天 射小妹网站 寂寞穴 西西人体模特苍井空 操的大白逼吧 骚穴让我操 拉好友干女朋友3p