Edited by: Wilhelmina May Huston, University of Technology Sydney, Australia
Reviewed by: Antonio M. Mendes, Instituto de Medicina Molecular, Portugal; Joyce Altamarino Ibana, University of the Philippines Diliman, Philippines; Nagendra Singh, Augusta University, United States
This article was submitted to Microbiome in Health and Disease, a section of the journal Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology
†These authors have contributed equally to this work
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
The digestive tract plays a central role in nutrient acquisition and harbors a vast and intricate community of bacteria, fungi, viruses and parasites, collectively known as the microbiota. In recent years, there has been increasing recognition of the complex and highly contextual involvement of this microbiota in the induction and education of host innate and adaptive immune responses under homeostasis, during infection and inflammation. The gut passage and colonization by unicellular and multicellular parasite species present an immense challenge to the host immune system and to the microbial communities that provide vital support for its proper functioning. In mammals, parasitic nematodes induce distinct shifts in the intestinal microbial composition. Vice versa, the commensal microbiota has been shown to serve as a molecular adjuvant and immunomodulator during intestinal parasite infections. Moreover, similar interactions occur within insect vectors of deadly human pathogens. The gut microbiota has emerged as a crucial factor affecting vector competence in
香京julia种子在线播放
As early as 1885, Louis Pasteur postulated the preconceived idea that life under microorganism-free conditions would not be possible (Glimstedt,
Structural and functional differences of the gastrointestinal tracts of mice and mosquitoes, and the localization of their intestinal parasites. The gastrointestinal tract of mice consists of esophagus, stomach, small and large intestine, and colon, whereas in mosquitoes, it comprises the foregut, diverticulum (crop), midgut (anterior and posterior) and hindgut. One of the differences between gut organization is the separation of the food digestive and nutrient absorption functions taking place in the stomach and the small intestine of mice. In mosquitoes, digestion and absorption occur in the same organ, the midgut. The tracts secrete a protective layer that serves as a mechanical barrier against the acidic gastric environment and diverse pathogens. In mammals, epithelial goblet cells dispersed throughout the epithelium produce a viscous mucus layer that covers the entire tract, except the large intestine, which is characterized by a double mucus layer. Similarly to mucus, mosquitoes secrete the peritrophic matrix (PM), a semi-permeable extracellular structure composed of chitin and glycoproteins. In larvae, the PM is secreted continuously by a specialized organ cardia located in the anterior midgut, whereas in adult females, it is believed to be secreted by the midgut epithelial cells only after blood feeding. Small
In the context of immunity to gastrointestinal parasites, the microbiota of mammals is an essential functional player in the induction and maintenance of the mammalian immune system (Grainger et al.,
Although specific aspects of host-parasite-microbiota interactions have been recently reviewed separately for mice and mosquito vectors (Ippolito et al.,
In the first year of life of most mammals, the microbial composition of their gastrointestinal tract develops from a sterile environment to one harboring a considerable density of commensal microorganisms, which over time develop a broad similarity to the microbiota composition of adults (Palmer et al.,
Similar to mammals, the microbiota of
Acute infection with
Compositional alterations and functional significances of commensal bacterial groups during intestinal parasite infections in mice. The gastrointestinal tract of mice is home to diverse communities of commensal bacterial species. Infections with intestinal pathogens are known to lead to notable alterations in the commensal microbiota composition of the host.
In contrast, the intracellular apicomplexan parasite
Infection with the murine small intestinal nematode
The murine whipworm
In contrast to mammalian intestinal parasites residing primarily in the intestinal lumen and allow for continuous interaction between the parasites and the host microbiota,
Protective immunity to
Microbiota-dependent host immune responses during intestinal parasite infections in mice.
Efficient immune control of intestinal nematodes largely depends on the development of protective type 2 immune responses driven by CD4+ Th2 cells in concert with type 2 innate lymphoid cells. Both cell types produce the Th2 cytokines IL-4, −5, and −13 leading to concerted immune effector mechanisms. These mechanisms fortify intestinal barriers via enhanced mucus production, increased epithelial cell turnover, intestinal fluid influx and hypercontraction of smooth muscle cells (Sorobetea et al.,
Whether the microbiota affects the development of immune effector mechanisms during nematode infections has only recently received attention. One study has reported that low dose antibiotic treatment during
Multiple reports in the past have highlighted the ability of bacteria to inhibit the establishment of
Female mosquitoes alternate between sugar and blood feeding. Such diverse diets expose the gut to strong physiological and oxidative challenges (reviewed in Sterkel et al.,
Immune responses of mosquitoes to midgut bacteria and to
The peritrophic matrix (PM) provides the first line of defense against blood meal-induced oxidative stress and bacterial infections (Figures
The immune-deficiency (IMD) pathway, initially identified in
In addition to inducing the immunity-mediated
How plasmodicidal properties of mosquito microbiota correlate with dynamics of
Treatment of giardiasis primarily relies on the administration of antibiotics like metronidazole. However, due to rising levels of resistance, frequent reports of side effects and clinical failures, there is a growing need for the development of novel alternative treatment strategies (Table
Administration modes, outcomes and proposed mechanisms of action of probiotic bacteria as potential treatment strategies against intestinal parasitic infections in murine hosts and mosquito vectors.
Reduced infection rates, lack of epithelial cell layer damage, no immune cell infiltration and lower inflammation rates (compared to placebo-treated control animals) | Metabolic generation of bile salts with direct anti-giardicidal properties | Pérez et al., |
||||
Elevated total IgA levels in intestine, as well as higher titers of intestinal |
Induction of naturally polyreactive intestinal IgA secretion | Benyacoub et al., |
||||
Elevated |
Induction of protective humoral immune responses during infection | Ribeiro et al., |
||||
Suppression of localized IFN-γ and TNF-α responses in secondary lymphoid organs, elevated worm burdens | Unknown | Dea-Ayuela et al., |
||||
Elevated tissue levels of IL-10, higher numbers of goblet cells and accelerated worm expulsion | Induction of protective IL-10 production by epithelial cells and enhanced mucus production during infection | McClemens et al., |
||||
Embryonic microinjection | Somatic infection, reduced prevalence and intensity of infection in |
Unknown. Potentially through activation of immune defenses | Hughes et al., |
|||
Administration of 103–105 CFUs with the infectious blood meal | Inhibition of |
Bacteria-produced ROS | Cirimotich et al., |
|||
103–107 bacteria/μl introduced to aseptic mosquitoes with the blood meal | Reduced infection rates and reduced survival after blood feeding | Unknown. Potentially through inhibition of |
Bando et al., |
|||
Engineered |
107 bacteria/ml introduced via sugar meal | Colonized midgut and reproductive organs, transmitted in three successive generations. Reduced infection rates | Through secretion of anti- |
Wang et al., |
Along the same line,
Treatment of toxoplasmosis, on the other hand, relies primarily on the administration of pyrimethamine and sulfonamide drugs (Alday and Doggett,
In intestinal helminth infections, few
The administration of probiotic bacteria against gastrointestinal protozoan parasite infections has gained attention as a novel and effective treatment strategy (Table
The environmental bias of the mosquito microbiome poses a significant challenge for its manipulation for vector control purposes. However, several approaches have been explored for introducing into natural mosquito populations bacteria with anti-
Recently, mosquito colonization with genetically engineered
A surprising link between immune activation and changes in microbiota composition of the mosquito reproductive organs has been reported recently. Transgenic mosquitoes that expressed an active form of the REL2 transcriptional factor in the midgut after a blood meal were reported to inhibit bacterial proliferation and
Another interesting approach to mosquito control exploits the entomopathogenic bacteria
Along the entire length of the mammalian intestinal tract from the small intestine infected by
The intestinal microbiota of mice and mosquitoes naturally faces vastly contrasting environmental and biochemical challenges due to major differences in host development, physiology and diet among many other factors (Table
Comparison of intestinal immunity, microbial diversity and microbiota-related interactions within the murine hosts and the mosquito vectors during intestinal parasitic infections.
Mechanical barriers | Mucus layer, enriched in mucin glycoproteins, permanently lining the intestinal epithelial layer as a shield from direct exposure to external stimuli and invading microorganisms. Commensal microbiota supports mucus secretion and maintenance. | Semipermeable peritrophic matrix (PM) composed of chitin and glycoproteins, lining the entire larval gut. In adult females, PM is secreted in the midgut upon blood feeding, which induces significant microbial proliferation in the midgut. Commensal microbiota stimulates peritrophic matrix synthesis. |
Intestinal microbial diversity | Higher complexity and species diversity. Compositional changes occur subject to environmental and dietary changes like breastfeeding or gastrointestinal infections. Exhibits overall less drastic compositional shifts during lifespan of host. Dominant bacterial groups include |
Lower complexity and species diversity. High fluctuation in diversity and species abundance observed throughout the development and after blood meal uptake. Exhibits drastic compositional shifts during vector development. Dominant bacterial groups include |
Microbial fingerprint during parasitic infections | Numerous studies have demonstrated significant alterations of intestinal microbial communities during infections with protozoan parasites (eg. |
Not enough evidence of |
Microbial priming of immune defenses against parasitic infections | Segmented filamentous bacteria (family |
Midgut microbiota is a potent inducer of IMD/NF-κB pathway. Basal activity of IMD is regulated by the midgut microbiome, and bacterial proliferation after blood feeding further enhances pathway activation. The microbiota-dependent activation of the IMD pathway impacts within-mosquito development of |
Although understudied, immune activation after blood feeding is linked to oxidative stress. Blood feeding increases hydrogen peroxide levels and ROS detoxification responses. Moreover, inhibition of ROS leads to lethal systemic bacterial infections. | ||
γ |
γ |
Following each blood meal, the mosquito midgut synthesizes a semipermeable peritrophic matrix that shields the gut epithelium from direct exposure to potentially harmful external stimuli and invading microorganisms. Similarly, the murine gastrointestinal tract contains a viscous layer of mucus enriched in mucin glycoproteins protecting the intestinal epithelial layer (Table
Changes in microbiota induced during intestinal parasite infections may provide valuable information on new intervention strategies against these pathogens. A better mechanistic understanding of how the microbial status and infection-induced microbiome alterations of an individual affects immune responses to parasites and of how the microbiome could be targeted to reduce infection success of parasites and arthropod vectorial capacity necessitates further studies. So far, the diversity in study designs using a gnotobiotic, mono-colonized, antibiotic-treated or standard-pathogen-free mouse and vector models offers invaluable tools for the elucidation of effector mechanisms responsible for the induction and maintenance of immune responses and to what extent specific members of the commensal microbiota are involved. Nevertheless, variations in study design like the colonization status of the host/vector, host age, sex, commercial provider, parasite strain and infection dosage, microbiota culturing and sampling techniques, as well as differences in data analysis at the phylum, order, family, or genus level present considerable challenges to microbiota research. Caution must also be taken in the interpretation of studies on microbiota-dependent immunity and the translation of their findings outside the laboratory, as inbred lab-reared mice/vectors experienced a considerable change in bacterial diversity/composition compared to wild animals, which provide a more representable animal model. Future studies should consider parallel investigations of wild rodent models and vectors from natural populations for a more comprehensive understanding of the tripartite interactions between host, microbiota and invading intestinal parasites. The administration of cocktails of probiotic bacteria with varying stimulatory effector functions, rather than single bacterial groups would represent successful future probiotic treatment strategies. As such, further studies focusing on how commensal and probiotic bacterial communities communicate and regulate each other in the context of gastrointestinal infections would be required in humans, laboratory and free-living mice and mosquito species alike.
All authors contributed to the work presented in this manuscript. EL and SH conceived the original framework of this paper. IY and SZ performed the literature search and wrote the manuscript. EL, SR, GC, and SH edited and critically revised the manuscript.
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.